Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading. Create account
Greer v. Moon
2:20-cv-00647— District Court, D. Utah
Docket No.
2:20-cv-00647
Court
District Court, D. Utah
Filed
Sep 15, 2020
Terminated
Apr 22, 2024
Nature of Suit
820 Copyright
Cause
17:0501 Copyright Infringement
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
None
Last Filing
Aug 6, 2024
Parties (4)
Parties
Joshua Moon, Kiwi Farms, Lolcow, LLC, Russell G. Greer
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 30)
#
Date
Description
Filing
—
Aug 6, 2024
Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113
May 15, 2024
ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112
Apr 28, 2024
NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111
Apr 25, 2024
Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024)
NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)
Greer v. Moon
21-4128— Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Docket No.
21-4128
Court
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Filed
Oct 26, 2021
Nature of Suit
3820 Copyright
Last Filing
Oct 15, 2023
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 11)
#
Date
Description
Filing
10010936535
Oct 15, 2023
Case termination for opinion
10010794067
Jan 5, 2023
[10967591] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Joshua Moon. Served on 01/06/2023. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GGS [Entered: 01/06/2023 12:15 PM]
10010791785
Jan 2, 2023
[10966429] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying Appellees’ Motion to Waive Oral Argument. The oral argument set for January 18, 2023 in Denver, Colorado remains set as scheduled. Counsel for Defendants - Appellees shall file a calendar acknowledgment form by January 5, 2023. Served on 01/03/2023. [21-4128] [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:16 AM]
10010776728
Dec 1, 2022
[10959168] Response filed by Russell G. Greer to Appellees' Motion to Waive Oral Argument. Served on 12/02/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] AG [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:34 AM]
10010776140
Nov 30, 2022
[10958830] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 12/01/2022. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GWK [Entered: 12/01/2022 07:49 AM]
GREER v. MOON
3:24-cv-00122— District Court, N.D. Florida
Docket No.
3:24-cv-00122
Court
District Court, N.D. Florida
Filed
Mar 19, 2024
Terminated
Jun 10, 2024
Nature of Suit
820 Copyright
Cause
17:501 Copyright Infringement
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
None
Last Filing
Oct 16, 2024
Parties (4)
Parties
RUSSELL G GREER, JOSHUA MOON, LOLCOW LLC, KIWI FARMS
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 30)
#
Date
Description
Filing
—
Oct 16, 2024
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132
Oct 15, 2024
Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024)
AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024)
ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024)
MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 469 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and Memorandum in Support; MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
Modification of Docket re 469 MOTION to Strike : Error: The document is requesting two possible reliefs. An event should be chosen for each relief filer is requesting, including motions in the alternative. Correction: MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted added to the entry. No further action is needed. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
469
Apr 13, 2026
MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and alternative MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Hardin, Matthew). Added MOTION on 4/15/2026 (alf). (Entered: 04/14/2026)
I imagine they've been sweating and shitting themselves for the past two months about whether to grant it or not. "His response wasn't that late, but if we grant it the Defense will object and it might come up before the 10th Circuit, but if we don't grant it this idiot will object and make us go through the whole thing again multiple times,
Wouldn't this turn on how much discretion a court has to grant late responses? If there's enough leeway in the rules, I could easily see the morons up at 10th Appeals saying "meh, it was just barely late, and he's pro se, that's close enough within their discretion to manage the case".
Of course if they keep doing it, it prejudices the other side, and Hardin has a damn good claim for that. But that's probably a larger and less clear standard that he'd have to argue.
The funny thing is that he keeps watching Sean's streams looking for anything to file a complaint about to youtube, but he absolutely refuses to take any of Sean's advise.
I'm still of the opinion that the document is the more interesting part. He's still not provided it. It's part of discovery. You can't just say "Oh, sorry, that document I promised, well you can't have it." The order to show cause was just for failing to provide the document in a timely manner, it does not excuse him from providing the document.
The only resolutions seem to be: Get the document. Toss the case for discovery fuckery. Allow the defendants to assume everything in that document supports their case that Lolcow LLC did nothing wrong and get it tossed that way.
I almost think Mr. Hardin should provide a monthly status report. "Nope, still no document provided." Actually I guess he did in October and November, time for a December one.
That fucking lunatic.
Hopefully this will prove the bad-faith approach Greer takes to all his dealings, and be a reason to FINALLY dismiss the case against Null.
Filing a stalking claim against a defense attorney for...trying to defend his client against your claims...seems fairly strong evidence of a frivolous and vexatious litigant
I Don't see how this is possible without disrupting Nulls rights in court. You can't sue a guy and then sue his lawyer in a sesperate court to get him not to communicate with you. You're directly disrupting the defendents right to a legal defense.
The real question is how quickly this is going to get slapped down and by who and what effect this will have on Nulls case directly.
Greer is like a sick experiment to see how far the legal system is willing to be disrespected before it puts on the big boy pants without progressives and special interest groups telling them to.
I guess because this is against Mr. Hardin he can't ask the existing Federal judges to remove the case to their court and attach it to the existing case. That would be peak funny.
