🐮 Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[ShinyStar]

I left it to fully archive when I was trying and it left me with "Not Found (yet?)" page.
Twitter archived without any issues.

Stupid internet. I'll check on that tomorrow and see if the archiving worked/if I can get it to work.

 

[Spergichu]

So who's gonna be Null's wigger debt collector?

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

So who's gonna be Null's wigger debt collector?

He already announced his top pick.

EDIT. Sweet little find:
Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-6282077
Quote: User Deadpool: "Except all the things you've obviously failed at. Like getting your thread taken down, and successfully sueing Null. Or marrying someone who doesn't beat and rape you. Or raising a child that knows his ring finger from his middle finger. Or winning an argument/debate in this thread."
Mrs. Scott: "All those are ASSUMPTIONS, not actual "failures". Look at the definition of failure again. It is being unsuccessful in achieving ONE'S goal. None of the examples you gave are related to my goals at all."
Comment: Admits winning the lawsuit wasn't her goal.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

It'll be easier to remove notes later if someone (looking at you, @Useful_Mistake) points out they are irrelevant than to look for more.

DM me what you want me to look over, and I'll gladly provide assistance.

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/2020-12-07-scott-v-moon-mk-vi.80988/post-8461691
Quote: „I can completely mock Joshua Moon who is too illiterate to even file his own paperwork.”
Comment: Can be interpreted as filing lawsuit to mock the defendant

Considering the context, probably irrelevant. She is mocking him getting a lawyer to respond, and talking about making fun of him here.

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5818791
Quote: „And I also propose a question to you, the question is twofold: (a) Do you know what the penalty is in The Torah for persecuting the Righteous? and (b) do you know when Elohim will pay out those penalities?”
Comment: Admits to wishing to ruin Mr. Moon's life for religious reasons and personal vengeance

Maybe only relevant as a "death of a thousand cuts" sorta thing.

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5824288
Quote: "Second of all, The Torah does not command me to submit to worldly governments. More proof you worship Paul, not Elohim!"
Comment: Admission of not accepting secular law therefore unlikely to seek justice through legal system

Probably irrelevant. Saying your God does not require you to submit to law, doesn't necessarily mean you are abusing the legal system.

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5825054
Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5840566
Quote: "Israelites can steal the booty of their enemies."
Quote: "Nobody's said anything about stealing from pagans. What I said was ENEMIES. If you don't want your booty stolen, don't start shit and provoke an Isrselite. Enough said!"
Comment: Endorses theft and extortion of resources from her "enemies".

AFAIU, this was not said in the context of talking about Null, rather about her love life. That being said, you are allowed to promote illegal activities, as long as that does not immediately lead to said illegal activities (Brandenburg v. Ohio)

Comment: Admits the goal of the lawsuits is to influence the way Mr. Moon moderates his forum.

Where does she say that? Most I see is her implying that she's angry at Josh allowing a stalker on this forum, and that a reasonable person wouldn't. I don't think I saw anything implying a lawsuit.

Comment: Pattern of using legal system as a mean of intimidation (in this instance: to intimidate judge to get favorable ruling despite admitting that unfavorable ruling was a result of her lack of legal knowledge)

She is talking about using a lawful recourse (i.e. reporting them) in its intended way to deal with a perceived corruption. Now if you were to include the context of her using bullshit like her filling said motions immediately following an unfavorable ruling(doc 1, doc 2) with baseless unfounded accusations in an attempt to overturn the unfavorable rulings, that could work.

Comment: Admits financial motivation for the lawsuits

Comment: Admits her motivation for suing is financial.

I mean, the point of lawsuits is to reimburse you for damage suffered. You need to prove she has no right to said money (i.e. she is just suing to extort him)

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5850739
Quote: "That's called trying to minimize abuse. In this case, verbal abuse. When you gossip, slander (through lovely), and lie about others, that's verbal abuse. You are uneducated and need a course on moral philosophy.
Your examples of the waitress and man aren't equal. Both of them were wronged first before they told something TRUTHFUL to another person in PRIVATE. This website has other factors that you ommitted."
Comment: Confuses morality \ ethics with law.

I can't see how that is relevant.

**link:
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-7338966

https://archive.md/wip/DktKV

"No, actually it NEVER says to obey the laws of the land. The Torah doesn't teach that. You're the fool trying to pretend you know anything about The Torah even though you don't! You don't follow The Torah and you don't even study it, you're just a presumptuous fool who thinks she knows what she is talking about!"

comment: Demonstrates that she feels her religious convictions mean she can flaunt the laws of the land. No respect for the secular government.

Irrelevant for the same reasons I pointed out in my replies to @Illuminati Order Official quotes

comment: She doesn't accept that any of her previous dismissals mean that she should stop bringing suit. Instead, she demonstrates clearly that she believes all her suits are being dismissed over minor technicalities that, once she corrects, mean that she will win. Rather than contradicting her previous expressed opinion that she is unlikely to win due to bias, this instead explains the mechanism through which she sees the bias manifesting. The biased judge will find some nitpicky rule by which to throw out her lawsuit.

Irrelevant, I'd say

Anything else I didn't choose to comment on is likely relevant, imo

 

[Baby Yoda]

@TamarYaelBatYah I was talking to someone close to me and they had mentioned someone told them a sexy story. This woman named Clarisse was at an art gallery with a friend. They were both looking at the paintings and having a good time when Clarisse caught a man looking at her. He was tall dark and handsome... clarisse had to take a shit though, so she went to the bathroom. Shr barely made it in there and sat her ass on the toilet and let out a loud fart. The toilet echoed and brown poop with red chunks filled the toilet. She was juuuuust at the end of her monthly so her tampon fell out of her vagina into the toilet. "Oh fuck" she said as the contents of her inner ass made their way into the toilet.

She left the bathroom and the hot guy approached her and handed her his number and winked at her. The rest of the evening Clarisse looked at the rest of the paintings until closing. As she got home she texted hot guy and asked him if he wanted to come over and he obliged. Hot guy came over and they passionatey kissed on Clarisse's bed. Clarisse lay on her stomach and hot guy whispered in her ear in a deep voice, "I hope for your sake you took a shit today. This wont be pretty". Oh thank goodness! Thought Clarisse. She was so happy she emptied her bowels just a couple hours ago. Mr, Hot slipped his penis into her shit-hole, using her poop as lube. All positions were peformed: piledriver, doggy, squatting, cowgirl. Mr. HOT moaned in his powerful. Manly voice and roared as he emptied his nuts into clarisse's asshole. The walls were covered in blood, guts, cum and poop. Mr. HOT left her to clean up the mess.
As Mr. HOT left he winked at her and said "whore." That was the last she heard of him.

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

@Useful_Mistake
Thanks! In relation to:

Where does she say that? Most I see is her implying that she's angry at Josh allowing a stalker on this forum, and that a reasonable person wouldn't. I don't think I saw anything implying a lawsuit.

Andrew is mentioned a lot in relation to the lawsuits that's why I decided to include some posts related to him like this one:

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-6310134
Quote: "The Stalker is Point A. Had he not made YouTube videos about me, no one would know anything about the personal details of my life.
The (unrighteous) vindictive ex-wife of Marshall is Point B. She's the original poster of the thread on Kiwi Farms trying to trash Marshall and I. I have my personal opinion about her motives, but no need to say here. Her internalized misogyny shows in her writing though.
Kiwi Farms fan club is Point C. They seek to scapegoat anything that defies Patriarchy. Male anxiety about women who defy Patriarchy results in abuse and violence towards though women.
Joshua Moon is Point D. As I've seen from how he spoke to an official of Australia, he doesn't handle civility well.
Each of these people's spiritual sicknesses fed off of each other. And the threads were born."
Comment: Admits her issue is with Mr. Andrew Carlson and that her only issue with Mr. Moon is him being "uncivil" and "suffering from spiritual sickness".

 

[Useful_Mistake]

@Useful_Mistake
Thanks! In relation to:

Andrew is mentioned a lot in relation to the lawsuits that's why I decided to include some posts related to him like this one:

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-6310134
Quote: "The Stalker is Point A. Had he not made YouTube videos about me, no one would know anything about the personal details of my life.
The (unrighteous) vindictive ex-wife of Marshall is Point B. She's the original poster of the thread on Kiwi Farms trying to trash Marshall and I. I have my personal opinion about her motives, but no need to say here. Her internalized misogyny shows in her writing though.
Kiwi Farms fan club is Point C. They seek to scapegoat anything that defies Patriarchy. Male anxiety about women who defy Patriarchy results in abuse and violence towards though women.
Joshua Moon is Point D. As I've seen from how he spoke to an official of Australia, he doesn't handle civility well.
Each of these people's spiritual sicknesses fed off of each other. And the threads were born."
Comment: Admits her issue is with Mr. Andrew Carlson and that her only issue with Mr. Moon is him being "uncivil" and "suffering from spiritual sickness".

If you can, look for the posts after or during June of 2020, when she allegedly first had issues that prompted this lawsuit:

Those are more likely to be relevant.

That being said, this post could be relevant too.

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

If you can, look for the posts after or during June of 2020, when she allegedly first had issues that prompted this lawsuit:

I'm half-way through April of 2020 Null said "any time, anywhere" so I started at the beginning. @ShinyStar picked up at page 500 and covered 500-600.

Regarding CPS, found some posts where she claims to not be bothered by the agency:

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5827028
Quote: "Call CPS and all I have to do is show them the screenshot of what you just said. It automatically dismisses the allegations under Virginia law."
Comment: Encourages CPS call therefore can't claim the call happening caused emotional distress

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-6191060
Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-6191168
Quote: "I'm not afraid of CPS. Ever since I sued the county they now have to ask each person whether they are Native American or Eskimo (I effectuated some change, thank goodness). 5 of my household members have Native American partially as an ethnicity so they can't even come in my house without a damn good warrant. The rest of us are protected under the 1st and 4th Amendment. Ever since they got sued they sent the supervisor over when they come to my house to make sure they don't fuck up. Sent them away using the 1st amendment and Virginia Code 57-1 every time. Case closed each and every time. If they get too aggressive, I'll be happy to sue again. I've already let them off the hook for some 1st and 4th Amendment violations. There is no statute of limitations on those, so I could scoop them in the next pleading. But should the time come that I need to sue again, I won't make the mistake of forgetting the word "policy" in my pleading."
Quote: "CPS actually has no power to take anyone's children. Only a judge can do that. A judge has to write an Order allowing the removal of anyone's children.
I'm not afraid of them. Actually, I think they got very nervous coming to my house because in no small language, I have always had a sign on my front door warning any government employee attempting to enter my house without a warrant. Many people are unaware that in the US, CPS workers have to show you a warrant to get into your home. I am aware of my rights. For two, I've already sued them once. I'm a hot potato in their hands. And for three, I'm absolutely wiling and ready to sue again if they get too aggressive trying to harass me or impede on my 1st or 4th Amendment rights. And like I said, this time my case isn't going to be dismissed in part because I forgot the word "policy". I'm already sharpened by my last lawsuit. I know what errors not to make."
Comment: Admits she's not bothered by potential CPS visits.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I'm half-way through April of 2020 Null said "any time, anywhere" so I started at the beginning. @ShinyStar picked up at page 500 and covered 500=600.

Regarding CPS, found some posts where she claims to not be bothered by the agency:

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5827028
Quote: "Call CPS and all I have to do is show them the screenshot of what you just said. It automatically dismisses the allegations under Virginia law."
Comment: Encourages CPS call therefore can't claim the call happening caused emotional distress

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-6191060
Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-6191168
Quote: "I'm not afraid of CPS. Ever since I sued the county they now have to ask each person whether they are Native American or Eskimo (I effectuated some change, thank goodness). 5 of my household members have Native American partially as an ethnicity so they can't even come in my house without a damn good warrant. The rest of us are protected under the 1st and 4th Amendment. Ever since they got sued they sent the supervisor over when they come to my house to make sure they don't fuck up. Sent them away using the 1st amendment and Virginia Code 57-1 every time. Case closed each and every time. If they get too aggressive, I'll be happy to sue again. I've already let them off the hook for some 1st and 4th Amendment violations. There is no statute of limitations on those, so I could scoop them in the next pleading. But should the time come that I need to sue again, I won't make the mistake of forgetting the word "policy" in my pleading."
Quote: "CPS actually has no power to take anyone's children. Only a judge can do that. A judge has to write an Order allowing the removal of anyone's children.
I'm not afraid of them. Actually, I think they got very nervous coming to my house because in no small language, I have always had a sign on my front door warning any government employee attempting to enter my house without a warrant. Many people are unaware that in the US, CPS workers have to show you a warrant to get into your home. I am aware of my rights. For two, I've already sued them once. I'm a hot potato in their hands. And for three, I'm absolutely wiling and ready to sue again if they get too aggressive trying to harass me or impede on my 1st or 4th Amendment rights. And like I said, this time my case isn't going to be dismissed in part because I forgot the word "policy". I'm already sharpened by my last lawsuit. I know what errors not to make."
Comment: Admits she's not bothered by potential CPS visits.

Not being afraid of CPS, doesn't mean that the call (which presumingly was made to steal your children/make you lose them) couldn't have been perceived by her to be "so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community." That being said, reporting stuff (especially in good faith) to a governmental agency usually does not fall under that requirement.

 

[White Baby]

Ideally the Fourth Circuit will join it's sister courts and declare First and Fourth Amendment violations, therefore setting a precedent for all families in Virginia and those in the Fourth Circuit. Ideally, I will get monetary compensation for severe injuries and damages for severe deprivation of my constitutional rights.

Ideally, I'll learn some about IIED in the process. I've never sued for that before, my learning curve here will be steep!

More than anything though, I have already accomplished one major thing: to approach this with my Boston Tea party attitude, and a display of my courage means more to me than anything!

SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS!

More information leading to a conclusion that her suits are primarily to "further her legal education".

Keep talking shit. You're still John Doe in a case that hasn't been dismissed.

I don't even have to prove actual financial loss for suing you for something called pecuniary damages. This was stated clearly in the Judge's opinion in 2018. All I have to do is demonstrate you tried to negatively impact my business to thwart earning potential. Potential lost income is enough to make a case.

More information leading to the conclusion that her legal filings are also an attempt to rake in money for herself/her family.

 

[Cup Noodle]

I wouldn't say that archive is working so much as that I am attempting to use archive in the hopes that it ultimately will work... I believe that, in the future, if you take the /wip/ out of the address, it should link to the archived page. I could be wrong.

I really have to stop for now after this (I'm on page 624), but these pages are around the time that the case against Wise County gets dismissed. She seems to be talking a good deal about the lawsuit here, so starting at page 625 would be a good place to look for quotes.

**link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-7501589

https://archive.md/wip/i0PbI

comment: She doesn't believe it's important to win her lawsuit. She dismisses the idea that in the legal system, it is important to bring meritorious cases and instead believes that 'fighting your battles' is sufficient justification for using the court's resources and targeting an opposing party using the power of the State.

**link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-7532096

https://archive.md/wip/cABQP

comment: She contradicts claims she made in her court case, admitting that the site isn't important and isn't worth getting mad about.

**link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-7547028

https://archive.md/wip/sYsXz

comment: Another post demonstrating that she thinks it is appropriate to continue to bring the same suit over and over as an iterative process to correct minor defects and ultimately prevail. She demonstrates that she has not received the message from the court that she has no case and should stop using the legal process to harass Mr. Moon.

**link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-7551327

https://archive.md/wip/DQhWu

comment: Another post demonstrating that she thinks it is appropriate to continue to bring the same suit over and over as an iterative process to correct minor defects and ultimately prevail. She demonstrates that she has not received the message from the court that she has no case and should stop using the legal process to harass Mr. Moon.

I hate you for your avatar.

So who's gonna be Null's wigger debt collector?

I'm mulling it over.

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

I'm mulling it over.

Null said he wants Ethan Ralph and if Ralph refuses - a man who's an essence of white trash. You are an entrepreneur, farmer, land owner and generally a well-cultured fella so I don't think you qualify for the position.

 

[Cup Noodle]

Null said he wants Ethan Ralph and if Ralph refuses - a man who's an essence of white trash. You are an entrepreneur, farmer, land owner and generally a well-cultured fella so I don't think you qualify for the position.

I'm 6'4" 220lbs of pure manliness. I don't know if you happened to see the full ralph retort chris chan arrest stream, but Ralph was too afraid to knock on Chris's door and after going back and forth for like an hour he sent his horse to knock on Chris's door only to get cucked by staff. Ralph is a yellow bellied wigger. Maybe I'm not white trash, but I could play the role better than is pussy ass. I'd walk up to Melinda's house and order my kids to take her kids bikes out for a spin while I confiscated her twenty dollar phone and crt tv.

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

Lol. Where's that rainbow dumptruck pic when I need it.

Good enough?

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

May I suggest to Melinda that she should start charging $50 for people to have a quickly with her. She's going to need all the money she can get.

By the way, keep in mind all of the times that Melinda has claimed that she's not poor. If she's not poor she can pay court costs.

 

[Toasty]

By the way, keep in mind all of the times that Melinda has claimed that she's not poor. If she's not poor she can pay court costs.

Even if she can and should pay her own court costs (which she absolutely can and should.)
She doesn't think she has to because everyone, particularly the government should just hand her everything.
It's definitely going to show up in her response to Josh's motion for his court and lawyer costs. I will bet you guys all the pop tarts that she claims that if Josh had just given her what she wanted to begin with, she wouldn't have had to sue him so all of his incurred expenses are his fault.
So even though this case has once again proved that she has no legal basis to sue him, and that she had no standing to try and force him to bend to her wishes regardless his website,
She still thinks that he should be punished for not giving her what she wants.
It's like an abusive person who gets stuck with the medical bills of the person they beat on saying that " if they just wouldn't have made me mad, I wouldn't have bashed their he'd into the door. Therefore the medical bills are their fault. If the bitch would have just shut up, none of this would have happened!"

EDIT: Yup, and she did it really hard. She even did it to the judge. It's all Jones' fault because he didn't bow down and recuse himself the minute she asked.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

New docs! Images to come soon.

Spoiler: Notice of appeal that only now arrived

Spoiler: Reply to Null

Spoiler: memorandum

Spoiler: Appeal sheet

 

[ConSluttant]

New filings! Get your new hot filings! Watch Melinda rehash everything she's ever said and bang your head against the wall!

We see you Melinda. Hi!!

 

[White Baby]

Ideally the Fourth Circuit will join it's sister courts and declare First and Fourth Amendment violations, therefore setting a precedent for all families in Virginia and those in the Fourth Circuit. Ideally, I will get monetary compensation for severe injuries and damages for severe deprivation of my constitutional rights.

Ideally, I'll learn some about IIED in the process. I've never sued for that before, my learning curve here will be steep!

More than anything though, I have already accomplished one major thing: to approach this with my Boston Tea party attitude, and a display of my courage means more to me than anything!

SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS!

More information leading to a conclusion that her suits are primarily to "further her legal education".

Keep talking shit. You're still John Doe in a case that hasn't been dismissed.

I don't even have to prove actual financial loss for suing you for something called pecuniary damages. This was stated clearly in the Judge's opinion in 2018. All I have to do is demonstrate you tried to negatively impact my business to thwart earning potential. Potential lost income is enough to make a case.

More information leading to the conclusion that her legal filings are also an attempt to rake in money for herself/her family.

New docs!

Lmao she scanned a page upside down

 

[Cynically Insane]

She still can't accept that the default judgement is gone.

And I am just giddy that she brought up the freemasons again. She looks like a conspiracy retard. This bitch has less of a grip on reality than a modern day tranny.