📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Presented without context
Screenshot_20201213-013000~2.png
 
Reparations in social situations doesn't cure anything. After a full blown war reparations do help - the country can rebuild. These blacks and alphabet people don't understand that this MONEY won't bring life long relief from "oppression"

Either this generation/kinds of people are just so narcissistic they want the power trip of taking cash for no reason. OR they are materialistic/so dense and cash brings them happiness...

Money will bring you a little bit of joy for a bit... it's quite a novelty. The easiest way to get a bit of happiness is to turn off the fucking iPhone, PC and TV and go outside for a stroll... it's a bit of paradise, even in the shittest places. African-Americans and troons go watch the sunset - you might have an epiphany and finally shut the fuck up.
 
Kujo Jotaro said:
Whats with all of the insistence on fucking troons lately? What ever happend to being able to say no for whatever reason, without getting harrassed?
Click to expand...
For lesbians it started 6 years ago with the infamous cotton ceiling workshop. A lesbian porn whore refused to have sex with Drew Devaux- a male troon porn whore and he was so salty the he created a workshop for troonbians with the help of planned parenthood (!!!). In this workshop he and his fellow troon degenerates talked about how to convince lesbians to fuck troons. The cotton ceiling is reffering to the underwear of lesbian women which these guys wanted to "overcome" and "break down" their sexual barriers. It is a really disgusting and even violent fantasy only a sick piece of incel troon shit could invent.
1_nrOLOLOW0nmf1lLUPVcxbg.png
You can find a lot more about the cotton ceiling fiasco on the internet.

The backlash was huge so the term cotton ceiling died but the pressure for lesbians to date troons has been increasing ever since.

And then ftm Aidens were starting to go after gay men and it's also increasing rapidly. It started slow a few years ago with a few articles here and there but it's getting worse and worse. There are tons of examples in this thread.

Slowly but surely they are starting to bully heterosexuals too but this is way harder. There is no straight community to attack as a whole so I wonder what these sick fucks come up with in the future. There was one incident on tv where a straight black man refused to kiss a man who trooned out recently and was called troonphobic on twitter.

www.okayplayer.com

Was Ginuwine Being Transphobic In Refusing To Kiss A Transwoman On TV?

The “Pony” singer, Ginuwine, sparked a hefty debate on Twitter after refusing a kiss from Celebrity Big Brother UK housemate India Willoughby, a trans woman. Ginuwine (remember him?) has caused quite the controversy after a recent episode of Celebrity Big Brother UK. As a member of the live-action
www.okayplayer.com www.okayplayer.com

Also apparently Tinder removed the option to filter out troons. So they are working behind the scenes to push trans dating. But even tho they are demanding identity validation through dating - nearly no one is attracted to them. There are even studies about it.

Tl;dr Troons won't give up trying to force people to date them and they are getting bolder.
 
Sinner's Sandwich said:
The cotton ceiling is reffering to the underwear of lesbian women which these guys wanted to "overcome" and "break down" their sexual barriers. It is a really disgusting and even violent fantasy only a sick piece of incel troon shit could invent.
Click to expand...
1_nrOLOLOW0nmf1lLUPVcxbg.png

Isn't this just a workshop for rape? Learning psychological tactics to get a lesbian/queer woman to have sex with them or force because you've taken this workshop and they must want you, they just don't know it.

This just blows my mind, I'd heard the phrase before but didn't know what it meant. Not sure if I want to know. Too late now. I think I'm going to be sick. 🤢
 
Powerleveling whatever.

I'm not going to lie, I am biased against immediately going into medical intervention unless necessary because of my own personal experienences. For any of you fellow crazies, I take lithium and can say it has saved my life. While it works, it also has a shit ton of side effects, as in you need the monitor your levels constantly or else you can fuck up your kidneys and thyroid, or if your levels get too high die from toxicity. It also can wreak havoc on your hair, but I'll take reversible thinning as a trade off to not bouncing off the fucking walls for a week. Thankfully the person who originally prescribed this to me went over these risks in detail and let me decide if they were worth taking. It's helped me become way more vigilant about my health in general.

Now, there's trannies who are told of every single risk but have tunnel vision and just want hormones but there's plenty of people in crisis whose mental state dictates the last thing they should be doing is fucking with their body chemistry. Doctors fast track them with minimal to no discussion of the risks and most important the absolutely necessary aftercare that this person will need for the duration of being on hormones or if they get some form or surgery.

Or you have a doctor alter your consent form and remove your vagina with your knowledge: https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/ne...a-of-transgender-patient-without-his-consent/

Or the fact that a decent amount of doctors are getting into this stuff solely because it pays handsomely per surgery (yes, Jezebel but I'm linking via WaybackMachine): https://web.archive.org/web/2020082...surgeons-fail-their-trans-patients-1844774990
 
RazorBackBacon said:
What gibbering insanity.

Selective post-zygotic edits of the individual genome are 20 years away at minimum. Even then, expect it to be for cancer treatment, not making brokebrains feel good about their bodies. To alter an adult body from XY to XX or vice versa would require a full systemic treatment done all in a single go, just to prevent an auto-immune response or the transmuted cells from going cancerous. You know those big goo tanks from the cheesy sci-fi movies? We're gonna have to shove you in one of those. And even then it wouldn't have a visible change because a man has been exposed to androgens (not just testosterone) since he was pre-natal and his entire physionomy is different.

So where does the uterus come from? We can't just slap some waste uterus from a FtM into you. Where does the breast tissue come from; not just the fatty supportive tissue, but the lactal structures? If you want to be the first man in history to give birth, we need to crack your entire pelvis and spread it like a butterfly, then hope it heals back without complications.

And 'self-configured babies'? What the fuck does that even mean? Do you mean babies that decided their physical and sexual traits before birth? That's impossible because a fetus is non-cognizant. The only way that would happen is if we built a true AI in a computer and had that make a designer baby, then uploaded the AI into the resulting custom meatsack.

This troon is talking out his mangled mangina. Everything he mentioned is medical unicorns until at least 100 years from now, if then. And by then we'll have a pill that cures troonery.


I KNEW I LOVED SENATOR MILKIES FOR A REASON!

That reminds me, a year ago a coworker promised she'd make me a hat like that and she still ain't delivered. I'll have to yell at her Monday.
Click to expand...
Rewriting a person's genes to transform them into the opposite sex is like turning a cooked hamburger back into a cow. Any troon who thinks this is remotely possible must be fucking retarded. Getting your head transplanted onto a female cadaver is more feasible than that.

I think "self-configured babies" means the embryo somehow consciously chooses what genes it's going to express or somehow generates an extra sex chromosome out of nowhere... maybe they think you can CRISPR one in from a frozen fertilized egg with the same parents? I have no idea and don't know why you'd do that anyway. I mean all babies are self configured when you think about it, nature is pretty good at self correcting for errors in development as they happen, or spontaneously aborting if it's too genetically fucked. The sex being "wrong" doesn't make any sense, wrong according to who or what? Why would a pregnant woman troon out her fetus and what exactly is that supposed to accomplish? I don't know, it gets dumber the more you try and think about it.

If this off-the-wall garbage reflects how badly some people understand science, that's sad and worrying but also hilarious. No wonder troons think dick chops and hormones are voodoo magic and troon doctors are the fairy godmothers who will transform their fat, greasy, balding Chris Chan looking ass into a pretty pretty princess. People who are this delusional or stupid are having doctors promise them the world and then mutilating them, it is so incredibly fucking predatory.
 
The fantasies they have are hilarious. I will never understand how a ugly hulking hairy bepenised beast can legit fool himself into thinking becoming a delicate teenage waifu is possible for him. Because don’t you think if some combination of hormones, surgery, and makeup could turn a huge ugly man into a slender pretty girl that huge ugly women would’ve already been doing it? Do males imagine female ugliness is 100% about lacking willpower and being too lazy to go procure hundreds of thousands of $$ for face and body remodeling? If it couldn’t be fixed if you were female it certainly can’t with you being male.
 
Unpaid Emotional Labourer said:
The fantasies they have are hilarious. I will never understand how a ugly hulking hairy bepenised beast can legit fool himself into thinking becoming a delicate teenage waifu is possible for him. Because don’t you think if some combination of hormones, surgery, and makeup could turn a huge ugly man into a slender pretty girl that huge ugly women would’ve already been doing it? Do males imagine female ugliness is 100% about lacking willpower and being too lazy to go procure hundreds of thousands of $$ for face and body remodeling? If it couldn’t be fixed if you were female it certainly can’t with you being male.
Click to expand...
To a certain extent female ugliness in today's world is due to them being lazy, I'd say a lot of girls who are average to ugly looking give up on taking care of themselves. The same could probably be said for men, but I'm not attracted to them so I don't pay as much attention. That being said cooming is a hell of a drug, and I'm sure they've developed some fantasy in their head along these lines to coom too. I'm sure anything that even hints at the possibility of this being a thing gives them a stiffy immediately.
 
Kujo Jotaro said:
To a certain extent female ugliness in today's world is due to them being lazy, I'd say a lot of girls who are average to ugly looking give up on taking care of themselves. The same could probably be said for men, but I'm not attracted to them so I don't pay as much attention. That being said cooming is a hell of a drug, and I'm sure they've developed some fantasy in their head along these lines to coom too. I'm sure anything that even hints at the possibility of this being a thing gives them a stiffy immediately.
Click to expand...

For anyone, assuming you know, access to civilization, fitness and hygiene are controllable. Basic ugliness is not. Many of these men are fat and many have terrible hygiene. But if we control for that, the overwhelming majority are simply lacking in prettiness potential, as many women are. That doesn’t mean they can’t get someone to throw them some dick, but you know as well as I do that that is not challenging and does not in any way mean you are pretty. And considering how much one’s life improves when one is pretty...ugly women would be pursuing it, were it achievable. And since many more women are going to be close to but not quite pretty than these guys are it would take much less $$. If a woman who is 50% away from hotness can’t be carved into that state, how can a man who is 75-100% away?
 
Last edited:
All this talk about embryo selection, editing etc. reminds me of something insane I read recently from EssenceOfThought, an Atheist/"Skeptic" YouTuber who is the living embodiment of why bullies are a social good. One of those twerpy little autists who found a niche in dunking on retards who hold undefended positions like astrology being predictive or the earth being 6000 years old. Consequently, he developed the unfortunate condition known as Internet Skeptic Syndrome wherein you (a) become incapable of conceiving that you might be both wrong and retarded and (b) develop the delusion that cherry-picked "scientific" papers constitute unimpeachable evidence.

Anyways, he released a video wherein he makes a bunch of more or less nonsense claims, pretty standard stuff:
1607856429443.png

Note how he almost perfectly inverts the probable reality; gender identity is biological & innate [citation needed] according to him and yet he believes that all the gender expression stuff is all "socially enforced". Baffling. Particularly since the latter point is pretty well established and not really disputed by troonists either. So, he has managed to settle on the most retarded of all possible positions that you could take.

The real pisser is this though:
1607856898499.png

"targetted abortion of queer fetusues" :story::story:

Source: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CxigSCxYccTZhRTi1fubvUjPStgKGc_Gsmha9N6UlsY/edit
Video link is in the google doc as well but don't watch it, you'll just get mad because the guy sounds like the biggest loser.
 
Last edited:
Father Brown said:
Note how he almost perfectly inverts the probable reality; gender identity is biological & innate [citation needed] according to him and yet he believes that all the gender expression stuff is all socially enforced. Baffling. Particularly since the latter point is pretty well established and not really disputed by troonists either. So, he has managed to settle on the most retarded of all possible positions that you could take.
Click to expand...
He's tying himself into pretzels because pointing out the outrageously sexist nature of troon ideology is a favorite pasttime of radfems. So he's stuck trying to square the circle of both being not-sexist and not-transphobic, resulting in this mess of rationalizations. He doesn't seem to realize that he's completely undermined the meaningfulness of "gender identity". The reason we keep men and women separated from each other is because of the behavior of (a small subset of) predatory men. You can make an argument that mentally, trans women are women, and thus no more dangerous than any other women. And indeed, this is the argument most trans activists go with to justify allowing them access to female spaces. But if gender identity has absolutely NO consequences for behavior, then trans women are just as dangerous as "cis" men, blowing a hole into the very foundation of what they're advocating for.
 
Father Brown said:
Anyways, he released a video wherein he makes a bunch of more or less nonsense claims, pretty standard stuff:
View attachment 1785795
Note how he almost perfectly inverts the probable reality; gender identity is biological & innate [citation needed] according to him and yet he believes that all the gender expression stuff is all socially enforced. Baffling. Particularly since the latter point is pretty well established and not really disputed by troonists either. So, he has managed to settle on the most retarded of all possible positions that you could take.
Click to expand...
Troonism, at its core, has two basic premises, both of which are extreme but not entirely insane.
1) Gender is an artificial concept that only exists due to social enforcement (radical conclusion: gender is meaningless)
2) Gender is an innate and immutable part of a person's sense of self (radical conclusion: gender is one of the most important parts of your identity)

Both of these can be true to a degree and you don't need to reach the radical conclusion. Personally I believe that some aspects of what we consider gender are artificial concepts that only exist due to social enforcement, stuff like color preferences and clothing; I believe that some aspects of what we consider gender are hard-wired at birth, stuff like modes of sexual attraction or kinesthetics. The first premise is generally a progressive idea while the second is conservative and I'd say that the vast, vast majority of people are somewhere in the middle. I'm personally a little more invested in the first and I think that it's the more defensible one, it's definitely the more popular position in the progressive circles where I hang out and it's the one that appeals the most to handmaidens.

The issue is that trannies, depending on what they want at the moment, go 100% in either one. The first argument is the motte and the second is the bailey. #1 is used to defend actual trans rights and #2 is used to force everyone to play along. For example, radical feminists tend to lean heavily for #1 and don't have any problems with men defying socially constructed gender norms like clothing or hobbies. But they also think that men in general are socialized to be oppressive (some of them also hold some #2 beliefs about men naturally being aggressive, but that's not relevant here) and should not be in women's spaces that are intended specifically for women to be free from oppressive gender dynamics and that men would fuck that up and they don't even need these spaces*. Even if you're a TWAW evangelist, it's undeniable that TiMs are socialized as males and don't face the same issues as women, at least it's undeniable if you're remotely sane, so a #1 argument just won't work here. But suddenly #2! Keeping TiMs out of women's spaces invalidates their core gender identity and that's not just some social construct, it's a core part of their personality and by denying it you're denying their right to exist. And then when handmaidens peek in on the TiM radfem fight they get told that these radfems are the ones who think that gender has a meaning and since they refuse the radical conclusion of #1 then clearly they are adherents of #2. To someone who hasn't (or won't) spent much time actually thinking about this stuff that seems like a reasonable enough argument.

Some clearly non-threatening trannies who were obviously being oppressed by patriarchal gender dynamics were exceptions. These exceptions ended up being the first step on a slippery slope and now radomes are probably less willing to make these exceptions in the future
 
How Do You Do Fellow Kids said:
He's tying himself into pretzels because pointing out the outrageously sexist nature of troon ideology is a favorite pasttime of radfems. So he's stuck trying to square the circle of both being not-sexist and not-transphobic, resulting in this mess of rationalizations. He doesn't seem to realize that he's completely undermined the meaningfulness of "gender identity". The reason we keep men and women separated from each other is because of the behavior of (a small subset of) predatory men. You can make an argument that mentally, trans women are women, and thus no more dangerous than any other women. And indeed, this is the argument most trans activists go with to justify allowing them access to female spaces. But if gender identity has absolutely NO consequences for behavior, then trans women are just as dangerous as "cis" men, blowing a hole into the very foundation of what they're advocating for.
Click to expand...

I don’t think you get the point here though: this is damaging to actual females, and I have never known a Skeptic bro who wouldn’t get erect over that.
Chromeo said:
A troon on Twitter bitching about something that I can almost guarantee did not happen:
View attachment 1785856
A handmaiden in the replies kissing troon ass:
View attachment 1785857

The profile, with the usual e-begging and terrible selfie pfp
View attachment 1785859

And a very sad before and after set of pics from their recent media:
View attachment 1785860View attachment 1785861
Click to expand...

This shit has got to stop before the entire supply chain of middling white men breaks. It’s fine (hilarious actually) when they’re low quality and sad the few times they appear to be (but of course actually are not) high quality, but the mid-range (where nothing is wrong with them but nothing is great either) is where most husbands will be found for most women, low, medium, and high quality alike, so we really need to maintain a lot of inventory on hand.

For the sake of true and honest white and swirl-chasing females everywhere, I vow to find opportunities to compliment mid-range white men on their abilities, qualities, and/or interests at least twice a week, in an attempt to head off incipient troonery. Though I fear I am too late, I suppose I should start with the college friend on Facebook who out of nowhere has stopped posting about craft beer and started posting about the anime he‘s watching and how non-binary people are being erased.
 
Law Lets Female Rape Victims Select Female Forensic Examiners; Trans Activists React With Outrage | Women Are Human.

www.womenarehuman.com

Law Lets Female Rape Victims Select Female Forensic Examiners; Trans Activists React With Outrage | Women Are Human

UK — Holyrood, Scotland. On the night of December 10, Holyrood, Scotland passed legislation protecting the legal right of female rape victims to be attended by female forensic teams. While many female rape survivors cheered the decision as a safeguard of their right to bodily autonomy...
www.womenarehuman.com www.womenarehuman.com

“Resisters United expressed bewilderment at transgender advocates’ reaction: “I kid you not – they are kicking off about not being able to examine rape victims. Twitter is full of screaming angry tweets about ‘their rights.’ Some are declaring not being able to examine a rape victim makes them ‘feel unsafe.’”
 
Last edited:
Unpaid Emotional Labourer said:
For anyone, assuming you know, access to civilization, fitness and hygiene are controllable. Basic ugliness is not. Many of these men are fat and many have terrible hygiene. But if we control for that, the overwhelming majority are simply lacking in prettiness potential, as many women are. That doesn’t mean they can’t get someone to throw them some dick, but you know as well as I do that that is not challenging and does not in any way mean you are pretty. And considering how much one’s life improves when one is pretty...ugly women would be pursuing it, were it achievable. And since many more women are going to be close to but not quite pretty than these guys are it would take much less $$. If a woman who is 50% away from hotness can’t be carved into that state, how can a man who is 75-100% away?
Click to expand...
All I'm saying is a lot of people are fat and lazy because they don't see a need to put in effort to maintaining health as they're already below average or average looking. Isn't it odd to see an obese woman with a beautiful face? idk where you're from but that is the case in my part of the country. Like I said I don't find men attractive so I'm not as likely to notice. Never said or even insinuated as far as I can tell that trannies could some how surpass ugly women in beauty? "life improves when one is pretty" :story: . Yes there are benefits to being pretty, handsome, attractive or whatever word of choice, but these are not intrinsic improvement's in life and often times lead people down the wrong path. Youthful beauty is fleeting and if you build your entire life and self esteem around being "pretty" you're going to find yourself lost when you hit 30. Being fat and lazy is unattractive even in naturally beautiful people, so when I say I think there are a lot of women who make themselves ugly through neglect of health this is what I'm implying. Inb4 men do this too yes I concede this is most likely the case, especially looking at obesity numbers, but I'm not a fag so can't really speak to the subject in the same way.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom