US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
lmao suck it fat pedo
Still gonna give that $2000 or whatever welfare nigger gibs from the 66 gazillion tariff revenue to keep your retard simps happy?
I think the site is glitching out, I seem to be unable to set this disruptive poster to Ignore.

EDIT:
For future travelers: if you want to be an exceedingly petty bitch, here's how to create a uBlock Origin filter for posts by specific users:
Code:
kiwifarms.*##[data-author="namegoeshere"]
I bear no responsibility for the potential consequences of you blocking posts by staff.
 
Last edited:
Reciprocal tariffs and the Fentanyl ones. A lot of the IEEPA tariffs were also on countries that are used as middlemen to skirt tariffs imposed on country of origin as well.

Steel & Aluminum, Copper, Automobiles & parts, and Semiconductors are still in effect.
I figured out what I wanted with your answer, thank you!
 
Mixed feelings, strictly legally speaking they are probably right. In a less retarded world Congress would do more to protect domestic manufacturing via tariffs and other means. The President shouldn't need to run around threatening countries to show our economic teeth with blanket tariffs. For the 'Trump is finished, orange man has no power' crowd I wouldnt be too smug. Now he has less options, but the forceful  ones are still on the table.

The real short term losers are all the gov employees who have to weed through tariff repayments, and the American taxpayers funding their overtime.
Trump still has the power to ban foreign imports on an emergency basis with the definition of emergency being left nebulous on purpose. What he can't do is levy tariffs on specific goods. This is probably the single sloppiest ruling since Roe v Wade and will just entrench the tribalism deeper while accomplishing nothing. If you are looking for a "good" outcome then market uncertainty might calm down as Trump can't kneejerk decide to kill off domestic small business ventures because some chink was bragging about computer chips. Damage is already done though.

Raising standards for manufacturing and growing crops would solve a lot more problems without skyrocketing costs but that would make Trump's buddies in business and finance lose some shekels.
 
This needs highlighted because it just shows how much everything is just going to work out for Trump long term
The midterms are in 7 fuckin' months, the primaries started this week. Unless the Republicans keep the House (which the math looks very bad for), Impeachment Season starts in 8 months.

There is no "long term" in the most likely scenario.
 
Not only this but keep in mind countries like China bypassing the tariffs by going through Canada first.
Those chinky communists are so fucking annoying. They also pull the “manufactured 49% of something in China, ship it to CCP owned factories in Vietnam, finish the remain 51%, then slap a ‘made in Vietnam’ stamp on it” trick.

Idk how you can economically defeat China peacefully. They have slave labor and will KILL anyone selling American products without permission. The death grip the CCP has on its citizens is jaw dropping.

Meanwhile the USA can barely tard wrangle its population away killing themselves to protect niggers that FUCKING HATE THEM.
 
Generally yeah, you don’t want a dictator. The problem we have is that our political institutions clearly don’t answer to the president unless the president happens to agree with them
Would a solution here be reforming (idk how this would be done) the political institutions rather than say expanding executive power and risking in time a dictator?
 
Idk how you can economically defeat China peacefully. They have slave labor and will KILL anyone selling American products without permission. The death grip the CCP has on its citizens is jaw dropping.
You don't beat that the same way you don't beat American investment Jews manipulating money and their stock market to make massive waves in global finance. America has its power and China has its power. All you can do as a pleb is navigate the choppy ocean and hope you don't drown. None of these people are your friends y'know.
 
Kay
Happy for you tho
Hf
Just say you cant read *checks post* FIVE lines of greentext and find a bridge chud.
Is it not good in theory at least to limit Presidential power?
Depends i suppose. The miggas are just mad cause this ruling did not go in favour of drumf and the TESfags dont care as long as drumf loses.Everyone involved in this is retarded
 
The midterms are in 7 fuckin' months, the primaries started this week. Unless the Republicans keep the House (which the math looks very bad for), Impeachment Season starts in 8 months.

There is no "long term" in the most likely scenario.
They aren't going to have enough in the senate no matter what to convict so they can do a daily impeachment and would love to if they can and it'll just backfire on them like always.
 
Then why does their thread ban dissenters on sight? Honest debate goes both ways.
I was banned for citing law and regulations over Trump's court proceedings in new york and how the entire process was legally fucked up for him. Like how the judge did not give the jury instructions and directly stated they did not have to be unanimous in their decision.
 
Who do you think is the best-looking female politician?
If you're including local races, then I am not sure since there's a ton of state reps and local reps I am not aware of.

If you're going solely on physical appearance for congress and senate, I will pick one from each party off the top of my head. For Democrats, I'd probably go with AOC; I like latinas and she's a good looking woman, honorable mention of Jasmine Crockett since I got a weakness for nice smiles and she's probably got a nice ass. For Republicans, I'd go Nancy Mace since she has the milf thing going on. Lauren Boebert would be honorable mention for Republican since she's younger, in shape and I bet she's amazing in bed

What about you? Purely physical appearance, from each party
 
If you're including local races, then I am not sure since there's a ton of state reps and local reps I am not aware of.

If you're going solely on physical appearance for congress and senate, I will pick one from each party off the top of my head. For Democrats, I'd probably go with AOC; I like latinas and she's a good looking woman, honorable mention of Jasmine Crockett since I got a weakness for nice smiles and she's probably got a nice ass. For Republicans, I'd go Nancy Mace since she has the milf thing going on. Lauren Boebert would be honorable mention for Republican since she's younger, in shape and I bet she's amazing in bed

What about you? Purely physical appearance, from each party
I was going to goof on you and suggest Crockett but you actually did it. Nice.

For me it's almost none of the above. Boebert has those damn trashy tats, and Mace is mid.
 
Back
Top Bottom