Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
BoxerShorts47 said:
2. Society was much more healthier back then the age of consent was lower?
Click to expand...
You are such a retarded bastard, do you have any idea of how medical practise has reduced fetal and infant mortality? I hope Jesus Christ Himself returns for the sole reason of calling you a faggot and popping a thunderclap in your dumb flip ass.
 
Foghot said:
1: "Do you agree that pepole validated my fetish back then?"

2: Childhood STDs and emotionally damaging kids are as healthy as chewing pure lead, stop doing the latter.

3: "Why can't pepole let me fuck pre-teens in peace?"

Something something not a fetish, eh?
Click to expand...
Foghot said:
1: "Do you agree that pepole validated my fetish back then?"

2: Childhood STDs and emotionally damaging kids are as healthy as chewing pure lead, stop doing the latter.

3: "Why can't pepole let me fuck pre-teens in peace?"

Something something not a fetish, eh?
Click to expand...
1. Mybad. Historical age of consent was 10 in USA, with some states having 12. I don't see proof that people changed the laws because they decided that was a "fetish." According to wikipedia the laws were promoted by a feminist named, Elice Hopkins who appears to have never been married or had any children.

Age of consent reform - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
.
en.wikipedia.org

Ellice Hopkins - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

So our modern age of consent laws have only existed for about ~100-140 years and the family has not improved during this time period.

2. Avoiding. yes or no. Was the marriage and birthrate higher back then? and age of consent doesn't prevent sex, it doesn't stop people from getting into emotionally bad high school relationships. In fact it does the opposite, it basically guarantees everyone will have awful relationships between ages 14-18.

3. Yes or No. Do people, despite all the brainwashing, still violate these age of consent laws because they don't view them as immoral. At their core, they knew these laws are arbitrary and go against human natural.

You are ignoring all my talking points and responding in bad faith. This is a good sign that I'm winning the argument.
 
can you imagine being like in the game psychonauts where you can jump into a person's mind? can you imagine doing that to boxershorts47? can you imagine what terrifying, incomprehensible lovecraftian landscape of horrors lurk behind that thing that resembles a brain?

A DAY IN BOXERSHORTS47'S LIFE:

Code: 
>wake up, throw confederate flag blanket off of me to begin my daily resistance against the ZOG. 
>eat breakfast, with good clean, whole white milk in my cereal, to strengthen the bones of this brave young warrior fighting for his kind
>kiss mom goodbye, it's time for school where all the niggers and spics and mulattos all are
>reminded of private shame for slight Polish ancestry
> go to class to study, using the keen intellect my caucasian heritage has endowed me to secure a future for my people
>see Stacy, she's so cute and she's completely white, she would be an excellent specimen to breed many beautiful white babies to recuperate our numbers lost to breeding to inferior niggers with the cancerous scourge that is race mixing
>Please notice me Stacy, can't you see I love you?
>Stacy, I dream about you, girl.  I feel like you could be the one.  Why won't you look at me?
>Why do you look at Chad like that, Stacy?  You're breaking my heart.  I LOVE YOU!  He's a fucking goddamned nigger, Stacy, a fucking NIGGER!  You fucking race traitor bitch!
>WE COULD HAVE SAVED THE WHITE RACE
>watches stacy kiss chad's big nigger lips and my world is turned upside down and i am so traumatized and I know we might just lose the race war
>runs home, tears in eyes, doesn't even wait for mom
>pulls out dad's Ruger 10/22.  That's a machine gun, right?  A fine weapon for a valiant soldier of the white race.
>i walk out the door ready to avenge the white race and PURGE THE GODDAMN FUCKING DISLOYAL RACE TRAITORS THAT FUCK BIG NIGGER LIPS CHADS
>I go back inside because I can't even see past the tears
>call in sick so I can therapeutically post on kiwifarms and avenge the white race while nobody can see my face red from crying and think i'm an inferior savage native american
 
Last edited:
BoxerShorts47 said:
Yes or No.
1. Do you acknowledge that age of consent was historically 12 before feminism?
2. Society was much more healthier back then the age of consent was lower?
3. Even today, people (specifically 18-22 yr olds) regularly break the age of consent? "omg dude she told me she was 18."
Just answer my questions.
Click to expand...
1. It was, that doesn't make it a good idea. By that rationale, we should go back to candles and oil lanterns, then? Maybe cook all our food on the fire? Historically, that's how we did things before, right?
2. Yeah, can't beat the good old "died birthing her 4th child, aged 17, survived by her 36 y/o husband and the only kid that lived"
3. People do all sorts of stupid shit that's commonplace but still illegal; making it legal doesn't automatically make it a good idea. Is it a completely fair and fault-free system? No, but spamming the age of consent down to the point where kids are too young to buy most vidya titles is not the fucking answer. You fucking cretin.
 
BoxerShorts47 said:
Not a fetish you retard. Normal human sexual behavior before feminism. Age of consent was 12 historically in USA. Clearly the society was much more healthy back then so the only thing raising the age of consent has caused is less marriagable relationships.
Click to expand...
A society back then where you were lucky to live to 40, unstable governments, draconian laws, and sent kids to work in unsafe mines and factories for low pay? Also including the many wars and epidemics that killed up to millions of people and destroyed various of countries as well. Why would you want to go back to those times?
 
We should go back to those times because then he'd be locked up in an asylum where the doctors lop off bits of retards' brains until they're actual comatose vegetables
 
Unblock me you spineless ponce, I have things to say.


BoxerShorts47 said:
...

2. Avoiding. yes or no. Was the marriage and birthrate higher back then? and age of consent doesn't prevent sex, it doesn't stop people from getting into emotionally bad high school relationships. In fact it does the opposite, it basically guarantees everyone will have awful relationships between ages 14-18.

3. Yes or No. Do people, despite all the brainwashing, still violate these age of consent laws because they don't view them as immoral. At their core, they knew these laws are arbitrary and go against human natural.

You are ignoring all my talking points and responding in bad faith. This is a good sign that I'm winning the argument.
Click to expand...

Marriage and birthrates were higher, yes. Christianity was much more widespread and the social convention was that you were to get married, which most people did. Birthrates were naturally higher, because contraception was scarce to nonexistent and the proliferation of religious fervour meant that abortion was not widely available, if at all and certainly not by any official means.

People do violate the AoC laws, yes. Mostly kids/late teens. Who, science tells us, are literally unable to help making stupid decisions when hormonally influenced. When a grown-ass man in his mid-20s and up violates the AoC laws, it's not hormonal or based in love or any of that. It's a fetish. The taboo is part of the fetish for some of these degenerates, it feeds a sense of power that they are violating not just someone weaker than them but also a societal convention that they rail against.

If your points are being ignored, perhaps it's because your points are nothing short of abhorrent to everyone here. You are the outlier, not the standard.

EDIT: fucked up the quote tags.
 
I'm just sitting here for Boxer's hot takes on Christianity that demonstrate a total lack of scriptural knowledge at all. Pick up a bible and maybe some Aquinas or some other theologian and start to figure out what the fuck a Jesus is before conflating kindness with weakness.
 
BoxerShorts47 said:
Yes or No.
1. Do you acknowledge that age of consent was historically 12 before feminism?
2. Society was much more healthier back then the age of consent was lower?
3. Even today, people (specifically 18-22 yr olds) regularly break the age of consent? "omg dude she told me she was 18."
Just answer my questions.
Click to expand...
And to probably no-one's surprise the resident sped is now arguing for pedophilia.
 
Draza said:
Why would you want to go back to those times?
Click to expand...

Because he really, really wants to fuck kids.

Popper Whiting said:
And to probably no-one's surprise the resident sped is now arguing for pedophilia.
Click to expand...

This is why incels like this are boring. The instant someone comes on with dumb /pol/eddit incel talking points they're inevitably going to go there. Every time. It's like they're robots and not even the /r9k/ kind although they go there too.
 
Dr W said:
I'm just sitting here for Boxer's hot takes on Christianity that demonstrate a total lack of scriptural knowledge at all. Pick up a bible and maybe some Aquinas or some other theologian and start to figure out what the fuck a Jesus is before conflating kindness with weakness.
Click to expand...
Correct. Because that is not what I hear from Christians in practice. What i cite is what de facto Christianity, not de jure theoreticians.
 
I have to admit, his tenacity is endearing. Someone suggest something outlandish like moon rocks or something. I want to see how he argues in favor of something that doesn’t exist.
 
BoxerShorts47 said:
Correct. Because that is not what I hear from Christians in practice. What i cite is what de facto Christianity, not de jure theoreticians.
Click to expand...
There's nothing better than an anti-christian telling Christians how he understands their religion better than they do. Do you know what you're doing, Tinkerbell? You're flying the exact same shit the fucking troons do when they tell women what being a woman is about. That's where you are; on the level of deranged fucking troons.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom