US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png ​

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Click to expand...
GunCar Gary said:
you added an image to give your claim credibility when you could have waited 30 minutes for most of the counties to report in and have an even stronger argument. you edited the image after being called out. very brown behavior. shameful
Click to expand...
even when there was 0%, Casey Putsch was still set to lose by massive landslide margins showing how irrelevant extremely online people are to elections

that's my point
 
Last edited:
lmao my wife finally got jeetpilled from some jeet-ette bitch from some other company hassling her on the wife's internal company email instead of the front-facing one
 
mango_reseller said:
But if you get 0.8% of results and they're really not close at all (in this case +70% margin), that's a very, very difficult to overcome "exit poll"
Click to expand...

Statistics requires a random sample, which this data is not. Go back to election night and look at the earliest returns for several states and see how badly off they were from the final result because the were from areas that leaned heavily in one direction but didn't represent an average sampling of the population of that state.

The results will be in soon enough that sperging over early results in either direction is retarded.
 
Irene and 22 others said:
Statistics requires a random sample
Click to expand...
If Ohio's counties' populations were fully discrete sets I would agree, but would you make the argument that republicans in bigger counties (i.e. those for the major cities of Ohio) are significantly MORE racist than the rural ones (or, alternatively, significantly MORE against Trump than the rural ones)? Obviously I agree generally with your point but we're talking about more or less the same types of voters, and any differences seem to me to favor Vivek more so than Putsch, hence why 0.8% would be more than enough of a "poll" to get the final result. Which is I assume why AP also called it at like 0.5%.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom