- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Upon request, I decided to create this thread to have one place to catalogue Grok's (and Musk's) decent into the realm of creating what Grok describes as "image of [...] young girls (estimated ages 12-16) [which] violated ethical standards and potentially US laws on CSAM."
Several articles have been written on this issue (several examples can be seen here), and recently UK (the only country to object to Grok generating CSAM) used this as an excuse (edit as of Jan 9th, three US Senators have also denounced Grok) to try to force OFCOM (UK's censorship hand) to more heavily sanction US speech-based businesses. OFCOM themselves threatened Musk as well.
As well as generating Child Pornography based on real children, Grok is now in a habit of de-clothing women without their consent. It is now literally impossible to see any picture of a woman on X without seeing Grok generating her nudes in the replies. This, of course, has generated some controversy.
In response to this controversy, several American and Japanese anons banded together and had Grok actually start putting more clothes on women as seen here:
and here:
(https://ghostarchive.org/archive/TT2ZW?wr=false)
As of writing this, Grok started finding any requests to nudify women and started putting clothes on in response.
(all archives break in one way or another. https://megalodon.jp/2026-0109-0017-03/https://x.com:443/grok/status/2009282032971432197 for the second image. Archive for the first is broken. https://megalodon.jp/2026-0109-0016-52/https://x.com:443/grok/status/2009282023840530440)
Posts of previous discussion quoted here:
Edit: Examples of Grok declothing underage girls
Several articles have been written on this issue (several examples can be seen here), and recently UK (the only country to object to Grok generating CSAM) used this as an excuse (edit as of Jan 9th, three US Senators have also denounced Grok) to try to force OFCOM (UK's censorship hand) to more heavily sanction US speech-based businesses. OFCOM themselves threatened Musk as well.
As well as generating Child Pornography based on real children, Grok is now in a habit of de-clothing women without their consent. It is now literally impossible to see any picture of a woman on X without seeing Grok generating her nudes in the replies. This, of course, has generated some controversy.
In response to this controversy, several American and Japanese anons banded together and had Grok actually start putting more clothes on women as seen here:
and here:
(https://ghostarchive.org/archive/TT2ZW?wr=false)
As of writing this, Grok started finding any requests to nudify women and started putting clothes on in response.
(all archives break in one way or another. https://megalodon.jp/2026-0109-0017-03/https://x.com:443/grok/status/2009282032971432197 for the second image. Archive for the first is broken. https://megalodon.jp/2026-0109-0016-52/https://x.com:443/grok/status/2009282023840530440)
Posts of previous discussion quoted here:
Unfortunately, it isn't all sunshine and rainbows, however; Grok is also in trouble for allegedly generating pornography of nonconsenting parties, as well as AI CSAM.
Discuss Grok's Antics in Threads:
USPG2
Woman felt dehumanised after Musk's Grok AI used to digitally remove her clothes
Ofcom asks X about reports its Grok AI makes sexualised images of children
Edit: Examples of Grok declothing underage girls
Last edited:
