💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.6%

  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 277 39.7%

  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.5%

  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.2%
  • Total voters
    698
Tookie said:
Sex offenders are the one class of criminals we've specifically singled out with a publicly searchable list so I think as a society we've decided it is very much a matter of public interest.
Click to expand...
Sex offender databases (as they are now, anyway) are a dumb idea. Dudes get dumped on sex offender databases, in some states for life, if they shtup a seventeen-year-old one time after she lied about her age. I'm not afraid of a guy who did something like that being around my kids. I think I'd prefer to know if my neighbor is a murderer or drug-peddler or serial thief. Either we need databases for other types of criminals too, or we need to ensure that only those that the general public really has cause to fear appears on them - preferably both, IMO.

But yes, there were so many poorly-worded lines in that document that it boggles the mind a bit. I'll grant that his audience was a judge, not the general public, but it's hard to imagine that both the lawyer and the judge could be so disconnected from how normal people would take some of the lines written in that thing.
 
feral cat #6385 said:
Wrongkeita thinks the Judge will accept this new opposition document so obviously the Judge won't and will dismiss the case.

0 and 19 SQUWAK!
Click to expand...

I think the judge will accept the document but throw out the case anyway. If the judge doesn't, he is genuinely extremely pissed off and things are going to go extremely poorly for Romeo. This guy appears to be no Chupp and I don't expect him to Chupp up the case.
 
AnOminous said:
I think the judge will accept the document but throw out the case anyway. If the judge doesn't, he is genuinely extremely pissed off and things are going to go extremely poorly for Romeo. This guy appears to be no Chupp and I don't expect him to Chupp up the case.
Click to expand...

What do you think the chances are of someone going after Romeo for the criminal admissions in his own filings?
 
AlexJonesGotMePregnant said:
What do you think the chances are of someone going after Romeo for the criminal admissions in his own filings?
Click to expand...

I could easily see Keem's lawyer moving for the court to refer the matter to state or federal authorities, or both. The idiot admitted to feloniously sending dick pics to an underage girl and that he knew she was underage. It's hard to imagine worse lawyering, frankly. This guy should be fucking disbarred or at the very least sued for malpractice. He may have completely ruined Romeo Lacoste's life even if he doesn't get him literally sent to prison in a civil case.

It's impossible to overstate how incompetent this lawyering is. The more you think about it, the worse it looks.

You hear about lawyers so bad they'll get you the death penalty in a traffic ticket case. This guy may manage to get his client put behind bars for filings he made in a civil case where he is the plaintiff. At the very least, he has him admitting to crimes in his own legal filing. How the fuck do you do that? What possibly makes a lawyer think this is a good thing to file?

Not just that, he didn't just admit it once, where it might have been relevant to the case, it's like this clown lawyer can't mention it enough! He practically goes through the entire filing mentioning his client is a pedophile and even the specifics of his dick pic sending habits, his attraction to minors, and how the fact that he's a pedophile isn't of public interest. Even if it isn't relevant he's just repeatedly volunteering incredibly damning facts about his client.

Just. Wow.

This is just the opening filing too.

Then you get into the whole incompetence of filing a defective document that gets stricken, ignoring the judge's command to refile it on time, then filing it a day late with exactly the same thing wrong with it the judge specifically told you to fix, then filing a "dog ate my homework" excuse when it's stricken a second time. He could easily have lost his client's case just by that alone, and that's objectively malpractice.

Tbh it's probably better for Lacoste if the case is thrown out because his lawyer procedurally fucked up than have the court literally find that he's a child molester who admitted to it. Maybe it's some incredibly bizarre attempt to fall on his sword, although that seems a little too ethical for this lawyer.

I just have to wonder if Romeo is even literate. Has he read this shit? How much did he pay this lawyer? Imagine you paid a lawyer $20K up front and you find out after the fact that what he did for your money was spend 50 pages calling you a pedophile.
 
Last edited:
AnOminous said:
I could easily see Keem's lawyer moving for the court to refer the matter to state or federal authorities, or both. The idiot admitted to feloniously sending dick pics to an underage girl and that he knew she was underage.
Click to expand...
That's something I'm not getting about this case. If it's so slam-dunk that he has been doing this stuff, has it really not come to the attention of the authorities yet? Did the girl(s) making these allegations not take them to the cops? Did nobody from Keem's huge audience contact the cops in Lacoste's area to try to get him busted? I'm sure any prosecutor would love to have a #MeToo conviction with an underage victim on their resume. Makes me wonder if, even with the guy seemingly admitting to all this stuff, there's still not enough there for the cops or prosecutors to find worth their time.

On the other hand, we've seen people get convicted for less…
 
Least Concern said:
That's something I'm not getting about this case. If it's so slam-dunk that he has been doing this stuff, has it really not come to the attention of the authorities yet?
Click to expand...

I have no idea who's done what. Maybe the authorities don't give a shit. Maybe everyone involved is dumb, incompetent, or corrupt. Maybe yet another diddler just slips through the cracks.
 
feral cat #6385 said:
Wrongkeita thinks the Judge will accept this new opposition document so obviously the Judge won't and will dismiss the case.

0 and 19 SQUWAK!
Click to expand...
AnOminous said:
I think the judge will accept the document but throw out the case anyway. If the judge doesn't, he is genuinely extremely pissed off and things are going to go extremely poorly for Romeo. This guy appears to be no Chupp and I don't expect him to Chupp up the case.
Click to expand...

The judge did not find good cause to permit the late filing and struck it again.

1590100291207.png

www.courtlistener.com

Docket for Nicko LaCoste v. Daniel Keem, 2:20-cv-02323 - CourtListener.com

Docket for Nicko LaCoste v. Daniel Keem, 2:20-cv-02323 — Brought to you by the RECAP Initiative and Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.
www.courtlistener.com www.courtlistener.com
 
Last edited:
I'm not a Robot said:
The judge did not find good cause to permit the late filing and struck it again.
Click to expand...

The judge is fucking PISSED. Note, this is a discretionary decision and is subject to appeal. However, part of the "good cause" needed to justify allowing a late filing such as this is a likelihood of prevailing on the merits in the first place. The court has, sub silentio, ruled on that issue as well by refusing this late filing.

I think the court may end up having to address the underlying merits if Keem goes for SLAPPback, which it would be nice to see because fuck some pedo who sues someone for calling him a pedo when he literally fucking admits he's a pedo.
 
I'm not a Robot said:
The judge did not find good cause to permit the late filing and struck it again.

View attachment 1310242
www.courtlistener.com

Docket for Nicko LaCoste v. Daniel Keem, 2:20-cv-02323 - CourtListener.com

Docket for Nicko LaCoste v. Daniel Keem, 2:20-cv-02323 — Brought to you by the RECAP Initiative and Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.
www.courtlistener.com www.courtlistener.com
Click to expand...

SQUAK 0-19! 0-19 ONCE AGAIN NICK WRONGKEITA IS WRONG!

Tonight's show is boring. If Nick isn't going to put any effort into his show he should just play video games.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom