US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
the two big open questions here are
1) can the republicans hold on to power post 2028?
2) will a post trump republican party revert to how it was pre trump or will the changes that came with trump stick around?
both of them need to resolve in white peoples favor: the gop must stay in power, and the trump people must stay in charge of the party. if either of those fail then i don't think white americans will have a future.
It's very difficult to imagine the Democrats regaining power because they have nothing to offer the country aside from spite. Likewise, the old Republican party has nothing to offer the party's voters at all.
If Vance is actually 'our guy'. That guys really rubs me wrong, remember he puts his dick in a pajeet. I mean it's the same feeling I get when I am forced to be around faggots or niggers.
 
It surprises me Latinos think they won’t be the boat this time. Must be some retarded niggas there.
"Hey hombre, I've hearing that the Estados Unidos have been blowing up a lot of your boats recently, is this really safe?"

"Of course it's safe, ése, they only show the ones they catch! We get hundreds through a day!" (Deception increased to 35).
 
One of my exs had a JEEP that would immediately turn off as soon as you came to a stop and then the engine would start again as soon as you hit the gas. This was around 2015 and it was one of the weirdest experiences in my life because why the fuck would that even be a thing in the first place?
To save teaspoons of gas
 
This change should be totally within his power / only need a majority vote. However any change to limit the filibuster is much more aggressive than anything we've seen him do so far, so who knows if he will actually follow through with the threat.
Why? Remove it, get the vote you need, then reinstate it.
 
If Vance is actually 'our guy'. That guys really rubs me wrong, remember he puts his dick in a pajeet. I mean it's the same feeling I get when I am forced to be around faggots or niggers.
I’m actually split on Vance and Rubio. Vance says all of the right things, and has said “we need to support White men”, but I’m suspicious of him for the reasons you listed. I’m gonna find it hard to cast a vote for the guy who did this:
IMG_3462.jpeg
Meanwhile, Rubio is obviously extremely competent, but 1) he is a spic, and electing a spic to the highest office in an ostensibly White nation reeks to me and 2) he has neocon tendencies.
 
This change should be totally within his power / only need a majority vote. However any change to limit the filibuster is much more aggressive than anything we've seen him do so far, so who knows if he will actually follow through with the threat.
it's not actually a change. before when the democrats would threaten a filibuster, the GOP would give up without actually making them filibuster.
Thune is likely backdoor talking to Schumer about if they have to force it, what could be offered to just let it go, and if he does force it how much token resistance will be offered.
Schumer won't do it. He's already treading water in the party. to make a deal would sink him entirely. Maybe even put his life in danger with how crazy the commies are these days.
 
You are all way over estimating what Save will do.

The nigs in Fulton and Cook county will continue to do what they have always done and lawfare with sympathetic judges will protect them. No non dirty judge is going to overturn an "election" and the dirty ones are helping.

California where every lever of control is under Dem control wont suddenly change.

What it actually accomplishes is giving red and purple states more of a chance to fight back, and the feds reason to investigate. If you think Minnesota wont just stuff Somali ballots lol.

It will likely just prove every election for a long ass time has been bullshit and destroy all confidence in American elections. This is good, what can be destroyed by truth should be.
 
It's very difficult to imagine the Democrats regaining power because they have nothing to offer the country aside from spite. Likewise, the old Republican party has nothing to offer the party's voters at all.
It's not about offering anything, just saying the right words and slowly steering the system to benefit their side. The goal for the Democrats for at least my entire life has been a slow and steady consolidation of power. They do this through gerrymandering, judicial appointments, loose voting laws, encouraging foreigners to bolster their districts in the census and at the very least benefiting from the anchor babies of illegals.

It's a strategy that is working to date.
 
Also lots of states already require it. So it "doesnt matter" and its basically impossible to articulate a reason against it thats not "let non citizens vote". The Dems cant go mask off yet

Also forcing a talking fillibuster is great because the Dems have to make a huge fight over something 80 percent of america agrees with. Great optics. It also means Thune doesnt have to do anything else for a week straight. Also preferable to him. Schumer isnt personally opposed to it, because it helps his Dem faction too. (And helps him personally against AOC challenge). You can also tell the media is struggling to say why its bad. They cant say the quiet part out loud. And once again the Dems core of Women all have ID already.
Here's a good video laying out what you said here.
 
I’m actually split on Vance and Rubio. Vance says all of the right things, and has said “we need to support White men”, but I’m suspicious of him for the reasons you listed. I’m gonna find it hard to cast a vote for the guy who did this:
View attachment 8558418
Meanwhile, Rubio is obviously extremely competent, but 1) he is a spic, and electing a spic to the highest office in an ostensibly White nation reeks to me and 2) he has neocon tendencies.
Miller x Rubio, gotta prop the only jew that doesnt suck and is Rubio's destiny to manage the cosmos.
 
I was playing streets of rage 3 earlier and I think I know the solution to Americas problems.

Remove cops on a micro level and let vigilantes take over small communities if they (criminals) fit stereotypes. Like, I saw a tranny hang out near the 7/11 I go to and honestly, doing a sick uppercut on that nigga and throwing him into a car fender would make my day better. Maybe do some sick head kicks to a hobo and wail on his scrotum like a speedbag would be good for humanity.

I’m sick of people saying “uuuuhhhh that’s hecking violence and violence is always wrong.” Newsflash, retard. Violence should be acceptable if they got absolute truths regarding dregs of society.

If democrats and leftists want violence justified, what’s wrong with my proposal? Also, we should put hot rotisserie chickens in drum barrels.
 
Schumer won't do it. He's already treading water in the party. to make a deal would sink him entirely. Maybe even put his life in danger with how crazy the commies are these days.

Agree. But i am just saying where i think in the process we are now. Thune is going to ask and Schumer is going to waste time pretending he can get his faction to agree to a concession both to stall this and not appear weak. If he offers anything its just going to promise it wont go past a week or 2 in exchange for something else he wants so he can offer open resistance. Like i said this bills helps him personally in a challenge against AOC. New York will 100 percent let illegals vote against him in the primary.
 
"Hey hombre, I've hearing that the Estados Unidos have been blowing up a lot of your boats recently, is this really safe?"

"Of course it's safe, ése, they only show the ones they catch! We get hundreds through a day!" (Deception increased to 35).
I mean, I would actually like to know the percentage of boats we hit versus how many get through. I sincerely doubt there’s only been the ones we hit trying to do narco runs since we started this
 
They are running propaganda 24/7 to convince you that it's hopeless.
The point of propaganda isn't to convince you of anything. It's to convince you that everyone else already believes the propaganda, and you're overwhelmingly outnumbered.
If some retarded sheep do get convinced by it, that's just a bonus.
 
Depends on how Husted responds, and how long people's memories are.
Wexner is the richest man in Ohio, parts of The Ohio State University are named after him.

I'm surprised there hasn't been more heat directed as Les Wexner and all his businesses. Him hiring Epstein out of nowhere is one of the most suspect things in Epstein's story.
Oh, that's simple, he did a common shady money thing and turned power of attorney for his money over to Epstein so if the shady shit Epstein was doing with his money veered into the illegal and Epstein got caught, Wexner could disavow it and not get in trouble for it by claiming he had no idea what was going on with it. Which would be true.

Wexner owns L Brands, he didn't need Jeff to be his middle man if he wanted underage girls or boys. Good luck on getting anyone arrested for the Epstein stuff though, even if you do find actual evidence that could be used against people, by the document dump you've probably poisoned the well for jury pools to the extent that all the big law firms these people have will easily be able to get them out of it. Making all this shit public was always a double-edged sword and most normies think the legal system works like a comic book or Law and Order episode. Congrats, going full on Q-Tard about Epstein was never a good idea.
 
You are all way over estimating what Save will do.

The nigs in Fulton and Cook county will continue to do what they have always done and lawfare with sympathetic judges will protect them. No non dirty judge is going to overturn an "election" and the dirty ones are helping.

California where every lever of control is under Dem control wont suddenly change.

What it actually accomplishes is giving red and purple states more of a chance to fight back, and the feds reason to investigate. If you think Minnesota wont just stuff Somali ballots lol.

It will likely just prove every election for a long ass time has been bullshit and destroy all confidence in American elections. This is good, what can be destroyed by truth should be.
The idea isn't to flip hellholes like Cali, but to make it much harder to steal states like Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and anywhere else that had split ticket results in 2024. It's to flip purple states red with a combo of ensuring non-citizens cannot vote + making it much harder to manufacture and deliver mail in ballots in real time.

Cracking down on election fraud turned Florida, home of Broward county, from a purple to a solid red state, so I wouldn't write it off entirely.


Also forcing a talking fillibuster is great because the Dems have to make a huge fight over something 80 percent of america agrees with. Great optics. It also means Thune doesnt have to do anything else for a week straight. Also preferable to him. Schumer isnt personally opposed to it, because it helps his Dem faction too. (And helps him personally against AOC challenge). You can also tell the media is struggling to say why its bad. They cant say the quiet part out loud. And once again the Dems core of Women all have ID already.

Nevada was dumb enough to put voter ID on the ballot in 2024, and a state that Trump only won by 45,000 votes and produced a democrat senator (allegedly) voted for Voter ID by a margin of 75-25.
 
Back
Top Bottom