Culture Judge rules against Christian college in lawsuit claiming Biden rule would 'place males in girls' dorms' - ...But the Slippery Slope doesn't exist guys. Nobody is gonna force churches to accept their political ideology...

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Judge rules against Christian college in lawsuit claiming Biden rule would 'place males in girls' dorms'​

Troons invade religious women's college dorms.

College of the Ozarks in Missouri may face fines if they do not comply with the Fair Housing Act​

By Audrey Conklin | Fox News

A federal judge has ruled against a Christian college in Missouri arguing that a Biden administration rule would require the school to open women's dorm rooms and showers to biological males.

The College of the Ozarks sued the administration in April, arguing that a federal directive "requires private religious colleges to place biological males into female dormitories and to assign them as females’ roommates," which goes against the school's rules prohibiting male students from female dorms and vise-versa.

District Judge Roseann Ketchmark on Wednesday denied the college's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against the Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Fair Housing Act.

The Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), a Christian nonprofit advocacy group that filed the lawsuit on behalf of the college, plans to challenge the judge's dismissal, Ryan Bangert, ADF's vice president of legal strategy, told Fox News.

"The Fair Housing Act hasn’t changed. What has changed is HUD," Bangert said.

President Biden issued an executive order on his first day in office to prevent "discrimination on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation," which directed federal agencies to interpret the word sex to include gender identity and sexual orientation.

While the Fair Housing Act does not include that language, the agency announced in February that it would "administer and enforce the Fair Housing Act to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity."

What does that have to do with a Christian college in Missouri?

"If you have a male who identifies as female, that student must be allowed to access female dormitories" and bathrooms, Bangert explained.

If the school does not comply, it could face hefty fines of up to six figures. The White House did not immediately respond to an inquiry from Fox News.

"We disagree with that," Bangert said.

While the school "has long been guided by a Biblical worldview that all people should be treated with dignity, grace, and holy love, whatever their sexual beliefs," it also "teaches that sex as determined at birth is a person’s God-given, objective gender, whether or not it differs from their internal sense of ‘gender identity,'" the lawsuit states.

The school argues in the lawsuit that a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction are necessary because the act, under Biden's order, "creates immediate upheaval within the College’s continuing enforcement of its housing policies" that have been in place since its founding.





The College of the Ozarks is also currently engaged in housing plans for current and incoming students in the fall semester, and the school argues that the Biden directive "threatens massive penalties on the college for maintaining its policies and making statements about them."

"Our Constitution protects the right of faith-based institutions to operate according to their beliefs. It also protects our freedom by separating power and limiting government," the ADF said in its statement. "And in this case the government is clearly overreaching."



The alliance added: "Young women shouldn’t be forced to share private spaces — including showers and dorm rooms — with males."
 
If a man wants to rape a woman in a woman's bathroom it would have been obvious his intentions before. If a tranny walks into a woman's bathroom there's people who will look the other way. If this increases the risk of people's lives being irrevocably fucked up because of sick people, then it is bad, bar none. Why are you making excuses for this?
Because what you're fearmongering over isn't going to happen. Just like all the Conservative fearmongering over the gays in general didn't happen.

It's been nearly a decade since trangenderism became fashionable and there was no massive explosion of rape or the complete destruction of women's sports or any of the other shit Conservatives said would totes happen the worst that's happened is now tv shows have a token gay guy in them * oh the horror *.

Because there simply aren't enough of them * and most of them just want to be left alone like everyone else *.

The only thing that's happened that's of slight concern is the underage transition thing but that's less an LGBT issue and more kids treating medicine as a fashion fad thing.

"We gotta wait until the problem's actually out of control before we start doing something, instead of exercising any kind of foresight."
"You have other problems so you can't talk about this one at all."
"The numbers of people that'll be engaging in [insert singular tree in forest here] will be so small it won't even matter" (so why is it even being litigated, if it "doesn't matter"?)

Are these the worms that whisper in the ear of the standard conservative and moderate?
Or we could just deal with actual problems instead of chasing shadows out of anti gay paranoia.
 
Because what you're fearmongering over isn't going to happen. Just like all the Conservative fearmongering over the gays in general didn't happen.

It's been nearly a decade since trangenderism became fashionable and there was no massive explosion of rape or the complete destruction of women's sports or any of the other shit Conservatives said would totes happen the worst that's happened is now tv shows have a token gay guy in them * oh the horror *.

Because there simply aren't enough of them * and most of them just want to be left alone like everyone else *.

The only thing that's happened that's of slight concern is the underage transition thing but that's less an LGBT issue and more kids treating medicine as a fashion fad thing.


Or we could just deal with actual problems instead of chasing shadows out of anti gay paranoia.
what shadows? the anti gay fears were legitimized by a string of anti christian, pro lgbt governmental and corporate policies.

the bake the cake guy dosent even win on religious freedom grounds but on commerce loopholes. he treats all his cakes the same.
 
This thread be like:

"Oh no we gotta protect these poor helpless women from getting raped by troons at a place that explicitly forbids them!"

Actual woman (me) comes in and points out women in fundie communities are way more likely to get raped by fundie dudes than troons b/c fundies already have a massive sex pest problem

"STFU tits or GTFO u just secretly wanna get raped by troons/are a Troon!"

Really makes u think🤔
 
"Oh no we gotta protect these poor helpless women from getting raped by troons at a place that explicitly forbids them!"

Actual woman (me) comes in and points out women in fundie communities are way more likely to get raped by fundie dudes than troons b/c fundies already have a massive sex pest problem
Yes, which is why adding even further risk of rape is a good idea. They're clearly not getting raped enough.
 
They're less than 1% of the entire US population.

You'll probably go your whole life without ever seeing one outside the internet especially if you live in a more Conservative area * which given your posting history I assume is the case *.
I'm assuming you're some flavor of non-American, but I live in a very conservative area and I've run into one almost passing tranny, one possible tranny or enby not sure which, and at least one enby. All in the same day. It's the flavor of the week up here in the land of the civilized. Not that I expect bug eaters to be capable of critical thinking, you're simping for an actual insane autist. Which is why, I'm assuming, you're ignorant of the slippery slope that's been happening up here for the last two decades.
 
It's been nearly a decade since trangenderism became fashionable and there was no massive explosion of rape or the complete destruction of women's sports or any of the other shit Conservatives said would totes happen the worst that's happened is now tv shows have a token gay guy in them * oh the horror *.
How is this true? The federal overstep in the legalization of gay marriage was a few years after this. Tumblr didn't become trannyblr for a few years. Twitter wasn't as much of a joke as it is now, and the mass media didn't push transgenderism like they do now. If you said past five years you may have been correct, but how is that enough time to see the effects? We haven't even hit the peak yet.

Because what you're fearmongering over isn't going to happen. Just like all the Conservative fearmongering over the gays in general didn't happen.
Lol. It's been a few years since normalization and pride parades are full of dog suiters, people covered in dildos, and they want children evolved, and you're actually saying the slippery slope isn't coming true. Are you actually blind?

Because there simply aren't enough of them * and most of them just want to be left alone like everyone else *.

I used to believe this too. But looking at the amount of transtrenders, trannies who so obviously want everyone to know they are trannies, and the amount of Yaniv-likes out there I've slowly lost all of my respect for any of the movement. I would bet on at least 20% being solely into it for the attention, and many more being into it for fetish reasons.

The only thing that's happened that's of slight concern is the underage transition thing but that's less an LGBT issue and more kids treating medicine as a fashion fad thing.


Or we could just deal with actual problems instead of chasing shadows out of anti gay paranoia.

We are discussing this under an article where a religious institution was disallowed from barring people from doing something they do not like within their own buildings? After the bake the gay cake fiasco and the subsequent lawsuits? After Yaniv has gotten away with what he's gotten away with? When there's a tranny in the white house who won't say if they disagree with child transitioning?

I don't even know why I'm still bothering trying to get through to you.
 
Because what you're fearmongering over isn't going to happen. Just like all the Conservative fearmongering over the gays in general didn't happen.

It's been nearly a decade since trangenderism became fashionable and there was no massive explosion of rape or the complete destruction of women's sports or any of the other shit Conservatives said would totes happen the worst that's happened is now tv shows have a token gay guy in them * oh the horror *.

Because there simply aren't enough of them * and most of them just want to be left alone like everyone else *.

The only thing that's happened that's of slight concern is the underage transition thing but that's less an LGBT issue and more kids treating medicine as a fashion fad thing.


Or we could just deal with actual problems instead of chasing shadows out of anti gay paranoia.
>be in a thread about the government meddling in religious institutions over LGBT issues
>"their fears were never realized"

"Oh no we gotta protect these poor helpless women from getting raped by troons at a place that explicitly forbids them!"
Women being the victim here isn't important, it's just happenstance. I (and I assume most of the posters) don't like anyone being raped. This is not about white knighting, this is just about not liking rape.

Actual woman (me) comes in and points out women in fundie communities are way more likely to get raped by fundie dudes than troons b/c fundies already have a massive sex pest problem
No one cares if you have a cunt and it's irrelevant to the discussion. It does not inform your opinion at all. Quit trying to play the vagina card because no one here is going to simp for you.

And once again, yes other thing is bad. But we're not talking about other thing sweet cheeks, we're talking about this bad thing. Both things are bad, you can shut the fuck up about it.

"STFU tits or GTFO u just secretly wanna get raped by troons/are a Troon!"
Still haven't posted tits. If you're gonna bring up that you got tits post them or shut up because unless we get to see titty, your gash is not important.

Honestly I believe you are a woman cause this is some shit tier woman logic.
 
On one hand, it's hilarious seeing religious right nuts getting a taste of their own medicine. On the other it's kind of frightening to think of how this can be abused by creeps, weirdos, and perverts.

I'm sure incels have already thought of this and worse.

Then again the worst Christcucks think of women as nothing more than baby factories, but the Handmaid's Tale is a work of fiction so far.

How many people in America would actually accept a real world Gilead, I dunno.
even by retard anti fundie standards the handmaiden is a joke of a christian satire. speaking in biblical terms like black southern baptists doesnt mean much to most christians.
This thread be like:

"Oh no we gotta protect these poor helpless women from getting raped by troons at a place that explicitly forbids them!"

Actual woman (me) comes in and points out women in fundie communities are way more likely to get raped by fundie dudes than troons b/c fundies already have a massive sex pest problem

"STFU tits or GTFO u just secretly wanna get raped by troons/are a Troon!"

Really makes u think🤔
you cant whine about wanting to be male tranny and then hold on to your womanhood when your opinion is disregarded.

we already know men have a sex pest problem since its a problem everywhere, not wanting to add fuel to the fire isnt a bad thing.
For a problem to be "out of control" it has to be an actual problem and not just paranoid fear.
the fear has manifested with churches giving into secular lgbt mores. but the goalposts keep moving it seems.
 
I'm assuming you're some flavor of non-American, but I live in a very conservative area and I've run into one almost passing tranny, one possible tranny or enby not sure which, and at least one enby. All in the same day. It's the flavor of the week up here in the land of the civilized. Not that I expect bug eaters to be capable of critical thinking, you're simping for an actual insane autist. Which is why, I'm assuming, you're ignorant of the slippery slope that's been happening up here for the last two decades.
Same. I love in a very conservative area and know 3 troons personally. And I'm antisocial and rarely leave the house.

I don't even know that many gay people.
 
Same. I love in a very conservative area and know 3 troons personally. And I'm antisocial and rarely leave the house.

I don't even know that many gay people.
It's because it's harder to be gay for the attention nowadays when it's been normalized for as long as it has and the media has mostly moved on to 'greener' pastures. That and you can hide that you're gay. Trannies are physically obvious.
 
Yes, which is why adding even further risk of rape is a good idea. They're clearly not getting raped enough.
Except they're not adding anything since they explicitly forbid troons and trooning out is grounds for major disciplinary action per the current student handbook
Still haven't posted tits. If you're gonna bring up that you got tits post them or shut up because unless we get to see titty, your gash is not important.
I actually did, you just must have missed them while you were fuming about a yucky woman-creature busting into your circlejerk

Really think the issue isnt actually fear about women getting raped🤔
 
Except they're not adding anything since they explicitly forbid troons and trooning out is grounds for major disciplinary action per the current student handbook

I actually did, you just must have missed them while you were fuming about a yucky woman-creature busting into your circlejerk

Really think the issue isnt actually fear about women getting raped🤔
Why do women seem to want to ardently defend the destruction of their own in-groups and allow the invasion of AGP men?
 
This thread be like:

"Oh no we gotta protect these poor helpless women from getting raped by troons at a place that explicitly forbids them!"

Actual woman (me) comes in and points out women in fundie communities are way more likely to get raped by fundie dudes than troons b/c fundies already have a massive sex pest problem

"STFU tits or GTFO u just secretly wanna get raped by troons/are a Troon!"

Really makes u think🤔
Fwiw, I'm a woman who wants to throw up every time I see retards like you simp for autogynophiles who habituate child grooming ("lol it's totes an egg uwu"), just-barely-allowed voyeurism, and molestation.
 
I actually did, you just must have missed them while you were fuming about a yucky woman-creature busting into your circlejerk

Really think the issue isnt actually fear about women getting raped🤔
"Haha I posted the bird not my tits, got em"
I saw I just ignored. That's shitty facebook boomer humor.

I don't know what your insinuation is about the "yucky woman-creature" thing. I said I don't care if you're a woman. Some of these other posters could be too, no one fucking cares. You tried to make it relevant since you're clearly an attention whore.

Edit, case and point:
Fwiw, I'm a woman who wants to throw up every time I see retards like you simp for autogynophiles who habituate child grooming ("lol it's totes an egg uwu"), just-barely-allowed voyeurism, and molestation.
 
Why do women seem to want to ardently defend the destruction of their own in-groups and allow the invasion of AGP men?
More like why do men who claim to want to protect women from sexual violence deny the actual threats women face in fundie communities

I don't want to be in the bathroom with either Yaniv or Josh Duggar, but I'm way more likely to have to deal with the latter at a fundie college in Mississippi (that wouldn't allow Yaniv to enter in the first place)
 
More like why do men who claim to want to protect women from sexual violence deny the actual threats women face in fundie communities

I don't want to be in the bathroom with either Yaniv or Josh Duggar, but I'm way more likely to have to deal with the latter at a fundie college in Mississippi (that wouldn't allow Yaniv to enter in the first place)
Because fundie "communities" are increasingly dead and gay especially since the internet allows almost anybody to see the greener grass on the other side and want a taste of it. Plus the media has been ardently against fundamentalism for ages and has been a major cause of it's deconstruction. The satanic panic sure didn't help.

Second point, how?
 
Back
Top Bottom