💥 Trainwreck Pamela Swain / DocHoliday1977 / MsPhoenix1969 / Observer1977 / danishlace2003 / Writer_thriller - Victim of grand #MeToo conspiracy, litigious wannabe starfucker, off her meds and online

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date
  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Which member of the Pamspiracy does Pam secretly want to fuck the most?


  • Total voters
    548
[Citation Needed]
ask Him
God's will is the foundation of the constitution (or rather the foundation of the declaration of independance, upon which the constitution was built ). Since the constitution protects us, it means that we still follow what God deems right.
Every good gift and perfect gift comes from God above. The Constitution is a gift from God and you are actively going against it grifting for money at the hands of baby Christians who don't know any better.
[Citation needed]
Ask Him.
You can like God and do evil things. You can even do evil things in God's name. Hell, the God himself does things he claims are evil. Rapture anyone?
Do you even know what the rapture is and why it exists in YHWH's plan?
Yes, he killed most of the world population because they didn't use the free will he gave them the way he wanted them to (i.e. to not have free will).
Ask Lucifer about free will. Then ask YHWH.
Suppose he hates us all. Why doesn't he do anything? Or does he suddently work as a deadra does? That being said, it's funny to see a failure claim success she clearly does not have.
You are confused cause you refuse to acknowledge YHWH's supreme rule and existence over humanity and the souls that are living right now. You can pour over Nietzche, Dostoevsky, and any other dead writers of the 18th and 19th centuries but they are just humans who lived 100 or 200 years before you stuck in the same matrix. You refuse to rise out of the matrix above your humanity. My guess is cause you still hold on to a hope that you are some hidden god and you are not.
 
I see Pam has Mad lolcow disease,She is now crazier than a rabid racoon loaded on meth.
The level of insanity she has is unbelievable
And yes Pam I'm Suzanne Sommers..
My head is still stuck in a popcorn bucket. I don't know how I manage to keep posting.

Boomerposting is not required, sweetie....
Weak. You know I am more powerful than you. You are jealous every damn day about it, but even I know I am not a god. I'm that huge spiritual warrior the God unleashed and neutralized the evil ones.

LOL at your rapture reference.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No. You made an assertion. Back it up. Ah, but you can't.
The Constitution is a gift from God and you are actively going against it grifting for money at the hands of baby Christians who don't know any better.
Constitution was not created or gifted by God. It was created according to ideals he showed in his works. Ergo, Cosntitution still follows his will and you are just mad.

Do you even know what the rapture is and why it exists in YHWH's plan?
I am capable of reading, yes.
Ask Lucifer about free will. Then ask YHWH.
Lucifer granted the people freedom, true free will, and intelligence (Genesis 2:17, Genesis 3:5, Genesis 3:6)
In order to try to prevent the people of gaining the gifts of Lucifer, god tried deceiving the people (Genesis 3:3, Genesis 3:7)
You are confused cause you refuse to acknowledge YHWH's supreme rule and existence over humanity and the souls that are living right now. You can pour over Nietzche, Dostoevsky, and any other dead writers of the 18th and 19th centuries but they are just humans who lived 100 or 200 years before you stuck in the same matrix. You refuse to rise out of the matrix above your humanity. My guess is cause you still hold on to a hope that you are some hidden god and you are not.
That's all well and good, but you didn't address my question at all.

Also, interesting how quickly she dropped the "god is against slavery" argument.
 
No. You made an assertion. Back it up. Ah, but you can't.
Please rephrase the assertion so I can completely respond.
Constitution was not created or gifted by God. It was created according to ideals he showed in his works. Ergo, Cosntitution still follows his will and you are just mad.
I beg to differ:
I am capable of reading, yes.
Explain it to us, theological genius.
Lucifer granted the people freedom, true free will, and intelligence (Genesis 2:17, Genesis 3:5, Genesis 3:6)
In order to try to prevent the people of gaining the gifts of Lucifer, god tried deceiving the people (Genesis 3:3, Genesis 3:7)
Lucifer can't grant anything, dear. he is a created being. And he can't seem to stop me, can he?
That's all well and good, but you didn't address my question at all.

Also, interesting how quickly she dropped the "god is against slavery" argument.
Rephrase it. But read this in the interim.

You're not a god, tony robbins. LMAO......total god complex.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Please rephrase the assertion so I can completely respond.
Do you not understand the words you yourself posted?
It matter's very little what this says, because constitution was created by men, men who clearly expressed their reasonings for creating it.
But, lets read the article, shall we? Oh, it doesn't disagree with me, huh? It certainly doesn't seem to agree with you.
Explain it to us, theological genius.
I did. Briefly, perhaps, but I did.
Lucifer can't grant anything, dear. he is a created being.
And yet he did. And yet we are all here because of Lucifer. We all are able to think because of him, we are able to act, improve. Don't be mad at me for the words of your own religion.
Rephrase it.
Rephrase what? You responded to two different comments.
But read this in the interim.
If you have a verse that contributes to the discussion, cite it. The article still doesn't change the fact that the book of god says that raping(Deuteronomy 22:28-29), slaving(Leviticus 25:44-46) is okay.
 
Do you not understand the words you yourself posted?
If you can't rephrase it, it must not have been important in the first place.

It matter's very little what this says, because constitution was created by men, men who clearly expressed their reasonings for creating it.
But, lets read the article, shall we? Oh, it doesn't disagree with me, huh? It certainly doesn't seem to agree with you.
Men who believed in God and attended church regularly.

And yet he did. And yet we are all here because of Lucifer. We all are able to think because of him, we are able to act, improve. Don't be mad at me for the words of your own religion.
You mean bringing death into the world? He tricked a woman into disobeying God cause the man and woman weren't choosing evil on their own. Tricked. It wasn't her natural choice. Tricked.....like pretending to be someone else online.

I did. Briefly, perhaps, but I did.
Nope you didn't.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you can't rephrase it, it must not have been important in the first place.
Of course, I can. I just don't see why I should rephrase your own words to you. Surely you can read and understand your posts, right?
Nope you didn't.
I did.

Men who believed in God and attended church regularly.
How does this counter anything I said?
You mean bringing death into the world?
God did that himself, obviously. With creation, there must be destruction, and no text says he made his creations immortal. His creations knew concepts such as death and feared them as all mortals do. That's why god deceived his creations, in hopes they would not be able to think as he does.
He tricked a woman
Well that's just false. To trick implies falsehood. All what Lucifer said turned out to be true.
 
Of course, I can. I just don't see why I should rephrase your own words to you. Surely you can read and understand your posts, right?
Poor Alan, so angry.
How does this counter anything I said?
God was inspiring him and directing him to write a fair government for the United States?

God did that himself, obviously. With creation, there must be destruction, and no text says he made his creations immortal. His creations knew concepts such as death and feared them as all mortals do. That's why god deceived his creations, in hopes they would not be able to think as he does
Lol. So if God was "deceiving people" why become a snake? Why not just turn up as the blond woman looking angel and tell those poor naked humans that God hates them?

Well that's just false. To trick implies falsehood. All what Lucifer said turned out to be true.
Truth isn't subjective the way you Alan and Lucifer wish it to be.

You know what I think...I think you are jealous of women...their beauty...their humanity, their God-given intelligence and abilities.

Must be tough.

 
God was inspiring him and directing him to write a fair government for the United States?
There is a big leap between going to the church and getting a voice in your head. Besides, they never said what you said to be true, and I feel like it would be an important part to mention. All his other alleged followers sure did.
Why not just turn up as the blond woman looking angel and tell those poor naked humans that God hates them?
Who is to say? What we do know is that he spoke truth and he did not deceive. Far more than can be said about your beloved god.
Truth isn't subjective the way you Alan and Lucifer wish it to be.
Truth is that he didn't trick. Like I said, trickery requires falsehood. There was no falsehood to be had. Not my fault Genesis disagrees with you.
You know what I think...I think you are jealous of women...their beauty...their humanity, their God-given intelligence and abilities.

Must be tough.
Think what you will. As always, you are wrong.
It literally is a 1st amendment lawsuit. People mocking him are illiterate retards.
Screenshot_20210708-211757_Drive.jpg
 
There is a big leap between going to the church and getting a voice in your head. Besides, they never said what you said to be true, and I feel like it would be an important part to mention. All his other alleged followers sure did.
You are actually right but the "voice in one's head" is the Bible.
Who is to say? What we do know is that he spoke truth and he did not deceive. Far more than can be said about your beloved god.
Why would God create humans to lie and deceive them? What does He get out of that?
Truth is that he didn't trick. Like I said, trickery requires falsehood. There was no falsehood to be had. Not my fault Genesis disagrees with you.
He changed into a snake, dumbass.
Think what you will. As always, you are wrong.
Lmao. Worried?

It literally is a 1st amendment lawsuit. People mocking him are illiterate retards.
Go ahead and try to shove the first amendment down a private companies throats. See how far it gets you. I guess that hacking ransom venture plopped like runny turds.

By the way, the first amendment is the right of people to criticize the government without legal retribution. It has nothing to do with private companies. Donald had his own blog.
 
You are actually right but the "voice in one's head" is the Bible.
Compare this statement to my original one. Nothing more needs to be said about that issue.
Why would God create humans to lie and deceive them? What does He get out of that?
It's not important. What is important is that he deceived.
He changed into a snake, dumbass.
You missed my point.
Nah.
a private companies throats.
Do you know about "common carriers"? Or, hey, have you seen Norwood v. Harrison, 413 US 455, 465? Or United States v. Stevens, 559 U. S. 460, 468? Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCC, 512 U. S. 622, 684? PruneYard Shopping Center v. Robins, 447 U. S. 74, 88? Blum v. Yaretsky, 457 U. S. 991, 1004–1005? Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan, 372 U. S. 58, 68 (1963)?
Have you looked at the various laws and regulations constantly being applies to private companies? Of course not. That would require you to have an educated opinion, and not get all your opinions from CNN and Twitter.
By the way, the first amendment is the right of people to criticize the government without legal retribution. It has nothing to do with private companies. Donald had his own blog.
You know, if you did actual research into topics you were talking about, you wouldn't sound so retarded.
 
Last edited:
Compare this statement to my original one. Nothing more needs to be said about that issue.

It's not important. What is important is that he deceived.

You missed my point.

Nah.

Do you know about "common carriers"? Or, hey, have you seen Norwood v. Harrison, 413 US 455, 465? Or United States v. Stevens, 559 U. S. 460, 468? Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCC, 512 U. S. 622, 684? PruneYard Shopping Center v. Robins, 447 U. S. 74, 88? Blum v. Yaretsky, 457 U. S. 991, 1004–1005? Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan, 372 U. S. 58, 68 (1963)?
Have you looked at the various laws and regulations constantly being applies to private companies? Of course not. That would require you to have an educated opinion, and not get all your opinions from CNN and Twitter.

You know, if you did actual research into topics you were talking about, you wouldn't sound so retarded.
Insults are soooo immature. *yawn*
 
Who is to say? What we do know is that he spoke truth and he did not deceive.
It's actually easy to say why: because in the original text it was meant to be a talking snake, not a demon. There are no implications of it being anything else than a regular (well, talking) snake, everybody including the narrator address it and talk about it like it is just a snake:

1. Now the serpent was more cunning than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said to the woman, “Has God indeed said, ‘You shall not eat of every tree of the garden’?”

2. And the woman said to the serpent, “We may eat the fruit of the trees of the garden; 3. but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God has said, ‘You shall not eat it, nor shall you touch it, lest you die.’ ”

4. Then the serpent said to the woman, “You will not surely die. 5. For God knows that in the day you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”

(...)

14. So the Lord God said to the serpent:
“Because you have done this,
You are cursed more than all cattle,
And more than every beast of the field;
On your belly you shall go,
And you shall eat dust
All the days of your life.

15. And I will put enmity
Between you and the woman,
And between your seed and her Seed;
He shall bruise your head,
And you shall bruise His heel.”
 
It's actually easy to say why: because in the original text it was meant to be a talking snake, not a demon. There are no implications of it being anything else than a regular (well, talking) snake, everybody including the narrator address it and talk about it like it is just a snake:
Lucifer was a dragon/serpent. This was his original form since he was created as an animal first and became an angel second. Once an angel, he could take whatever human-like form he wanted. He chose to look what we would call a female but in the image of God (God is a human-like entity) not male or female. All angels come from an animal prehistory form - tiger, wolf, bull, goat, bird....etc. Yeshua (Jesus) had the form of a lion to interact with them in their prehistory. That's why the lion is the unspoken king of the jungle. That's why Judah has a lion mascot. That's why Jesus is called the Lion of the tribe of Judah.
You see, he (Lucifer) was immensely jealous of human being made in the image of God first. So he set out to deceive his rival in beauty - Eve, so God would have to destroy her causing pain and suffering to Adam and YHWH. Lucifer only cares about causing Yeshua pain. It's so funny how you all don't get it.

15. And I will put enmity
Between you and the woman,
And between your seed and her Seed; (Jesus exposed the hybrid human/angel breeding scam Lucifer was planning)
He shall bruise your head,
And you shall bruise His heel.”

This was the moment Yeshua decided to become a lowly human and be killed for humanity's salvation.
 
Back
Top Bottom