War New ‘Trump-Class’ Navy Warships Named After President: What to Know

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
President Donald Trump announced plans Monday for a new class of large Navy warships bearing his name.

The so-called “Trump-class” ships would be described as battleships, though officials say they would be next-generation surface combatants built on technology derived from the Navy’s existing Arleigh Burke-class destroyers. Retired Rear Adm. Mark Montgomery, now a senior director at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told the Associated Press the announcement is expected to include a new, large surface combatant class of ship and up to 50 support vessels.

The White House is framing the move as a centerpiece of Trump's vision for a revamped “Golden Fleet."
AP25356794570915.webp
...
The president was joined Monday at Mar-a-Lago by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Navy Secretary John Phelan for what the White House called a “major announcement.”

The announcement follows renewed White House pressure to expand U.S. shipbuilding after the Navy recently scrapped plans for a smaller warship amid cost overruns and delays.

The plan is being unveiled at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort as he vacations in Florida and as U.S. forces conduct operations in the Caribbean that the administration says are aimed at disrupting drug trafficking and increasing pressure on Venezuela’s government. Retired Rear Adm. Mark Montgomery said he supports expanding the fleet with additional support ships but questioned the need for a new battleship-like vessel.

Historically, the term battleship has referred to large, heavily armored ships armed with massive guns, a class that peaked in prominence during World War II. The role of such ships declined rapidly after the war as aircraft carriers and long-range missiles became dominant, and the Navy decommissioned its last Iowa-class battleships in the 1990s after briefly modernizing them in the 1980s.

Trump has long expressed strong views about the Navy’s fleet, at times favoring older technologies. During his first term, he unsuccessfully pushed to return to steam-powered catapults on aircraft carriers and has repeatedly criticized the appearance of Navy ships, including complaints about rust.

Navy Secretary John Phelan has told senators that Trump has frequently texted him late at night about ship maintenance and design, and Trump has previously said he personally intervened to alter the design of a now-canceled frigate, calling the original version “a terrible-looking ship.”


...
This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

This article includes reporting by the Associated Press.
 
This is a retarded idea that will lose our entire naval power if we enter a weapons hot conflict against China. We would be better off building this version instead, that is if we had any ship building capability remaining.
Trump Class.jpeg
 
Also nuclear armed.
Planned to be nuclear armed with a weapon that isn't projected to hit IOC until 2034. The US doesn't have a nuclear cruise missile in service after the TLAM-N was retired in 2013.
Are there also plans to rebuild our ship production capabilities?
Yes. This is something that is being talked about at very high levels. It's a serious problem but luckily one that has been recognized by both parties.
 
Planned to be nuclear armed with a weapon that isn't projected to hit IOC until 2034. The US doesn't have a nuclear cruise missile in service after the TLAM-N was retired in 2013.
Well I guess it's good this ship is going to be in development for a while. Lmao your cope is delightful.
Yes. This is something that is being talked about at very high levels. It's a serious problem but luckily one that has been recognized by both parties.
>bipartisan
Shut the fuck up. Biden had 4 years to fix the Navy and did NOTHING.
 
Yes. This is something that is being talked about at very high levels. It's a serious problem but luckily one that has been recognized by both parties.
That's good to hear. Definitely super late, but hopefully this is a case of "better late than never". I wonder if they are also planning on revitalizing our steel, electricity, and lead production as well, if we are going to remember that letting our enemies own all of our industry is a bad idea. This nation has been allowed to be chopped apart and decay for so long that it will take a lot of things being fixed simultaneously to make us a viable nation again.
 
Shut the fuck up. Biden had 4 years to fix the Navy and did NOTHING.
And Trump four years before him. This is a problem we've had since the 90s. We need to rebuild our skilled labor base which has evaporated as those with the skills we need have retired. Programs like the SSGP, the ICE Pact with Canada and Finland, and partnerships with Korea and Japan to help train US workers will take time to bear fruit. You're right that not enough has been done, and that applies to orange nigger as well as the sleepy joepedo.
 
And Trump four years before him. This is a problem we've had since the 90s. We need to rebuild our skilled labor base which has evaporated as those with the skills we need have retired. Programs like the SSGP, the ICE Pact with Canada and Finland, and partnerships with Korea and Japan to help train US workers will take time to bear fruit. You're right that not enough has been done, and that applies to orange nigger as well as the sleepy joepedo.
Trump got out the Gerald R Ford. Also those programs to rebuild our labor force are because of Trump. You are determined to say this won't work. Nigger.
 
What to know: it will be designed by committee, have cost overruns, be delivered 2 years late at double the budget, make nobody happy, and have tons of problems operating them. Then the class will need to be scrapped after the first few hit the water, because things changed and we need something different. This will have nothing to do with who it's named after, but who is running the program.

But at least Trump will show up to the first launch to smash a bottle of Trump Wine on it.
 
Trump got out the Gerald R Ford. Also those programs to rebuild our labor force are because of Trump. You are determined to say this won't work. Nigger.
The USS Gerald Ford? The same one that was laid down in 2009 and launched in 2013? That one? Just because Trump commissioned it in 2017 doesn't mean he gets credit for it, retard. Holy shit. That's insane.

Anyway, no, all of the programs I mentioned are Biden era programs.
 
So, it basically looks like DDG(X) but with a railgun (more like failgun, amirite?), that they just decided to name after Trump because Trump wanted it named after himself?

This is cool and all, but the Navy sucks ass at designing and building new ships, and we have shut down almost all of our ship manufacturing because we let robber barons ship all of our industry overseas. Are there also plans to rebuild our ship production capabilities? What about plans to hold the Navy accountable when it wastes billions on not designing or building ships again? This is a neat idea and all, but I have absolutely no faith in them being able to follow through on this given what's happened in the past.

I wouldn't hold my breath on these ever reaching fruition.
So, the situation is bad but it's not that bad.

New Arleigh Burkes continue to be built, with the most recent one being finished this past March. The Gerald R. Ford's issues were more "new technology not working as promised" issues rather than "yeah so we couldn't build a carrier" issues.

The biggest issue is the US Navy can't fucking decide what it wants, and so it straps new requirements and new mission scenarios onto planned ships every few years and ultimately kills them.

Planned to be nuclear armed with a weapon that isn't projected to hit IOC until 2034. The US doesn't have a nuclear cruise missile in service after the TLAM-N was retired in 2013.
AGM-86B is still in service.

It does look nice and has guns all over it, Im in support of it.
The problem is, aside from CIWS and maybe maybe 57-76mm doing anti-USV/suicide boat duty, guns are borderline fucking useless against any competent near-peer power.

Bringing a gun to an anti-ship missile fight is like bringing a fucking flintlock pistol to a sniper rifle duel.
 
The USS Gerald Ford? The same one that was laid down in 2009 and launched in 2013? That one? Just because Trump commissioned it in 2017 doesn't mean he gets credit for it, retard. Holy shit. That's insane.
It launched under his watch. Yes it is his ship.
Anyway, no, all of the programs I mentioned are Biden era programs.
Lmao. Cope and sneed motherfucker. Your hatred for orange man blinds you to the truth.
The problem is, aside from CIWS and maybe maybe 57-76mm doing anti-USV/suicide boat duty, guns are borderline fucking useless against any competent near-peer power.

Bringing a gun to an anti-ship missile fight is like bringing a fucking flintlock pistol to a sniper rifle duel.
They mentioned the HVP rounds. They are bringing a sniper to a sniper duel.
 
AGM-86B is still in service.
Apologies, I meant to say surface launched cruise missile.
The biggest issue is the US Navy can't fucking decide what it wants, and so it straps new requirements and new mission scenarios onto planned ships every few years and ultimately kills them.
This. Design and scope creep are the biggest problems outside of just not having enough physical shipyard space and workers.
 
Back
Top Bottom