Culture White House science adviser sworn in on 500-year-old Jewish text - The text, which dates back to 1492, is in the Library of Congress and focuses on ethics

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

When Vice President Harris’s office reached out to Eric Lander, the new director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, to ask what book he planned to use during his swearing-in ceremony on Wednesday, he was stumped.

1622967582577.png

Eric Lander, director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, is ceremonially sworn in by Vice President Harris as his wife, Lori Lander, holds a Mishnah, at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building near the White House on Wednesday

“I confess I had not thought about the question until they asked,” Lander told Religion News Service. “But once they asked, I had to think deeply about it, because when you choose a text you’re choosing values, or history, or other meaningful things.”

The question, he explained, made him think about the choice as “a statement of what’s in my mind and what’s in my heart” as he approaches his new role.

That choice set the scientist-turned-Cabinet official, who was confirmed by the Senate last week, off on a frantic evening of rigorous research that would eventually lead him to the Library of Congress and an obscure, recently rediscovered 500-year-old printing of a well-known Jewish text.

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard biology professor and geneticist began his search by convening a Zoom confab with his wife and children, who helped point him to a value from Lander’s Jewish tradition: tikkun olam, Hebrew for “repair the world.”

Lander, who served as co-chair of President Barack Obama’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, said he attends Jewish services but that his own Judaism is “complicated to describe.”

Suffice it to say that “the traditions — the ethical traditions — everything that comes from that faith and the faith I still practice in some ways, they matter a lot to who you are,” he said.

His family picked up on a similar sentiment. “The minute we realized the question was values, we all went to tikkun olam,” Lander said, explaining that tikkun olam has particular resonance in his family: “What is our purpose here? Our purpose is to repair the world, to help others in need of help, to take in strangers, to have empathy.”

That realization, in turn, reminded Lander of an expression found in the Mishnah, the earliest collections of rabbinical interpretations of oral Jewish law: “It’s not required that you complete the work, but neither may you refrain from it.”

In scouring the Library of Congress catalogue for a copy of the Mishnah, however, Lander stumbled upon something a bit more specific: a 13-page volume containing the Pirkei Avot, a subset of the Mishnah that focuses on ethics and contains the expression.

Lander couldn’t help but notice the publication date: 1492, an era when Jewish populations were expelled from the kingdom of Spain. He’d later learn the book was produced by a Jewish printer in Naples, whose history was entangled with Spain at the time: The kingdoms were ruled by men who shared a family connection and a name — Ferdinand.

While one Ferdinand is known for setting in motion the Spanish Inquisition, the other (in Naples) was more tolerant and accepted Jewish refugees.

In listening to that history, Lander heard a lesson for modern ears.

“The world has experimented with intolerance, with the view that everybody has to think like I think, worship like I worship,” he said. “(But) the world experimented in 1492 with tolerance — with the idea that we would have a diversity of people and perspectives. I think the lessons of the 1492 era are lessons for today: coming together and making our diversity an incredible asset for this country going forward.”

Ann Brener, a specialist at the Library of Congress who helped Lander with his request, is well acquainted with the book and its peculiar history. “This book that Dr. Lander found was only inches away from not being catalogued at all,” she said in an interview.

Brener stumbled upon the volume a decade ago while working with a collection of some 40,000 uncataloged rabbinical texts, most from the 19th and early 20th centuries. In the course of her work, she examined a thin publication that didn’t look altogether different from others: a large, folio-sized book with a flimsy binding lined with what looked like Victorian wallpaper.

But when she examined its pages, she realized she’d found something special.

“When I touched this paper, I knew immediately . . . that I was touching something very ancient — none of this 19th century stuff,” she said.

Even then, the work wasn’t made available for people such as Lander to find online until a few months ago. Technically, it’s still not fully catalogued: Brener said it can only be located virtually because Dave Reser, a colleague at the Library of Congress, found a way to insert information from PDFs of research documents that included a record of the book’s existence into the searchable online catalogue.

“Sheer magic,” Brener said in a follow-up email.

But placing a record of a book online isn’t the same as making it easy to find or procure, and Brener was impressed Lander tracked it down.

“Dr. Lander acted like a true scholar: He went into the catalogue, he did research, he found something that caught his eye,” she said. “That’s what we always hope for in our leaders and, frankly, seldom find.”

Lander said that in his job advising the president, he hopes his example will illuminate how research — especially scientific research — can achieve the values behind tikkun olam, something he suggested is illustrated by the ongoing pandemic.

“Being able to care for the afflicted, help people avoid illness, recover from the illness — this is an element of repairing the world,” he said.

Lander has some experience with intersections of religion and science: In 2020, he was appointed to the Vatican’s Pontifical Academy of Sciences. He also rejects the idea that religion and science are fundamentally opposed to each other.

“I don’t see why they should be incongruous with each other,” he said, arguing that “disagreements over facts” between faith leaders and scientists are the “least interesting” areas of discourse between the two.

He sees potential for future science-informed partnerships between the government and faith communities to tackle the pandemic — such as ongoing involvement of faith groups in vaccine distribution — or helping stem the impact of climate change.

“What really matters is values, and in that I find much less incongruity,” he said. “We are all trying to make the world better, make people feel better, give them comfort in the world.”

At the very least, both Lander and Brener hinted that using a 500-year-old Pirkei Avot to take the oath of office may serve as a reminder of an early — and enduring — collaboration between religion, technology and science: using a printing press to reproduce sacred texts.

“In Hebrew, when you publish something, the term is to go out into the light — it’s a biblical phrase,” Brener said. “(The book) went out into the light in Naples in 1492, but Dr. Lander is letting it go out into light for a second time, and I couldn’t be more thrilled with that.”



Really activates the almonds.
 
For those who don't know him...


Basically, Dude wants to eliminate dwarfs and gets women pissed off...

Seems based. Hope CRISPER or whatever can give me a 14 inch mega weiner
 
“It’s not required that you complete the work, but neither may you refrain from it.”
I get the sentiment, but this ethos can really make things much worse than they already are.

This does raise an intriguing question; what will the zoomers swear themselves in with, when they are appointed to such positions? The official Minecraft guide?
 
Wait you can choose what book you get sworn in on?
Imma be an American politician now just so I can get sworn in on Monster Girl Encyclopaedia.
 
Avot 1:6:
Yossei the son of Yochanan of Jerusalem would say: Let your home be wide open, and let the poor be members of your household. And do not engage in excessive conversation with a woman. This is said even regarding one's own wife—how much more so regarding the wife of another. Hence, the sages said: One who excessively converses with a woman causes evil to himself, neglects the study of Torah, and, in the end, inherits purgatory."
Ironically, the discussions of "tikkun olam" that appear in the mishna are found in the tractate that deals with divorces, which has some very "problematic" content.
 
Wait you can choose what book you get sworn in on?
Imma be an American politician now just so I can get sworn in on Monster Girl Encyclopaedia.
There's no laws regarding this to my understanding, swearing in on the Bible is just tradition because most American politicians are Christian. This guy's Jewish so he got sworn in on Jewish texts. And while I doubt I'll ever be in a position to do so, I would personally swear in on a book of law in the style of John Quincy Adams as IMO America's secular nature is greater than my own personal religious feelings.

That being said, poor son of a bitch got sworn in by Harris. I'd refuse the position if I was insulted in such a manner.
 
Which part did he swear on?

The one where it's okay to swindle and steal from the goyim, or the part about sucking the blood from an infant's genitals?
 
There's no laws regarding this to my understanding, swearing in on the Bible is just tradition because most American politicians are Christian. This guy's Jewish so he got sworn in on Jewish texts. And while I doubt I'll ever be in a position to do so, I would personally swear in on a book of law in the style of John Quincy Adams as IMO America's secular nature is greater than my own personal religious feelings.

That being said, poor son of a bitch got sworn in by Harris. I'd refuse the position if I was insulted in such a manner.
Monster girls are my religion so it’s still fine
 
Which part did he swear on?

The one where it's okay to swindle and steal from the goyim, or the part about sucking the blood from an infant's genitals?
Now I'm not too well versed in Jewish theology, but I'm pretty sure any of that stuff isn't in the Pirkei Avot. What I recall of the Pirkei Avot is just like a bunch of short quotations about life and religion

Monster girls are my religion so it’s still fine
>American President sworn in on picture of dog girl, all the cat girl lovers launch a jihad against the government.

--Future headline circa 2050
 
Dunno, old texts are always comfy. I didn't had any book older than the late 1800s.

That realization, in turn, reminded Lander of an expression found in the Mishnah, the earliest collections of rabbinical interpretations of oral Jewish law: “It’s not required that you complete the work, but neither may you refrain from it.”
The concept reminds me of the Talmud. Basically a autistic FAQ for Yeshiva students.
“The minute we realized the question was values, we all went to tikkun olam,”
Please don't tikkun olam, it's gay.
Lander couldn’t help but notice the publication date: 1492, an era when Jewish populations were expelled from the kingdom of Spain.
Oh. Why did that happen?
 
That "tikkun olam" crap is always what the filthy perfidious kikes use to justify marxism, feminism, transhumanism or the current absolutely delusional iatrocratic germophobic hysteria. Kikes always need to come up with various "illnesses" such as terrorism, white supremacy, misogyny, covid-19, and they always feel the imperative to become saviours of the world. The truth is the only germs that needs to be 100% removed from the face of earth are the perfidious fake khazars of the synagogue of satan who are not God's children and who do the work of their father the devil
 
I don't really get why people should care? Like if it was a thing you usually swear on a symbol of the USA then that would been pretty disgusting, but actually using a document you believe in would be preferable to something you don't believe in.
 
Back
Top Bottom