🐱 'This is not acceptable': TikToker accuses adult influencer of ‘pedophile baiting’ by editing her photos to look like a teen

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
CatParty


A TikToker accused an adult social media influencer of pedophile baiting in a viral video. The TikToker alleges the influencer edits her explicit content to make herself appear younger than she really is.

The TikTok video, posted by @bekahdayyy on June 21, alleges the user—@cosmickitty143 on Instagram—took it “past the point of smoothing her skin texture to take a few years off to completely changing her facial structure to look like a young teenager.”

She says it reminds her of “the baby filter on Snapchat.”

The TikToker shares the alleged real name of the influencer, who, according to her social media pages, is an artist and content creator. She also has a Twitter account and an OnlyFans page.

The TikTok video shows an unedited picture of the user’s face beside an edited photo which she has posted to social media. The difference in appearance is obvious.

“So why is she posting explicit content and editing her face to look adolescent? … Who do you think they’re editing it for? I can’t say the word, but I think you catch my drift,” she says, implying the influencer is trying to appeal to pedophiles.

“I understand there is a market for it, but at the end of the day, this is p-word baiting and this is not acceptable,” she adds.

The TikToker has posted other “Instagram vs. Real Life” videos, in which she compares what influencers and celebrities look like in unedited photos vs. edited photos.

The video has so far garnered 730,000 likes and 13,400 comments.

“Nah fr anyone who subscribed to them should be investigated. It’s too close to the bone,” commented @user5068510589888.

The OnlyFans page has 3,100 posts with 1.25 million likes and 11,800 fans.

“How does someone have the time and patience to edit their face in every single picture for YEARS???? She never shows her face in videos too…,” wrote @slayerhexx.

“People think that if you can give then an ethical fantasy option, then they won’t hurt real kids– THAT IS FALSE. false,” added @heatherenby.

“Yeah she blocked me after i commented something that’s how you know she KNOWS it’s wrong bu just doesn’t wanna admit it,” commented a third user, @alythefuturemilf.

The Daily Dot reached out to @bekahdayyy and @cosmickitty143.
 
1625225703745.png

The accuser looks like Tranny the Poo. Hopefully they come after anime next, because that genre is even bigger pedophile bait.
 
Pedophile service user accuses other pedophile service user of servicing pedophiles.
 
Oh no someone used a filter, must be a pedo.

Anyways...

Modern journalism was a mistake.
 
Other people remixing your TikTok shit is not acceptable but the Chinese owned app with full access to your microphone, camera, messages, emails, location, phone book, address, metadata bla bla bla is just A-OK.
 
By the way, how exactly does going from a generic blonde thot to a pale bright-eyed ginger equate to "pedo bait"?
 
View attachment 2310204
The accuser looks like Tranny the Poo. Hopefully they come after anime next, because that genre is even bigger pedophile bait.
Literally everyone in this """controversy""" is profoundly ugly and the accusation is coming from nowhere. If Claudia Conway or whatever her name was can look like she's in an abusive relationship with The Wall before she even reaches voting age, it's ridiculous to accuse someone of pedobaiting just because they made themselves look younger with copious amounts of makeup and filters. What, exactly, are you relying on to support such an accusation? "She made her skin too smooth"? The average adolescent's face looks like a pizza pie.
“People think that if you can give then an ethical fantasy option, then they won’t hurt real kids– THAT IS FALSE. false,” added @heatherenby.
You're right, but it doesn't cause them to hurt real kids, either. They were already on their way to doing that, and the "ethical fantasy" is at best a speed bump to their eventual offense. It doesn't seem like a valuable point to make if you're not also arguing that it encourages them to offend.
 
Back
Top Bottom