2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
EmuWarsVeteran said:
Yeah looking at Canada's elections it seems Trudeau has somehow managed to win fair and square while under some of the fairest election laws out there, which if anything just serves to show that you can't cure stupid and some countries just need a good nuking.
Click to expand...
That's because he's importing most of his voter base. He doesn't need to cheat when he can just import most of his voters
 
Defense uses the fact that Republicans are leading in some state races ("on the same ballot") in order to argue that plaintiff's contention is not with voter fraud, but with voter choice.
 
Zero Day Defense said:
Defense uses the fact that Republicans are leading in some state races ("on the same ballot") in order to argue that plaintiff's contention is not with voter fraud, but with voter choice.
Click to expand...
Right, now I see whats going on. This is the blunderbuss approach, throw EVERYTHING at the wall and see what sticks. This is... a bad idea.
 
So we now know why the left has been kinda silent about all this shit.

They don't have a defense. They can't defend this. Their arguments are pants on head retarded.

This bodes well if it gets up to the SCOTUS.
 
Defense is now gaslighting that the plaintiff could have raised these issues before the election but did not... when plaintiff did raise these issues before the election and were ignored or rejected
 
Gustav Schuchardt said:
"Because we didn't rig the down-ballot races which we lost we couldn't have rigged the presidential race which we won"
Click to expand...
Zero Day Defense said:
Defense uses the fact that Republicans are leading in some state races ("on the same ballot") in order to argue that plaintiff's contention is not with voter fraud, but with voter choice.
Click to expand...
It's like their troon /pol/ shills and their lawyers are the same people.
 
draggs said:
Defense is now gaslighting that the plaintiff could have raised these issues before the election but did not... when plaintiff did raise these issues before the election and were ignored or rejected
Click to expand...
They literally had a high profile case about this basically go to SCOTUS right before the election. What the actual fuck?
 
HTTP Error 404 said:
So we now know why the left has been kinda silent about all this shit.

They don't have a defense. They can't defend this. Their arguments are pants on head retarded.

This bodes well if it gets up to the SCOTUS.
Click to expand...
This does make me slightly more optimistic, yes.
 
We've got case number two for the SCOTUS, defense better not try PA way of defending fraud.
Screenshot_20201117-162411_Brave.jpg
 
Zero Day Defense said:
this man is arguing for ballot curing when ballot curing is illegal in PA
Click to expand...
Its the blunderbuss approach. Argue EVERYTHING, and find what sticks. It means they don't have any set of arguments they believe will work well so are hoping to find many small ones to add up to a win. I... its shockingly incompetent. I legit thought they'd have more.
 
Wanted to wait until I got more solid confirmation on this, but the Michigan Republicans are trying to impeach Whitmer.
2020-11-17_9-49-00.jpg

Knowing our long history with impeachments, it will probably go as well as those attempts. But it is the thought that counts, right?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom