Science New immunotherapy fights aging symptoms by clearing out defunct cells

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://newatlas.com/medical/anti-aging-immunotherapy-senescent-cells/

Aging comes for us all – but perhaps the unpleasant symptoms don’t have to. In a new study, scientists may have found a kind of anti-aging immunotherapy, reinvigorating immune cells to better clear out defunct cells known to contribute to the aging process.

One of the major drivers behind the physical signs of aging are senescent cells, those that have stopped dividing but also refuse to die. When we’re young, the immune system detects and destroys these freeloaders, but it naturally loses its effectiveness over time. That means that these senescent cells tend to build up in our bodies as we get older, leading to the symptoms of aging and contributing to associated diseases.

So for the new study, researchers at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) set out to find a way to recharge the immune system. They aimed to bring invariant Natural Killer T (iNKT) cells – those that normally have the job of hunting down senescent cells – out of retirement.

The researchers found that iNKT cells could be activated using lipid antigens, which in turn reduced the number of senescent cells. The iNKT cells are useful for two main reasons, the team says – first, the receptor that activates them doesn’t appear on any other cell, so the therapy can be very specific. And secondly, they will naturally settle into a dormant state after a while, preventing the treatment from running too wild.

The team tested the treatment in mice with two different health conditions that increase the buildup of senescent cells – obesity and lung fibrosis. In both groups, the team found that senescent cell numbers dropped compared to controls. In the obese mice, their glucose control improved, while those with lung fibrosis had fewer damaged cells and lived longer.

"I think this is a potential immune therapy for senescence and fibrosis,” says Mallar Bhattacharya, an author of the study. "It's a fairly well tolerated therapy, and we just have to get around dosing and trials."

Further tests in human cells in culture showed that iNKT cells should also wipe out senescent cells in our own bodies. However, this will of course need to be verified through human testing. A spinoff company from the research team is now working on that, with an eye towards trials in the next few years.

The new immunotherapy technique could be an alternative to senolytics, an emerging class of drugs designed to clear out senescent cells or rejuvenate them. Early studies have proven promising, with some studies improving the health of mice and even extending their lifespan by more than a third.

The research was published in the journal Med.

Source: UCSF via Eurekalert
 
You are speaking from a perspective of death being inevitable after 70ish years as a matter of fact but if we circumvent that an entire new way of viewing existence would be formed. Some would likely hang on to the old world of death while others embraced a lifespan that, barring accident or incurable disease, would allow the mastery of disciplines in a way that has been previously impossible.

It would be interesting or horrible or horresting....interible? Interrible?
Death is inevitable. That's what makes life so precious. It doesn't matter how long you live, without death, life is meaningless.
 
I'm not particularly fond of the idea of immortality, but the idea of your grandparents getting to stick around to see a few more greats on their grandkids is kind of nice.
 
"I'm afraid!" isn't a good reason to avoid reality.
Choosing to prolong life is entirely reasonable though. How old do you want to live to? Will you be saying the same thing when you're that age-1? Will you lay down and let yourself die when that age comes? Will you wish you were dead when you're that age+1?
Chances are, you'll be holding on to every day you get and hoping it's not your last. This is especially true if tech like this can spare you the negative effects of old age.
 
Well yeah, even in the best case scenario you're still going to have to eventually deal with the heat death of the universe.
You've just repeated what I said. But with more words.
Nah this is just cope. Immortality fucking rules, anyone who disagrees is just too much of a pussy to seize their destiny.
Ooooorrrr.... Those who shy away from death are pussy for not wanting to take the next step.
 
Ooooorrrr.... Those who shy away from death are pussy for not wanting to take the next step.
Sorry to spoil but when you die it's over, man. With all due respect, your religion's a scam that made sense in the past, but as I love to say, times are changing. For the best? I don't know. But this is inevitable, this is our ultimate fate. This is what mankind has always strived for. And there's nothing wrong with that, just look at it with an open mind. They'll call us barbarians in a hundred years.
 
Choosing to prolong life is entirely reasonable though. How old do you want to live to? Will you be saying the same thing when you're that age-1? Will you lay down and let yourself die when that age comes? Will you wish you were dead when you're that age+1?
Chances are, you'll be holding on to every day you get and hoping it's not your last. This is especially true if tech like this can spare you the negative effects of old age.
Prolonging it? Sure. I wouldn't mind 120 since that seems to be the best our bodies can do for us. Live forever? No thanks.
 
Prolonging it? Sure. I wouldn't mind 120 since that seems to be the best our bodies can do for us. Live forever? No thanks.
Well as has already been said, there's no getting around the heat death of the universe (unless free energy is a thing but we'll stick with conventional physics for now). But let's say, in the next 50 years or so, we learn how to effectively reverse aging. By the time you're 120, you can achieve the body of a 20 year old. It would require you take your prescribed cocktail of drugs/gene therapy, but doing so will keep you nimble and spry for much, much longer. You may even be able to keep your mind intact or perhaps improve it. Wanna spend your days indulging in hedonistic pleasure? Wanna travel the world? Wanna read up on some history? Wanna pick up a new skill? These are all things you can't do when you're dead.
I don't think anyone's advocating for forcing immortality on people. The goal is to make death a choice. And I'm pretty confident that most people, on any given day, would choose to be alive for at least one more.

Though as I typed this, it does raise one moral quandary that I haven't thought of before: if death becomes a choice, the burden now lies on you to know that those close to you may be hurt to see you go. This may lead to the unfortunate case of people legitimately ready to die, but are stuck clinging to a life they no longer want because ending it causes others pain and there's no longer an unavoidable way out.
 
Why do people want to live forever? Nobody is that interesting.
LMFAO, yeah, being interesting is the reason to live forever, not prosperity or anything.
From what I get from this is that it just stops cells from getting older, it does not stop organs from failure, thus people may be more fit unill their organs give out.
And organs are made of...?
 
Why do people want to live forever? Nobody is that interesting.
Sleep is awesome.


And a majority of them are fedora atheists.
Funny how deleting God from your life creates an existential void for an overwhelming vast majority.
I'm not an atheist, but I actually prefer atheism. The idea of an afterlife scares the living shit out of me, as only Buddhism really grappled with the "You're going to heaven and it will still lead to suffering" idea. Like holy fuck who wants to live 1000000000000000000000000000000 years bored of everything, only to have infinity to go. You will eventually become batshit insane, you will beg for death but there will be no death. At that point how the fuck is heaven any different from hell?
The idea of just vanishing also disturbs me, but I think it's the least terrible.

Immortality will never happen. You still need to avoid running out of stem cells, even if you do that your genome changes as you age as you pick up random mutations. You can't avoid them either, just by existing in an aqueous environment with respiration occuring in your cells you are exposing yourself to mutagens, in most cases your body fixes the damage before it becomes passed on, but you can't really stop it.

LMFAO, yeah, being interesting is the reason to live forever, not prosperity or anything.
"Prosperity"
You will spend your extended lifespan toiling away to pay back the cost of your life extension, with interest. In case you haven't noticed everyone is getting poorer and poorer. Own nothing, get in the cage, live in the pod, eat the bugs, etc.
 
Why do people want to live forever? Nobody is that interesting.
Sleep is awesome.


And a majority of them are fedora atheists.
Funny how deleting God from your life creates an existential void for an overwhelming vast majority.
I don't know, death it still pretty scary with God in your life. Every day I pray that He's not going to cast me into the lake of fire for mocking retards and loathing niggers.
 
"Prosperity"
You will spend your extended lifespan toiling away to pay back the cost of your life extension, with interest. In case you haven't noticed everyone is getting poorer and poorer.
LMAO no they're not, a big complaint I hear all the time is that boomers are holding onto too much wealth, that goes without mentioning all the literal thousands of crypto currencies there are. Also bear in mind that each subsequent economic crash has been less severe than the last, the Great Depression was not eclipsed by the "Great Recession" nor has that been eclipsed by Covid lockdowns. Not only that, after every pandemic there's always an economic boom. Places like New York and California are likely just fucked, but that's due more to shitty politics and leadership than financial failure. Businesses all over are hiring at escalated wages because people don't want to work when they can have unemployment.

Moreover, this is technology, not real estate you can lend on or an education degree you can hold hostage from a position of authority. Tech gets reverse engineered all the time, and only gets cheaper the more it spreads.

No, this is hugely optimistic, it means that prosperity can be reached before you're biologically 40 after making all the right moves and knowing all the right people. What consequence is it to toil away for 40 years to become wealthy when you're still biologically 20?
 
Back
Top Bottom