IN ‘Unscientific, dangerous nonsense’: Why a hepatologist is warning against this popular athlete recovery trend: Suction Cup Therapy - Experts like Dr Cyriac Abby Philips (The Liver Doc) are sounding the alarm on the risks of infection, scarring, and the myth of skin-based detoxification.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Article: Warning Indian site!
https://archive.ph/9sxSD
IMG_8561.jpeg IMG_8560.webp IMG_8559.jpeg
Cupping therapy has been around for centuries and continues to be used by some athletes and wellness enthusiasts for muscle recovery and pain relief. The renewed popularity of such practices on social media has sparked debate about whether they offer genuine health benefits or simply create the illusion of treatment without scientific backing. That debate has intensified following a warning issued by Kerala-based hepatologist Dr Cyriac Abby Philips, widely known online as ‘The Liver Doc’, in an Instagram post.

Critiquing the procedure, he described cupping therapy as “unscientific, dangerous nonsense”, urging people to reconsider what he called a “superstitious trend” being presented as legitimate medical care. His post included images of wet cupping, where suction is applied after small incisions are made to draw out what some believe is “toxic” blood. Dr Philips challenged the basic premise behind the practice, stating, “The skin is not a filter for toxins; that is the job of your liver and kidneys.” He added, “Cutting the skin to suck out blood is not detoxification; it is a recipe for infection, scarring, and, in some cases, severe skin damage.” He also raised concerns about hygiene and medical safety, noting that the use of non-sterile tools or poor aftercare could expose people to serious infections such as hepatitis B, hepatitis C and HIV. According to him, the intense suction used in cupping can also cause hematomas, permanent scarring, and skin discolouration, and may delay proper treatment for underlying conditions if people rely on it instead of seeking medical care.

He also argued that public promotion of such practices can confer unwarranted credibility and divert attention from evidence-based recovery methods. Referring to athletes who have used cupping, he said that using it for recovery is based on flawed assumptions about how the body heals. Speaking about the practice, he noted, “Recovery involves restoring energy and repairing muscle fibres through nutrition and rest. Intentionally bleeding (wet cupping) creates a new injury that the body must waste energy to fix. It lowers blood volume, which is actually the opposite of what an endurance athlete needs.” Summing up his stance, he wrote in his caption, “Cupping therapy is unscientific, dangerous nonsense. Evolve your thinking and rationality. Use critical thinking. It will help you drown the background noise.”

What occurs in the body during cupping therapy?

Dr Palleti Siva Karthik Reddy, MBBS, MD, general medicine, FAIG, consultant physician at Elite Care Clinic, tells indianexpress.com, “Cupping therapy works by creating localised suction on the skin using heated or mechanical cups. This suction increases superficial blood circulation, causes mild tissue swelling, and often results in temporary bruising due to rupture of small blood vessels beneath the skin. From a physiological standpoint, the effect is largely limited to the skin and soft tissue layers and does not influence deeper muscle recovery or systemic detoxification.”

IMG_8562.jpeg IMG_8563.jpeg

He confirms that there is “no credible scientific evidence showing that cupping removes toxins from the body.” The human body already has highly efficient detoxification systems through the liver, kidneys, and lymphatic system. Some individuals may experience short-term pain relief due to placebo effects or temporary changes in blood flow, but large-scale clinical studies have not demonstrated consistent or measurable recovery benefits for athletes or patients.

Potential health risks associated with wet cupping or hijama

Wet cupping, also known as hijama, involves making small cuts on the skin to draw blood, which introduces clear medical risks. “If proper sterilisation is not followed, there is a possibility of bacterial infections, transmission of blood-borne diseases, and poor wound healing. Repeated procedures can also lead to scarring and skin discolouration,” notes Dr Reddy.

He adds that blood removal, even in small amounts, can be risky for individuals with anaemia, diabetes, clotting disorders, or compromised immunity. “Another concern is that reliance on such therapies may delay evidence-based diagnosis and treatment for conditions such as muscle injuries, chronic pain disorders, or inflammatory diseases. This delay can worsen outcomes and prolong recovery.”

DISCLAIMER: This article is based on information from the public domain and/or the experts we spoke to. Always consult your health practitioner before starting any routine.
IMG_8566.webp IMG_8567.webp
 
Last edited:
I should mention cupping is ridiculously mainstream for Chinese athletes, probably more common than hot/cold switching for muscle recovery.
Might be pseudoscience but China and Taiwan did world's better at the Olympics than India.
 
I’m pretty sure it works in the sense that it numbs those areas and so you probably don’t feel as sore after so can push yourself harder, etc. It doesn’t seem to have no negative effects. The ‘risky’ individuals being described don’t do this. This is a thing done by top-tier atheletes.
 
I should mention cupping is ridiculously mainstream for Chinese athletes, probably more common than hot/cold switching for muscle recovery.
Might be pseudoscience but China and Taiwan did world's better at the Olympics than India.
They also eat meat.
 
I've never heard of wet cupping before with the blood letting, sounds painful and that picture at the end looks like a 2nd degree burn. Although technically, blood letting (or blood donations) is the only way to remove PFAS in your body, so in a way, the cupping people are right, it does remove toxins.
 
I've never heard of wet cupping before with the blood letting, sounds painful and that picture at the end looks like a 2nd degree burn. Although technically, blood letting (or blood donations) is the only way to remove PFAS in your body, so in a way, the cupping people are right, it does remove toxins.
I only had blood let after getting high iron months with the infusions i got post remission/stem cell transplant , didnt hear anything about PFAS other than the RAAF contamination of the groundwater where i grew up contributing to it
 
I've never heard of wet cupping before with the blood letting, sounds painful and that picture at the end looks like a 2nd degree burn. Although technically, blood letting (or blood donations) is the only way to remove PFAS in your body, so in a way, the cupping people are right, it does remove toxins.

If you want to remove PFAS, sell your plasma. You’ll make money, get rid of the PFAS, and even PFAS-tainted plasma is better than nothing for the people who need it
 
What's with people making it seem like they're prepping to be disciples of Nurgle recently?
 
Back
Top Bottom