The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Outcome?

  • Guilty of Murder

    Votes: 75 7.6%

  • Not Guilty of Murder (2nd/3rd), Guilty of Manslaughter

    Votes: 397 40.0%

  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 221 22.3%

  • Mistrial

    Votes: 299 30.1%
  • Total voters
    992
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
This entire thing was a psyop to get George Floyd's face all over America and have everyone just burst out laughing every time they see this nigga from now on.
 
Obscure Creature said:
Are they trying to disprove that he overdosed holy shit lol
Click to expand...
That has always been part of the prosecution's strategy. They want to convince the jury that Chauvin's knee was the cause of death and not the obscene amount of fentanyl and similar narcotics in Floyd's system.

1 (2).png
 
Hüftpriester said:
Jesus, he called his mother mama too. What the fuck
Click to expand...
George Floyd, kang of Thebes

itskaon said:
is the prosecution deliberately shooting themselves in the foot? do they want more nigger riots?
Click to expand...
They're just establishing facts about the drug use and timeline. I think prosecution is trying to establish that he might have a higher tolerance to opioids due to the fact that he was such an addict and that therefore Chauvin is the murderer (this was in their opening argument on day 1). Defense is using it to impeach Floyd's character and establish him as a junkie. But I think defense is looking a little worse than the prosecution for it because they've pissed the witness off, made her cry with a fairly unrelated question in the middle of a string of other questions, and ate several objections in the midst of all that. I don't really see the point of both sides drawing focus to the "mama" thing since it doesn't really change anything, but I guess maybe it makes him seem less like a poor defenseless child while he was being pinned.
 
Wait the they just reveal to the whole world that this dead man had a Oedipus Complex?!
Thats cold stop this plz
 
If, hypothetically, someone in the Twin Cities area wanted to reserve a hotel room out of town for the date of the verdict and the six days following, what would be the start date of said reservation? This thread moves quickly and I have had trouble finding information as to when deliberation might begin and how long it may take. I appreciate any insight people may provide on this.
 
Wayneright said:
That has always been part of the prosecution's strategy. They want to convince the jury that Chauvin's knee was the cause of death and not the obscene amount of fentanyl and similar narcotics in Floyd's system.

View attachment 2048890
Click to expand...
Except they brought the store worker and the old man who confirmed he was basically as high as a kite at the very least. The old man saying there was foam at the mouth was like a soft confirm of an overdose.
 
AnOminous said:
The state had unlimited fucking money for this and they assembled this team of buffoons. Marcia Clark, eat your heart out, you just lost your position as shittiest prosecutor in a high profile case in history.
Click to expand...
People who run a business or a show will get people that are like them on their team.
 
This is like Aaron Hernandez and during the whole thing people were defending him by saying he was not only depressed, he was secretly gay and had his IQ impacted by sports, instead of just being a violent jealous piece of shit.
So his legacy care of his champions was as a sad gay retard.
 
Cucked Sky News pretends to be conservative yet they are stating that George Floyd was killed, even though that's why we're having this trial. Pathetic.
1617291447573.png

1617291423203.png

Hurry youtube, disable the dislike feature! You're not sweeping it up fast enough!!
 
ABC is actually being slightly honest.
They got a new guy giving commentary on the trial and he flat out said she was a better witness for the defense than the prosecution. I think they realized everyone watched the same trial and no one thinks the prosecution is remotely competent.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom