UK Plans for governing body to make digital identities as trusted as passports - UK government announces plans for new government agency to "make digital identities as trusted as passports"

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

New proposals for governing body to ensure safe and secure use of digital identity
  • Plans to boost legal status of digital identities to make them as widely recognised as driver’s licences and bank statements
  • Easily recognised trustmarks to be issued for digital identity products to build public confidence
Plans to create a new system to make digital identities as trusted and secure as official documents, such as passports, have been published by the government.

Digital identities allow people to easily and quickly prove their identity, such as when buying a house or starting a new job, without the time, effort and expense currently involved when using a physical document.

The technology, which can take a number of forms such as a phone app or other web-based service, has many advantages over paper documents. For instance, 220,000 cases of personal data abuse and impersonation were recorded in 2019. Digital identities could help reduce these cases as they are much harder for fraudsters to access and replicate.

They also boost privacy by restricting the personal information an organisation sees to precisely what is required. For example, someone buying age-restricted goods would be able to prove they are over 18 without needing to disclose their date of birth, name or address.

Today the government launched a consultation on proposals for a governing body charged with making sure organisations follow government rules, developed with industry and published in draft form earlier this year, that allow digital identity companies to prove they adhere to the highest standards of security and privacy.

The body - which could be housed within an existing regulator - would have powers to issue an easily recognised trustmark to digital identity firms which certifies that people’s data will be handled in a safe and consistent way. It will work with organisations to take proactive action to prevent and enable the detection of fraud and security incidents, as well as encouraging inclusion.

Digital Infrastructure Minister Matt Warman said:
"The plans laid out today will ensure people can trust the app in their pocket as much as their passport when proving their identity."
"Digital identities offer a huge opportunity to make checks easier, quicker and more secure, and help people who do not have traditional forms of ID to prove who they are."
"This technology is a vital building block for the economy of the future, and we’re ensuring that people who choose to use it can have confidence their data will be handled safely."

Digital identity will widen access to legally valid forms of identification for people who currently find it difficult to prove something about themselves. For example, if someone does not have access to an official document, such as a passport, they may be able to prove their identity digitally through another government service, or other means such as a vouch from a doctor or other trustworthy source.

To ensure digital identity products are available to as many people as possible, businesses will be required to report annually to the governing body on which users are excluded from using their services and outline what is being done to mitigate this.

Equally, digital identity use will not be mandatory and people will retain the option to use available paper documentation.

It also suggests new powers to allow digital identities to be built on a greater range of trusted datasets - such as those managed by the DVLA, or the General Register Office which are responsible for birth certificates. It proposes allowing digital identity businesses to ask government authorities to confirm whether a piece of information, such as someone’s age or address, is valid and matches their records.

Just as the government is committed to not making digital identities compulsory in the UK, it also wants to ensure that people in the future are not forced to use traditional identity documents, if these are not strictly required.

The consultation sets out how the government can build confidence in digital IDs so they have a similar status in law as physical proofs of identity that businesses and individuals already trust.

The consultation is open to any member of the public and closes on 13 September.

ENDS
 
I say this with all sincerity if you're English there is no hope for you. You are fucked and so is your country.
Enjoy living in a open air prison with Muslim rape apes as the guards
 
There are other countries that did this already like Germany.
They've integrated NFC chips into their federal ID cards that were supposed to be used to verify your identity when buying online or identifying yourself to the government to request things online without having to physically show up at the office.
This also required card-readers and sketchy ass proprietary software (that was only available for Windows and Mac) and last I heard no one but the government even accepts this form of ID anymore online.
 
You will need this in the future to register on social media. It's just the matter of time. Also, have fun using this to verify your age on porn sites and show what you watch to the government.

Capture.PNG
 
Loads of other European countries have something similar and it works fine? I don't see the problem with this, as long as you don't have to sign your twitter shitposts with it.

Brits will definitely find a way to fuck it up though.
 
Assuming this passes:
Let's just wait until someone hacks the IDs of prominent politicians and uses them for something illegal.
They'll reverse this shit lickity split.

Let's also think about how privileged this way of thinking is.
Plenty of people live in hostile environments (for example, a gay person in an orthodox Islamic family, which happens quite a bit in the UK) and can only express themselves online.
They absolutely can't reveal their real identities because they will face serious consequences.
Making your real identity a mandatory part of your internet identity will ruin these people's lives.
It's like these morons think that people only use the internet to post memes, but shit on amazon and say "nigger".
Zero critical thinking skills.

Also, I'm not giving Facebook or Twitter my ID.
That's one of the dumbest thing a person can do these days.
 
You will need this in the future to register on social media. It's just the matter of time. Also, have fun using this to verify your age on porn sites and show what you watch to the government.

View attachment 2407930
So, no social media for those that don't want to do this. What a loss.
 
Why do they need an online ID to post on Twitter? Why do they need to know the personal identity of someone shitposting on Facebook? What's even the point?

Time to go Fediverse lol.
 
Unless you're going to go innawoods and hide in a cave for the rest of your life,
it is far too late.
if i stop my contract with my ISP, i no longer have access to the cyberworld, it's good enough for me

And digital passports were always going to be a thing. The amount of people i see at airports or in shops, using their phones as plane tickets, payment cards etc. This was the next logical step
 
Equally, digital identity use will not be mandatory and people will retain the option to use available paper documentation.
For now. Then you either have your biometric digital ID, or you will starve to death due to lack of UBI access. I mean you will have a choice. hah
And digital passports were always going to be a thing. The amount of people i see at airports or in shops, using their phones as plane tickets, payment cards etc. This was the next logical step
Retarded normalfags who are too lazy to use a plastic card will doom humanity. But hey at least it was convenient.
 
When are the christians gonna be up in arms about shit like this literally being the mark of the beast? Are they too lazy?

Why do they need an online ID to post on Twitter? Why do they need to know the personal identity of someone shitposting on Facebook? What's even the point?
Because its easier to ruin someon's life that way. And the governement could do it for them. Everything's digital (money, loan, etc) makes it easier for someone to just click a button on a website to make you homeless and broke. No way this'll be abused nor done on accident. And if it was done on "accident", bureaucracy will make it so it'll be years before you're life is back in order.

All because you misgendered someone by a honest accident or said some naughty things eons ago about whatever group the government wants to montycoddle this week. Hell, you could just piss someone off just for existing and some rogue blue hair sjw governement worker will just ruin your life for kicks. Also, considering how lax IT Security is at these places, your id could be stolen by hackers by just hacking the government. Clown Hell World
 
Last edited:
Retarded normalfags who are too lazy to use a plastic card will doom humanity. But hey at least it was convenient.
Wrong. It's the retarded normalfags who are too lazy to use cash who will doom humanity. Plastic debit and credit cards were one of the incremental steps that got us here.
 
Wrong. It's the retarded normalfags who are too lazy to use cash who will doom humanity. Plastic debit and credit cards were one of the incremental steps that got us here.
True. Same goes for most social media and smart devices as well.
 
You will need this in the future to register on social media. It's just the matter of time. Also, have fun using this to verify your age on porn sites and show what you watch to the government.

View attachment 2407930
Didn't they already try this porn ID and in typical government fashion it went so tits up that in spite passing it into law they just decided to trash it? I seriously doubt the competence of them to get this to work.

In euroland they kinda already have this with Youtube. If you have a youtube video that is considered NSFW (usually any video that has a bad word in its title) they need you to upload an ID to ensure you are of age in order to watch it. Thing is, there are so many work arounds that it's basically rendered completely useless. Use a VPN, jump on a site which bypasses it by changing the video format. There will be workarounds these things for the time being.
 
Back
Top Bottom