Science You don’t have a male or female brain – the more brains scientists study, the weaker the evidence for sex differences

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Everyone knows the difference between male and female brains. One is chatty and a little nervous, but never forgets and takes good care of others. The other is calmer, albeit more impulsive, but can tune out gossip to get the job done.

These are stereotypes, of course, but they hold surprising sway over the way actual brain science is designed and interpreted. Since the dawn of MRI, neuroscientists have worked ceaselessly to find differences between men’s and women’s brains. This research attracts lots of attention because it’s just so easy to try to link any particular brain finding to some gender difference in behavior.

But as a neuroscientist long experienced in the field, I recently completed a painstaking analysis of 30 years of research on human brain sex differences. And what I found, with the help of excellent collaborators, is that virtually none of these claims has proven reliable.

Except for the simple difference in size, there are no meaningful differences between men’s and women’s brain structure or activity that hold up across diverse populations. Nor do any of the alleged brain differences actually explain the familiar but modest differences in personality and abilities between men and women.

More alike than not​

My colleagues and I titled our study “Dump the Dimorphism” to debunk the idea that human brains are “sexually dimorphic.” That’s a very science-y term biologists use to describe a structure that comes in two distinct forms in males and females, such as antlers on deer or the genitalia of men and women.

A brightly colored male zebra finch is perched next to a more drab colored female.

A pair of wild zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) perch in South Australia. The male is in the foreground, the female behind. Whitworth Images/Moment via Getty Images

When it comes to the brain, some animals do indeed exhibit sexual dimorphism, such as certain birds whose brains contain a song-control nucleus that is six times larger in males and is responsible for male-only courtship singing. But as we demonstrate in our exhaustive survey, nothing in human brains comes remotely close to this.

Yes, men’s overall brain size is about 11% bigger than women’s, but unlike some songbirds, no specific brain areas are disproportionately larger in men or women. Brain size is proportional to body size, and the brain difference between sexes is actually smaller than other internal organs, such as the heart, lungs and kidneys, which range from 17% to 25% larger in men.

When overall size is properly controlled, no individual brain region varies by more than about 1% between men and women, and even these tiny differences are not found consistently across geographically or ethnically diverse populations.

Other highly touted brain sex differences are also a product of size, not sex. These include the ratio of gray matter to white matter and the ratio of connections between, versus within, the two hemispheres of the brain. Both of these ratios are larger in people with smaller brains, whether male or female.

What’s more, recent research has utterly rejected the idea that the tiny difference in connectivity between left and right hemispheres actually explains any behavioral difference between men and women.

A zombie concept​

Still, “sexual dimorphism” won’t die. It’s a zombie concept, with the latest revival using artificial intelligence to predict whether a given brain scan comes from a man or woman.

Computers can do this with 80% to 90% accuracy except, once again, this accuracy falls to 60% (or not much better than a coin flip) when you properly control for head size. More troublesome is that these algorithms don’t translate across populations, such as European versus Chinese. Such inconsistency shows there are no universal features that discriminate male and female brains in humans – unlike those deer antlers.

Brain MRI images showing multiple views

Human brain structure is the same in males and females. Movus/iStock via Getty Images Plus

Neuroscientists have long held out hope that bigger studies and better methods would finally uncover the “real” or species-wide sex differences in the brain. But the truth is, as studies have gotten bigger, the sex effects have gotten smaller.

This collapse is a telltale sign of a problem known as publication bias. Small, early studies which found a significant sex difference were likelier to get published than research finding no male-female brain difference.

Software versus hardware​

We must be doing something right, because our challenge to the dogma of brain sex has received pushback from both ends of the academic spectrum. Some have labeled us as science “deniers” and deride us for political correctness. On the other extreme, we are dismissed by women’s health advocates, who believe research has overlooked women’s brains – and that neuroscientists should intensify our search for sex differences to better treat female-dominant disorders, such as depression and Alzheimer’s disease.

But there’s no denying the decades of actual data, which show that brain sex differences are tiny and swamped by the much greater variance in individuals’ brain measures across the population. And the same is true for most behavioral measures.

About a decade ago, teachers were urged to separate boys and girls for math and English classes based on the sexes’ alleged learning differences. Fortunately, many refused, arguing the range of ability is always much greater among boys or among girls than between each gender as a group.

In other words, sex is a very imprecise indicator of what kind of brain a person will have. Another way to think about it is every individual brain is a mosaic of circuits that control the many dimensions of masculinity and femininity, such as emotional expressiveness, interpersonal style, verbal and analytic reasoning, sexuality and gender identity itself.

Or, to use a computer analogy, gendered behavior comes from running different software on the same basic hardware.

The absence of binary brain sex features also resonates with the increasing numbers of people who identify as nonbinary, queer, nonconforming or transgender. Whatever influence biological sex exerts directly on human brain circuitry is clearly not sufficient to explain the multidimensional behaviors we lump under the complex phenomenon of gender.

Rather than “dimorphic,” the human brain is a sexually monomorphic organ – much more like the heart, kidneys and lungs. As you may have noticed, these can be transplanted between women and men with great success.
 
Keep it coming.
I look forward to more and more liberal Karens realizing their mistakes too late as their bathrooms, offices, and special sections in gyms/public transport become inundated with burly men in wigs.

Gen B will have a better reason to hate millenials and zoomers than gen-X ever did for boomers and the silent generation.
 
What the fuck are they talking about? This was the consensus 20 fucking years ago and the only reason it shifted focus was because of the trannies and trying to justify their madness as anything other than magical thinking.
 
