2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
At the inauguration, someone swaps all instances of ”Joe Biden” with “Donald Trump” on the teleprompter.

Joe Biden, being pudding-brained, reads it verbatim.
Speaking of inaugural speeches, if Biden goes off script and rambles on about Corn Pop and hairy legs and other instances, on top of video footage floating around, the transcript will be archived on sites like the Miller Center and Bartleby forever.
 
I'm gonna mostly bounce because like I said, it's going to be boring until the 6th, but I'll say this - if that retarded document that linked to a C: \ and which compared the vote tallies at 6:30pm on election day to the vote tallies 3 days later and suggested there was fraud because people voted after 6:30 is what you're banking on, it isn't going to be a deep state gayop when it's revealed that he was a tech-illiterate boomer who had no idea what he was looking at.
Well the audit found 600+ votes removed from one of the specific elections, so later votes don’t exactly explain it. In the specific example you’re referring to the number of votes increased by 70%, which is pretty extreme for late votes, but I suppose not technically impossible.
Of course it could still be the poll workers or the analyst being tech illiterate boomers.
 
Last edited:
All the sane people go elsewhere. The only people left in Oregon are libshits who are equivalent to niggers on the proverbial Democratic plantation.
Actually Oregon and California both are pretty republican outside of the shitass cities. Small towns and rural areas are littered with Trump signs.
 
I very much believe fraud occurs in alot of states where it's not the deciding factor but it very much dilutes.

Places like Massachusetts, Minnesota, Pre-Desantis Florida, Nevada in years prior, Potientially New Mexico and Colorado.

I think if you removed fraud there would be a few more potiential swing states.

I don't think Shiva will flip Massachusetts but I think he has a chance to expose a good deal of fraud that dilutes the vote.
Add Virginia as well. It is the east-coast California, after all. Heard a story from a family member about a friend who did security that influenced my thoughts on this as well.
 
I'm gonna mostly bounce because like I said, it's going to be boring until the 6th, but I'll say this - if that retarded document that linked to a C: \ and which compared the vote tallies at 6:30pm on election day to the vote tallies 3 days later and suggested there was fraud because people voted after 6:30 is what you're banking on, it isn't going to be a deep state gayop when it's revealed that he was a tech-illiterate boomer who had no idea what he was looking at.

It's already been explained to you that they didn't try and fail to link to a local file. Try reading it. They imaged the disks and mentioned files on it by where those files were - as you'd have to for it to be sensible. They can't and probably shouldn't be releasing the actual disk images.

You're thick enough already without deliberately trying to misconstrue things to make them fit your worldview better.
 
I very much believe fraud occurs in alot of states where it's not the deciding factor but it very much dilutes.

Places like Massachusetts, Minnesota, Pre-Desantis Florida, Nevada in years prior, Potientially New Mexico and Colorado.

I think if you removed fraud there would be a few more potiential swing states.

I don't think Shiva will flip Massachusetts but I think he has a chance to expose a good deal of fraud that dilutes the vote.
What about states like Alabama, Mississippi, Texas, and the Dakotas?
 
I dunno when you pine for 4 years ago as a more "innocent time" things must be going pretty terrible.
Four years ago, a bunch of drooling idiots weren't LARPing around as "patriots" squaring off against a bunch of soy golems LARPing as "revolutionaries". I'm also not sure if you're aware, but there's this pandemic thing which is a pretty big deal that's popped up somewhat recently.
Well the audit found 600+ votes removed from one of the specific elections, so later votes don’t exactly explain it. In the specific example you’re referring to the number of votes increased by 70%, which is pretty extreme for late votes, but I suppose not technically impossible.
Of course it could still be the poll workers or the analyst being tech illiterate boomers.
How exactly did the audit find them, by the by? See, that rambling document basically states that there was a "software glitch" or something that caused the error, but it fails to go into any detail at all about what the workers claimed that glitch to be, how it could be replicated - this falls more on the election officials to explain in more detail, yes, but it was also something that they admitted to before the "audit" in which a guy took pictures of a dell server for some reason.
Statements given to the effect seem to suggest that there's two quintessential elements at play here: the actual votes and the 'tabulator.' The suggestion of the officials seems to be that the official votes never suffered a glitch, but the 'tabulator' was reading incorrect values - if I remember, the "audit" itself makes reference to the response being along the lines of "even if we hadn't caught it early, we would have caught it before certification" or so. If the tabulator for some stupid reason was spitting out the combination of two different cells in earlier versions, that would explain it - which they should say.
Mail-in ballots were also almost all counted fairly late into the days, if this slice of the country is anything like everywhere else. The bulk of the day itself is spent opening and recording the ballots, with their being scanned later into the night.

It also claims that data regarding the time of the election itself was missing - I would not be surprised if he needed more permissions to access it and he just didn't realize. Many of the particular claims in the thing would be noteworthy if it didn't read like the guy just didn't understand what he was doing or what he was looking at, or if he had provided ACTUALLY USEFUL image references. He claims to have essentially cloned the drive, so it would not be fucking hard to provide printouts of memory operations that support his assertions. Because that's generally what I think of when I hear "forensic audit" applied to computers - tracing what someone did to the memory at each little instance to find inconsistencies. Not misreading a permissions error as "someone tried to zero out all the election results!"

It's already been explained to you that they didn't try and fail to link to a local file. Try reading it. They imaged the disks and mentioned files on it by where those files were - as you'd have to for it to be sensible. They can't and probably shouldn't be releasing the actual disk images.

You're thick enough already without deliberately trying to misconstrue things to make them fit your worldview better.
you aren't good with computers, are you? let me pull up that link:
Source: C: \Program Files\Dominion Voting Systems\Election Event Designer\Log\Info.txt
Notice 'source'? No-one can reference this thing. No judge could do anything with this unless they had the exact and specific machine on-hand that they could look through, pristine and totally untouched. You would never reference the address path to make this claim uniquely. You would include exact copies of the file - and the other files whose address path is mentioned - in evidence and make reference to them. You would restrict access to that evidence from everyone but the proper channels.

This is immediately below "Notably 42 minutes earlier on Nov 21 2020 at 13:53:09 a user attempted to zero out election results. Id:3168 EmsLogger - There is no permission to {0} - Project: User: Thread: 189. This is direct proof of an attempt to tamper with evidence." If you can't identify why that line is patently stupid, you really shouldn't be calling other people thick.
 
Last edited:
fraud is just conspiracy. when the democrats had the chance to btfo trump's lawyers on the national stage they... just filibustered in "muh democracy" and sucked Kreb's dick. Krabs had to admit he doesnt know jack shit about the issues the lawyers brought up and couldn't say anything about it.. Thus "this was the most secure election" only refers to foreign hacking and nothing else.

the antitrumpers cant even overcome the simplest of syllogisms:

1.)accusations require proof
2.) "this was a secure election" is an accusation
3.) "this was a secure election" requires proof.

yesterday's senate hearing reveals how little facts and data the nofraudsters have to believe their position. its a dogmatic religion in the same way sola scriptura christian fundamentalists were in the 80's - 90's.


e: i notice the nofraud crowd pouring over documents deboonking sthing. im jealous, i wish we had documents t debooonk but no one is able to post nofraud evidenve
 
Last edited:
fraud is just conspiracy. when the democrats had the chance to btfo trump's lawyers on the national stage they... just filibustered in "muh democracy" and sucked Kreb's dick. Krabs had to admit he doesnt know jack shit about the issues the lawyers brought up and couldn't say anything about it.. Thus "this was the most secure election" only refers to foreign hacking and nothing else.

the antitrumpers cant even overcome the simplest of syllogisms:

1.)accusations require proof
2.) "this was a secure election" is an accusation
3.) "this was a secure election" requires proof.

yesterday's senate hearing reveals how little facts and data the nofraudsters have to believe their position. its a dogmatic religion in the same way sola scriptura christian fundamentalists were in the 80's - 90's.


e: i notice the nofraud crowd pouring over documents deboonking sthing. im jealous, i wish we had documents t debooonk but no one is able to post nofraud evidenve
The left believes in science and racial equality, things that are actually tangible unlike the right's imaginary spaghetti sky daddy and lizardmen. We don't need to show proof to lesser beings built on conspiracies and divine spaghetti monster daddies. Go back to fapping to Jack Chick comics and Alex Jones, you unevolved chud ape.
 
Some apparent insights on why the SCOTUS rejected the TX suit.

Can someone confirm if there was large crowds outside the SCOTUS building?
there were riots when ACB was seated with idiots trying to force their way into the soctus building. they've also been attacking courthouses. I don't know if i believe it but it's believably told. bank on Roberts staying mum instead of clarifying because he doesn't want to explain their decision at all. so we'll never get the full story. but we can all see roberts, chief cuck justice fearing the mob.

The left believes in science and racial equality, things that are actually tangible unlike the right's imaginary spaghetti sky daddy and lizardmen. We don't need to show proof to lesser beings built on conspiracies and divine spaghetti monster daddies. Go back to fapping to Jack Chick comics and Alex Jones, you unevolved chud ape.

but race is a social construct and science goes through the "no real scienceman" all the time with homeopathy and colloid silverism. "that's not real science," the scientists say as they kneel, averting their eyes from the 13/52 sign.
 
you aren't good with computers, are you? let me pull up that link:
Source: C: \Program Files\Dominion Voting Systems\Election Event Designer\Log\Info.txt
Notice 'source'? No-one can reference this thing. No judge could do anything with this unless they had the exact and specific machine on-hand that they could look through, pristine and totally untouched. You would never reference the address path to make this claim uniquely. You would include exact copies of the file - and the other files whose address path is mentioned - in evidence and make reference to them. You would restrict access to that evidence from everyone but the proper channels.

This is immediately below "Notably 42 minutes earlier on Nov 21 2020 at 13:53:09 a user attempted to zero out election results. Id:3168 EmsLogger - There is no permission to {0} - Project: User: Thread: 189. This is direct proof of an attempt to tamper with evidence." If you can't identify why that line is patently stupid, you really shouldn't be calling other people thick.

Why don't you just link to the twitter thread you're taking all your erroneous talking points from and eliminate the middleman, you.

Scroll back up to page 16

Wed 04/10/2019 10:34:33.14 - Info: Used path "D:\WSUSOFFLINE1091_2012R2_W10\cmd\" on EMSSERVER (user: EMSADMIN)

• Wed 04/10/2019 10:34:35.55 - Info: Medium build date: 03/10/2019 17 • Found on c:\Windows\wsusofflineupdate.txt • *WSUS Offline Update (v.10.9.1) was created on 01/29/2017

Do you think they're just being boomers trying to link to their own drive there too?
 
Why don't you just link to the twitter thread you're taking all your erroneous talking points from and eliminate the middleman, you.

Scroll back up to page 16


Do you think they're just being boomers trying to link to their own drive there too?

Some of us actually read the nonsense you claim is deliverance.
Do you think every single instance of these isn't retarded? The one on page 21 references a text file that they are drawing conclusions from, whose address path is totally irrelevant.

Those two items? Those ones are completely fucking pointless to link in the first place. Please explain to me why you would need to describe the path for any of these, much less why you would include what user profile you logged in as. They're included to make the guy seem like he's doing some DEEP TECHNICAL WORK, but to anyone with passing familiarity with a computer, it's real, real fucking stupid.

Let me make this as clear as possible: if you can get to discovery, sure, these paths are kindof relevant then, since you can haul in the original server and verify your evidence with it. This "audit" is not getting anyone to discovery on its face; no judge can look at those paths and do anything with them. They're completely useless.
 
Last edited:
WSUS is a Windows update server, if it got compromised and sending out malicious updates to workstations, it's pretty relevant to know the date/time, server name (WSUSOFFLINE1091_2012R2_W10) and user name (EMSADMIN). No reason why it can't be used to attack connected infrastructure.
 
Last edited:
WSUS is a Windows update server, if it got compromised and sending out malicious updates to workstations, it's pretty relevant to know the date/time, server name, and user name. No reason why it can't be used to attack connected infrastructure.
proof.png


He links the time of access/execution for just about everything that he includes. Here's the full excerpt of why he references WSUS.
I trust you can read both what he's included and what he's saying, yes? It's very different from your assertion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom