US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It’s funny as hell if it’s indeed true that Tucker Carlson was fed bullshit info from Trump who then told it to the Iranian government who were lulled into a false sense of security. Like we’re getting literal spy fiction unfold in front of us.

Also laughing at all the keyboard warriors going “If they throw Tucker in prison we’re starting a revolution!” Imagine pretending to care so much about a Glow in the Dark Nigger.
I’m tired of Tucker, he’s such a phony. “Oh I drive an antique pick up Truck! My intro music is twangy country music.” Douchebag will always be an insider who was born with a silver spoon in his mouth. Trump is proud that he’s a rich SOB, Tucker is ashamed of it and tries to hide it in his grift.
 
Any proof of this yet?
White house correspondent David Alandete who represents Diario ABC and Cope radio (lol) as well as Telemadrid put this out:


For months, I've been seeing Tucker Carlson show up at the White House during delicate moments. Not once, not twice. Several times. In sensitive meetings, on key days. I saw it myself, like in this photo I took. He was there when they were talking about Venezuela, about oil, about Iran.

Among the journalists, the same question always floated around in hushed tones: what exactly is a television host doing here? Why is he in rooms where normally only officials, diplomats, or national security advisors are allowed?

Carlson seemed convinced that he could play another role. That he could be an informal link, someone capable of calming Trump, opening channels, pushing deals. For years, he has defended that strategy of negotiating with autocrats, talking to dictators, exploring pacts like the ones he proposed with Russia or with the Venezuelan regime.

But no.

Now he himself has said something that changes everything: that the CIA has reviewed his messages with people in Iran and that there could be a criminal referral to the Department of Justice for those contacts before the war, under the law that regulates agents of foreign powers (FARA).

If that's true, many scenes from these months start to take on a different light. Those discreet entries into the White House. Those meetings where no one quite understood what he was doing there. And those conversations in which Trump seemed to give him information that later turned out to be incomplete or downright wrong.

Within the administration itself, there's talk of the possibility that Trump might have been feeding him misleading or incomplete information to throw off the ayatollahs before the attack. It would be a pattern that was already seen in another recent episode: when he agreed to speak on the phone with Nicolás Maduro in the middle of negotiations, sending messages through Ric Grenell, and shortly afterward ended up ordering his arrest.

Moreover, this episode also has an internal reading in Washington. In the struggle within Trumpism between Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the situation is relevant. Carlson is close to Vance and has been for years one of Rubio's harshest critics. If now his figure is called into question in this context, that indirectly strengthens Rubio's position within the administration.

1773610285028.png
 
us, because as much as people on both sides don't like to admit it, israel is a vassal state who requires US aid to exist in the area it does. or it used to, this is pretty fucking embarrassing. we use them to test new shit, to see how weapons work on russian equipment, and now chinese equipment. additionally, allowing iran to grow stronger only benefits muzzies, and doesn't benefit us in any way.

you are so distracted by whether or not the kikes will benefit from this and how they shouldn't benefit from anything, that you have blinded yourself to America's benefits to all this.
i think that this is the root of the disagreement. i don't buy into the fact that we benefit MORE from this than israel does. iran, for all their backwards terrorist bullshit, could never cause the cessation of the US like they could with israel. when fundamental survival is on the line, like it is with israel, everything else pales in comparison. sure, we may get some benefit from having israel around, but even with that being said israel's survival is on the line if iran goes batshit one day.

personally i believe that the country who benefits the most should be the one that does the majority of the "work", whether it be financially, militarily, or whatever else. with the iran conflict its obvious this is not the case, and on top of that the average americans daily life is being disrupted with oil prices (for the time being) and that's combined with all the other bullshit that we have to deal with as a country. the main gripe i see from "regular" people and republicans (deranged tranny lefties don't count because they're deranged tranny lefties) is that with everything going on in this country we shouldn't be fighting another mideast shit war for the OVERALL benefit of another country. i won't even get into the social aspects of this and how everyone is simply fed up in general with what goes on in america nowadays. we have a country full of people that are fed up. fed up with our lying politicians, fed up with our shit bag economy, fed up with not having affordable housing, fed up with skyrocketing consumer debt, and whatever other thing you can throw into the pile.

with all of that being said yes, if we woke up tomorrow and iran was a paved parking lot we would all benefit. i'm not arguing that point nor am i pleading a case for any fundamentalist towelhead regime, if it were up to me i would snap my fingers and they would all cease to exist. i think that summing up any actual critique of this situation by calling the person complaining "blinded by antisemtism" or "defending muslims? u must be brown lol" is just a lazy. there are plenty of legitimate points that oppose all of this.
 
I've said it before, and I'll say it again: you could literally have a paranoid schizophrenic with a known history of crack-cocaine and methamphetamine abuse running for mayor of NYC, whose only campaign promise is to kill and kill again, and the paranoid schizophrenic would win against Andrew Cuomo in a landslide
This is one of the funniest things I've read all week.
 
See how far that goes when it turns out he's been communicating with the Iranian regime at the same time as he was lobbying Trump to not attack Iran a few days before the initial strike. He essentially confirmed that was true in the video. If Tucker wasn't openly advocating for Iran to the point of having meetings to try to convince Trump to not attack Iran, you might have a point.

Try claiming the first amendment for this:

View attachment 8703692
View attachment 8703693

Also, if the CIA knew about this, Trump would definitely have been warned about Tucker prior to having meetings with him, especially the meeting a few days before the war. Wonder why the Iranian leadership was so comfortable meeting in large groups when the US was openly building up assets.
I used to think dissident right dovishness was just wanting some 'me time' to enact the hardline domestic politics they advocated for. But between this and the Russia stuff with Tucker as it's face it's obviously just subversiveness

Tucker's podscast Hanoi Hannah routine is so shameless that he must genuinely believe it... the thrill of contrarianism can’t fully explain this
 
I'm a born and bred native New Yorker
as am i, i just got more and more fed up the older i got. i won't bore you with the details but i remember the exact time place and moment where i said to myself "i'm done". between the traffic, the lawlessness, the cost of living, the absolute 0 personal freedoms and the favoring of criminals over tax paying citizens i just couldn't take it any more. there were some other major reasons why i left but the state of the city definitely didn't help plead its case.

i grew up listening to stories about how nyc used to be, the sense of comradery, how neighbors used to play cards under street lights and things like that. in comparison to modern day it was just a completely different animal. how many people do i have to walk over on 10th avenue that are passed out with a needle hanging out of their arm? how many people do i have to watch smoke crack on the street? how many times do i have to almost get into a fist fight with a drunken bum because he's threatening a young girl (yes this actually happened). then there's the realization that it will simply never get better. i know a lot of people hate new yorkers but we aren't all bad. people forget that there used to be a lot of normal white families that lived in the city and not all of them white flighted out back in the 70's (although mine should have).
 
you're not a kikesperg. simple as that.

i'm happy to agree to disagree on things like this. what makes it exhausting is when people imply there's not an inch of benefit for any of the shit we're doing, or that the US doesn't literally own israel through weapons contracts and money that they have tried very hard to stop needing so that if we become an islamic regime or whatever, they still have a chance.

babydunk pretends to be but does it in a funny way. these other kikespergs are just exhausting because they have one line and it's repeated every single time, and it doesn't land if your debate opponent isn't actually a supporter of israel. when you try to debate someone who's talking about how iran is good for america, and all you can say is that it being good for israel is bad, that doesn't really own up to the fact that iran being a parking lot would be the ideal outcome for basically every single middle eastern nation, oy veysrael included, and that all i want is for these sandchuggers to shut the fuck up and stay contained to their own sandbox (haha) because if they do, and they stop trying to fuck up oil shipments to get their way, i wouldn't give a FUCK about any of them.

it's just so funny to watch the ones who vehemently hate israel to the detriment of everything else, to the point where they'd side with muzzies in a conflict. it's why i don't even read what that retard chaotic good barbarian says. it's niggerbabble.
 
personally i believe that the country who benefits the most should be the one that does the majority of the "work", whether it be financially, militarily, or whatever else. with the iran conflict its obvious this is not the case
What do you call the 12 day war and the low level work on the ground for 20 odd years?

everything going on in this country we shouldn't be fighting another mideast shit war for the OVERALL benefit of another country.
this is all part of Trump's plan to knock the supports out from China, Israel benefitting is a side thing and as shown from the Hexagon talk, Israel wants to separate from the US a bit, something that also works in the favor of the US's isolation oriented posture


calling the person complaining "blinded by antisemtism
says the guy who has actually been insulting me for being jewish lol
 
you're not a kikesperg. simple as that.

i'm happy to agree to disagree on things like this. what makes it exhausting is when people imply there's not an inch of benefit for any of the shit we're doing, or that the US doesn't literally own israel through weapons contracts and money that they have tried very hard to stop needing so that if we become an islamic regime or whatever, they still have a chance.

babydunk pretends to be but does it in a funny way. these other kikespergs are just exhausting because they have one line and it's repeated every single time, and it doesn't land if your debate opponent isn't actually a supporter of israel. when you try to debate someone who's talking about how iran is good for america, and all you can say is that it being good for israel is bad, that doesn't really own up to the fact that iran being a parking lot would be the ideal outcome for basically every single middle eastern nation, oy veysrael included, and that all i want is for these sandchuggers to shut the fuck up and stay contained to their own sandbox (haha) because if they do, and they stop trying to fuck up oil shipments to get their way, i wouldn't give a FUCK about any of them.

it's just so funny to watch the ones who vehemently hate israel to the detriment of everything else, to the point where they'd side with muzzies in a conflict. it's why i don't even read what that retard chaotic good barbarian says. it's niggerbabble.
I’ll listen to resonable arguments against the war if it’s done without Jew sperging. Luckily these faggots only seem to be online.
 
Is it possible to be against the Iran strikes and not be a Jew Sperger? I keep getting reminded of Captain ahab here.
Why is it that K I K E S, who we all agree are not White and agree also cause many problems, get ABSOLUTE FAGGOTS like you farming clout off of glazing them?

You don’t do this for:

Spics
Nigs
Chugs
Pineapple Niggers
Curry Niggers
Rice Niggers

Yet you absolutely sweep for NOSE NIGGERS.

Explain yourself, ‘white’ ‘man’.

Tldr you are a pussy ass bitch living in fear of criticizing nose niggers. Null himself as a potential nose nigger - I know he’s jewisih but somehow has Honor - but you sweep for them in a way he, as a member of the Tribe, doesn’t.

Telling .
 
Back
Top Bottom