I am totally on board with what the study concludes, that there is no man or woman brain. With that, I'm laughing that from that they extrapolate that it follows that trannies are MORE likely to exist, though a big hill they were dying on (or 40% ing) was that they had a woman's brain trapped in their man body. It just means at the end of the day you're either born with a dick or a cunt and unless you want to mutilate your junk, you're kinda stuck with being born a man or a woman. That gender bullshit is just personality types repackaged to make it seem like your dick or your cunt is responsible for the shitty person you are.
 
Fortunately, many refused, arguing the range of ability is always much greater among boys or among girls than between each gender as a group.
I always hated this argument, it's like saying there are no measureable differences between male and female average heights because giants and dwarves of both sexes exist. It's just stupid.

Men and women tend to think differently, have different interests, strengths and weaknesses--the fact that there is also overlap is irrelevant. Anyone with a shred of common sense can easily recognize this and all the studies in the world to "prove" otherwise will never change it.
 
Let's assume this is true. This means that troons aren't born that way -- they are damaged by their environment and that's why they end up loony-troon and thinking they've got a female brain trapped in a man's body. I'm cool with this. I'll pretend men and women only have different inclinations because of female and male socialization if it means we can drop kick troons.
 
Okay, but you do have male and female life experiences based on your body. You cant identify as a female, other than in the most superficial of ways, for the same reason you dont "identify" as a human, you dont have any other point of comparison on what it means to be a woman or be a man.
 
I'll at this point note that nowhere does this study disprove or even attempt to disprove that the end result behaviorally is dimorphic, just that running a really fancy diff between a bunch of male brains and female brains doesn't result in a significant different between what they can see for brains originating from either sex.

Also "only 1% different between sexes" is a bit like saying "humans and chimpanzees have only a 4% difference between genome structures".

Those little differences can make a big difference, but what do us lumpenproles know anyway...
 
These are stereotypes, of course, but they hold surprising sway over the way actual brain science is designed and interpreted.

Stereotypes exist for a reason; while they may not be a 100% this is how shit is, there are truths hidden in them. When things are easily noticeable in nature, science (real science) could be used to help determine why. If stereotypes hold sway, maybe because they haven't been disproven yet.

Still, “sexual dimorphism” won’t die. It’s a zombie concept, with the latest revival using artificial intelligence to predict whether a given brain scan comes from a man or woman.

Spend a couple of paragraphs talking about the differences between men and women, but somehow "sexual dimorphism" isn't a thing.

Avail thyself into the sun with a narration by black science man.
 
Sure, I’m willing to accept that brain wiring is mostly independent of gender.
that being said, penises and vaginas are not located in the brain. If a PC can understand “arouse $sex_organ” than so can a brain.
 
It needs to be said, if you encountered just about anyone doing neuroscience over the past decade, they were either tight lipped or pretending they never heard of human brains not having dimorphic sex differentiation. They would also straight up tell you all about how they could take you down to the lab and even a retard like you could see the differences between male and female brains. This shit is published all over their journals.

And now, the memory hole and the gaslighting will commence.

This will all probably be resolved once we have all the protein shapes and receptors mapped, if I had to guess.
 
All of this science-to-excuse instead of science-to-understand will inevitably be our downfall. Information is reviewed in a very biased manner these days and only seems to be used to solidify already held beliefs instead of expanding knowledge for everyone.
 
I have no idea what I'm talking about here but don't most thought processes other than like jumping out of the way of a car/catching a ball involve language to assess the input and determine the action/output? "I see a person walking towards me, his look indicates he may have a 6x higher violent crime rate than people I'm used to, do I avoid?"

And maybe brains are mostly physically the same as far as examination or scans can see between men and women, infants and adult or even between humans and animals but the language that runs things might have different structures and interpretations and such? Infant brains and animal brains are like a wristwatch cpu with no language but I could take 2 same model desktop pcs load win10 on one and redhat m'lady edition on the other and have hugely different experiences. (installed a full-spectrum co2 extract oilpen service pack to my OS just a few mins ago)
 
All of this science-to-excuse instead of science-to-understand will inevitably be our downfall. Information is reviewed in a very biased manner these days and only seems to be used to solidify already held beliefs instead of expanding knowledge for everyone.
"Science" is screened at the pitch level when the researchers are looking to finance their research. If they don't pencil fuck lie about what they're looking into and how they're going to do it, they'll get cut off before any real questions can be formulated. The people holding the bag of money have an agenda to push, and they'll only finance the agenda they want to. That's why all the shit that's easily noticeable out in the wild will never have a real study saying "here's why" and the truth will be smothered by progressive pseudo-science. And even if you get through that, you'll still struggle to get your shit published in any sort of revered journal; and all the other "professionals" in the field will tear it to pieces not over scientific merit, but because it doesn't reinforce the settled science.

The modern "scientist" would be in the mob wanting Copernicus to drink hemlock or whatever fucking death sentence he'd deserve, because the science of the Sun orbiting the Earth was settled at that time.
 
Last edited:
Theres a big difference. Women just think of celebrity dicks and selfies. I only think of what if scenarios like Urkel being in Die Hard and what if Satanist worshipped santa claus.
 
Well if true then trannies can't screech that they were born with a female brain and are therefore a real woman.
 
They gotta keep pushing The Narrative BS that "gender is a social construct".

Assuming the media is reporting the research right, how much fraud is in it?
 
Or, to use a computer analogy, gendered behavior comes from running different software on the same basic hardware.
In other words, you should be able to reprogram a tranny's brain to match his birth sex, to have him enjoy being his birth sex. This is surely a worthwhile goal and I wonder why aren't people researching in this area?
 
Back
Top Bottom