Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Fareal said:
It’s important that anyone who tries to rape an eight year doesn’t get to bleat about “future marriage” on the way to the gallows but just shits themselves as they hang.

Eight year olds are not responsible for shit. You are a depraved sweaty predator with a hard drive full of CP who walks slowly past the elementary school wanking through your pocket lining.
Click to expand...
disagree and again you're misrepresenting my position as a strawman because you don't want to debate what I've actually said.
 
BoxerShorts47 said:
Actual humans just believe whatever the mainstream media tells them to believe. If the MSM says gay marriage is marriage then they believe. If the MSM says diversity is our strength then that's what they believe. If the MSM says we should bomb Iran than that's what they believe. Asking the avg person what they think is 100% stupid because they repeat the mainstream culture like brain-dead zombies, includes you.
Click to expand...
Okay Alien
 

Attachments

  • image0 (1).png
    image0 (1).png
    442.9 KB · Views: 52
  • Dove-Seal-Family-Approved-Shadow.png
    Dove-Seal-Family-Approved-Shadow.png
    115.8 KB · Views: 54
BoxerShorts47 said:
Why don't you make a survey for western parents and see how many want slightly older men to marry their post-pubescent daughters?

You're clearly misrepresenting my position to try and defeat it, strawman argument. Again this might work at first but in the long-run people say, "well what are the pros and cons of changing the age of consent." You're just using the same bad faith tactics that the cuckservatives and skeptic communities used to defeat the liberals and SJWs. You can get a short-term victory but long-term loss once people realize you got no arguement.
Click to expand...

pros of changing the age of consent: pedos get to get their rocks off legally

cons: young girls who are not capable of making educated decisions suffer the complications of developmental pregnancy and mental health issues as a result of exploitation by pedophilic twatmongers like you.

There. Done. Now...

1596908261204.png
 
AnOminous said:
Why don't you consider that you'll be put up against a wall and shot in your preferred future? Nobody likes a disgusting child molester like you. Fascists have you on their first to kill list.
Click to expand...
1. I'm not a fascist. Retard slur. 2. The actual fascists were pro-family and wanted women to get married and have kids so I think they'd agree with me.

The age of consent was set at 14 by Section 176 of the Criminal Code for the German Empire in 1872. This has remained in force under all successor regimes, including the Third Reich.

In addition Section 182 of the Criminal Code made the seduction of an “unblemished” girl under 16 a prosecutable offence if her parents or legal guardian made a complaint.
Click to expand...
 
BoxerShorts47 said:
disagree and again you're misrepresenting my position as a strawman because you don't want to debate what I've actually said.
Click to expand...

You have said it should be legal to sexually abuse children of eight and upwards. Your position is not capable of debate because it is grotesque, deviant, perverted and also talking about this is giving you an erection.

Jesus sees you and He knows what you are.
 
BoxerShorts47 said:
Actual humans just believe whatever the mainstream media tells them to believe. If the MSM says gay marriage is marriage then they believe. If the MSM says diversity is our strength then that's what they believe. If the MSM says we should bomb Iran than that's what they believe. Asking the avg person what they think is 100% stupid because they repeat the mainstream culture like brain-dead zombies, includes you.
Click to expand...

Niggers like you are what give other niggers a bad name. You're the detritus left at the bottom of a bad pint of beer, the shallow end of the gene pool, you should be disqualified from the human race for shoving. You keep telling us what parents want for their kids, how the fuck would you know? Your daddy left when he realised he'd sired a chimaeric waterhead and your fat mom can't take Omar's dick out her mouth long enough to give you an opinion.
If you went outside your tarpaper shack and talked to actual parents, you'd probably find that the recurring theme when you ask them what they want for their kids is for them "to be happy", not "married at 15, mother of 8 by 25".
If your mom is gargling hints through a throatfull of semen about you finding a girl and getting married, it's because she wants your lazy NEET ass out of her hovel.

Gunt.Inc said:
And that's your problem you do not recognize that when you hit puberty you brain has not developed enough to evaluate future decision.
Click to expand...
He doesn't recognise that development because it never happened to him. He's still an edgy teen, mentally, and probably will remain so until his second or third heart attack kills him before he's 40.
 
littlearmalite said:
pros of changing the age of consent: pedos get to get their rocks off legally

cons: young girls who are not capable of making educated decisions suffer the complications of developmental pregnancy and mental health issues as a result of exploitation by pedophilic twatmongers like you.

There. Done. Now...

View attachment 1505444
Click to expand...
this is absolutely retarded. 1. I am not promoting pedo-philia aka pre-pubescent girls. 2. You act like casual sex pump and dump high school relationships which are perfectly legal under age of consent are not damaging. 3. Allowing women to enter relationships with men that are more likely to marry is less damaging.

Total inversion. Again this is part of the problem with feminism or diversity. it makes right wrong and wrong right.
 
BoxerShorts47 said:
disagree and again you're misrepresenting my position as a strawman because you don't want to debate what I've actually said.
Click to expand...
Even if you wanted to prepare girls for marriage when does sex therefore the age of consent come into play? Your ignoring the fact that you can keep the age of consent the same and have schools to teach about marriage like we have sex ed. You just want an excuse to sexually exploit kids.
 
BoxerShorts47 said:
1. I'm not a fascist. Retard slur. 2. The actual fascists were pro-family and wanted women to get married and have kids so I think they'd agree with me.
Click to expand...
If you actually believe the age of consent in the world is 14, then you must be stupid. the actual age in some countries (including the US and Canada) is either 16 or 18. Minimum age of consent is 13.
 
Fareal said:
You have said it should be legal to sexually abuse children of eight and upwards. Your position is not capable of debate because it is grotesque, deviant, perverted and also talking about this is giving you an erection.

Jesus sees you and He knows what you are.
Click to expand...
Different women will develop faster or slower that's why I think age of consent should be set at puberty which is 100% NOT pedophilia and then from there the women and parents need to be responsible. I said earlier in this thread that natural selection will occur and different groups will have different ages of consent. some humans will evolve to reproduce faster, others slower. You cannot apply a 1 size fits all policy to all people. If a women does hit puberty at age 8, maybe that's an advantage? an adoption. You're infringing upon natural selection with these liberal laws.
 
BoxerShorts47 said:
this is absolutely retarded. 1. I am not promoting pedo-philia aka pre-pubescent girls. 2. You act like casual sex pump and dump high school relationships which are perfectly legal under age of consent are not damaging. 3. Allowing women to enter relationships with men that are more likely to marry is less damaging.

Total inversion. Again this is part of the problem with feminism or diversity. it makes right wrong and wrong right.
Click to expand...

Strawman from you this time. I never claimed that non-monogamous and/or short term, entirely sexual relationships did not have adverse effects on women. Obosen.

Studies have shown that men AND women under the age of 25 are still developing physically and mentally. Would you fuck a baby as it came out of the womb? Would you fuck an eight year old?

Actually, don't answer that.

The point is, your position is quite literally advocating for causing severe mental and physical distress to literal children in the eyes of almost every civilized nation on earth.

You are, and I cannot stress this enough, an autist, and I implore you- neck thyself.
 
Gunt.Inc said:
Even if you wanted to prepare girls for marriage when does sex therefore the age of consent come into play? Your ignoring the fact that you can keep the age of consent the same and have schools to teach about marriage like we have sex ed. You just want an excuse to sexually exploit kids.
Click to expand...
This is a good question. Theoretically there is nothing stopping a 15 yr old from dating an 18 year old. BUT in practice retards like the posters in this thread will scream pedophilia which socially prohibits such relationships.

I also don't want schools to teach sex. I'm 100% against that because it just primes the kids to be scared about not having sex and them FOMO into having casual sex. Especially when they provide free condoms or birth control, clearly the goal of these products is to internalize casual sex which I already said is very damaging to both men and women.
 
BoxerShorts47 said:
this is absolutely retarded. 1. I am not promoting pedo-philia aka pre-pubescent girls. 2. You act like casual sex pump and dump high school relationships which are perfectly legal under age of consent are not damaging. 3. Allowing women to enter relationships with men that are more likely to marry is less damaging.

Total inversion. Again this is part of the problem with feminism or diversity. it makes right wrong and wrong right.
Click to expand...
Excuse me but it appears you have lost your fucking brain. Please pick it up you fucktard.
 
T_Holygrail_Jesuschrist 2 said:
Excuse me but it appears you have lost your fucking brain. Please pick it up you fucktard.
Click to expand...
allowing women to enter relationships with slightly older men is LESS damaging because those relationships are more likely to be serious and led to marriage. Age of consent traps women into degenerate high school casual sex relationships and delays them from thinking about marriage. Age of consent is just another liberal special snowflake we need to shelter the kids policy that seems good on paper but has the exact opposite real world consequence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom