Law Justice Amy Coney Barrett Megathread

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
So the announcer at the rose garden announced her as she walked out with the president.

will find an article soon.

e: he official announced her as his third pick.

e2:

---------------------------------------------
Article Start

The long-term academic, appeals court judge and mother of seven was the hot favourite for the Supreme Court seat.

Donald Trump - who as sitting president gets to select nominees - reportedly once said he was "saving her" for this moment: when elderly Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died and a vacancy on the nine-member court arose.

It took the president just over a week to fast-track the 48-year-old conservative intellectual into the wings. This is his chance to tip the court make-up even further to the right ahead of the presidential election, when he could lose power.

Barrett's record on gun rights and immigration cases imply she would be as reliable a vote on the right of the court, as Ginsburg was on the left, according to Jonathan Turley, a professor of law at George Washington University.

"Ginsburg maintained one of the most consistent liberal voting records in the history of the court. Barrett has the same consistency and commitment," he adds. "She is not a work-in-progress like some nominees. She is the ultimate 'deliverable' for conservative votes."

And her vote, alongside a conservative majority, could make the difference for decades ahead, especially on divisive issues such as abortion rights and the Affordable Care Act (the Obama-era health insurance provider).

Barrett's legal opinions and remarks on abortion and gay marriage have made her popular with the religious right, but earned vehement opposition from liberals.

But as a devout Catholic, she has repeatedly insisted her faith does not compromise her work.

Barrett lives in South Bend, Indiana, with her husband, Jesse, a former federal prosecutor who is now with a private firm. The couple have seven children, including two adopted from Haiti. She is the oldest of seven children herself.

Known for her sharp intellect, she studied at the University of Notre Dame's Law School, graduating first in her class, and was a clerk to Justice Antonin Scalia, who, in her words, was the "staunchest conservative" on the Supreme Court at the time.

Like her mentor Scalia, she is an originalist, which is a belief that judges should attempt to interpret the words of the Constitution as the authors intended when they were written.

Many liberals oppose that strict approach, saying there must be scope for moving with the times.

Barrett has spent much of her career as a professor at her alma mater, Notre Dame, where she was voted professor of the year multiple times. One of students, Deion Kathawa, who took a class with her earlier this year, told the BBC she was popular because she involved everyone in discussions. He found her "collegial, civil, fair-minded, intellectually sharp, and devoted to the rule of law secured by our Constitution".

Another student told the WBEZ new site: "I feel somewhat conflicted because … she's a great professor. She never brought up politics in her classroom... But I do not agree with her ideologies at all. I don't think she would be good for this country and the Supreme Court."

Barrett was selected by President Trump to serve as a federal appeals court judge in 2017, sitting on the Seventh Circuit, based in Chicago. She regularly commutes to the court from her home - more than an hour and half away. The South Bend Tribune once carried an interview from a friend saying she was an early riser, getting up between 04:00 and 05:00. "It's true," says Paolo Carozza, a professor at Notre Dame. "I see her at the gym shortly after then."

Carozza has watched Barrett go from student to teacher to leading judge, and speaks about her effusively. "It's a small, tight-knit community, so I know her socially too. She is ordinary, warm, kind."

A religious man himself, he thinks it is reasonable to question a candidate about whether their beliefs would interfere with their work. "But she has answered those questions forcefully... I fear she is now being reduced to an ideological caricature, and that pains me, knowing what a rich and thoughtful person she is."

Her confirmation hearing for the appeals court seat featured a now-infamous encounter with Senator Dianne Feinstein, who voiced concerns about how her faith could affect her thinking on the law. "The dogma lives loudly within you," said Mrs Feinstein in an accusatory tone. Defiant Catholics adopted the phrase as a tongue-in-cheek slogan on mugs.

Barrett has defended herself on multiple occasions. "I would stress that my personal church affiliation or my religious belief would not bear in the discharge of my duties as a judge," she once said.

However, her links to a particularly conservative Christian faith group, People of Praise, have been much discussed in the US press. LGBT groups have flagged the group's network of schools, which have guidelines stating a belief that sexual relations should only happen between heterosexual married couples.

LGBTQ advocacy group Human Rights Campaign has voiced strong opposition to Barrett's confirmation, declaring her an "absolute threat to LGBTQ rights".

The Guttmacher Institute, a pro-choice research organisation, declined comment on Barrett specifically, but said appointing any new conservative Supreme Court justice would "be devastating for sexual and reproductive health and rights".

To secure the position on the Supreme Court - a lifelong job - Barrett will still have to pass a gruelling confirmation hearing, where Democratic senators are likely to take a tough line, bringing up many of their voters' concerns.

Professor Turley thinks she will take it her stride, due to the "civil and unflappable disposition" she showed during the hostile questioning for the appeals court position.

"She is someone who showed incredible poise and control… her [appeals court] confirmation hearing was a dry run for a Supreme Court confirmation. She has already played in the World Series."

article end
---------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------
Article Start

President Trump on Saturday announced he has chosen Amy Coney Barrett as his pick to fill the Supreme Court seat vacated by the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg -- a move that could significantly shift the nation's highest court to the right if she's confirmed by the Senate.

“Today it is my honor to nominate one of our nation's most brilliant and gifted legal minds to the Supreme Court," Trump said in the Rose Garden alongside Barrett. "She is a woman of unparalleled achievement, towering intellect, sterling credentials and unyielding loyalty to the Constitution -- Judge Amy Coney Barrett.”

Trump announced Barrett, a judge on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, who had been considered by Trump for the vacancy left by the retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy in 2018. Trump eventually chose now-Justice Brett Kavanaugh instead.

Ginsburg, a liberal trailblazer who was a consistent vote on the court’s liberal wing, died last week at 87. The announcement sets up what is likely to be a fierce confirmation battle as Republicans attempt to confirm Barrett before the election on Nov. 3.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has promised to put the nominee up for a vote, despite the objections of Senate Democrats -- who cite McConnell’s refusal to give Obama nominee Merrick Garland a hearing in 2016.

A source familiar with the process told Fox News that Oct. 12 is the target date for the beginning of confirmation hearings. This means that Barrett, 48, could potentially be confirmed by the end of the month and just days before the election.

Barrett, a former Notre Dame professor and a mother of seven, is a devout Catholic and pro-life -- beliefs that were raised as a problem by Democrats during her 2017 confirmation hearing to her seat on the 7th Circuit.

"The dogma lives loudly within you, and that's of concern," Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., told Barrett. She was eventually confirmed 55-43.

Trump was also believed to have been considering candidates including 11th Circuit Judge Barbara Lagoa. Trump had said publicly that he had five potential picks he was considering.

A source told Fox News that Trump had taken note of how “tough” Barrett was when she faced the tough confirmation fight in 2017 and had kept her very much at the front of his mind since then.

The source said Trump met her during the considerations on who to replace Kennedy in 2018, talked to a lot of people about her and wanted to keep her in place through the Kavanaugh vetting process in case there was an issue. Kavanaugh did face hurdles in his confirmation battle, but that came after his nomination was announced.

The source said that after Ginsburg died, Barrett was the only candidate he met and spoke with at length, although he made a few calls to Lagoa because some people were pushing him very hard to do so. But ultimately Barrett was always at the front of Trump’s mind to fill a Ginsburg vacancy.

Should she be confirmed, Barrett would be Trump’s third Supreme Court confirmation. That’s more than two-term Presidents Barack Obama, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush -- who each put two justices on the court.

Democrats have vowed to oppose the pick, but the Senate math does not appear to be in their favor. Republicans have 53 Senate seats and Barrett only needs 50 to be confirmed -- with Vice President Mike Pence acting as a tie breaker in such a case.

So far, only Sens. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, and Susan Collins, R-Maine, have indicated they oppose moving forward with a confirmation before the election. Murkowski has since suggested she still may vote for the nominee.

Fox News' John Roberts, Mike Emanuel and Tyler Olson contributed to this report.

article end
---------------------------------------------
 
Last edited:
SCOTUS doesn't get protection from the SS or US Marshals, they have their own small security team in the Supreme Court Police, it's one of the smallest federal agencies and only numbers around 125 officers. When they're inside the Washington metro area they get protection by them at all times, when they leave they need to request them as security.

Like if John Roberts went to West Virginia for some matter or another he'd have to ask the SCP to accompany him if he felt it was necessary and requested it.
They get, or are offered, USMS protection outside DC.
 
Tucker is discussing all the shit thrown at ACB. Also Schumer actually knows that RGB is in heaven. Democrats now discussing God and the afterlife lol.
But remember: Schumer says she is in a grave in Heaven. This opens a whole new field of theology, ridiculism or, oneday, Schumerism.
 
5304.png
https://mobile.twitter.com/AP/status/1310733540699635713 (https://archive.vn/IhnxT)
 

That's an odd way of saying she's Catholic.

This can't be real. This is nanny state shit. They actually believe that democrat voters are idiots.

This shouldn't surprise you at all. A very large percentage of the population has been fully and irrevocably demoralized, an important aspect of which is the complete abolition of critical thought.

Have you tried talking to a "serious", young progressive? Unless what you say and believe is exactly in line with what maybe a dozen or so sources ( CNN, UN, WHO, Twitter checkmarks etc ) say you're wrong, a white supremacist nazi and a danger to democracy, women and especially black bodies ( this is nothing but a conditioned response to any form of wrongthink ). What we are seeing is the culmination of what Yuri Bezmenov warned us about decades ago, fully programmed drones unable to process any information from outside the approved bubble.

Which is why Trump is working to establish patriotic education plans, in combination with a stacked Supreme Court we will hopefully be able to weather the storm until new generations, free from Marxist demoralization, are large enough in number to nullify the vote of the lost generations X, Millenials and partial Zoomers.
 
This can't be real. This is nanny state shit. They actually believe that democrat voters are idiots.

They also tricked people like Labor MP Jess Phillips, yes the one that Sargon said he wouldn't even rape, with the story about LeBron James and other NBA players wearing a lace collar to honor RBG.



They also got fact checked for this obvious satire story.

And here's the original piece of the Bee's website.

 
Last edited:
Dems simply can’t win attacking her. They’re not going to drag some mentally ill person out to accuse her of rape like with Kavanaugh and the petty attacks make them look like woman hating sexists. Blue check marks have been getting BTFO’d all day on twitter and deleting posts they’ve made about her. They can’t win, Amy is in.

And I'm loving every moment of it.
 
I agree that Lagoa is not as safe a choice as he made her out to be, if only because of the vetting that hasn't been done on her. We just don't know much about her life, and something negative outside of judicial decisions could really hurt her. So in that sense, ACB was a good choice. Still, a lot of conservatives (e.g. Fox news neocons) think she's a slam dunk when there is a significant chance it won't be. She's super smart, though, so hopefully she's prepared to cut through idiots like Hirono or Kamala.
Barrett was on the list since Kavanagh was picked at least. Properly vetted and it shows in the attacks they throw at her. Absolutely weak from she's a catholic to she's anti abortion to supporting traditional roles in the family, none of which are a slam dunk at all. She's the right choice for pushing her through quickly. Even CNN couldn't do anything with her after her speech accepting the nomination, so now it's back to Trump's taxes again instead of her.
 
Barrett was on the list since Kavanagh was picked at least. Properly vetted and it shows in the attacks they throw at her. Absolutely weak from she's a catholic to she's anti abortion to supporting traditional roles in the family, none of which are a slam dunk at all. She's the right choice for pushing her through quickly. Even CNN couldn't do anything with her after her speech accepting the nomination, so now it's back to Trump's taxes again instead of her.
yeah I can certainly see how lib butthurt over the Cuban chick would have been possibly pulling an inside straight flush, but a solid three of a kind is a nice hand too
 
Mitch McConnell should have just put the vote today so Trump can concentrate on his campaign.

Apparently he has the ability to do so assuming the GOP is truly united behind the pick.

There is always a feeling like Kavanaugh that the democrats are gonna try some crazy shit.
 
Barrett was on the list since Kavanagh was picked at least. Properly vetted and it shows in the attacks they throw at her. Absolutely weak from she's a catholic to she's anti abortion to supporting traditional roles in the family, none of which are a slam dunk at all. She's the right choice for pushing her through quickly. Even CNN couldn't do anything with her after her speech accepting the nomination, so now it's back to Trump's taxes again instead of her.

>Be ACB
>Get job at highest court
>First day, something about abortion.
>You look at the precedent. They've got a case.
>Pope kicks down the door.
>Oh my god I've always wanted to meet you.
>Pope cusses me out, clearly drunk on communion wine.
>Says God wants me to outlaw abortion.
>Cant argue with god.
>Make up some excuse, abortion gets banned.
>Next day new case.
>Some woman's rights groups are protesting abortion.
>First amendment pretty clear here TBH
>Husband busts through door clearly drunk on normal wine
>Yells at me and tells me woman should be seen not heard
>Can't argue with the master of my household
>Make it so woman don't have right to free speech
>Not even allowed to talk anymore. Just let the pope and my hubby do the job
 
Mitch McConnell should have just put the vote today so Trump can concentrate on his campaign.

Apparently he has the ability to do so assuming the GOP is truly united behind the pick.

There is always a feeling like Kavanaugh that the democrats are gonna try some crazy shit.
this, just fucking do it, they're gonna throw a spaz fit for the next dozen years over this either way, just do the damn thing
 
re. The Minneapolis vote thefts by the dune coonness, this from Tulsi Gabbard. How many of you fine faggots would consider voting for her if she had gotten the nomination? I actually might. She's pretty based for a Democrat.

 
Last edited:
re. The Minneapolis vote thefts by the dune coonness, this from Tulsi Gabbard:. How many of you fine faggots would consider voting for her if she had gotten the nomination? I actually might. She's pretty based for a Democrat.

gabbard-vote.mp4
based surf mommy shittalking the dems
 
re. The Minneapolis vote thefts by the dune coonness, this from Tulsi Gabbard:. How many of you fine faggots would consider voting for her if she had gotten the nomination? I actually might. She's pretty based for a Democrat.

Tulsi and Yang are probably the few remaining sane people left in the Democrat party. Hopefully the Dems go through a purge after the election. More hopefully Tulsi and Yang survive that purge, the opportunities for them and the rest of the sane Dems would be great if they're able to capitalize.
 
Back
Top Bottom