Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
It's HK-47 said:
They already tried violence and Antifa got its ass beat and then nearly all of the "ring-leaders" wound up in federal prison.
Click to expand...
I thought those prosecutions resulted in only one felony conviction. The article you linked was from before all of that was settled. Do you have more current information?
 
tehpope said:
So a bunch of Wayfair workers are staging a walkout in protest of yhe company selling furniture to the detainee camps.
www.bostonglobe.com

Wayfair employees plan walkout to oppose furniture sales to migrant detention facilities - The Boston Globe

Workers learned that a $200,000 order of bedroom furniture was placed by a government contractor that has been managing camps at the border.
www.bostonglobe.com www.bostonglobe.com

Also its trending on twitter, with the usual blue checkmarks praising the move
Click to expand...

I like how the blue checkmarks are the ones who screech about the detainees being in poor conditions, but then praise workers walking out in protest to making furniture for the poor detainees so they don't have to sit/sleep on the dirty floor. They're not even hiding how literally two-faced they are anymore.
 
@It's HK-47

Federal prosecution helped, but I honestly think what put the kibosh on ANTIFA is when they found out, to their dismay, that only the Portland Police Bureau put up with their shit.

When ANTIFA/BLM protests/street forts in other cities got dismantled by riot cops within 48 hours of trying to set up and the local Mayors said "Meh, self-defense" when a masked ANTIFA took a soy-swing at a dude twice his size and got leveled in response, the movement had a mass pussy-out by the 90% of it that was just hangers on looking for a crowd to hide in while they broke windows or LARPd as revolutionary soldiers and fought each other for the best backgrounds to selfie on.
 
Last edited:
StarkRavingMad said:
I love how AOC compared this current situation to concentration camps. For, like, one day, a bunch of people were actually thinking for themselves. I saw the vast majority of people, even TDS sufferers, exclaiming how that statement was hyperbolic at best. Then, the media pushed forward the narrative and the mental gymnastics that AOC was correct with that comparison, and now everyone is saying how we're making another Holocaust happen.

It's incredible how the mainstream media still influences so many people.
Click to expand...
You know I can’t see that and not think about the story of AOC auditioning to run for office. Makes me tinfoil about who exactly is writing her script and why the press seems to have articles prepared in advance to astroturf whatever retard idea she spits out into the conversation.
 
DanteAlighieri said:
Khamenei, not sure if he's related as I don't really care. Iran is one of the largest sponsors of terrorism, along with Saudi Arabia so the entire Middle East being glassed would make the world better off.
Click to expand...
Except Israel. We should save Israel, for it is the promised land of Yahweh.

It's HK-47 said:
They already tried violence and Antifa got its ass beat and then nearly all of the "ring-leaders" wound up in federal prison. To this day I'm still amused by how massive a problem Antifa was shaping up to be with a new riot kicking off every other week, and then out of the blue it seemed like they all but vanished and went back to being a handful of obscure idiots who show up at an event once in a great while to get punched in the face.

The operations they were pulling to root out the people in Antifa who were actually pulling the strings were really impressive. That's why there were so few long-term arrests made for the rank-and-file. The DOJ wasn't interested in the random idiots, they wanted the ones calling the shots, and fortunately for them Antifa was stupid enough to publish their "training manual" with all of their colour codes and call-signs on the internet because they thought that real life was a fucking movie.
Click to expand...
What about JournoFa, the network of failed propagandists that work with Antifa?

 
This'll be the final Holocaust post. For those who want futher fuhrer-ious discussion, convo button is to the side.

Judge Holden said:
The way I look at the holocaust is as a progressively nihilistic "scorched earth" policy applied on people instead of resources. Specifically the people Hitler and his homedawgs held as eminently responsible for all of Germany's failures and misfortunes before and during the war.

Initially it seems like the jews in Poland were simply going to be hunger-plan'd out of existence, with those in Germany and western europe earmarked for eventual ethnic cleansing after the expected swift german victory, but when Germany invaded the soviets the Einsatzgrupen were formed and given orders to murder ever growing categories of jews in the occupied soviet territories, and once Germany's advance was halted and its desperate gamble in the east looked set to fail thats when plans for death camps started to take shape which were eventually rubber stamped by the Wannasee conference.

It should be remembered that Hitler and his close associates worldview of volk/race superseding all national loyalties and interests was not limited solely to germanic peoples. He saw this as true for all other races, including the Jews. Thus when shit started hitting the fan it was obviously because "the evil plutocratic jews in london/washington/moscow" had conspired to force their host nations into war against germany/refusing to lie down and die when invaded by germany, and thus to punish them punitive measures against all jews in europe, concluding with full blown genocide, was the obvious way to retaliate.

Especially since those Jews being murdered, from Bavarian artists to Polish farmers to Ukrainian street sweepers, from babies and children to crippled old people, were inherently complicit in the vast Jewish conspiracy by virtue of blood guilt and thus they had to pay the price for "the crimes of their race"
Click to expand...

I'm going to try to tl;dr this and fail.
A lot of WWI veterans believed that Germany could have won, or at the very least gotten a better deal on the surrender, if they had kept going. One of the reasons they couldn't keep going is because Germany ran out of money, and the business/financial community wouldn't loan the Kaiser more money on war that was being lost.
Hating bankers is a popular past time for people who aren't bankers, and a disproportionate number of bankers were Jewish.
A lot of disgruntled WWI vets blamed a SPECIFIC SUBSET of Jews (Bankers) for the loss and the punishing terms of the treaty of Versailles.
This morphed into a general dislike of Jews in general, especially in the aftermath of WWI as members of the minority Jewish community were looked after by the disproportionate percentage of them that were less affected by the collapse of the german economy. (To put that a bit more clearly: Jews made up 2% of the population of Berlin, but owned 50% of the businesses and banks)
And eventually turned into stories of Jews actively sabotaging German efforts to force Germany to surrender at the end of WWI.

Hitler was one of these disgruntled WWI vets (its possible he simply parroted the argument and didn't really believe; but if he didn't believe he never broke kayfabe on the record). So Hitler did not like the Jews. Not the point of wanting them exterminated, but when he took over he wanted the traitorous, disloyal Jews out of his country, and those that wouldn't leave rounded up and watched so they couldn't sabotage Germany a second time.

Hitler was surrounded by people who DID have the sort of "kill them all" sort of attitude. Hitler had a real knack for identifying talent and delegating; so what happened is when he delegated things, he was almost certain to delegate them to someone who WOULD like to see the Jews as a people destroyed and wiped out.

Hitler also didn't like the Poles. This was, and remains, a popular European past time, so he was hardly out of step. He didn't view them as a race that was worth saving, and more or less planned to quietly exterminate ALL the Poles, not just the Jewish ones, by basically preventing them from having kids and letting them die out over a few generations, with a little bit of Ukrainian-style starvation tossed in there for good measure. (Which I mean was pretty much what he planned to do eventually with all non-Germanic people, planning to leave small 'reservations' for the non-germanic races he deemed worthy enough to save from total annilation, like the Anglos and the Rus-Russians)
Hitler's persecution of the Jews in Poland was made more rampant by the fact that was where a number of German jews had fled to, and knew what German occupation held for them, so became partisans, sealing the fate of all Jews in Poland to be regarded as partisans.

Judge Holden said:
I suspect this mindset came about after the failure to take the caucuses became apparent and Hitler realised his ultimate gamble was about to start backfiring hard, and Hitler was probably just blue-sky thinking ways to salvage some form of half victory repeat of the brest litovsk treaty before the tsunami of soviet shit surged into germany.
Click to expand...

That mindset was pre- and immediately post- Barbarossa. Well before it looked like things in the east had taken a nasty turn, and they were trying to manage the eastern european territory taken.
IIRC, the plan had been to take everything East of the Urals. Hitler debated leaving Stalin as the head of the USSR rump state or make him the administrator/governor of these captured territories of Western Russia, under the thought Stalin just liked power, would switch allegencies when he saw he'd have more power as a German vassal than a Soviet Dictator, and would be an effective vassal to keep the Russians in line.
 
Last edited:
Dom Cruise said:
There's probably going to be a second Civil War over Trump and the "child prisons"
Click to expand...

There isn't going to be a second Civil War, the left has no guns, no concept of sacrifice, no stomach for fighting and no loyal surrogate group that can be sent out to fight in their stead.

Tim Pool's been scared CWII is "soon" for 3 years now because "it's getting worse and worse out there" even as ANTIFA and BLM cease operations..... where's the beef, guys?
 
TowinKarz said:
.where's the beef, guys?
Click to expand...

I get what youre sayimg but given the extent silicon valley and the msm want to crack down to prevent the peasants from voting incorrectly plus the continued delusion of both the hardcore left and the willfully ignorant among the normies...

If/when Trump wins again there will be a flood of extra salty chili con carne
 
TowinKarz said:
Tim Pool's been scared CWII is "soon" for 3 years now because "it's getting worse and worse out there" even as ANTIFA and BLM cease operations..... where's the beef, guys?
Click to expand...
I think Tim Pool is thinking of a general war between left-wingers/Democrats and right-wingers/Republicans, not just between Antifa and whoever.
 
@Freddy Freaker

The people out in the streets of my town right now are not Silicon Valley constructs, and none of them are talking about shooting anyone. The left is deluded, but, that delusion also extends to a belief they could somehow rig the upcoming 2020 election with YouTube algorithms.


As I said before, the fact Clinton couldn't win with every MSM institution supporting her proves that ultimately, the populace can't be controlled as easily as they'd like to believe into voting against the very things they see every day of their lives, like high taxes and unchecked illegal immigration, simply by feeding them clumsy propaganda in the form of suggested YouTube vids.

I've also said before and I'll say again, "Diversity is our strength!" no matter how artfully presented and backed by flashy production and celebrity endorsement, will not sway a person who is on their 3rd straight year of underemployment and just saw the leading "D" candidate say "we're gonna put the coal miners out of work!"

You'd think the left would notice the censorship of the last 4 years has been more a damnable annoyance to the populace than actually effective.


Do they not notcie that Trump's approval has, albeit slowly, trended UP since his election?

Guess not since they're putting fruitcakes like E Jean Caroll on the TV as "proof" and never dreamed they'd have to pull the plug on her when she started blabbing tales with as much credibility as those from the mouths of a resident of Happy Acres.

Iwasamwillbe said:
I think Tim Pool is thinking of a general war between left-wingers/Democrats and right-wingers/Republicans, not just between Antifa and whoever.
Click to expand...

He's ourtright said he fears armed conflict, he doesn't know between WHO, but he's pretty convinced that there are going to be county-level violent brawls the likes of "Bleeding Kansas" in the near future, and I don't see it.
 
Last edited:
The talk of civil war is pretty silly if you ask me. It's true, politics (especially the left but the right too) is probably more divisive and fanatical than it has been since the LA race riots, maybe even the civil rights era. But people aren't exactly forming militias and coercing military officials. The truth is the second one side starts yelling "CIVIL WAR 2.0 WOOOO' like the retards they are and shooting their ideological enemies the military will squash them harder than a safe dropped on a water ballon.
 
372D18B2-2ECD-4ED4-A183-E92B5CE0A129.jpeg
Did...did I wake up in Bizarro Land, what the fuck is happening?
 
Classist. said:
The talk of civil war is pretty silly if you ask me. It's true, politics (especially the left but the right too) is probably more divisive and fanatical than it has been since the LA race riots, maybe even the civil rights era. But people aren't exactly forming militias and coercing military officials. The truth is the second one side starts yelling "CIVIL WAR 2.0 WOOOO' like the exceptional individuals they are and shooting their ideological enemies the military will squash them harder than a safe dropped on a water ballon.
Click to expand...
Yup if the AOC style Progressives/Pepe loving Alt Right ever tries a legit insurgency they'll be shocked at how fast their pet politicians join the other side in bipartisan condemnation of them.
 
TowinKarz said:
There isn't going to be a second Civil War, the left has no guns, no concept of sacrifice, no stomach for fighting and no loyal surrogate group that can be sent out to fight in their stead.

Tim Pool's been scared CWII is "soon" for 3 years now because "it's getting worse and worse out there" even as ANTIFA and BLM cease operations..... where's the beef, guys?
Click to expand...

I didn't say it wouldn't be over with quickly, just that I think it's a possibility that when Trump wins reeelection there's going to be a fringe of crazy fools who are going to start some shit.

But I could be wrong and I really hope I AM wrong.
 
Dom Cruise said:
There's probably going to be a second Civil War over Trump and the "child prisons"

Though make no mistake, the left will get torn a new asshole, but yeah, it's probably only a matter of time until there's violence.
Click to expand...
And this one will be bloodier than the first. Last time the country boys were holding their own against the factory boys at first. But eventually their lack of a manufacturing base got them. This time the country boys and the factory boys will be on the same side against the soy boys and wimpy boys.

The right's K/D ratio will be obscene. At least 25.
 
SteelPlatedHeart said:
View attachment 815296
Did...did I wake up in Bizarro Land, what the fuck is happening?
Click to expand...
Trump thought that various forms of election interference skewed the 2016 popular vote totals. This was in response to a specific question on the subject. I've seen no evidence that he's as preoccupied with this notion as his opponents are about the election's actual result.

It's just a smirking attempt to bust Trump's chops. It relies on ignorance of context, or a willingness to dismiss that context in order to believe comforting things. Tricks like this won't budge the needle away from Trump, but they can damage CNN's ailing credibility.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom