U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unfortunately, it doesn't work, since that's what Movieb(l)ob unironically advocates for on Twitter all the time, and Antifa just dismisses him and calls him a Nazi:
ZMOT just needs to add "don't lick Hillary's/Democrats' taints and don't shit all over Midwest working shlubs" and they can probably avoid that fate.
 
ZMOT just needs to add "don't lick Hillary's/Democrats' taints and don't shit all over Midwest working shlubs" and they can probably avoid that fate.

Bonus points if the burner accounts used for this are all BIPOC, female, or troon profiles pic and have a lot of the leftist shibboleths (pronouns in the bio, pride flags and commie iconography, punk and goth imagery, etc.)

Part of why MovieBob gets shat on by Antifa and BreadTube all the time is because he's a DNC bootlicker and partly because he's a straight White male who only attacks the Southern and Midwestern Whites.

Vaush is also a similarly repulsive bearded soy bugman but unlike Bob, he's opposed to the DNC, hates America in its entirety, and is better at hiding his vile nature.

I don't support failtrolling but if 4chan or whomever wanted to do this as a prank, I'd laugh my ass off.
 
Historically, commies rely on literate, educated industrial workers and (less so) on uneducated peasants. These are neets and nepotist intelligentsia, united by the fact that they don't fucking work and they're guaranteed a livable income nevertheless.
this isn't new or abnormal. commies have always been led by exactly this type of person (intellectuals, academics, authors/publishers, etc)
hell, marx himself was what would today be called a NEET who made a living by leeching off his wealthy friend engels while spending his time on politisperging and writing manifestos
 
The idea that America is uniquely and singularly bad is totally reliant on this kind of historic short-sightedness.

It’s easy to get worked up about Jim Crow when you don’t pay attention to the Holodomor. US chattel slavery is a dark stain on our history, but it seems darker when you’re ignorant to its existence in the Middle East and Africa for a much longer time-frame. You rightfully learn in school about Axis atrocities during WWII but you don’t learn about how the Italians outlawed slavery in Ethiopia when they invaded. That doesn’t make them the good guys, but it adds some context as to what was going on in other parts of the world while we were worrying about who could eat at certain lunch counters.

There’s a growing tendency to focus on what we got wrong at the expense of what we got right, especially when compared to the rest of the world. The truth remains that the US common law system and ideological focus on individual liberty spared us from the more horrifying mistakes made by the rest of the world.

Slavery, our treatment of the American Indians, internment; these are all things we should come to terms with, but we should be hesitant to demonize the system that dampened their impact and allowed us to grow past them. Because there’s nothing we’ve done as a culture that even comes close to the millions-strong stack of skulls in the Cambodian jungle.
The problem is, we don't teach the World Wars as world wars, we teach them as "what has Hollywood made interesting movies about lately" so they can show Saving Private Ryan and Schindler's List and the teacher can take multiple days off showing films. When we learned about WWII in school the Pacific Campaign was glossed over in about 5 minutes with "Pearl Harbor was attacked so we nuked Japan" basically. The Mediterranean campaign didn't get mentioned at all, nor did what was going on in China or Burma. Russia only got mentioned because Stalingrad is really dramatic. Nothing about buzz bombs, no mention of rationing on the homefront but plenty on Japanese internment (yet nothing on the highly decorated 442nd Infantry, composed almost entirely of Americans of Japanese descent because that would necessitate mentioning the Mediterranean campaign).
 
Last edited:
I really think that none of these Leftists in Western Society have ever read or paid attention to history. They really seem to think this is Tsar Russia, and they are the Bolsheviks, when in reality, they will be the first to be hung by whoever amasses the most power in the chaos.

@Forgetful Gynn remember, its only White Supremacy that is the problem. Black Supremacy is what these maggots want, and they will not stop until they are swinging from a gallows. Sadly, as these few months have shown, Hitler didn't go far enough.

...fuck. I just wanted to grill and chill. Now, if I DON'T get involved, there's actually a higher chance of getting fucked over now.
Honestly, from what i've seen, central plains territories would just accept american overlordship fairly quickly. Quebec gets its independence so it can fuck off. BC and Ontario will be pricks though
 
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power." ~Benito Mussolini (attributed but not verified)
He never said that, and it's not the definition of corporatism. Mussolini's fascism wasn't the merger of state and corporate power, but the establishment of the state as the supreme and all-encompassing body to which everything else was bound and subservient. Each individual, each entity within a nation was but a single twig, but when they were bound together by the state, they became a mighty faggot.

Corporatism is government by collective interest groups, like farmers, or bankers, or other large collective groups with a common interest. A state controlled by the whims of a surgery of troons would be edging toward corporatist.
 
this isn't new or abnormal. commies have always been led by exactly this type of person (intellectuals, academics, authors/publishers, etc)
hell, marx himself was what would today be called a NEET who made a living by leeching off his wealthy friend engels while spending his time on politisperging and writing manifestos
Another thing to add is that "literate, educated workers" in reality is usually "literate, indoctrinated workers". They can read, but they can only read materials approved by the party. That's not education.
 
They're definitely not communists, but fascists of the (alleged) Mussolini definition, hiding behind a veneer of socialism-lite.

"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power." ~Benito Mussolini (attributed but not verified)

"-lite" in that they don't favor "seizure of the means;" one might note that despite so many today self-identifying as socialist or socialist-Democrat (of all economic classes), only the most hardcore (and/or delusional) touch on the "seizure" element. These guys at the top don't even mind some redistribution of their own wealth, as they understand that it will be made up for and then some in profits and destruction of competition (or simply privilege... see Fauci and his two friends enjoying a ballgame in an empty stadium, no troublesome plebs asking them to pass down a beer and peanuts), and that the concurrent redistribution of middle-class wealth downwards prevents that class from establishing independence or competition to mega-corps, while it provides those to which it is redistributed "purchasing power" that is funnelled right back into the mega-corps'/banks coffers.

They favor the destabilization that leads to a "socialist-lite" centralization of control, as they know or at least expect that they will be the ones with the favorable lines of communication, "cooperation," and subsequent graft. Bezos doesn't want everyone to rely on the government, he wants the government to make everyone rely on Amazon. They want over-regulation that is fatal to smaller businesses but only an inconvenience to transnationals. They know the public at large is not favorable to straight-up communism, but the leftward push of the Overton window is needed to make centralized "socialist" policies seem reasonable and palatable to the population. It also benefits a basic "divide and conquer" strategy, and has neighbor attacking neighbor instead of attacking their consolidation of markets and power, as the public attacks against the established corporatists are essentially superficial and only temporary on the road to centralization.



View attachment 1484593
:thinking:

You do understand that Corporatism, the economic system, and the 'corporate groups' that Mussolini are referring to do not refer to private corporations such as Amazon, and the like, right? A corporation =/= corporate group; they are two different sociological and economic terms - one refers to a private conglomeration such as Amazon, the other refers to a vague unity between likeminded individuals.


To look at the word 'corporatism' and think it means 'LOL CORPORATIONS' in the literal sense is absolutely goofy and fucking asinine.
 
The problem is, we don't teach the World Wars as world wars, we teach them as "what has Hollywood made interesting movies about lately" so they can show Saving Private Ryan and Schindler's List and the teacher can take multiple days off showing films. When we learned about WWII in school the Pacific Campaign was glossed over in about 5 minutes with "Pearl Harbor was attacked so we nuked Japan" basically. The Mediterranean campaign didn't get mentioned at all, nor did what was going on in China or Burma. Russia only got mentioned because Stalingrad is really dramatic. Nothing about buzz bombs, no mention of rationing on the homefront but plenty on Japanese internment (yet nothing on the highly decorated 442nd Infantry, composed almost entirely of Americans of Japanese descent because that would necessitate mentioning the Mediterranean campaign).

When I was still in school we spent more time on the Holocaust than anything else related to WWII. I'd bet most Americans would struggle to name one battle of the Pacific Theater other than Pearl Harbor and maybe Iwo Jima if they saw that one movie. The Eastern Front wasn't even mentioned, the battles in China or India weren't mentioned, the African Campaign wasn't mentioned, it was basically just: "Holocaust, therefore Hitler bad, therefore D-Day and France. Also Pearl Harbor happened so we nuked Japan, but it was BAD." Wanted to hear more about Wake Island, Guadalcanal, Okinawa, or even Stalingrad? Tough shit, here's more bullshit about lampshades and belts made out of Jews. Italy? Who cares? Holocaust.

I hate to say it but as a kid, I probably learned more about WWII from movies and video games than I did in school. And WWI was basically a footnote. We heard plenty about the Holocaust but nothing about the Soviet Union's various purges, famines and mass executions.
 
When I was still in school we spent more time on the Holocaust than anything else related to WWII. I'd bet most Americans would struggle to name one battle of the Pacific Theater other than Pearl Harbor and maybe Iwo Jima if they saw that one movie. The Eastern Front wasn't even mentioned, the battles in China or India weren't mentioned, the African Campaign wasn't mentioned, it was basically just: "Holocaust, therefore Hitler bad, therefore D-Day and France. Also Pearl Harbor happened so we nuked Japan, but it was BAD." Wanted to hear more about Wake Island, Guadalcanal, Okinawa, or even Stalingrad? Tough shit, here's more bullshit about lampshades and belts made out of Jews. Italy? Who cares? Holocaust.

I hate to say it but as a kid, I probably learned more about WWII from movies and video games than I did in school. And WWI was basically a footnote. We heard plenty about the Holocaust but nothing about the Soviet Union's various purges, famines and mass executions.
I shit you not, I once had a supervisor ask me, "which one was the Hitler war?"

Stalin isn't necessarily lionized, but he's also a footnote. I also had an English teacher tell us that 1984 was actually about what would have happened if Germany had won WWII (even though that's decidedly *not* what happens, as Oceania was created by the US's absorption of the Western hemisphere, the British Isles, Australia, and South Africa). No mention of how the whole book is about a Soviet-style regime in the Anglosphere.
 
Last edited:
'scuse my puzzle pieces, but I try to cover my bases...

Granted, but no one that used the term 'corporatism' during that period referred to corporations - corporatism has never referred to corporations; it's an established socioeconomic system that's applicable to a number of ideologies that refers to, as said, governmental control and setup by likeminded groups.

The quote you are referring to belongs to Giovanni Gentile, the actual author of the Doctrine of Fascism - Mussolini was not the actual author of the book, and numerous Gentile quotes are misattributed to Mussolini.

I shit you not, I once had a supervisor ask me, "which one was the Hitler war?"

Reminds me myself that I've seen high-school educated suburbanites place Ireland on a map next to New Zealand.
 
When I was still in school we spent more time on the Holocaust than anything else related to WWII. I'd bet most Americans would struggle to name one battle of the Pacific Theater other than Pearl Harbor and maybe Iwo Jima if they saw that one movie. The Eastern Front wasn't even mentioned, the battles in China or India weren't mentioned, the African Campaign wasn't mentioned, it was basically just: "Holocaust, therefore Hitler bad, therefore D-Day and France.
This is virtually my exact experience too. I remember that he had to watch Escape from Sobibor and the opening beach scene from Saving Private Ryan. We had a lot of Holocaust talk and read The Diary of Anne Frank. Some names like Hitler, Mussolini, Churchill and Stalin were brought up but nothing was really in depth about anyone. We actually did watch the Alec Baldwin movie Nuremburg and did a mock trial where half of us had to be the defendants and the other half were the prosecutors which was kind of cool albeit it sort of shallow. WW1 was essentially just being told the name 'Franz Ferdinand' and about the only other thing covered was Vimy Ridge (because Canada).

The only other things we even covered in History classes if I recall correctly had to do with the fur trade (which no one cared about because it's mind numbing how boring of a topic it is) residential schools, the Avrow Arrow and the Komagata Maru.
 
When I was still in school we spent more time on the Holocaust than anything else related to WWII. I'd bet most Americans would struggle to name one battle of the Pacific Theater other than Pearl Harbor and maybe Iwo Jima if they saw that one movie. The Eastern Front wasn't even mentioned, the battles in China or India weren't mentioned, the African Campaign wasn't mentioned, it was basically just: "Holocaust, therefore Hitler bad, therefore D-Day and France. Also Pearl Harbor happened so we nuked Japan, but it was BAD." Wanted to hear more about Wake Island, Guadalcanal, Okinawa, or even Stalingrad? Tough shit, here's more bullshit about lampshades and belts made out of Jews. Italy? Who cares? Holocaust.

I hate to say it but as a kid, I probably learned more about WWII from movies and video games than I did in school. And WWI was basically a footnote. We heard plenty about the Holocaust but nothing about the Soviet Union's various purges, famines and mass executions.


If at all humanly possible, get your hands on Purnell's Second World War. It's expensive as all hell to find a complete collection (about £180/$240) but I have it and it is the most ridiculously comprehensive and incredible magazine. Covers every subject, many battles in extreme details and in many cases has the actual generals or officers who were there themselves.
 
It basically boiled down to "assassination happens, world at war, lots of people died."
To this day I don't know what WWI was about. Franz Ferdinand died, there were trenches, Germany had pointy helmets, ???, the end. And I'm pretty sure I learned all three of those points outside of school. I honestly might have never even had a WWI class. I wasn't a good student, but I definitely remembering learning about Korea and Vietnam and whatever, but never WWI.

And like everyone else says, my public school telling of WW2 was 90% holocaust, 10% nukes. I'm old enough that the narrative was War Bad rather than Whitey Bad, but the curriculum is the exact same.
 
When I was still in school we spent more time on the Holocaust than anything else related to WWII. I'd bet most Americans would struggle to name one battle of the Pacific Theater other than Pearl Harbor and maybe Iwo Jima if they saw that one movie. The Eastern Front wasn't even mentioned, the battles in China or India weren't mentioned, the African Campaign wasn't mentioned, it was basically just: "Holocaust, therefore Hitler bad, therefore D-Day and France. Also Pearl Harbor happened so we nuked Japan, but it was BAD." Wanted to hear more about Wake Island, Guadalcanal, Okinawa, or even Stalingrad? Tough shit, here's more bullshit about lampshades and belts made out of Jews. Italy? Who cares? Holocaust.

I hate to say it but as a kid, I probably learned more about WWII from movies and video games than I did in school. And WWI was basically a footnote. We heard plenty about the Holocaust but nothing about the Soviet Union's various purges, famines and mass executions.
I almost forgot to mention something about WWII curriculum:
>America bad for Japanese internment camps
>but FDR good because muh gibs and bash the fash
>muh wamyn in factories were the real heroes
>no mention of Unit 731, American POWs used as slave labor, or the fact that Japan is, to this day, more racist and xenophobic than America has ever been.
 
Last edited:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=qd8-SK_naYU
A white guy yelled at Stella "Demon Semon" Immanuel for not being black enough
I can't call any educated person who believes in supernatural sources for worldly problems an "oreo". Their negrocity evaded a wearing down by the atheist indoctrination system. I can, however, definitely identify that man as a wigger.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom