Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
TheGreatCitracett said:
RRRRRREEEEEEEEE!

I'm sure that's exactly what the kid was doing.

View attachment 644823
Click to expand...
​

Your just jealous that Donald Trump is richer than you and your husband (if you got one that is.) And you hate the fact that your so precious Hillary Clinton lost the election. And that your feminism isn't going shit for you. Donald Trump smirk is like kryptonite for you SJWs, cause all you'll ever see is a "man who oppresses women."

Fact check, despite the fact that Donald Trump has been married three times, all of his ex-wives don't speak badly about him.

https://www.cheatsheet.com/money-ca...pular-new-years-resolutions-really-cost.html/

Not only that but Donald Trump made sure that his wives were educated. Ivana Trump has been married four times already, but she is a businesswoman, (which is probably a more successful job than what you currently have Alex Cranz.)

Marla Maples is a better public speak than you Alex, due to the fact that she does a lot of charity work. What short of things have you been doing Alex?

Don't just say stupid shit like "People who smiles are Nazi's" or anything like that.

CatParty said:
View attachment 644844
Click to expand...

Wait a minute? Wasn't Hermione afraid to say Voldemorts name for years? And she wasn't the one who formed Dumbadore's Army. Other than being super smart and have a natural talent for magic, she did crap when it came to the books. Harry and Ron both did more things than she did, and it was Ron's idea to use a Basilisk fang from the Chamber of Secrets, and it was Ron that opened the Chamber as well. In fact I don't recall Hermione destroying a horcrux at all.
 
The Pink Panther said:
Hermonine was a token female character. Get real. Find someone else to model over as your strong female figure to defeat the Empire Of Tramp.
Click to expand...
Jigglyjogglers said:
Hermione was also an insufferable know-it-all who talked down to everyone around her, thought she was flawless and without equal, and constantly talked loudly and at length about her outrage at the oppression around her that she never actually did anything effective to fight throughout the entirety of her life.

Who else would these people model themselves on?
Click to expand...

Hermione is a self-insert by Rowling, she has literally stated this.

It's important to note that for all the flaws the books are willing to give her she is also pretty much always correct. Her failures can be written off due to outside factors such as being discriminated against, being smarter than everyone and being ahead of her time, common "failures" for a certain kind of character and ones that Rowling seems to attribute to herself. Indeed, if SJWs concede any kind of flaws I think those line up with the consensus.
 
Bad_Guys_are_Good4EVER said:
Wait a minute? Wasn't Hermione afraid to say Voldemorts name for years? And she wasn't the one who formed Dumbadore's Army. Other than being super smart and have a natural talent for magic, she did crap when it came to the books. Harry and Ron both did more things than she did, and it was Ron's idea to use a Basilisk fang from the Chamber of Secrets, and it was Ron that opened the Chamber as well. In fact I don't recall Hermione destroying a horcrux at all.
Click to expand...
They gave Hermione in the movies all of Ron's good lines and clever actions from the books.
 
Coconut Gun said:
I present to you, evil in its purest form.
videoblocks-okay-sign-by-man-white-background_sjsds-4ix_thumbnail-full04.png
Click to expand...
You forgot the maga hat.
 
Weppers said:
They gave Hermione in the movies all of Ron's good lines and clever actions from the books.
Click to expand...
Yeah, in the movies Ron was reduced to a comic relief, pretty much. Sure, in the books he was the "funny one", but he had a brain and a spine as well, even if they weren't as respectively big as Hermione's and Harry's.
 
I wish these Harry Potter fags would obsess over a better series. Like A Wizard of Earthsea, just to give an easy example.

Lol, who am I kidding, LeGuin didn't autistically over-describe every tiny aspect of her world in books that weigh in at five pounds each so they wouldn't be interested.
 
Jigglyjogglers said:
Hermione was also an insufferable know-it-all who talked down to everyone around her, thought she was flawless and without equal, and constantly talked loudly and at length about her outrage at the oppression around her that she never actually did anything effective to fight throughout the entirety of her life.

Who else would these people model themselves on?
Click to expand...

:autism:
Hermione is JK Rowling's obvious wish-fulfillment self insert, she has admitted as such. Ron is a stand in for some guy she had crush on in highschool. So if you ever read the books and wondered why Hermione kept chasing after Ron, its because Rowling never got laid in school. (And if she did the tsundere shit Hermione did, no wonder).
IIRC she said her "Ron" was the older brother a friend, if you're wondering where Ginny & Harry came from.

So a grating character angry at people who don't pick up her subtle hints that is a Femcuck's attempt to rewrite history.
As you said, who else would they model themselves on?

:autism: x2:
Having read her psuedonym Detective novels, where the main female character is obviously a Rowling self insert (to a disturbing degree when you compare physical appearance), I don't think she's capable of writing a work without a singular female lead who isn't a Mary Sue. Hermione was the only real female main character.

-Cho Chang was in the books for about 10 minutes as "someone not Ginny or Hermoine that Harry can make out with" and then prompty disappeared
-Luna, again in the books for about 15 minutes, is never given a whole lot beyond 'crazy conspiracy girl raise by hippies' archetype.
And other than that one girl who was their main Magic Air Soccer person, that's about it for anyone who was more than a barely mentioned background character.

Edit: @Puddleduck
I don't consider any of the adults "characters" in childrens novels unless they get knowlingly involved in the adventures, as until they do, the adults are background props & plot points, not characters.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom