Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

5412086-6317165-image-m-70_1540490802441.jpg

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'
Click to expand...


FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

FB_IMG_1540539738552.jpg
 
Last edited:
Click to expand...
AnOminous said:
And yet they're recommending these for people to use to spread diseases? This has to be a joke right? 4chan made this up? Please.
Click to expand...
The second pic is definitely satire, after reading it fully. Albeit, very funny. You can tell by, "I am appreciative of this moment of tenderness" and "Can we make this quicker? My kid's in the car". I don't think the other ones are satire though.
 
Terrifik said:
View attachment 1466450
Click to expand...

Ok no, this one is a troll. The menacing picture of teeth and hands poking through a hole? "pop your peen"? "B.C. GloryHole SuperHost"? "Can we make this quick, my kid's in the car"? 420 spinal injuries?? Fine print of coverage for glory hole injuries for construction workers and police with thick dicks, but only with photographic evidence of penile injury??? Sorry but this is such an obvious fake.
 
A thought I have (probably late), is it possible the whole dead naming thing be used to fuck over crime investigations? Like have an illegal trafficking used under the male name and then asking court to dismiss every document bearing that name because "I'll literally die if someone refers to me by that name".
 
Police: 44-year-old sexually assaulted teen

125306195_web1_Tomko-480x381.jpg

WILKES-BARRE TOWNSHIP — Township police arrested a Wilkes-Barre resident who allegedly sexually assaulted a 14-year-old over the Fourth of July weekend.

Robert Richard “Ruth” Tomko, 44, was arraigned on Wednesday morning and charged with a number of felony and misdemeanor offenses, including aggravated indecent assault and corruption of minors.

Police said a joint investigation between Wilkes-Barre Township detectives and the Luzerne County District Attorney’s office revealed that Tomko had met with the victim on three separate occasions and assaulted them in a wooded area near Anastasia Court.

Officers said they posed as the victim, using the youth’s cell phone, and uncovered texts from the suspect proclaiming love for the victim.

Tomko was remanded to the Luzerne County Correctional Facility for lack of $100,000 bail.
 
Lil Yahtzee said:
Police: 44-year-old sexually assaulted teen

View attachment 1467413
WILKES-BARRE TOWNSHIP — Township police arrested a Wilkes-Barre resident who allegedly sexually assaulted a 14-year-old over the Fourth of July weekend.

Robert Richard “Ruth” Tomko, 44, was arraigned on Wednesday morning and charged with a number of felony and misdemeanor offenses, including aggravated indecent assault and corruption of minors.
Click to expand...

At least they didn't insist on calling this thing a woman although they avoided calling him what he obviously is.
 


Joe Rogan is one of the biggest figures in podcasting. His show, The Joe Rogan Experience, consists of lengthy, often rambling interviews with a diverse array of athletes, academics, actors, entrepreneurs, and more. But you could also say that Rogan has really built his audience through selecting guests who bring their own notoriety to his show, or whose specialist subject is the kind of hot-button issue that will inevitably gain him some streams.

These interviews can take many forms, like getting infamous tech boss Elon Musk to smoke weed on camera, instantly immortalizing the moment in meme form. Or, more esoterically, speaking with pilots who claim to have had close encounters with UFOs. A lot of the time it's harmless (if slightly deranged) fun. And then there are the episodes which, by virtue of Rogan's massive online reach, lend a veneer of credibility to some truly dangerous prejudices.

Take the recent episode with guest Abigail Shrier. During Shrier's conversation with Rogan, in which she promoted her book, Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters, Shrier invalidated the lived experience of trans and nonbinary kids and teens, and made numerous dangerous, entirely unsound false equivalencies. She compared transitioning among teenagers to historic adolescent phenomena such as eating disorders, self-harm, and (bafflingly) the occult, calling this age group "the same population that gets involved in cutting, demonic possession, witchcraft, anorexia, bulimia."

She even described wanting to transition as a "contagion" with the potential to infect other children with the same ideas, drawing yet more scientifically baseless parallels with eating disorders. "Anorexics, they are always really careful when they put them together," she said. "They have to be on hospital wards because we know that it will cause it to spread."

Plenty of savvy producers book guests like this to stir up controversy and accumulate outrage-clicks from their viewers. But was Rogan sitting back as a host and letting Shrier dig her own grave? Nope. He appeared to reaffirm this notion that being trans is something a child can be persuaded into through peer pressure, referring to time spent with "wacky friends" at school. He also mocked Caitlyn Jenner, and described LGBTQ+ activists as people who aren't "looking at all sides of it."

"They have this agenda," he said, "and this agenda is very ideologically driven that anyone who even thinks they might be trans should be trans, are trans, and the more trans people the better. The more kids that transition the better."

For all their talk of self-harm and other issues that teenagers can experience, neither Rogan nor Shrier openly acknowledged that more than half of transgender and nonbinary youth seriously considered attempting suicide last year. And that wasn't due to "wacky friends" somehow transmitting gender dysphoria; it was due to the prolific, ubiquitous messaging in media that tells them there is something wrong with them, and how they feel doesn't matter.

By alluding to a pro-trans lobby with that aforementioned agenda, Rogan positioned himself and Shrier as marginalized voices in their own right—a technique commonly employed by high-profile pundits who believe "cancel culture" is somehow coming for their right to free speech. But Rogan has 283 million active users across his social channels. Similarly, Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling tweets her transphobic half-thoughts out to 14.3 million followers—many of whom are the very kids she is attacking. They have huge platforms, and they are using them to actively, willfully spread misinformation and propaganda that will cause very real harm.

Of course, you could always make the argument that Rogan doesn't actually believe any of the views that he encourages his guests to espouse on his show. Maybe he is just a cultural weathervane, conducting interviews on whatever outrageous topic is making headlines at the time. In one episode, he might endorse Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, or provide a safe space for openly gay strongman Rob Kearney to share his story. But in others, he is guilty of humoring (if not downright enabling) homophobic jokes and alt-right conspiracy theories from his guests.

Which is worse? To expose such bigotry to your millions of subscribers because you genuinely endorse it? Or to have so little conviction that you will knowingly platform hate speech about some of the most vulnerable, persecuted young people in our society to benefit your own career? You be the judge. Both are appalling in their own way.

Rogan likes to put on a furrowed brow and even, pensive voice; the hallmarks of a reasonable man with an inquisitive mind. Someone who is "just asking questions" or "wants to start a debate." In reality, he's an intellectual shock jock who amplifies the voices of conspiracy theorists, white supremacists, homophobes, and transphobes in the name of interesting conversation. And it's becoming increasingly clear that as long as these tactics keep making him money and acquiring him followers, he doesn't care who he hurts along the way.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Men’s Health is looking to get podcaster Joe Rogan blacklisted because he’s “putting lives in danger.”

Oh, I’m sure Men’s Health would deny that all day long: Harrumph, harrumph, harrumph; we’re not looking to blacklist or cancel anyone, we’re just publishing an op-ed that disagrees with him, harrumph, harrumph, harrumph…

Gimme a break.

We all know how this bullshit of “safetyism” works on the fascist left. You fascists accuse someone you disagree with of making you or POC’s or whoever feel “unsafe,” and suddenly expression that speech become “violence” and that physical act of violent speech must be blacklisted and canceled.

Meanwhile, according to the left, the terrorists in Black Lives Matter and Antifa who are burning, looting marauding, and toppling are not committing violence. Their actual violence is speech.

So why is Men’s Health jumping on a stool, throwing its skirt over its own head and screaming Eeek!?

Well, Rogan dared to invite on a guest who is not fully onboard with all this anti-science trans nonsense – you know this baloney about how a male can magically become female just by saying so…

Here’s the headline, subheadline, and relevant portions:

Joe Rogan Is Spreading Transphobic Hate Speech and It’s Putting Lives in Danger

Rogan has a history of platforming divisive voices. Now he’s actively fanning the flames of hate.

And then there are the episodes which, by virtue of Rogan’s massive online reach, lend a veneer of credibility to some truly dangerous prejudices.

Take the recent episode with guest Abigail Shrier. During Shrier’s conversation with Rogan, in which she promoted her book, Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters, Shrier invalidated the lived experience of trans and nonbinary kids and teens, and made numerous dangerous, entirely unsound false equivalencies.

Although I could not disagree more, I would have no issue with Men’s Health publishing a rebuttal to Rogan and Shrier.

If you disagree with them, if you honestly believe it’s healthy to give adolescents injections in the unicorn hope it will magically change their sex (it won’t), in the unicorn hope this will magically help confused children psychologically with whatever is fooling them into believing they need to change their sex (it won’t); if you honestly believe it’s healthy and compassionate to patronize a boy who believes he’s Napoleon a woman (it’s not) rather than get him psychological heap, I’m fine having that debate. Let’s rock…

But that’s not what’s going on here, and that is not what’s going on throughout the left when these crybullies blacklist and cancel others using these fascist “safetyism” tactics.

When you accuse someone of “putting lives in danger” over a perfectly reasonable and science-based discussion about transitioning, especially when just a few years ago these arguments were treated as mainstream; when you accuse someone of “fanning the flames of hate” and being “dangerous,” that is way beyond a debate.

That is about silencing someone, about accusing them of being responsible in some way for a suicide or hate crime they had nothing to do with.

As absurd and one-sided as the Men’s Health piece is, nowhere does it accuse Rogan or Shrier of ridiculing transsexuals, of painting a target on their backs, of any kind of personal attack against anyone. That, of course, would cross a line into bigotry and hate. But they didn’t do that…

Men’s Health, however, did cross that line. In a cynical and un-American effort to silence Rogan on this issue, or to see him silenced, it’s not his argument that’s refuted – no, he is targeted as a dangerous bigot who is literally going to get people killed.

Oh, and by the way, did you know the left-wing fascists have declared the word “blacklist” racist and therefore outlawed? Right out of Orwell’s 1984, these monsters are shrinking the dictionary, are placing precise and effective words off limits.
 
Ya know they have a point. Look at all the troons that are documented on this very site. They’re upstanding pillars of the community and there’s no way 41% of them won’t suicide.
 
Tweeting out that biological sex is an objective reality is "misinformation" and "propaganda" now? J.K. Rowling is not "transphobic", and she said those things in the nicest way possible. Women don't have to have their lives and experiences erased because of the insane demands of insidious autogynephiles.

Also, transgenderism does kind of seem "contagious", or at least having the potential for those vulnerable to be highly persuaded into it, because the young are encourage to identify and transition for vague reasons and not living up to gender stereotypes.
 
Last edited:
The one thing the article gets right is that Joe Rogan is a very agreeable person, meaning that the guests on his show dictates how he thinks at the time, especially with political opinions. I don't believe he has strong political opinions either way and that's why when he has someone political on the podcast he doesn't challenge them too much. But I'm not a mind reader so I don't actually know if this is all part of Rogan's master plan to crash the USA with no survivors.
 
UselessIdiot said:
Tweeting out that biological sex is an objective reality is "misinformation" and "propaganda" now? J.K. Rowling is not "transphobic", and she said those things in the nicest way possible. Women don't have to have their lives and experiences erased because of the insane demands of insidious autogynephiles.
Click to expand...
Troons are the sexual equivalent of Rachel Dolezal.

As for Joe Rogan, I can't listen to him anymore. His content is just so dull, and all he cares about is getting high.
 
Jesus OPs sperg was longer then the article. Sorry OP TLDR. Not sorry article Too Retarded Didn't Read (TRDR).

It is interesting to me that Men's Health apparently has a problem with one of Joe's guests... and has there for decided to attack Joe, instead of that guest. Curiouser and curiouser.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom