Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Sep 15, 2020
  • Terminated
    Apr 22, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Aug 6, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Joshua Moon, Kiwi Farms, Lolcow, LLC, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
— Aug 6, 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 May 15, 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 Apr 28, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 Apr 25, 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 Apr 25, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)
View all 30 filings

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    Oct 26, 2021
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    Oct 15, 2023

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 11)

# Date Description Filing
10010936535 Oct 15, 2023 Case termination for opinion
10010794067 Jan 5, 2023 [10967591] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Joshua Moon. Served on 01/06/2023. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GGS [Entered: 01/06/2023 12:15 PM]
10010791785 Jan 2, 2023 [10966429] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying Appellees’ Motion to Waive Oral Argument. The oral argument set for January 18, 2023 in Denver, Colorado remains set as scheduled. Counsel for Defendants - Appellees shall file a calendar acknowledgment form by January 5, 2023. Served on 01/03/2023. [21-4128] [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:16 AM]
10010776728 Dec 1, 2022 [10959168] Response filed by Russell G. Greer to Appellees' Motion to Waive Oral Argument. Served on 12/02/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] AG [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:34 AM]
10010776140 Nov 30, 2022 [10958830] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 12/01/2022. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GWK [Entered: 12/01/2022 07:49 AM]
View all 11 filings

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    Mar 19, 2024
  • Terminated
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Oct 16, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
RUSSELL G GREER, JOSHUA MOON, LOLCOW LLC, KIWI FARMS

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
— Oct 16, 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 Oct 15, 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) PDF
131 Jul 10, 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) PDF
130 Jun 10, 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) PDF
129 Jun 10, 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)
View all 30 filings

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    Apr 27, 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Russell G. Greer, Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 50)

# Date Description Filing
473 Apr 27, 2026 RESPONSE re 468 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision 460 to District Court filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/28/2026) 1
472 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 465 Response re 462 Order filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
471 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 469 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and Memorandum in Support; MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
470 Apr 13, 2026 Modification of Docket re 469 MOTION to Strike : Error: The document is requesting two possible reliefs. An event should be chosen for each relief filer is requesting, including motions in the alternative. Correction: MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted added to the entry. No further action is needed. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
469 Apr 13, 2026 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and alternative MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Hardin, Matthew). Added MOTION on 4/15/2026 (alf). (Entered: 04/14/2026) 1
View all 50 filings
I love how even Greer is getting fed up with Judgey-Boy's inaction now. Dare I hope that he'll try to mandamus them himself?

"Extrajudicial conduct" has got me rollin' though. Everyone knows Hardin should be like a shopping cart in a bad neighborhood, and his wheels should automatically lock up if he tries to leave the courthouse.
 
Man In A Dress said:
1766003207494.png
Click to expand...

You have to love the fact that he is accusing opposing council of mischaracterization, when that is literally all he does.

The Irony, it is too great! I fear that it will collapse in upon itself!
 
oh no its pipkun said:
ignoring deposition costs do you think Greee will pay a hooker $40 for no sex? i imagine he forgoes depositions altogether, calls his witnesses to the standand they say they have no idea about any of this stuff.
Click to expand...
It costs way more than that. Where is he going to conduct the deposition? His car? Yeah, it don't work that way.
 
All this, and he still won’t supply the RO application where he ran to the court to make them tell Null to stop being such a meaniehead. :heart-empty:
 
Plaintiff expressly instructed defense counsel to stop this conduct on four separate occasions.
Click to expand...
He really thinks he's in a position to command Mr Hardin to do anything.

I would be MATI about this, but just imagining the impotent, spittle-flecked temper tantrum he must be having about these protective order applications falling flat warms my heart.
 
Kosher Dill said:
I love how even Greer is getting fed up with Judgey-Boy's inaction now.
Click to expand...
Only for the fact they haven't ruled against him. After that, he'll proceed to complain about the court siding with Hardin because they misunderstood his plights. If only they'd let him explain.
Kosher Dill said:
Dare I hope that he'll try to mandamus them himself?
Click to expand...
Quick. Everyone needs to feed the LLM so it becomes a trending legal topic.
 
I have instructed you many times to stop contacting me about my copyright case. Enjoy sanctions, stalker lawyer.

It's been months, at this point why hasn't Greee sent multiple Rule 11 notifications to Mr. Hardin. If the defendant's lawyer is doing something wrong then surely the court would want to sanction them.
 
cromit said:
All this, and he still won’t supply the RO application where he ran to the court to make them tell Null to stop being such a meaniehead. :heart-empty:
Click to expand...
He can't cause he's poor. Also upon his review, despite not possessing the document, he decided it's not relevant and the defense doesn't even need to to see it so stop asking about it and mooooove on.

Am hoping the court drops the amount for his second sanctions before Christmas. Perfect gift for Greer would be being told he owes Hardin ~$4500.
 
obsdj said:
Greer has more than 10 motions going back to May that the judges have simply sat on instead of denying them as the bullshit they are. One could make the argument that all of Greer's recent pain is their fault because they forgot to rule on his motions and Greer should sue the judges as soon as possible!
Click to expand...
With the PO rejection, this now makes 3 separate judges who have told Greer that Hardin isn't doing anything wrong. He can't credibly claim that nobody is checking up on his opponent, even if the particulars of his latest "email harassment" were only looked at by 1 of 3 judges.

By contrast, when Greer said "oh discovery is stayed, let me do some discovery with 2 subpoenas", the Court immediately woke up and swatted him for a violation. I think we can conclude the Courts are aware of when they are being directly fucked with, and will ignore things when it is safe to do so. (Motions from Hardin as well.)

Only Greer can't read the room. He tard stumbles around and says "I don't know why they hit me and not Hardin!" But even in his latest filings, he admits he got hit for a discovery screwup. He wants everyone to think Hardin screwed up as well, but with 3 judges rejecting him, he can't pretend there's some unequal scrutiny; just unequal outcomes.
 
Last edited:
RodgerDodger said:
It costs way more than that. Where is he going to conduct the deposition? His car? Yeah, it don't work that way.
Click to expand...
I know, humor me. since any deposition is far, far away it'll be slightly off topic but imagine the flurry of motions about demands that an unpaid lady of the night be arrested for ignoring a totally real subpeona and honest mistakes about zoom calls and court stenographers. wish the judge would wrap all this shit up so we can see if it even gets that far.
 
oh no its pipkun said:
I know, humor me. since any deposition is far, far away it'll be slightly off topic but imagine the flurry of motions about demands that an unpaid lady of the night be arrested for ignoring a totally real subpeona and honest mistakes about zoom calls and court stenographers. wish the judge would wrap all this shit up so we can see if it even gets that far.
Click to expand...
Greer hasn’t realized the power of the subpoena- wait until he thinks you can subpoena some pussy.
 
oh no its pipkun said:
ignoring deposition costs do you think Greee will pay a hooker $40 for no sex? i imagine he forgoes depositions altogether, calls his witnesses to the standand they say they have no idea about any of this stuff.
Click to expand...
I don't think he's allowed to call witnesses due to his earlier fucky-wuckies, so there's nothing he could gain by deposing witnesses other than the ones Defendants are going to call, and that's likely only admissible for impeachment purposes.
 
On a more substantive matter, the stalking statute requires conduct without lawful authority. Now let's look at Hardin's conduct which Greee is taking issue with. Public records requests, communications with third parties, accusations made in the context of litigation... Last time I checked, litigation activity is with lawful authority.
Don't even get me started on how Greee thinks that he as a litigant can obtain the power to unilaterally forbid opposing counsel from doing his fucking job simply by saying "stop"
 
Mind Goblins said:
I just don't understand how he can be this deep in a case and not realize that the other guy doesn't have to give a shit about what he wants. He's opposing counsel for God's sake, his entire reason for being here is to point out the ways in which you are wrong and bad. Does Greer think the courts work like some kind of BDSM brothel? "I said the safe word, you have to stop now!" As has been said a few times in this thread already, the dildo of consequence rarely arrives lubed, and something tells me Greer isn't kinky enough to enjoy the one he's been building up for himself.
Click to expand...

With your kind permission, I'm going to steal that.

In regards to the failed restraining order, I seem to remember Russ saying there's no reason for Natalie Banks to feel threatened or in danger from Russ as they've never met face to face, and she's in OH while Russ is in NV.

As far as I know, Mr. Hardin and Russ have never physically met face to face either, and Mr. Hardin also resides several states away from Russ. Using Russholes own logic, there was no reason to feel threatened by Hardin, thus no reason for requesting the restraining order.
 
Last edited:
Harvey Danger said:
The denial was on page 1 of Hardin's exhibit A with ECF 421.
Click to expand...
LOL, bummer, I was hoping it was strategery. Then again, there's a good chance the judges will miss it too. It's not mentioned in the main document Hardin filed, that Greer's attempt was a failure.

Thomas Talus said:
I don't think he's allowed to call witnesses due to his earlier fucky-wuckies
Click to expand...
He can, but as Hardin warned him (which Greer complains was a threat), their stipulation says if Greer tries to call any other witness, we can subpoena his dad and brother again. He's utterly terrified of that prospect, but maybe he thinks he can get around it somehow.
 
Harvey Danger said:
I think we can conclude the Courts are aware of when they are being directly fucked with, and will ignore things when it is safe to do so. (Motions from Hardin as well.)
Click to expand...
I'm half convinced that both judges have a plan. That plan being recuse themselves and dump this case on a poor, unsuspecting soul. I'd prefer it be humourous intent instead of malicious, but it'd be a good prank either way.
 
Thomas Talus said:
I don't think he's allowed to call witnesses due to his earlier fucky-wuckies, so there's nothing he could gain by deposing witnesses other than the ones Defendants are going to call, and that's likely only admissible for impeachment purposes.
Click to expand...
I'd agree before he submitted the first 3 chapters of his book. Greee is emotionally reactive impulsive, clearly doesn't understand the witness stipulation he agreed to and i firmly believe that he will respond to huber and banks being formally submitted as witnesses by, at least, subpeonaing Null's mom Reika-sama.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom