UK Colin Pitchfork: Double schoolgirl murderer can be released - Released for good behavior and learning to help disabled people.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
A double child killer who was the first murderer to be convicted using DNA evidence can be released, the Parole Board has confirmed.
Colin Pitchfork, 61, was jailed for life for raping and murdering 15-year-olds Lynda Mann and Dawn Ashworth in Leicestershire in the 1980s.
Pitchfork has spent 33 years in prison - he was last denied parole in 2018.
The Parole Board said it was satisfied Pitchfork was suitable for release, which is subject to conditions.
"We can confirm that a panel of the Parole Board has directed the release of Colin Pitchfork following an oral hearing," a Parole Board spokesman said.
"Parole reviews are undertaken thoroughly and with extreme care. Protecting the public is our number one priority."

The decision is provisional for 21 days, the spokesman added.

'Positive behaviour'​

In a document explaining its decision, the Parole Board said at the time of the offences, Pitchfork had been someone who thought "about sex a lot" and used "violence and excessive force" and "sex to demonstrate power and control over women".
He also struggled to cope with anger, loneliness and had a willingness to "seek revenge".
But in prison, the Parole Board said he had taken part in several courses to address his behaviour and the panel heard Pitchfork's "behaviour in custody had been positive and had included extensive efforts to help others", including learning skills to help disabled people.
The panel concluded: "After considering the circumstances of his offending, the progress made while in custody and the evidence presented at the hearing, the panel was satisfied that Mr Pitchfork was suitable for release."

Colin Pitchfork: Two brutal murders​

_85367911_52be843d-b38e-48b5-a220-165bd4daead1.jpg
  • Colin Pitchfork, 22 at the time of the first murder, was married with two sons. He was a baker who grew up in rural Leicestershire and lived in Littlethorpe
  • In November 1983 he left his baby son sleeping in the back of his car and raped and strangled 15-year-old Lynda Mann in Narborough. He then drove home and put his son to bed
  • Three years later, less than a mile from where Lynda died, he raped and murdered Dawn Ashworth, also 15, of Enderby. The pathologist who examined her body described it as a "brutal sexual assault"
  • A police investigation initially led to the wrong man, a local 17-year-old who falsely confessed to one of the killings. After an unprecedented mass screening of 5,000 men using pioneering "DNA profiling" technology, Pitchfork was eventually caught. At first, Pitchfork had evaded justice by persuading a colleague to take the test for him
  • He pleaded guilty to both murders in September 1987 and was sentenced to life in January 1988. The judge said the killings were "particularly sadistic" and he doubted Pitchfork would ever be released
  • In 2009, his 30-year life tariff was reduced by two years for "exceptional progress" - a decision that was strongly criticised by the families of his victims
  • He was moved to an undisclosed open prison at some point prior to 8 January 2017, after his request for release
Presentational grey line

A source close to Justice Secretary Robert Buckland said the government would take legal advice to explore the use of the "reconsideration mechanism".

The Parole Board Reconsideration Mechanism, introduced in 2019, gives people the right to ask for a decision to be looked at again if they believe it was "procedurally unfair" or "irrational".

'Immoral, wrong and dangerous'​

South Leicestershire MP Alberto Costa, who had met with the Parole Board over Pitchfork's case, told the BBC he was "appalled" at the news.
"Even though some 30 years have passed, this isn't the sort of crime one can ever forget," he said.
"My constituents remember the victims, people who went to school with these victims.
"It would be immoral, wrong and frankly dangerous to release this disgraceful murderer of two children."
Speaking to the BBC when Pitchfork was last denied parole, Lynda's mother Kath Eastwood said: "The Parole Board have made the right decision [and] put the families of the victims first and listened to us before the murderer.

"Let us hope this continues."

Pitchfork's parole hearing was held via video link on 22 March and included evidence from his probation office and a prison service psychologist.
The board then considered the evidence along with an examination of the "robustness" of the risk management plan before concluding its review on 25 May.
His release is subject to a number of licence conditions.
These include living at a designated address, taking part in probation supervision, wearing an electronic tag, taking part in lie detector tests and having to disclose what vehicles he uses and who he speaks to, with particular limits on contact with children.
He will also be subject to a curfew, have restrictions on using technology and limits on where he can go.

Article (archive)
 
So they can put a rapist murder behind bars for a long time if they are White, but if they are 'Asian' the cops don't do anything. Curious, eh guv?
 
But in prison, the Parole Board said he had taken part in several courses to address his behaviour and the panel heard Pitchfork's "behaviour in custody had been positive and had included extensive efforts to help others", including learning skills to help disabled people.
Oh okay, so he took some courses and learned how to push people around in wheelchairs. That's very nice. A shame his victims can't take a couple classes to learn how to not be brutally raped and murdered. Or, you know, do anything ever again.

Criminal justice in the UK and EU fucking baffles me. It seems like they think that rehabilitation is the only purpose of incarceration, and they completely disregard punishment or incapacitation. A man who sadistically kills innocent people permanently forfeits the right to live in free society, no matter how much fingerpainting he does or how friendly he is to others in prison.
 
Criminal justice in the UK and EU fucking baffles me. It seems like they think that rehabilitation is the only purpose of incarceration, and they completely disregard punishment or incapacitation. A man who sadistically kills innocent people permanently forfeits the right to live in free society, no matter how much fingerpainting he does or how friendly he is to others in prison.
>put women in charge
>they start endlessly bitching and moaning about violence against women
>at the same time they lobby and pressure and reform the justice system to let convicted rapists and murderers walk free
so tiresome
 
>put women in charge
>they start endlessly bitching and moaning about violence against women
>at the same time they lobby and pressure and reform the justice system to let convicted rapists and murderers walk free
so tiresome

Universal suffrage might have been a mistake.
 
People like this should be executed. They are useless monsters and just because he learned how to assist the disabled doesn't make him a reformed person.

This guy left his kid asleep in the car, raped and murdered a girl then came back like he just went to ump gas.

Someone who is just driving around with his baby in the car and thinks "Time to go rape and murder someone" is not a person you want back in society.
 
So they can put a rapist murder behind bars for a long time if they are White, but if they are 'Asian' the cops don't do anything. Curious, eh guv?
They all got banged up eventually, and more are being arrested. The issue was that these crimes went unpunished for so many years because of fears that the police would be cancelled for being racist. The coppers were ahead of the ACAB curve by ten years.

OT: They should release him, if he's fit to be released. If we cannot rehabilitate people in prison, why bother having a prison? He is under very strict orders and electronically tagged. He isn't just going to hannibal lector in to a crowd of people and never be seen again.
 
Oh okay, so he took some courses and learned how to push people around in wheelchairs. That's very nice. A shame his victims can't take a couple classes to learn how to not be brutally raped and murdered. Or, you know, do anything ever again.

Criminal justice in the UK and EU fucking baffles me. It seems like they think that rehabilitation is the only purpose of incarceration, and they completely disregard punishment or incapacitation. A man who sadistically kills innocent people permanently forfeits the right to live in free society, no matter how much fingerpainting he does or how friendly he is to others in prison.
It's a pretty well thought out idea he has. At 61 it's going to be a lot harder to chase down a young girl, but if they're strapped to a chair the whole thing is a lot easier.
 
and EU fucking baffles me. It seems like they think that rehabilitation is the only purpose of incarceration, and they completely disregard punishment or incapacitation.
Hey now, we're not all as bad as the UK. My country hands out real life sentences, and we also have another regulation that can keep the worst offenders locked away until death.

That said, this European idea that all people can be rehabilitated is ridiculous. While I believe some 'murderers' or violent offenders can be rehabilitated, sexual predators can never be rehabilitated and should be permanently locked up or executed.
 
OT: They should release him, if he's fit to be released. If we cannot rehabilitate people in prison, why bother having a prison? He is under very strict orders and electronically tagged. He isn't just going to hannibal lector in to a crowd of people and never be seen again.
Why is "rehabilitating" people who commit intentional murder something that you think should be pursued? That may have some merit for people who commit other types of crimes, but if you kill another human being, you've erased everything that they ever could have been. This animal raped and murdered two young girls who remain inert corpses now, despite of all the supposed "good" he's done in prison or how much he grows as a person. You ask why bother having a prison. Here's a reason: to keep people like this encased in an unpleasant concrete box for the rest of their lives and kept separate from the rest of us who don't do atrocious things. That's a pretty fucking solid reason to have them.
 
OT: They should release him, if he's fit to be released. If we cannot rehabilitate people in prison, why bother having a prison?
He should have been hanged, someone who brutally rapes and murders two school girls should not be allowed to live. The fact he merely received a life sentence in it's self is an injustice, releasing the cunt is just fucking abominable.
 
They all got banged up eventually, and more are being arrested. The issue was that these crimes went unpunished for so many years because of fears that the police would be cancelled for being racist. The coppers were ahead of the ACAB curve by ten years.

OT: They should release him, if he's fit to be released. If we cannot rehabilitate people in prison, why bother having a prison? He is under very strict orders and electronically tagged. He isn't just going to hannibal lector in to a crowd of people and never be seen again.
1623083429843.png
 
Why is "rehabilitating" people who commit intentional murder something that you think should be pursued? That may have some merit for people who commit other types of crimes, but if you kill another human being, you've erased everything that they ever could have been. This animal raped and murdered two young girls who remain inert corpses now, despite of all the supposed "good" he's done in prison or how much he grows as a person. You ask why bother having a prison. Here's a reason: to keep people like this encased in an unpleasant concrete box for the rest of their lives and kept separate from the rest of us who don't do atrocious things. That's a pretty fucking solid reason to have them.
Prison isn't just about incarceration, it's also about rehabilitation. That's the corner stone of the justice system. If you break a law, you serve your time in prison, when you've served your time, if you're fit to be released, under heavy supervision, then you are released.

Otherwise what's the point? You may as well just ship all of the people you're never going to release from prison, in to Africa or some shit-hole Island and let them figure the rest out on their own.
 
>put women in charge
>they start endlessly bitching and moaning about violence against women
>at the same time they lobby and pressure and reform the justice system to let convicted rapists and murderers walk free
so tiresome
Please do tell me which women's organisations are involved in this, I will write them a very stern letter.

Edit user name checks out.
 
Back
Top Bottom