Opinion Space Jam: A New Legacy's director thinks y'all are "super weird" for mourning the loss of an over-sexualized Lola Bunny

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link (Archive)

Space Jam: A New Legacy's director thinks y'all are "super weird" for mourning the loss of an over-sexualized Lola Bunny​

Gabrielle Sanchez
FE7FB4D4-C99D-424D-9F8F-E176C6ACD545.jpeg

When director Malcolm D. Lee signed on to Space Jam: A New Legacy, he knew he wanted to rework Lola Bunny’s “over-sexualized” form presented in the 1996 original. What he did not know is that it would bring on a sea of “super weird” discourseconcerning the now-flat chest beneath Lola’s basketball jersey.

“I had no idea that people would be that up in arms about a bunny not having boobs,” Lee told Entertainment Weekly ahead of the film’s premiere on July 16.

“Listen, I understand people don’t want things to change, but I think we needed some evolution with her, not by objectifying her but by making her strong and still feminine.”

And no, Lee emphasizes the style change does not mean that actual, living, breathing women in real life cannot have boobs and showcase strength at the same time. He just wanted the animated cartoon rabbit in his children’s film to not have to be sexy and play basketball at the same time.

“And, yes, we had all these other women who were like, ‘Oh, you can’t be strong and have big boobs?!’ Sure you can, but we’re talking about a cartoon bunny, not women!” Lee says.

The controversy even made its way to actor Zendaya, who voices the new, less curvy version of Lola Bunny.

“I didn’t know that was going to happen either! I definitely know we love her, but I didn’t know it was going to be as much of a focus as it was,” Zendaya tells EW. “But I understand, because she’s a lovable character. She’s very important, so I get it.” Now, it’s up to viewers to get their head on straight when it comes to “loving” a character, and “overly sexualizing an animated female rabbit.”

Lola Bunny will play basketball all the same whenSpace Jam: A New Legacy, hits theaters July 16.
 
Who cares! the much bigger problem is that they replaced Jordan with somebody that cant play basketball and isnt known outside of the US.
 
Space Jam already is going to flop for having Lebron “Ugliest Beard in Sports” James in it, rather than a charismatic, likable player such as Michael Jordan. (Also for being a reboot of an awful movie.)

They need to drum up controversy wherever they can in hopes to get anyone to give a shit.
 
I think your movie is another piece of lazily-rebooted, tone-deaf, politic-infested (Hi LeCHINA James!) Hollywood trash that only proves the entire industry is bereft of ideas except self-censoring "problematic" stuff (Press "F" for PePe LePew) for political points, literally burning their own franchises down for the attention it creates and the expectations it supposedly "subverts" and then being shocked that a pile of cooling ash isn't drawing in the audience ...

P.S. - I think this independent of whatever happened to big titty-bunny.
 
The same people obsessed over how sexualized a cartoon rabbit looks are the same people who'd jack off to a cartoon rabbit.
The people who wants a flat Lola are the same as those who insist the boys in Luca are gay.
 
Space Jam already is going to flop for having Lebron “Ugliest Beard in Sports” James in it, rather than a charismatic, likable player such as Michael Jordan. (Also for being a reboot of an awful movie.)

They need to drum up controversy wherever they can in hopes to get anyone to give a shit.
I only like that movie because I was five when it came out and I loved looney tunes (still love the old cartoons btw), so I qualify it being not awful by nostalgia. Both sides of this argument are dumb, but the side that's pushing for desexualizing a cartoon character bc muh feminism are way worse.
 
Never saw the first one, won't see this one.

The problem isn't desexualisation of a furry cartoon, it's that Hollywood are so artistically cucked that they have no idea what sexy is anymore.

not one of those degenerate pedophile cock sucking homosexuals know what a sexy woman looks like. Selma Hayek in 'From Dusk TIL Dawn' would make these faggots break down and cry
 
Funny, the fact they constantly bring up that they desexualized Lola makes it seem like they WANT the controversity to get people to talk about this movie as a cheap marketing tactic...Then obviously play innocent and call people weird for talking about it.

You may trick others but you aint tricking a devious capitalist boi like me, asshole.
 
Fuck the director with a wooden spork.

I'm not 'sad' about them giving Lola a mastectomy and ruining her voice with Zendiarrhea because she's not sexy anymore.

I'm sad and ANGRY because as a girl I always loved her character, so much that when I found out she was in baby looney tunes I watched it a bunch because 'hey she's there!' And then when the Looney Tunes Show made her 'wacky' I still liked her I just was kinda miffed that they didn't let Kath Soucie voice her.

I'm upset because she's not 'Lola' anymore, or at least will be a shadow of herself.

This ain't about 'feminism' or something. This is about the director being self conscious about the erection OG Lola gave him on a regular basis so he MADE it about stupid, sexy Lola because that's all he cares about.
 
Last edited:
If you’re desexualising Lola, why does she have an exposed midriff during Porky Pig’s rap?
https://youtube.com/watch?v=FmW6gyWd0-8
THE FUCKING WHAT
1A068D10-00AB-4F18-98F3-A6276BAC857C.jpeg

Also I’m not mad that they desexualized her, I’m mad because she’s a cardboard cutout “strong woman” with nothing about her voiced by a biracial actress for woke points. Give me the bat shit Lola from the Looney Toons Show. Not this crap
 
“I had no idea that people would be that up in arms about a bunny not having boobs,” Lee told Entertainment Weekly ahead of the film’s premiere on July 16.

“Listen, I understand people don’t want things to change, but I think we needed some evolution with her, not by objectifying her but by making her strong and still feminine.”

It feels so pointless and perverse, in the original she already is strong and capable while being feminine. In her very first scene the Toons think she's just a pretty face, and she totally schools them, showcasing amazing skill and spine. She was shown to have high level athletic skill and feminine virtues like beauty, empathy, and compassion. She complimented her teamates
and their masculine virtues, which allowed them to defeat the Mon-stars.

Changing her in an attempt to make a 'strong and capable' character is doomed to fail because she already was. All they can do, and seem to have done, is strip her of the things that made her great. In place of a woman beautiful in appearance and character, they seem determined to present something hideous inside and out.

These people are diseased in the mind, evilly bent to invert all virtues into vice to match their depraved and pestilent inner self.

Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
 
Companies attacking legitimate criticism on their latest product, more at 11. They want a flop, they'll get a flop.
All to plan, modern Hollywood is about subsidizing failure and being shunned by the public that you can then spin at cocktail parties into proof of how much better you are than the common rabble who are obvious immoral trash....


....while you're balls deep in a preteen escort's pussy....
 
Back
Top Bottom