There isn't really any indicator that that is the plan anyway. There has been no preparation or staging of assets in the area to get ready for that, and even if it was the plan, it would be trivial to do anyway. I mean Iraq is still in living memory, the US Marine troops would be occupying Tehran in a matter of days.
Tried seeing if I could find some source on his statement
Don't tell anyone I told you this, but the Iran War is just a cover story to prevent them building a Metal Gear.
While I actually do disagree with this I agree we aren't going botg in any significant way. Kharg is the most I expect us to be interested in occupying in the first place.
Metal Gear? How do you know about that? It's supposed to be the most top-secret black project.
We're to believe regime change was never a goal of the operation yet the first act was a sneak attack to assassinate the Ayotollah.
It took US forces 30 days to move from the border into Baghdad in 03 with absolutely no resistance on the ground. Trying to do huge things takes time even in the best case scenario. II appreciate you contributing even if I disagree but if you remove this malleable timeline of US involvement, how fast do you imagine US military could move in optimized conditions? We move extremely fast and stike very hard compared to any previous military but were not extraterrestrials. It still takes time and money for us to do anything. My take on this war is that American public is ready to sacrifice up to a point and we are far from that point. I don't know that for sure. I'm just basing that on past American public performance during war and a faith we can do it right.
Regime change is a process by which we install a government of our choosing, Simply killing a leader does not not institute that and didn't itself even remove the regime from power. we've left the task of "changing the regime" to the people of Iran should they so choose to take it.
Gas prices in America are not going to go up 100%
How's that Ukraine war going for you guys? Is Russia defeated yet? How effective have you been there, NATO Allies? Oh, Russia is still gaining territory, and Ukraine is still reliant on US aid. Wow, sounds like you guys sure know a lot about how to win a war effectively. You've driven the Russians back exactly not at all since the start of the war and they're still going!
You are correct, he is stupid. He also sided with Joe "Podcast Surfer" Kent, and is coping about how actually he totally knew everything about Iran (except he apparently didn't know about the ICBM-level missiles they had) and Trump is just a retard for icing him out. Also the investigation is a witch-hunt (projection much?) as if a private investigation isn't exactly how it should be handled.
They have quite literally gone down since they peaked like a week ago, because oil speculation goes insane at the slightest pin drop.
Trump said he was going to choose Iran's new leader five days after it started.
The way to win an argument in USP2 is literally tell someone to source what they're saying if they cant or don't respond and post again you win. Want a couple of easy dubs go ask Fatpacks to not doom and don't get a response.
the first act was Operation Midnight Hammer, which destroyed nuclear infrastructure and killed people directly associated with the nuclear program. The Ayatollah was left alive with an opportunity to continue his brutal dictatorship without nukes. He was only killed after he continued enriching uranium.
I'm convinced that fatpacks is a bot or something. His behavior is too simple and consistent and he wouldn't respond to my DMs when I tried a while back. I really think the USPG2 have been arguing with a robot for years.
"We will have a role in influencing things."
Lol European. How's that war in Ukraine going? You still didn't answer!
News thread btw. Can we keep the sperging down a bit? That goes for everyone, not singling you out.
