🐮 Lolcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / Russell Greee / Russle / Brothel Prince / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Not really that important but in the last couple days two more people have been released from Russ's brothel lawsuit (the county employees). The way this is going it won't be long before it's just Russ suing himself.
 
I can’t get over his fucking profile pic. I know he’s had it for a while now but it’s still jarring every time you see it.
It is SO. FUCKING. FUNNY.

I cant get over it either. Jesus christ. There is so much I could say about it. Jesus christ, I love it.
 
Russ never accounts for free will in any of his wrangling. Even if polygamy was legal, you wouldn't HAVE to have multiple wives. He'd still be an incel. If prostitution was legal, the prostitutes don't HAVE to sleep with you. He seems to struggle with the distinction between something being legal and something being legally required.
 
Russ knows he's not going to end up having multiple wives.

Hell, he knows he's not even going to have one wife. At least not in this lifetime.

His bishop told him so.

Smart bishop.
 
Isn't one of the requirements of having multiple wives the ability and resources to take care of them? I know in Islam you're allowed up to four wives, but only if you can provide fully for them.

Russ can barely provide for himself, let alone anyone else. Unless they'd be like his own personal harem he could pimp out for cash or something.

Maybe the girls at the Mile High Neon would all be some sort of weird sister wives to him, and the reason he's dead set on a brothel in Utah is he figures can work the polygamy into the operation...
:thinking:
 
Last edited:
Screen Shot 2018-09-12 at 11.05.04.png
 
For the longest time I was actually thinking the lawsuit was for attention whoring puposes and not much else. While it certainly is also about that, (everything crusty rusty does is) it's obvious that he actually takes it serious on it's "legal merits". I am actually convinced he's still hoping on somehow scoring with Taylor Swift when he defeated her in court and all this "ugliness" is past and he probably spends a non-trivial amount of time thinking about it every day, like it's some pressing issue. It's crazy. The woman doesn't even know he exists. Not all that uncommon for stalkers though. I can only repeat what I said already a bunch of times - thank god he's an idiot. Dude would be scary if he wasn't.
 
Good lord, he never disappoints! Re-recording that piece of shit...I’m imagining studios flipping over signs to say “Closed” and locking multiple deadbolts, like a Warner Bros. cartoon.
 
Well, it's killing him so it's not like he really has a choice in the matter...
View attachment 539627
You know, if I were Songcat, I'd sue Rusty for for his repeated attempts to tarnish my reputation. He consistently says that it wasn't his song, but the artist who recorded it that sucks. Here's the thing Rusty, they are actual music professionals however small in scale in comparison to TS or AG or your obvious great talents. They have a professional reputation to uphold and I'm sure they looked at your 90 seconds of absolute garbage and thought, well, it's a paycheck and did their best to present it the best way possible. You didn't go to them and ask for money back or ask that certain things be re-recorded, in fact, IIRC you were quite pleased with it before it failed to get you your penis sucked. And, while sperging on the internet wouldn't necessarily be an issue, you've made yourself such a spectacle that the general public is now being told that these musicians suck all because you didn't get sucked and that sucks.
 
AnOnimous pointed this out but the reason that the line is drawn after gay marriage and before polygamy is because polygamy is rife with potential for government fraud/abuse. If you could marry unlimited partners, it’s very easy to use that to defraud welfare, Medicare, etc.

Not to mention the total headache it is for the government to enforce marriage contracts with potentially unlimited parties to the marriage.

Unsurprisingly, Russ quotes a dissent as if it might be a source of legal authority... a dissent has as much legal authority as a post on the Orchards. Plus, Roberts only brings up polygamy to point out that expanding marriage rights could be an issue; not because he thinks polygamy should be legalized. Overall it’s a nonsense dissent anyway.
 
But Russell, being a simple (and thirsty) creature, just responds to stereotypical "hotness" cues, such as her pose, bleach-blonde hair, and small bikini.
Russ looks at women the same way Borat does. Pam Anderson with her bleached hair and boulder tits is the hottest woman in the universe because that's what tv tells him and if there's any reason he needs a woman, it's as a status symbol to impress the popular kids.

A lot of cows see women this way.
 
Re-recording the Taylor song to prove he's got talent?

Surely he could have done that by writing and recording some new material, something which hasn't been tarnished like he claims the "I Get You" (aka "I get to have you") song has.

He claims to have been writing songs and musical scores for years, yet his SoundCloud account only has a handful of pitiful "woo songs" uploaded to it.

I think you're going to have to work a lot harder than that to prove you've got any talent Russ.
 
Late but it was funny when he claimed that obviously uncomfortable, defensive posture was a common professional pose. Of course he thought that since that’s probably how every woman he worked with must have looked like when he tried to talk with them.
 
We have some bona fide law talkin' guys here, so I'm wondering, have you ever had anybody remotely as deluded as Russ come to you with similar levels of frivolous claims?

I don't think even Lionel Hutz or Futurama's Chicken Lawyer would take Russ on as a client.
 
Isn't his legal argument essentially that the song was so amazing that by accepting those paper cranes or whatever but not his song TS was committing fraud by tricking people into thinking she accepted cool things and rewarded the creators.
 
Back
Top Bottom