Opinion It’s time to stop skirting the issue - The truth is, however, that there is absolutely no legitimate reason – practical, social or otherwise – why men should not wear skirts on a regular, if not daily, basis.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link (Archive)

It’s time to stop skirting the issue​


Teo van den Broeke
8 August 2021
396DC8AA-C957-40C7-AAC3-C6F60406904D.jpeg

Now is the moment to bare more leg than ever before, says Teo van den Broeke, and he doesn’t mean short shorts...​

Having delved deep into the annals (minds out of the gutter, please) of sartorial history over the many years I’ve worked in menswear, one issue I’ve long grappled with is just where the Western aversion to modern men wearing skirts, dresses and tunics really comes from.

It’s important to note from the outset that I’m not tarring all cultures with the “men scared to wear open-bottomed garments” brush. Arabic men have worn breezy white kameez tunics as an antidote to the heat for centuries, while airy dhotis and lungis are worn by men across the subcontinent to this day.

I’ve come to the conclusion that the reason men in the West (in Britain specifically) don’t wear skirts and kilts as a matter of course is really down to the Victorians. An age of puritanical pedants with a penchant for all things sad and sober, the Victorian era saw a distinct diminishment in the use of colour in masculine clothing and plain trouser suits in black, grey, brown and blue became order of the, well, centuries now.

The truth is, however, that there is absolutely no legitimate reason – practical, social or otherwise – why men should not wear skirts on a regular, if not daily, basis. It’s a point that the great Scots knew well before the boring old English came along and ruined things. Indeed, to this day even the most masculine men who live above Hadrian’s Wall revel in the act of throwing on a kilt and it’s important to remember that it’s considerably colder up there than it is down here in balmy old Sasann.

Personally speaking, I’m slightly irritated that I don’t feel entirely free to wear a skirt. I’ve long envied my female friends who are able to sport floaty maxi dresses on hot holidays and don’t even get me started on muumuus – if I could wear a muumuu every day for the rest of my life, in seasonal-appropriate fabrics, of course (a cashmere muumuu for winter and something in silk for summer, perhaps), I absolutely would. But thanks to those long-lingering Victorian prejudices that permeate our trousers and shorts-dominated wardrobes, I just don’t feel like I can.

If I could wear a muumuu every day for the rest of my life I absolutely would
7EC99D71-AD4A-4653-B877-A0E4B6B68BD0.jpeg

The good news is that a wide array of influential men in the fields of music, fashion, film and beyond have started flying the flag for men wearing skirts in a meaningful way. Kid Cudi wore a party frock in the style of the late, great Kurt Cobain for his turn on SNL earlier this year and Harry Styles was pictured wearing a Gucci dress on last December’s cover of American Vogue. More recently, A$AP Rocky sported a tartan kilt by Vivienne Westwood for his shoot with American GQ, while a host of nonbinary trailblazers, including Harris Reed, Tommy Dorfman and Ezra Miller, have been flying the skirt-wearing flag for years.

And the even better news is the aforementioned style mavens aren’t just stealing their garments from the women’s section of the store (though there’s nothing wrong with that; buy yourself a pair of women’s carpenter jeans from Arket and you can thank me later). A whole host of totally legitimate designers have started producing breezy skirts and dresses designed specifically with men in mind. From Gucci’s crimp-topped party frocks, which come imbued with a grungy appeal, to Westwood and Thom Browne’s classic kilts and the forthcoming mini-skorts shown as part of Raf Simons and Miuccia’s second outing for Prada, there’s quite literally something for every leg type.

Listen, I’m not saying that it’ll be easy or that you won’t get some troglodyte commenting that you should have done a better job of shaving your legs if you do decide to go full skirt down the pub, but the benefits have got to be worth it. Just think of the freedom – and the breeze. If you do it, I’ll do it. G’wan! It’s exactly what those pesky Victorians wouldn’t have wanted. And if you can’t take my word for it, then listen to global style deity Harry Styles instead. Because if not him, then who?

“When you take away ‘There’s clothes for men and there’s clothes for women’, once you remove any barriers, obviously you open up the arena in which you can play,” Styles told Vogue in his cover interview last year. “It’s like anything – any time you’re putting barriers up in your own life, you’re just limiting yourself. There’s so much joy to be had in playing with clothes.”
 
There has always been at least a differentiation in colour or pattern for male vs. female clothing, they were almost never completely interchangeable in any society. These people clearly just want a blurring of gender signifiers to help enforce the continuous blurring of traditional gender (sex) roles.
 
There has always been at least a differentiation in colour or pattern for male vs. female clothing, they were almost never completely interchangeable in any society. These people clearly just want a blurring of gender signifiers to help enforce the continuous blurring of traditional gender (sex) roles.
I absolutely agree with the idea that male and female clothing absolutely need to be different, male and female bodies are different and need different types of clothes.

I do think a male skirt could exist, the kilt was/is a thing after all. Just not in the manner these faggots want. And, I don't think I'll wear one.
 
If it's not festooned with pockets, I don't want it. My tools being on my person is far more important than fashion.
 
I do think a male skirt could exist, the kilt was/is a thing after all.
Funnily enough, the Scots at that time considered the wearing of pants to be unmanly, weak, and worst of all, English. Given what the weather in Scotland is like, they might have had a point...
 
Men regularly rode horses and then motorcycles. Skirts are not conducive to these activities. Pants are superior for action.

Plus Chad can't show off the bulge in a skirt.
 
Personally speaking, I’m slightly irritated that I don’t feel entirely free to wear a skirt. I’ve long envied my female friends who are able to sport floaty maxi dresses on hot holidays and don’t even get me started on muumuus – if I could wear a muumuu every day for the rest of my life, in seasonal-appropriate fabrics, of course (a cashmere muumuu for winter and something in silk for summer, perhaps), I absolutely would. But thanks to those long-lingering Victorian prejudices that permeate our trousers and shorts-dominated wardrobes, I just don’t feel like I can.
What does you being insecure in your faggotry have to do with me?
The good news is that a wide array of influential men in the fields of music, fashion, film and beyond have started flying the flag for men wearing skirts in a meaningful way. Kid Cudi wore a party frock in the style of the late, great Kurt Cobain for his turn on SNL earlier this year and Harry Styles was pictured wearing a Gucci dress on last December’s cover of American Vogue. More recently, A$AP Rocky sported a tartan kilt by Vivienne Westwood for his shoot with American GQ, while a host of nonbinary trailblazers, including Harris Reed, Tommy Dorfman and Ezra Miller, have been flying the skirt-wearing flag for years.
I'll go the other route. (((They))) couldn't pay Dave Chappelle enough money to put on a dress and he fucked off of TV for awhile. There's an example to follow.
Listen, I’m not saying that it’ll be easy or that you won’t get some troglodyte commenting that you should have done a better job of shaving your legs if you do decide to go full skirt down the pub, but the benefits have got to be worth it. Just think of the freedom – and the breeze.
>Doing what some bong fashion pouf tells you
>Freedom
These people are braindead.
 
Women don't poop, so skirts are okay. Men DO poop, and if they were having ass problems on any day where they were wearing a skirt or kilt, it could just drop on the ground and that would be embarrassing. Is this an edge-case scenario? Probably, I don't know I'm not drunk, filthy street-shitting Scot.
 
Women don't poop, so skirts are okay. Men DO poop, and if they were having ass problems on any day where they were wearing a skirt or kilt, it could just drop on the ground and that would be embarrassing. Is this an edge-case scenario? Probably, I don't know I'm not drunk, filthy street-shitting Scot.
I'm concerned about your digestive health if this is actually a concern for you...
I haven't shit myself since I was about 3, and I'm assuming that's true for most men.
 
Won't the notion that it is fine for cis-straight men to wear dresses interrupt those men wearing them for fantasy role play reasons?
 
I'm concerned about your digestive health if this is actually a concern for you...
I haven't shit myself since I was about 3, and I'm assuming that's true for most men.
lmao, that flag, defending Scot shitters
 
It's a special prep for prison rape. Thanks for leading the way, Harry Styles.

SpittingHarry.png
 
Yeah...nah. I'll continue to not fuck dudes in skirts, thanks, and stick to men in suits. Cuz unless you're a Scot or a Roman Senator/Legionary you should be wearing pants as a dude.

But way to convince beta idiot dudes that wanna be woke that women want to date dudes in skirts and dresses and it doesn't instantly turn us off. I'm sure they'll get them dates and not totally make them embittered weirdos.
 
Back
Top Bottom