Crime Mexican army kills leader of Jalisco New Generation Cartel, official says

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Featured on Feb 22, 2026 by Null: “El Mencho,” a Mexican cartel leader, has been killed by the Mexican army. This has caused narco-terrorism incidents across Mexico.
A Mexican federal official says the Mexican army has killed the leader of the Jalisco New Generation Cartel in a military operation
February 22, 2026 at 12:35 p.m

By Fabiola SÁnchez | AP


MEXICO CITY — The Mexican army killed the leader of the Jalisco New Generation Cartel, Nemesio Rubén Oseguera Cervantes, “El Mencho,” in an operation Sunday, a federal official said.
The official, who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly, said it happened during a military operation in the western state of Jalisco.


It followed several hours of roadblocks with burning vehicles in Jalisco and other states. Such tactics are commonly used by the cartels to block military operations.

The U.S. State Department had offered a reward of up to $15 million for information leading to the arrest of El Mencho.
In February, the Trump administration designated the cartel as a foreign terrorist organization.

(https://archive.ph/20260222173919/h...e91db44677b_story.html#selection-241.0-373.96) https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...d4820a-1014-11f1-8e8d-fe91db44677b_story.html
 
Click to expand...
Powerhouse of the Cell said:
Yeah, it actually was like this.

Early Christians during the rise of early Christianity were the original leftists that ended up being vital to the destruction of the Roman Empire.

In Christianity, the biggest things is "forgiving your enemies" and that everyone can be "forgiven" being a soft ass bitch is kinda has a lot to do with Christianity.
Click to expand...
This is not true at all. The Christian Church ironically is one of the few vestiges of the Roman Empire still functioning and was integral to Europe maintaining a relatively cohesive culture post collapse. The reasons for the Wrstern part of the Empire collapsing (eastern half lasted another 1,000 years) were many, but a big part of it was constant internal civil wars over the throne, institutional corruption and importing Germanic tribesmen as mercenaries to fight in said constant civil wars.
 
Kether said:
>latin-sourced

aren't the sacklers responsible for the opiod crisis? way more people die because of Jewish sourced decisions than LatinX drugs. I know kiwifarms is pro-jew but imagine trying to say latinos are cancerous parasites while Jeff Epstein's associates rule the country with an iron fist.
Click to expand...
Because unlike the Kikes, we can actually do something against the Latinx (if we got more motivation) whereas the Kikes got their satanic plot armor unfortunately.

Latinx also regularly work with Kikes anyways, like why the fuck is that Fuentes guy SUDDENLY now being pro-Jew, pro-Epstein all of a sudden right now after being years of a chud? "Its okay that Epstein rape kids, he didnt actually rape any kids, he's a HEBEphile o algo anyways he's based as HECK!"
 
JULAY said:
Funny you should say that... I used to live in Houston, and was a fan of Flying Saucer Draft House downtown, until a couple of friends of mine were culturally enriched by a two niggers who had their thievery glands activated by the presence of white people when leaving there one night. Not only did they get robbed, but one of them got pistol whipped and lost two teeth as an added bonus.

There's a reason why downtown Houston is deserted after the work day ends, and the reason, unsurprisingly, is niggers.
Click to expand...
Yep and ive met far too many stupid white people who are like "I love living in the trenchs" and im like no you don't. I swear thw peoplewho say this are white libs who don'twant to be seen as racist ie 40% of all the white people I meet.
Nice Stick said:
Another angle on the NG ambush yesterday (nitter). One of those pickup truck technicals and improvised light armor vesicles people were laughing at yesterday can be seen in action. Seems pretty effective to me.

ambush_ng.mp4
Click to expand...
At the end of the day if something is crude but it works then it isn't a stupid object.
The big issue with the cartels.
Again most Mexican police officials even well armed teams just don't have an RPG or high weed explosive grenades on hand especially in most police forces in Mexico.
Meanwhile you can created an uparmored APC that moves slowly but can stop all sorts of rounds.
 
deleuzeon said:
Yes,


It's retarded to try and settle arguments via scriptural quotations
You can always find one
Click to expand...
"He said to them, 'But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one."

Luke 22:36.

You misinterpret a scripture about one who seeks violence vs one who defends himself, his family, and his people.

You didn't find one, you misunderstood one.
 
It is being reported that at least 25 Mexican National Guard members were killed in yesterday's violence.

1.png
 
Powerhouse of the Cell said:
Link

View attachment 8609883

I feel like this is a step closer to the U.S. conducting operations in Mexico.

I don't imagine Trump's government is gonna stand having an economic clusterfuck from the fallout of warring cartels happening right next door.

I think within the next 10 years, there will definitely be some kind of military conflict between the two countries.

If I were an American living in Mexico, I would think this is a good time to gtfo years ahead before things get really bad.
Click to expand...
It would be economic suicide, no President would do it even assuming you could take 0 loses. The US trades a fuckton with Mexico, and it's not just like, oil or primary resources. Half of the US's manufacturing industry has an important number of steps in Mexican factories and you'd imagine Trump is stopping that, but he has explicitly given waivers for tariffs to Mexico because US factories cannot operate without that trade relationship.

US invading Mexico is such a fucking retarded idea that no president ever will give the order. US being allowed into Mexico as a partner is more viable, but there's no will for it south of the border because Mexico is culturally cautious about US intervention, given how all the previous ones have been objectively terrible for them. This fear is an important component of why they made their economy so tied to us, and they've been successful at that. You can take oil fields by military force, because you need little cooperation from the locals, and you can import the little manpower you need to extract it. You can take mines by military force, due to the same reasons. You cannot take a factory by military force and expect it to work as before because it depends on a system and infrastructure that you are actively destroying when you engage in war. Then there's also an issue with food supply, where both the US and Mexico have pretty interdependent food supplies. I know that it's kinda popular here to make a show and huff and puff around military muscle but with Mexico you really can't without doing such an economic drag that you bury your party for the next decade. Just look at what a minimal amount of economic pain is doing to Trump's numbers, and again, Trump is avoiding some of that pain by excepting key allies from his tariffs, and it's still too much for the American public to bear and it's likely the Republican party will lose the midterms precisely because of the minimal economic pain he has inflicted in the name of building up the economy. Now imagine selling an invasion when no American has died, for vague reasons, that will absolutely fuck your economy up. What's the upside for the voter?
 
oh no its pipkun said:
your average narco maybe but the narcos at the compound are disgruntled soldiers sometimes special forces dudes who wanted more pay. they also have m2s and assorted manpads to fight back. the zetas are gone but they showed the depths the xiabalba loving soldier can reach.
Click to expand...
My understanding is that the ex-soldiers (as in SF/"operators", not just guys who did a few years of grunt work) are the exception rather than the rule. Kingpins use them for bodyguards, maybe some minimal training, and the occasional cross-gang raid, but they're not fielding squads of trained soldiers, it's still almost entirely street gang types.

Sending a dozen guys with rifles to shoot up a disorganized rival crack house, or maybe the local police station, is not the same as fending off an organized military unit. If the fedgov decides to hit the compounds and mansions, any cartel asset there will be lost, and anyone who doesn't bail in advance is going to die.

LeChampion1992 said:
At the end of the day if something is crude but it works then it isn't a stupid object.
Again most Mexican police officials even well armed teams just don't have an RPG or high weed explosive grenades on hand especially in most police forces in Mexico.
Meanwhile you can created an uparmored APC that moves slowly but can stop all sorts of rounds.
Click to expand...
I agree that they're well-armed/equipped against local, town-level forces (police or rival gang). But not against a national guard or military force with equipment, trained units, and endless logistics/supply chains. The same fleet of home-armored trucks or whatever that can roll up and lay waste to a civilian facility are not going to fight a pitched battle against a platoon of infantry with helicopter support.
 
LeChampion1992 said:
The cartels don't really make their bread from cocaine as much as they make from extortion. Again you kill the people and extort a tax from the people and kill anyone who doesn't pay.
Again if you can extort a small city and 98% of its residents through siphoning let's say 2-3% of its GDP you can make more than controlling cocaine routes.
What makes it worse is the legitimately weak Institutions in Mexico so in many cases the cartel are the defacto government.
Plus the cartels now have their fingers in almost every single criminal pie you could imagine in Mexico.
Click to expand...
A wolf that eats gets bigger. It's why we have to tolerate a certain amount of criminality and greed from the government, because we want the government to be the biggest wolf. Otherwise, the way the incentives flow, the government becomes subordinate to something else and you're at the complete mercy of both.
 
Are you sure you don't want to invade Mexico?

 
LeChampion1992 said:
My concern is especially with Antifa cells along with the John brown gun club expanding into Texas despite getting federal charges i could very well see the cartels reaching out to left wing radicals and we see leftists get training in narco terrorism.

If were talking crime wise its probably going to be Houston still. The entire city puts you on edge in downtown after dark.
San Antonio is rough outside the tourist/downtown areas near the isolated places or the large barrios.
Dallas is key with South dallas and pleasant grove.
But if we want something that is surprisingly dangerous then it's a tie between these 3 cites.
Beaumont, Texarkana, and Odessa. Texarkana is like the detroit of Texas it didn't have industry come in and save it.
Beaumont is basically the slow death of the petrochemical industry.
And Odessa is a boom and bust city that is in a bust period since oil has crashed.
Click to expand...
Omg I was passing through San Antonio recently and I remember being shocked and horrified by the massive homeless encampments and shantytowns in certain sections of Downtown. It was genuinely reminiscent of Skid Row, possibly even worse and less contained than Skid Row

I was just so shocked and wasn't expecting to see it at all, because San Antonio isn't really a city that comes to mind when people think of the homeless issue. I wasn't expecting it to look like Southern California. I guess homeless people really are just in every single city now, huh? It's really unsettling because American cities never looked like this when I was growing up. I would see a few beggars here and there as a child, but never anything as prevalent and widespread as what you see these days. I hate this fucking planet with a burning passion and can't wait to die and be free of this place. If there's a Hell, it's most certainly Earth and we're living in it ladies and gentlemen.
 
frozen_runner said:
Blaming America for supplying the demand for illegal drugs is very similar (and popular with certain types of people) because it denies the agency of everyone else involved, and it falls back on the comfortable and comforting maxim that America is the source of all dysfunction and evil in the world. (And it ignores that demand for illegal drugs will always exist in any population. Blaming America in particular is like blaming America for the human sin of slavery. It makes people feel good, but it's factually bullshit.)
Click to expand...
I find it hilarious that liberals and commies talk about drugs in a way not even the most yellow pilled An Cap ever could.
You see when a forty year old manager at a McDonalds goes through his midlife crisis and craves some of that COCO someone needs to step up. If there is a DEMMAND there will be a SUPPLY. It's the moral and financial duty of the slave farmer to plant and tend to the coco plants. The market DEMANDS and the market OBEYS. That's why the middle man takes the crop, that's why he forces the slaves to process it. That's why someone smuggles it across the border. Every interaction from cutting it with baby powder and fent, to pushing it on kids to ordering hits on your rivals, on the cops. It's all just market action and reaction. If someone needs their coke, well the market needs to peel someone's skin alive if they get in the way.

But don't you apply that logic to healthcare or industry or anything that produces value. Only drogas.
 
LeChampion1992 said:
If were talking crime wise its probably going to be Houston still. The entire city puts you on edge in downtown after dark.
San Antonio is rough outside the tourist/downtown areas near the isolated places or the large barrios.
Dallas is key with South dallas and pleasant grove.
But if we want something that is surprisingly dangerous then it's a tie between these 3 cites.
Beaumont, Texarkana, and Odessa. Texarkana is like the detroit of Texas it didn't have industry come in and save it.
Beaumont is basically the slow death of the petrochemical industry.
And Odessa is a boom and bust city that is in a bust period since oil has crashed.
Click to expand...
When I went to San Antonio nearly 20 years ago for the first time it was pretty nice, what the hell happened?


Also what spares Midland from having the date of Odessa, aren’t the two basically just one area?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom