Danny DeVito Abruptly Loses Twitter Verification After Tweeting Support For Nabisco Strike

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
By Ryan Smith On 8/20/21 at 3:52 AM EDT

Danny DeVito's Twitter account was briefly unverified before being reinstated, after he tweeted support for striking Nabisco workers.

As walkouts spread across U.S. Nabisco bakeries, with union workers protesting proposed changes amid contract negotiations, screen star DeVito took to Twitter to express solidarity on Wednesday.

"Support Nabisco workers striking for humane working hours, fair pay, outsourcing jobs," wrote the actor, director and producer, who concluded his message: "NO CONTRACTS NO SNACKS."

1629457173413.png

However, in the hours that followed, a number of DeVito's followers soon expressed confusion over the status of his account, as his blue badge—Twitter's distinctive sign of verification—disappeared from his account.

One of DeVito's followers enquired if his choice of message had caused a problem, writing: "Did Twitter strip you of your blue check for this tweet?"

Another commented: "I'm a little flummoxed. Is it against the terms of service to talk about strikes on twitter??"

A third Twitter user said: "Danny, I would like to support your cause but I really can't do that unless you're verified. Please get verified."

On Thursday, media outlet More Perfect Union shared a tweet stating DeVito had confirmed to them that his Twitter account had been unverified.

1629457386698.png


According to Twitter's FAQs regarding verification, the company states that they "may also remove the blue badge from accounts that are found to be in severe or repeated violation of the Twitter Rules."

"This includes... Repeat violations in Tweets, including but not limited to: hateful conduct policy, abusive behavior, glorification of violence policy, civic integrity policy, private information policy, or platform manipulation and spam policy."

Newsweek has contacted representatives for Twitter and Danny DeVito for comment.

Nabisco, makers of Oreo cookies and Ritz Crackers, has faced increased pressure from striking workers at factories in Oregon, Virginia and Illinois, amid contract negotiations with parent company Mondelez International, Inc.

According to Today, employees at a sales distribution center in Colorado also joined the strike on August 12. All striking workers are members of the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers, and Grain Millers International Union.

At issue, say union leaders, is a proposal from Mondelez to go from eight-hour shifts, five days a week, to 12-hour shifts, three or four days a week, without overtime. Also proposed is more mandatory work on weekends without extra pay.

"This fight is about maintaining what we already have," Mike Burlingham, vice president of BCTGM Local 364 in Portland, told Today Food. "During the pandemic, we all were putting in a lot of hours, demand was higher, people were at home, and the snack food industry did phenomenally well.

"Mondelez made record profits and they want to thank us by closing two of the U.S. bakeries (last month) and telling the rest of us we have to take concessions, what kind of thanks is that? We make them a lot of money. It's very disheartening. How is that supposed to make us feel?"

 
12 hours a day, 3 days a week. That's only 36 hours. Why would you get overtime for that?

Then you could do 4 12 hour days the next week and you would have 84 total hours for 2 weeks. Slightly more pay, and more days off.

I'm guessing the company is trying to do this in response to the recent push for a 4 day work week?
 
A third Twitter user said: "Danny, I would like to support your cause but I really can't do that unless you're verified. Please get verified."
The scary part is, I don't doubt whoever said this actually believes this.
 
He tried to go against Big Biscuit, and they took down his verification. Wake up people, their tentacles run deep.
 
12 hours a day, 3 days a week. That's only 36 hours. Why would you get overtime for that?

Then you could do 4 12 hour days the next week and you would have 84 total hours for 2 weeks. Slightly more pay, and more days off.

I'm guessing the company is trying to do this in response to the recent push for a 4 day work week?
In California overtime is measured by the day not by the week
 
Back
Top Bottom