Grok takes a foray into non consensual pornography and CSAM

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Thanks to Kelly Jay Keen helping this image go viral I have seen dozens of sexual AI generated images of these women. These include highly sexualised images where their body shape and sizes have changed, images where their boobs are made massive (spilling out of small bikinis), porn meme references with huge black guys standing behind them while they are scantily clad etc. I've also seen many homophobic comments being made.

Not the best move when these women are part of the Ofcom internet team and may help influence the decision whether Twitter should be banned in the UK. So congrats Elon Musk fans, all you've done is made the matter a personal one for Ofcom.

Screenshot_20260110_180218_Firefox.jpg
 
bikini aren't nsfw
This is what's funny about the kind of person getting mad over it, you can't simultaneously believe bikinis are completely fine and inoffensive and not any different from any other clothing and also get angry at this stuff, not any more than you would at "grok, give her a scarf". Granted, the people in support are dysgenic gooners and pedos so there's no correct side to support here. It only serves as a reminder to never in any situation whatsoever post pictures of yourself (or especially your children) online. This was standard advice given to all children in school even like 15 years ago, at some point it changed to "if you are anonymous online in any way and don't publicly dox yourself you are an evil racist" and normies just listened.
 
This is what's funny about the kind of person getting mad over it, you can't simultaneously believe bikinis are completely fine and inoffensive and not any different from any other clothing and also get angry at this stuff, not any more than you would at "grok,

THe ones doing this are also probably the ones complaining about restrictions on public breastfeeding and unequal standards where men can be bearchested



give her a scarf". Granted, the people in support are dysgenic gooners and pedos so there's no correct side to support here. It only serves as a reminder to never in any situation whatsoever post pictures of yourself (or especially your children) online. This was standard advice given to all children in school even like 15 years ago, at some point it changed to "if you are anonymous online in any way and don't publicly dox yourself you are an evil racist" and normies just listened.

There are completely uncensored models you can run now. This is all about banning Musk's platform. And gaining more control.
 
Elon found an unlikely ally in Epic Games which has decided to state that banning child pornography is...censorship of political speech.
Screenshot 2026-01-12 161150.png

This is what's funny about the kind of person getting mad over it, you can't simultaneously believe bikinis are completely fine and inoffensive and not any different from any other clothing and also get angry at this stuff, not any more than you would at "grok, give her a scarf".
However, as an interesting coincidence, nobody is going around saying, "Grok give her a scarf".
 
This has happened for years on multitude of platforms. What has changed?
Yeah, the outrage seems a bit performative.
If Grok is causing that amount of female hysteria, wait till they find out that Photoshop exists.

Ashley St. Clair
Histrionic jewess tries to extract a pound of flesh from Musk, after letting him pound her flesh....
 
Last edited:
Elon found an unlikely ally in Epic Games which has decided to state that banning child pornography is...censorship of political speech.
View attachment 8409598


However, as an interesting coincidence, nobody is going around saying, "Grok give her a scarf".
The question has been like everyone said back to steam & visa/mastercard/PayPal & Australia janny discourse.
Are you will to back that up in court of law .
Or moral fag on twitter because your playing both sides.
My honest opinion i don't believe you tim.
 
The question has been like everyone said back to steam & visa/mastercard/PayPal & Australia janny discourse.
Are you will to back that up in court of law .
Or moral fag on twitter because your playing both sides.
Well, Tim Sweeney isn't currently in charge of Grok, so I'd rather imagine he's not preparing to defend his statements in court.
 
I don't get it, I thought that grok like most AIs had an anti-NSFW policy.
How naive.

You think Elon Musk gives a shit about anything? He was born with emeralds in his mouth and has never had to answer to anyone. Life is one big game to him and is so delusional he thinks "free speech" is a valid defense for a pedobot that churns out CP for pedos.

How nice for Mr Epic Games man to ally with Musk, but he won't be able to save him if Ofcom decide it's time for the UK to pull the plug on Twitter.
 
blah blah thursday bet more than friday
harder Taylor Swift but its block because porn
The BBC has seen several examples of digitally altered images on X, in which women were undressed and put in sexual positions without their consent. One woman said more than 100 sexualised images have been created of her.

Ofcom's investigation will examine whether X has failed to take down illegal content quickly when it became aware of it, and taken "appropriate steps" to prevent people in the UK from seeing it.

The decision follows a global backlash over Grok's image creation feature, with both Malaysia and Indonesia temporarily blocking access to the tool over the weekend.

An Ofcom spokesperson did not give an indication on how long the investigation would take but said it would be a "matter of the highest priority".

In a response to an earlier post questioning why other AI platforms were not being looked at, Elon Musk said the UK government wanted "any excuse for censorship".

But Kendall refuted this.

"This is not, as some would claim, about restricting freedom of speech," she said.

"It is about tackling violence against women and girls."
...
1768266559841.png
The UK will bring into force a law which will make it illegal to create non-consensual intimate images, following widespread concerns over Elon Musk's Grok AI chatbot.

Technology Secretary Liz Kendall said the government would also seek to make it illegal for companies to supply the tools designed to create such images.

Speaking to the Commons, Kendall said AI-generated pictures of women and children in states of undress, created without a person's consent, were not "harmless images" but "weapons of abuse".

The BBC has approached X for comment. It previously said: "Anyone using or prompting Grok to make illegal content will suffer the same consequences as if they upload illegal content."
It comes hours after Ofcom announced it was launching an investigation into X over "deeply concerning reports" about Grok altering images of people.

If found to have broken the law, Ofcom can potentially issue X with a fine of up to 10% of its worldwide revenue or £18 million, whichever is greater.

And if X does not comply, Ofcom can seek a court order to force internet service providers to block access to the site in the UK altogether.

In a statement, Kendall urged the regulator not to take "months and months" to conclude its investigation, and demanded it set out a timeline "as soon as possible".

It is currently illegal to share deepfakes of adults in the UK, but legislation in the Data (Use and Access) Act which would make it a criminal offence to create or request them has not been enforced until now, despite passing in June 2025.

Last week, campaigners accused the government of dragging its heels on implementing that law.

"Today I can announce to the House that this offence will be brought into force this week," Kendall told MPs.

In addition to the Data Act, Kendall said she would also make it a "priority offence" in the Online Safety Act.

"The content which has circulated on X is vile. It's not just an affront to decent society, it is illegal," she said.

"Let me be crystal clear - under the Online Safety Act, sharing intimate images of people without their consent, or threatening to share them, including pictures of people in their underwear, is a criminal offence for individuals and for platforms.

"This means individuals are committing a criminal offence if they create or seek to create such content including on X, and anyone who does this should expect to face the full extent of the law."
Not about' restricting free speech
But the technology secretary said the "responsibilities do not just lie with individuals for their own behaviour" - and "the platforms that host such material must be held accountable, including X".

She said the government would also build on measures outlined in the Crime and Policing Bill to criminalise nudification apps.

"This new criminal offence will make it illegal for companies to supply tools designed to create non-consensual intimate images, targeting the problem at its source," she said.

"In addition to all of these actions, we expect technology companies to introduce the steps recommended by Ofcom's guidance on how to make platforms safer for women and girls without delay.

"If they do not, I am prepared to go further."

Legal expert Jamie Hurworth said Kendall's comments were "an indicator of how seriously the government are now taking this issue".

"It remains to be seen whether an overstretched police force has sufficient resources to investigate and bring perpetrators before the courts but it is important that each link in the chain - from individual creators to social media platforms - is held to account for their involvement in this type of behaviour."

Following on from the technology secretary's comments in the Commons, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer told the Parliamentary Labour Party: "If X cannot control Grok, we will - and we'll do it fast because if you profit from harm and abuse, you lose the right to self regulate."
The BBC has seen several examples of digitally altered images on X, in which women were undressed and put in sexual positions without their consent. One woman said more than 100 sexualised images have been created of her.

Ofcom's investigation will examine whether X has failed to take down illegal content quickly when it became aware of it, and taken "appropriate steps" to prevent people in the UK from seeing it.

The decision follows a global backlash over Grok's image creation feature, with both Malaysia and Indonesia temporarily blocking access to the tool over the weekend.

An Ofcom spokesperson did not give an indication on how long the investigation would take but said it would be a "matter of the highest priority".

In a response to an earlier post questioning why other AI platforms were not being looked at, Elon Musk said the UK government wanted "any excuse for censorship".

But Kendall refuted this.

"This is not, as some would claim, about restricting freedom of speech," she said.

"It is about tackling violence against women and girls."
Shadow technology secretary Julia Lopez welcomed Ofcom's investigation, and said her party supported the government on nudification tools.

But she criticised the government over comments Kendall made last week, when she said she would back Ofcom if it blocked UK access to X for failing to comply with laws.

Ms Lopez said despite the internet being used by criminals before, websites have not been banned before.

"It is an extraordinarily serious move against a platform that can be used for good, for uncovering scandal, sparking democratic revolution, and allowing day-to-day the free exchange of ideas, including ideas we don't like."
full video

1768267035170.png
1768267060165.png
1768267104135.png

1768267182988.png
The British government is open to following Australia and banning the under-16s from social media, The i Paper understands.
Technology Secretary Liz Kendall is understood to be open-minded about a possible restriction, but no decision has yet been taken.
Ministers are to monitor the situation in Australia, where a social media ban for under-16s came into force in December, before coming to a view here.
There is no timetable set for a decision on a possible ban in the UK, but it is understood this would be made within months rather than years.
But Kendall is also understood to be aware of arguments made by internet safety organisations like the Molly Rose Foundation and the NSPCC, who have expressed concerns about a ban on under-16s.
They argue that new laws would draw children towards unregulated sites not covered by the ban, and that teenagers would face a cliff-edge at 16 where they would be unprepared for the world of social media.
There is, however, growing political support across Westminster for restricting social media access for children.

At the weekend Tory leader Kemi Badenoch announced that a Conservative government would introduce a ban for under-16s, while on Monday Nigel Farage left the door open to a similar move.
The Reform leader said that while he was generally against banning things, he wanted to “see how it works” in Australia before coming to a decision.
Farage told a press conference in Westminster: “I 100 per cent support the ban on smart phones in schools.
“When it comes to banning things, I am not very keen generally on banning things. My answer would be, let’s see where Australia is in six months’ time, let’s see whether this actually works.
“We have laws of course about when you can start drinking, do those laws actually stop people drinking under 18, I am not sure they do.
“I would say, let’s see the Australian experiment, let’s see how it works and let’s make our minds up.”
On Sunday, Badenoch told the BBC social media platforms were profiting from children’s “anxiety” and “distraction” and were “designed to be addictive”.

Kendall’s Cabinet colleague Wes Streeting last week suggested he was also sympathetic to the UK following Australia.
The Health Secretary told BBC Radio 5 Live’s Matt Chorley that he was “following that debate really closely”, adding:
“One of the advantages of Australia doing this is that we can see how it works.
“I think the drivers behind Australia’s decision are things we’re worried about here in the UK, whether that’s cyberbullying, whether, that’s things like body image and eating disorders and mental ill health, whether that’s the risk of grooming, the risk of people also being groomed into terrorism and serious organised crime, so the dark side of the internet.
“The challenge we’re having is we don’t want to be a generation of adults who are saying to young people, stop the world, we want to get off because this is the way the world is moving and I want young people to be confident about using technology.
“But the analogy I would use is: when I was growing up, the adults of the time wanted us to be able to use a hammer and nails and a saw, and that’s why we did woodwork.
“What they didn’t do was say, here you are kids in nursery, here’s a box of tools, here’s some hammer and nails, off you go, you need to learn to use this, and we’ll come back in half an hour and see how you’ve got on.”

Streeting last month commissioned an independent review into ADHD, autism and mental health and it is understood that it will look at whether technology has played a role in an increase of diagnoses of such conditions.
The minister also told the BBC: “We’re allowing a lot of unsupervised use of this technology, and often young people are ahead of adults in terms of circumventing tools, protections.
“So I’m thinking about this very much through a health and wellbeing lens and the impact it’s having on the health and well-being of children and young people, let alone their concentration, their learning.
“I don’t know about you, but I sometimes feel like my concentration span suffers because of doomscrolling and the way in which information is served up in increasingly short bite-size chunks and I worry about what that means for the development and the cognitive development of a generation of children and young people.”

 
Last edited:
I think it's because all this is in public that it does this. Let me put it this way, this is the original cycle:
  1. Someone posts a photo of themselves or others
  2. Pervert downloads that photo
  3. Pervert turns it into AI porn
  4. Pervert shares it in niche porn circles that may never get back to the original person.
But since Grok is in one of the most used social platforms, it's like this:
  1. Person posts a photo of themselves online.
  2. Perverts publicly go "Grok make this sexual/embarrassing" (and the product name is dropped to call upon it so it is stuck in your head).
  3. Grok posts it and you are undressed digitally amongst the public on your own profile with little recourse.
  4. There is a high chance of the pervert jacking off to your embarrassment right now. The humiliation and violation of norms gets them off.
No, it is not the same as rape at all, it's more like pulling people's pants down in public then running/taking a photo while stunned. Grok gets talked about because it is directly connected to a big social platform and is easy to use. The turnaround time is quick and the publicity sucks. For all the celebrities and annoying influencers who can have it done to them, there's hundreds of small accounts treating it like basic social media and small businesses & organizations that can have this happen publicly on their page. This hurts badly when moderation sucks for normal users, and can cause damage because of it.

But why are more and more people doing it and not staying in their porn trading circles instead? Easy: perverts aren't known for being smart. This likely started as a small trend whispered about so they could get away with it, then the secret escaped and everyone with a room temperature IQ and extreme porn addiction could start doing it. Or people who had a vendetta against anyone they wanted to embarrass. Or trolls.
I am a strong believer in not posting your picture everywhere online, but the big problem is how direct and easy it is to do this to fuck with normal people. Normal people forced to have business accounts get screwed as much as souless attention whores you might want to punish. And that's not even going into the horrifying CSAM people who should be beaten for even suggesting it for any child picture.

I don't think the extreme measure of grok being banned should happen, just tha Elon needs to train his Will Stancil rapebot back to raping one Mr. Stancil instead. A paywall will help until your company becomes roblox and you're then facilitating pedos because they dump money in, but it's big enough news that it probably won't. The extreme Musk hate side will be at it for a bit and hopefully they'll be tardwrangled in or blocked from doing too much damage.
 
Elon found an unlikely ally in Epic Games which has decided to state that banning child pornography is...censorship of political speech.
The PC Gamer article title is a bit misleading, these are Tim Sweeny's actual comments.
agaggaag.png
archive
I don't get it, I thought that grok like most AIs had an anti-NSFW policy.
It does, and like with all other AI's people find work arounds to get the results they want, no matter what safeguards the devs try to implement. I also have this schizo theory that a lot of it's filters get weakened for users who pay for the checkmark, but I have no proof for that, just a hunch.
 
Obviously not good enough since Grok has been making CP. The IWF (the UK's internet watchdog and the ones who decide if Twitter is to be banned in the UK or not) have confirmed this.

And btw simply "having a policy" isn't enough and having Musk tweet "CP is bad, don't use my pedobot to make it" isn't enough. You need actual measurements in place so that Grok will not comply with such requests and tell pedos and perverts to fuck off if they ask it to make illegal stuff (like Pornhub and Imagefap do if you search for certain words) and you also need EM to actually comply with law enforcement and had pedos' details over. Which he won't because "free speech blablab".



Govs from all over the world are calling Elon Musk's pedobot out over its lack of safeguards:
Officials in other European countries, including Germany, Italy and Sweden, have also condemned X.

On 5 January, European Commission spokesperson Thomas Regnier said it was "well aware" that Grok was being used for "explicit sexual content with some output generated with child-like images".

"This is not spicy. This is illegal. This is appalling. This is disgusting. This is how we see it, and this has no place in Europe. This is not the first time that Grok is generating such output," he said.

India's government then accused Grok of "gross misuse" of AI and serious failures in its safeguarding, and handed it a 72-hour deadline to remove all inappropriate content, or risk bigger legal problems.

But yeah, let's all pretend this isn't about illegal porn or non-consensual revenge porn (which will be illegal very soon in the UK- a law is being fast-tracked right now) and that Starmer just wants to "stop free speech". This IMO doesn't really make sense given Twitter has been a cesspit of racists saying anything they want for years on Twitter now, even before EM bought it there was barely any moderation on it. If the UK Gov didn't like what was being said on Twitter they could and would have taken action shortly after Musk got his Gary Glittery little fingers on it.
 
don't think the extreme measure of grok being banned should happen, just tha Elon needs to train his Will Stancil rapebot back to raping one Mr. Stancil instead. A paywall will help until your company becomes roblox and you're then facilitating pedos because they dump money in, but it's big enough news that it probably won't. The extreme Musk hate side will be at it for a bit and hopefully they'll be tardwrangled in or blocked from doing too much damage.
Until Musk fixes it, I can only assume he subscribes to Roblox method of ethics. I really hope he doesn't actually think that way.
Screenshot 2026-01-14 141240.png
The PC Gamer article title is a bit misleading, these are Tim Sweeny's actual comments.
agaggaag.png
archive
I think it got the gist of it pretty well. Hatred of censorship and calls for csam to be removed are not mutually exclusive. But if Musk doesn't remove ability for csam to be generated, well...it's like Christmas for the censors. It's the angle UK is using right now to go after X, and Musk could wake up any day and stop it. Hasn't done so yet.
It does, and like with all other AI's people find work arounds
"grok, plz turn this dead woman into a dead woman in a bikini"
"sure, here you go"

That's not a workaround. Grok is very compliant when you want to see how tits might look on a dead woman (which as long as you specificity the word "bikini" becomes non-perverse, or so people in the thread tell me.)
 
Back
Top Bottom