Kink (at) Pride - Why LGBTQIA+ needs BDSM

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

As June approaches, it’s time again for that perennial social media debate: should the BDSM/Kink community be included at Pride?

Some say no; Pride Month celebrates the LGBTQIA+ community and that should not be diluted or distracted by other communities. Others point out that this initialism itself has been expanded many times over the years to include other marginalized sexual communities. LGB was first used in the early ’80s, to be more inclusive than simply saying “gay.” By the 1990s, our Trans siblings were represented and the term evolved to LGBT. Representation for Queer, Intersex, and Asexual/Aromantic identities has been added over the last two decades, until finally folks started including a + sign, to indicate support for an expansive acceptance of marginalized identities within a shorthand that was rapidly becoming almost comedically cumbersome. And yet, for many, the + does not include kink.

This is surprising, considering the parallel paths of oppression, self-advocacy, and empowerment that both communities have followed. In the earliest days of psychology, homosexuality and sadomasochism were lumped together under the same overarching umbrella of “sexual deviancy.” This was eventually parsed out into a set of distinct diagnoses, each of which was considered a form of unnatural and degenerate behavior: homosexuality, sadism, masochism, transvestism, etc. In the 1970s, the Gay Liberation movement took on the American Psychological Association and lobbied hard to have homosexuality removed from the third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Illness (DSM) , the guidebook used by nearly every mental health provider in the United States to diagnose psychological concerns in their patients.


Today, the DSM still includes diagnostic criteria under paraphilic disorders for sadism, masochism, fetishism, and “transvestism” (what we might today more accurately refer to as cross-dressing). While it offers some general guidance about assessing for clinical distress before applying these labels, voices both within the mental health community and the world of BDSM strenuously object to the practice of safe and consensual power and sensation exchange being categorized alongside intrinsically problematic non-consensual behaviors such as pedophilia and frotteurism.


This battlefront extends beyond the world of mental health. While many states have taken steps to enact protections for discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation, sexual practice is not a protected class. This means that while a landlord in my home state might not be able to evict me for being gay, or trans, they have the legal right to evict me for engaging in consensual BDSM play in my apartment . Likewise, Kinksters are not protected against employment discrimination, zoning exclusion, censorship, and other forms of bias. The National Coalition for Sexual Freedom, which provides incident response and tracking for members of the BDSM and consensual nonmonogamy communities, tracks dozens of such incidents each month. Consider that that only counts the folks who knew to report their experience to NCSF at all. And that’s to say nothing of state and local laws that constrain or criminalize consensual BDSM play.


Quino Al/Upsplash

Kinksters have always been present at Pride.
Source: Quino Al/Upsplash

Evidence shows that when a parent’s BDSM identity is brought up in custody cases in court, that parent typically loses, regardless of whether there has been an allegation of inappropriate exposure to sexual materials or behavior or not. Researchers who track these cases state they have yet to see a kinky parent retain custody once the issue of their sexual identity is raised (Klein, Moser). And for many, BDSM is a core component of their sexual identity. Approximately 2% of people state that being kinky is their primary sexual orientation. Many, if not most, of the people interviewed report being aware that they were kinky before age 12, whether or not they had the word for kink in their vocabulary (Goerlich). That sounds a lot like a sexual orientation to me. This is a population roughly comparable to the number of left-handed people in America, or redheads, or Jews. It is a small, but not insignificant community that faces stigma on a daily basis. And that doesn’t include the 10-12% of people who state that they enjoy power exchange dynamics, but do not necessarily consider kink to be a key element of their sexuality. Or the 50% of Americans who report experimenting with some form of BDSM with their partners.

Marsha P. Johnson said, "No pride for some of us without liberation for all of us.” The work of liberation is far from done, and the battle to preserve the gains made since Stonewall seems never-ending. The BDSM/Kink community shares this struggle, both because many LGBTQIA+ folks are themselves kinky, and also because kinksters have historically faced the same social, medical, and criminal barriers that their queer comrades have fought so hard to overcome. There will always be room to debate just how sexualized the environment at any given Pride event should be. And we can have a debate over whether children belong at Folsom or if nudity belongs at NYC Pride. But there should be no doubt that those carrying the black-and-blue striped flag with a small red heart in the corner deserve their place underneath the rainbow.
 
And for many, BDSM is a core component of their sexual identity. Approximately 2% of people state that being kinky is their primary sexual orientation. Many, if not most, of the people interviewed report being aware that they were kinky before age 12, whether or not they had the word for kink in their vocabulary (Goerlich). That sounds a lot like a sexual orientation to me.

Sounds to me like we might need to start identifying “Kinky Children” so they can be introduced to fetishes as early as 3 years old! If Troon Children get toddler sized dildos, why shouldn’t Kinky Children get toddler sized whips and anal beads? Puppy collars and leashes are readily available as well!

Also LMAO “(Goerlich)” this fat cunt is quoting *itself*. Rhys McKinnon, your move, sir.
 
I thought "kinksters" enjoyed their activities precisely because they are taboo, i.e. the sexual frisson arises, to an extent, from the lack of societal acceptance of these practices.

Why is this jerk trying to rob them of that by normalising BDSM?
 
It already has BDSM, from the constant abuse of the Alphabet, that dirty whore.
 
Evidence shows that when a parent’s BDSM identity is brought up in custody cases in court, that parent typically loses, regardless of whether there has been an allegation of inappropriate exposure to sexual materials or behavior or not
Doesn't this imply they're probably cheating too?

Also I have no problem with masochists or people into the infantaliazation stuff gets dragged across the coals in custody battles.
 
KInks are fetishes. They have nothing to do with your sexual orientation: straight people have them, gay people have them, bi people have them. It'd be the same as marching saying "we also eat and we also sleep".

If they are trying to make this as a freedom statement, well, I didn't know we still have laws against kinky in the privacy of your room. You don't know what I do alone with my partner and I'm a straight woman, why we should care about what gay people do with theirs? I don't care, as long as everybody involved is willing and of legal age.
 
KInks are fetishes. They have nothing to do with your sexual orientation: straight people have them, gay people have them, bi people have them. It'd be the same as marching saying "we also eat and we also sleep".

If they are trying to make this as a freedom statement, well, I didn't know we still have laws against kinky in the privacy of your room. You don't know what I do alone with my partner and I'm a straight woman, why we should care about what gay people do with theirs? I don't care, as long as everybody involved is willing and of legal age.
Being gay IS a fetish when you think about it.
 
If they are trying to make this as a freedom statement, well, I didn't know we still have laws against kinky in the privacy of your room.
16 states still have the laws on the books, though the Supreme Court ruled they can't target gay people specifically in 2003 or so.

1621531480895.png
 
Sounds to me like we might need to start identifying “Kinky Children” so they can be introduced to fetishes as early as 3 years old! If Troon Children get toddler sized dildos, why shouldn’t Kinky Children get toddler sized whips and anal beads? Puppy collars and leashes are readily available as well!

Also LMAO “(Goerlich)” this fat cunt is quoting *itself*. Rhys McKinnon, your move, sir.
If that is all they are into, that would be the least of worries. But kink and fetish are things that could include literally anything. You could argue that a 8 year old boy actually wanted Father Jackovursohn to diddle him because he was into older men.
 
Last edited:
7A807F0D-B3F1-4D9B-A4AB-FA39427287E7.jpeg
Stefani Goerlich, LMSW, is an expert on the edges and a bridge builder between the margins and the mainstream. She is an award-winning author, most recently of The Leather Couch: Clinical Practice with Kinky Clients. With her private practice, Bound Together Counselling, she specializes in working with individuals and couples who identify as kinky, polyamorous, open/swinging, or other alternative relationship models. As a Clinical Social Worker licensed in several states, Stefani works with sexually diverse people to build better relationships with their bodies, their partners, and themselves.
 
I super don't give a shit what people want to do, but if your fetish is humiliation then everyone who gives you a judging look when you walk around in your gimp suit in public is an unwilling participant in the fetish that you are actively practicing in front of them. Its not the same as someone with a humiliation fetish getting a boner for looking stupid in a non-sexual context, you're straight up forcing people who don't want to participate in a sexual encounter with you to do so. The fact that your sex acts are removed from physical sex makes no never mind to me, this violates questions of consent and therefore needs to be banned from being done in public outside of BDSM sex clubs, full stop.
 
Let's see, gays have a sexual attraction to something most people don't sexualize (the same sex in this case).
Yup, sounds like a fetish to me.
It's not a fetish because it's not purely sexual. Gay people are also emotionally and romantically attracted to the same sex.
 
Don't pride events already have gimp suits and shit?
Gimp suits, those dog suits, dildos just straight up strapped onto leather harnesses, all out in public view, walking down a major road in multiple cities every year. It's a literal parade of degeneracy, and yet somehow it's not enough. BDSM might as well be the face of the movement at this point from how over represented it is from the loudest of faggots. Normal gay people have married, been in a regular relationships, whatever and been done with all the bullshit long ago. All that's left are the narcissists and those who get off on it. Probably both at the same time. And some try to involve children.
 
I can't believe they actually want to perpetuate this stereotype. Only the small minded and bigoted actually believe this. Not all of us BDSM freaks are gay.
 
Back
Top Bottom