💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 155 22.6%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 276 40.2%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 92 13.4%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 163 23.8%

  • Total voters
    686
isn't that when you dabble in drugs
That’s when you never touch drugs or alcohol!

It’s said tee-total-er.

I used to believe it meant the opposite too, because it was a word you’d always hear in the context of drink and drugs.
 
Sounds like he is messing up teetotaler, which is the inverse of what he means since they abstain from alcohol
Is he saying teetotaller? Which would also be the exact opposite of what he means as well as a wild pronunciation, but it is Null.
According to the hair follicle test she is a habitual cocaine abuser, so her also having a drinking problem would be the least surprising thing about Nick’s parenting.
 
Last edited:
Nick is awake and already busy again.
Archive
View attachment 7400876
I’d like to hear exactly what Cuck means by, “The state backed down…” as that particular sentence fragment is doing a lot of the heavy lifting for this particular lying session of morning reee-ing on twitter. Expert testimony is generally for trials, there was no trial. How’d the state backed down, exactly? More like, the case is sealed, so the cuck thinks he’s got carte blanch to lie through his balldo about the circumstances, again.
 
Null speculating that since Nick went from having to do nothing to everything while in the midst of addiction he drove the kids to church under the influence. Likely Nick thinks that the nanny leaving abruptly forced him to have to drive drunk, ruining his life:
Wasn't Nick drunk driving the kids around on no sleep long before the nanny left? Or does it just feel like this has been going on for years?
 
I’d like to hear exactly what Cuck means by, “The state backed down…” as that particular sentence fragment is doing a lot of the heavy lifting for this particular lying session of morning reee-ing on twitter. Expert testimony is generally for trials, there was no trial. How’d the state backed down, exactly? More like, the case is sealed, so the cuck thinks he’s got carte blanch to lie through his balldo about the circumstances, again.
The State did not back down.
He plead guilty.
He preened up about how he would win, then backed down like the pussy ass bitch he is.
 
I’d like to hear exactly what Cuck means by, “The state backed down…” as that particular sentence fragment is doing a lot of the heavy lifting for this particular lying session of morning reee-ing on twitter. Expert testimony is generally for trials, there was no trial. How’d the state backed down, exactly? More like, the case is sealed, so the cuck thinks he’s got carte blanch to lie through his balldo about the circumstances, again.

"The state backed down..." meanwhile in reality, junkies tend to have their kids test positive for drugs, Nick probably looked good because only ONE of his kids had ingested cocaine. They probably had no plans to litigate that at all and instead just made Nick bleach his whole house to make sure it was clear of environmental cocaine before letting the kids back in the house.

:really:Your honor, the evidence WILL SHOW through our expert that there's a 0.8% chance that my daughter's positive cocaine test was a mistake, the ebidance WILL S-
"Thank you, Mr. Rekieta, but that won't be necessary. You can have supervised visitation starting next week and we'll get them back in your home pronto as long as you keep pissing clean."

EDIT: I just realized he probably means the State backed down from hitting him with the child endangerment misdemeanor. He keeps saying they couldn't prove the elements but that's because in his swiss cheese'd brain he thinks he can just claim that the cocaine was all in a safe behind a locked door and thus there was no child endangerment. Nevermind that there was cocaine through an open bedroom door out in the open in the bedroom so he's retarded, that wouldn't work.

Then where are the charges? Why did they drop it? Nick traded the misdemeanors to cop to the felony. It's not complicated. He even admitted this on Twitter. It's also consistent with his defense of "they have him dead to rights on the revenge porn felony" - nick says that in THAT case, Aaron getting the felony dropped to plead to the misdemeanor does NOT suggest that they couldn't prove the felony on the revenge porn. But Nick getting the misdemeanor dropped to plea to the felony? That proves, BEYOND ALL DOUBT, that they wouldn't have been able to move forward on the misdemeanor child endangerment.
 
My impression is that it’s not usually this difficult, expansive or protracted to get bodycam footage, even if minors are present. Do any of the attorneys working on this have an idea of what the holdup is?
Isn't there speculation Nick's rich parents have been pulling a lot of weight for him or something to prevent embarrassment to the family?
 
The Nick Rekieta Crime family is trying to frame this poor nanny. We go from the daughter hiding her coke and drinking habits by claiming the nanny was the one stealing the booze, to the eldest son who didn’t notice a nanny slamming bottles of whiskey while babysitting, or the polycule, and doesn’t even know what drugs are. Then Lady Rackets who was arrested for cocaine possession and found to have a prescription bottle full of not only her prescription but weed gummies and an ‘unknown’ pill. I kinda lost my train of thought because lol at Kayla being arrested like that.

What a colorful family.
 
i dont understand what rekieta was saying on the female horse podcast. bodycam footage of criminal arrests is FOIAable in the United States of America. unless it's somehow different in Minnesota, which, im not a lawyer, but then again neither is he, I've FOIA'd bodycam stuff before on a felony case, and they withheld it until post sentencing and then simply charged me for their processing and editing fees to blur any victims. am i missing something here or is this crack ghoul just once again a complete fucking retard?
 
isn't that when you dabble in drugs

look english is my zeroeth language
Teetotaling is the exact opposite. If you are a teetotaler, it means you entirely abstain from drugs and alcohol (though some teetotalers smoke cigarettes, like Angus Young)
 
i dont understand what rekieta was saying on the female horse podcast. bodycam footage of criminal arrests is FOIAable in the United States of America. unless it's somehow different in Minnesota, which, im not a lawyer, but then again neither is he, I've FOIA'd bodycam stuff before on a felony case, and they withheld it until post sentencing and then simply charged me for their processing and editing fees to blur any victims. am i missing something here or is this crack ghoul just once again a complete fucking retard?
Under Minnesota Statutes, such data is generally nonpublic until the investigation is closed or the case has been resolved in court.
Even then, certain footage may be redacted, withheld, or delayed due to privacy concerns.
Any footage of the children should be (and I agree needs to be), censored entirely. They are victims. The adults are not.
Even more then, Nick will fight tooth and nail when notified of the request. Only with heavy legal pressure will Null get it released.
 
Back
Top Bottom