BradolfPittler
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2016
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Apparently Nick is the true mastermind here and somehow set it up for Vic to be falsely accused so he could then set Vic up with BHBH? Probably just so he could make a fake GFM and get all them juicy superchats....
View attachment 731184
https://archive.li/Aev5y
(first time archiving, let me know if I fucked it up or something)
It's one hell of a trippy experience to refresh that ANN article in real time to see the pro-Vic comments getting deleted.
ANN needs Rope
I lol'd
Yes, you dumb cunt, that's how it works! He swears he din du nuffin, the court goes by that and the accusers have to prove he did it. God, these people are so fucking stupid, it makes me doubt myself and this case and wonder if types like Ron and Rial are so faux-smug not because they're trying to appear confdient, but because they genuinely have something nuclear to eviscerate Vic with.reee, no supportive evidence!
I don't know why people are thinking that Vic shouldn't have done this and he's ruining his career doing this. HIS CAREER IS ALREADY RUINED. Also i'm seeing people say that lawsuit got the dates wrong.
Monica and the other VA's: We ruined your career because all we wanted was for you to get some help.
You know there are other ways to do that
Too bad courtrooms don't like cameras.
How do you prove a negative?I lol'd
I don't know why people are thinking
And we all know how that saga ends!Ok this needed to be posted, the ending kills me.
https://twitter.com/DragonBae_Z/status/1106834210180882433
It's Foldable Pedo's way of saying that Vic's fans don't know what they're talking about, which is ironic because Foldable Pedo doesn't have a damn clue about anything.View attachment 731416
Can someone give me an explanation what this guy means?
I mean, that's possible in theory if there's evidence or the accusation is concrete. Like, say, if Vic's accused of stuffing his hands in the roastbeef sandwhich that is Monica Rial on 53th of Decembriary 2001, at 5PM, in a hotel room. By showing photo of himself with a fan taken at 4:59, Vic could prove that he was way, way too far to be sticking anything into Monica's hole. Or if someone suspiciously alike Vic was seen stuffing his hand in the roastbeef sammich, him being elsewhere at the time proves his innocence.How do you prove a negative?
View attachment 731416
Can someone give me an explanation what this guy means?
Ah, so the great weeb beef is still acting like a magnet for idiots. You'd think the lawsuit would scare them off.He is one of the more autistic cows we document around here. A true steaming pit of creepy obsessions and wanton idiocy delivered with an almost inhuman robotlike lack of human emotions or empathy and a broomstick shoved firmly up his ass. This is the dickweasel that attempted to get /8chan/ in trouble for CP, by uploading CO to /8chan/ during Gamergate. He’s one of Indsey Ellis’s beta minions. His pretentious ravings as a general rule don’t make sense to normies.
Being a loose amalgamation of cells, I find it amazing that any of us can think.That's your problem right there. they aren't thinking. They arrived at a predetermined conclusion and feel reality will bend to it.
They feel Vic is guilty. So they feel this case has no legs, so they make up imaginary scenarios and pretend like they know what they're talking about. They act coy and well-informed. They say that "this is it?" like there aren't other lawsuits coming. Despite the fact that Ty has said again, and again, and again that there are more coming, but they ignore that. They assume victory. they don't realize they are stark naked for anybody with an iota of critical thought. They sneer at the requests for evidence. They flat-out missed the fact that we WANT the details of these investigations to be put into evidence, but that won't stop them from laughing as if they won something when they say "HA NOW THIS HAS TO GO INTO EVIDENCE, BET THEY DIDN'T THINK ABOUT THAT!!" -- yeah no shit Sherlock. It was literally demanded BY VIC'S lawyer. THAT is how strong Vic's innocence is.
They Arrive, Feel, Make up, Pretend, Act, Say, Ignore, assume, fail to realize, sneer, miss facts, and laugh
But there is absolutely NO thought whatsoever in any of it.
Literally what on god's earth...?and eating beans.
The jellybean story? Don't tell me you somehow missed the stupidest part of this whole insane festival of stupid.Literally what on god's earth...?
View attachment 731416
Can someone give me an explanation what this guy means?