💥 Trainwreck Pamela Swain / DocHoliday1977 / MsPhoenix1969 / Observer1977 / danishlace2003 / Writer_thriller - Victim of grand #MeToo conspiracy, litigious wannabe starfucker, off her meds and online

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date
  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Which member of the Pamspiracy does Pam secretly want to fuck the most?


  • Total voters
    548
Schools back in the early 80's were still using books from the 1950's. So having a high school reading level in grade 4 is the equivalent to having a grade 6 reading level in grade 4. Not that impressive. Also doesn't explain why she's terrible at reading now.

Also also, if she was so good in school why can she only get into expensive online courses instead of a college or university in her own State? Why can't she get good grades on an online course? Why can't she finish them?
 
Oh now they are back on Pacer
Learn to read. No, this case is not on Pacer.
You can't fucking read. I said the literal opposite of that
Imagine being her teacher. Some horror stories there, I'd imagine.
Someone's mad. I tested post high school in reading comprehension in 4th grade.
Well, that clearly isn't the case anymore.

So, when's the lawsuit? Since we didn't give in to your demands
 
Now and always. I encourage you to check your post history. All you do is lie, hate, seethe, cope and screech.
I suggest you check your post history. You are lying.

Learn to read. No, this case is not on Pacer.

Imagine being her teacher. Some horror stories there, I'd imagine.

Well, that clearly isn't the case anymore.

So, when's the lawsuit? Since we didn't give in to your demands
I did what I said I was going to.
Learn to read. No, this case is not on Pacer.
Now, we're back to state courts.
Also also, if she was so good in school why can she only get into expensive online courses instead of a college or university in her own State? Why can't she get good grades on an online course? Why can't she finish them?
Are you talking about my current GPA with another university or CTU? And you mean the current one where I was a student for a year and didn't flunk out at all?

I'm tempted to ask if Bud light tastes great or is less filling, but I don't want to involuntarily cause apoplectic seizures.
 
I suggest you check your post history. You are lying.
I don't need to because, unlike you, I'm fully aware of what I post and how it comes across (plus, I never stated anything about it so it makes no sense to tell me to check it because it's irrelevant).

Now, we're back to state courts.
We never said we "were not on" state courts, despite your best efforts to misrepresent the discussion.
 
I'm tempted to ask if Bud light tastes great or is less filling, but I don't want to involuntarily cause apoplectic seizures.
Wouldn't know, even when I did drink I never bothered with piss water, craft beers are the way to go. I'm a Scotch-Whiskey kind of guy, though I also like Rye-Whiskey and Jager.
 
don't need to because, unlike you, I'm fully aware of what I post and how it comes across (plus, I never stated anything about it so it makes no sense to tell me to check it because it's irrelevant).
Sure.
Don't see it yet on Federal level, nor (Georgia) state level, but if it was recently filed, no suprise. Did you do it in person, or by mail?

I always said it was in state court.
Not on Pacer? (Here we go again)
We never said we "were not on" state courts, despite your best efforts to misrepresent the discussion.
At this point, this is your mess. I could care less which you all decide it came from.

Don't see it yet on Federal level, nor (Georgia) state level, but if it was recently filed, no suprise. Did you do it in person, or by mail?
You're looking for it? Gonna call up the judge and pull out some secret sex society cred to get it thrown out, Rudy?

Wouldn't know, even when I did drink I never bothered with piss water, craft beers are the way to go. I'm a Scotch-Whiskey kind of guy, though I also like Rye-Whiskey and Jager.
I like Tequila. Good Tequila for dates and nights out, and bad Tequila after bad days and I need to feel the burn go deep into my soul.
 
Not on Pacer? (Here we go again)
If it's in regards to the previous topic, then your lack of basic reading is astonishing. If it's in regards to your new lawsuit, then it's not a suprise that it's not up there(assuming you filed in federal court). There's quite a few things impacting when it appears.
You're looking for it? Gonna call up the judge and pull out some secret sex society cred to get it thrown out, Rudy?
I'm going to post the documents here.
 
Literal room temperature IQ. In Celsius.
Low brow IQ insults, for those days you think you're losing......
If it's in regards to the previous topic, then your lack of basic reading is astonishing. If it's in regards to your new lawsuit, then it's not a suprise that it's not up there(assuming you filed in federal court). There's quite a few things impacting when it appears.
Again my reading comprehension is bad, huh?
I'm going to post the documents here.
Oh Donny Jr, aren't you the little engine that suffers from a whole lot of can't.
 
Again my reading comprehension is bad, huh?
Yes.
Oh Donny Jr, aren't you the little engine that suffers from a whole lot of can't.
Presuming I was Jr.(I am not), why wouldn't be able to post here? Georgia law (GA Code § 50-18-71 (2014)) says I can, the Supreme Court (Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589) says I can.
 
Literal room temperature IQ. In Celsius.
This is why you'll never be good enough for me.

Yes.

Presuming I was Jr.(I am not), why wouldn't be able to post here? Georgia law (GA Code § 50-18-71 (2014)) says I can, the Supreme Court (Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589) says I can.
Oh is that what I meant. You just have all access even into my thoughts.


Literal room temperature IQ. In Celsius.
 
Oh is that what I meant. You just have all access even into my thoughts.
Take your medication, or just another vaccine, before posting. You are getting incoherent.
Oh, cool, they are recycling the Trump story under a new name. They aren't even pretending now.
 
Take your medication, or just another vaccine, before posting. You are getting incoherent.
Oh, I'm incoherent now. Can I be Elvis next time?
Oh, cool, they are recycling the Trump story under a new name. They aren't even pretending now.
Oh yes, the Trump narrative of "fixing" and "rigging" shit.
 
Oh yes, the Trump narrative of "fixing" and "rigging" shit.
You believe that almost everyone in power, and quite a few outside it, colluded to oppress you and rig everything you do to fail, including but not limited to the courts, but you don't believe the election could be rigged?
 
You believe that almost everyone in power, and quite a few outside it, colluded to oppress you and rig everything you do to fail, including but not limited to the courts, but you don't believe the election could be rigged?
I have documentation and this thread. Donald was president and if I may venture a supposition, probably thought the election was rigged for him except that people came out and voted for Joe. Truth is, Joe is more stable-minded and not a contradictory sorehead.
 
I have documentation and this thread
No you don't, and this thread proves nothing but the fact that you are insane, and are extremely lawsuit-happy.
Truth is, Joe is more stable-minded and not a contradictory sorehead.
Have you seen the debates? Have you seen even a single statement he made? I assure you, "stable-minded" is not something that fits Biden.
Donald was president and if I may venture a supposition, probably thought the election was rigged for him except that people came out and voted for Joe.
There is quite a bit of evidence of faults with the election, some problems even being before Trump's time. NYTimes predicted that the election would be rigged, interestingly enough. Bloomberg confirmed that election security was non-existent. Bloomberg findings were confirmed by WashingtonPost two times. These issues were further supported by many other outlets (1,2,3, etc). All of this is irrelevant, because the people who rigged it, went on national news, and admitted it.
That's a lot more evidence than any one of your claims ever had.
 
No you don't, and this thread proves nothing but the fact that you are insane, and are extremely lawsuit-happy.

Have you seen the debates? Have you seen even a single statement he made? I assure you, "stable-minded" is not something that fits Biden.

There is quite a bit of evidence of faults with the election, some problems even being before Trump's time. NYTimes predicted that the election would be rigged, interestingly enough. Bloomberg confirmed that election security was non-existent. Bloomberg findings were confirmed by WashingtonPost two times. These issues were further supported by many other outlets (1,2,3, etc). All of this is irrelevant, because the people who rigged it, went on national news, and admitted it.
That's a lot more evidence than any one of your claims ever had.
You fell for it, fool! Thunder Cross Split Attack!

No you don't, and this thread proves nothing but the fact that you are insane, and are extremely lawsuit-happy.
Let me know when you post more and help me win, mmkay?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom