Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Sep 15, 2020
  • Terminated
    Apr 22, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Aug 6, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Joshua Moon, Kiwi Farms, Lolcow, LLC, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
— Aug 6, 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 May 15, 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 Apr 28, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 Apr 25, 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 Apr 25, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)
View all 30 filings

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    Oct 26, 2021
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    Oct 15, 2023

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 11)

# Date Description Filing
10010936535 Oct 15, 2023 Case termination for opinion
10010794067 Jan 5, 2023 [10967591] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Joshua Moon. Served on 01/06/2023. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GGS [Entered: 01/06/2023 12:15 PM]
10010791785 Jan 2, 2023 [10966429] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying Appellees’ Motion to Waive Oral Argument. The oral argument set for January 18, 2023 in Denver, Colorado remains set as scheduled. Counsel for Defendants - Appellees shall file a calendar acknowledgment form by January 5, 2023. Served on 01/03/2023. [21-4128] [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:16 AM]
10010776728 Dec 1, 2022 [10959168] Response filed by Russell G. Greer to Appellees' Motion to Waive Oral Argument. Served on 12/02/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] AG [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:34 AM]
10010776140 Nov 30, 2022 [10958830] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 12/01/2022. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GWK [Entered: 12/01/2022 07:49 AM]
View all 11 filings

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    Mar 19, 2024
  • Terminated
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Oct 16, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
RUSSELL G GREER, JOSHUA MOON, LOLCOW LLC, KIWI FARMS

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
— Oct 16, 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 Oct 15, 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) PDF
131 Jul 10, 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) PDF
130 Jun 10, 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) PDF
129 Jun 10, 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)
View all 30 filings

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    Apr 27, 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Russell G. Greer, Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 50)

# Date Description Filing
473 Apr 27, 2026 RESPONSE re 468 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision 460 to District Court filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/28/2026) 1
472 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 465 Response re 462 Order filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
471 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 469 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and Memorandum in Support; MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
470 Apr 13, 2026 Modification of Docket re 469 MOTION to Strike : Error: The document is requesting two possible reliefs. An event should be chosen for each relief filer is requesting, including motions in the alternative. Correction: MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted added to the entry. No further action is needed. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
469 Apr 13, 2026 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and alternative MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Hardin, Matthew). Added MOTION on 4/15/2026 (alf). (Entered: 04/14/2026) 1
View all 50 filings
ECF 392 & 393
Screenshot 2025-12-04 173114.png

Screenshot 2025-12-04 173238.png
Screenshot 2025-12-04 173302.png
Screenshot 2025-12-04 173321.png
Screenshot 2025-12-04 173339.png
Screenshot 2025-12-04 173349.png
 

Attachments

So he's apparently been unemployed since October of this year? Wasn't he DoorDashing? I have no doubt his firing (if true) was the result of some type of inappropriate behavior towards a female customer.
 
StinkySnack said:
So he's apparently been unemployed since October of this year? Wasn't he DoorDashing? I have no doubt his firing (if true) was the result of some type of inappropriate behavior towards a female customer.
Click to expand...
Hold the phone. That redacted filing he made.... surely he wasn't admitting to losing his job in that, right?
 
Sexy Senior Citizen said:
Hold the phone. That redacted filing he made.... surely he wasn't admitting to losing his job in that, right?
Click to expand...
I guess so, maybe he didn't want to publicly admit that he was too poor to afford the princely sum of $65 to get the document while at the same time soliciting investors for his hooker coffee shop.
 
StinkySnack said:
So he's apparently been unemployed since October of this year? Wasn't he DoorDashing? I have no doubt his firing (if true) was the result of some type of inappropriate behavior towards a female customer.
Click to expand...
Oh I'm sorry, is very kindly offering a becoming woman the position of whore in your non-existent brothel considered inappropriate these days?
 
Did this absolute poorilla nigger actually file under seal "I'm a broke ass nigger now, can't afford shit" as his reason for not following court orders that are almost a year fucking old?

Is this Greer or fucking John Titor?
 
reptile baht spaniard rid said:
Did this absolute poorilla nigger actually file under seal "I'm a broke ass nigger now, can't afford shit" as his reason for not following court orders that are almost a year fucking old?
Click to expand...
We will find out. If he files a tantrum whining about Harding publicizing information that's supposed to be under seal, we will know for sure.
 
reptile baht spaniard rid said:
Did this absolute poorilla nigger actually file under seal "I'm a broke ass nigger now, can't afford shit" as his reason for not following court orders that are almost a year fucking old?
Click to expand...
I just shot hot coffee thru my nose.
Apologies to U_M and Josh for not having anything relevant or informative to share...but come on now. As a lover of absurdist theatre, it doesn't get better than this thread.
Done.
 
Is Hardin in the clear for publishing information contained in the redacted filing? Or could there be some kind of repercussions for that?
 
StinkySnack said:
Is Hardin in the clear for publishing information contained in the redacted filing? Or could there be some kind of repercussions for that?
Click to expand...
He is allowed to contest it relying on information provided. He didn't leak a copy, but merely summarized the gist of the relevant issue in as non revealing way as possible.
 
I like that Hardin is now regularly getting ahead of the Tard Guard Train and preemptively saying "I want a hearing if you're going this route". He's very clearly wise to Cute Judge Tricks at this point.
 
Watch this retard pay the sanction for not paying $65 for a file he was told to get, then file saying he can't afford $65 because he paid the sanction.

How long before the judge admits Russ will never, ever, under any circumstance provide documents (any documents, he won't magically start producing others on demand either).


Edit: I just caught that Hardin asks for a dismissal under the same reasoning 'Greer has refused to comply with a simple order over a year, just toss the case'
 
DiabeticSydePhil said:
Edit: I just caught that Hardin asks for a dismissal under the same reasoning 'Greer has refused to comply with a simple order over a year, just toss the case'
Click to expand...
1764865405652.png

Is that actually proper in a response to a "notice of filing"? Doesn't it need to be a separately-filed motion? Though the motion to dismiss at 274 still remains open, and the non-motion supplemental authority suggestion at 359 to stay ruling on the motion to dismiss until Cox is decided still sits out there as well.
 
The genius plan to avoid paying $67 for some documents by attempting to re-litigate the same court order over and over and over again, racking up thousands of dollars of sanctions in the process, may be unravelling.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom