2026 Minneapolis ICE riots - Suicidal Empathy and its consequences

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

What’s gonna happen?

  • Nothing

    Votes: 804 53.5%

  • George Floyd 2.0

    Votes: 253 16.8%

  • Tim Walz tried in court of law, Jacob Frey too

    Votes: 211 14.0%

  • Martial law

    Votes: 234 15.6%
  • Total voters
    1,502
Here's more Anti-Ice propaganda on Facebook Screenshot 2026-01-29 184541.png . Screenshot 2026-01-29 184606.png
 
namelesstacotruck said:
No place wants a prison in their area. Point blank.
Click to expand...
Places with no other jobs do. Prison guards get paid a lot for doing something that requires no skill at all other than being able to beat down some meth freak from time to time.
 
Taser Confetti said:
Prisons provide zero experience needed, well-paying jobs with benefits to potentially hundreds of a communities residents.
Click to expand...
Incorrect. Its going to be sub 100 ftes at most. And the rest will be dei compliant federal contractors. Food, building, pretty much everything is going to be out of area contractor owned by a women or minority (at least on paper). Especially federal facilities that end up being landing pads for ex military. Remember if you take a prison guard job for the feddies for this you also have to agree to go anywhere in the US that needs an ICE guard. Also ICE gives priority to Spanish speakers. This means ICE is a dumping ground for Hispanic ex military.

Also if you want less illegals in your area then having an ice facility where faggot judge says set them free on a whim and where you may have protestors show up doesnt do that.

The real reason is it makes boomers property values go down of course.
 
Last edited:
mindlessobserver said:
These people also assume that due process for every illegal immigrant in the country means they have to go through the court system and not simply be asked to present a valid visa allowing them to be here. We hear it all the time. "No due process." They did get process. They were asked to present their Visa, and when they couldn't they got sent back to their home country.

Which is another obnoxious thing about liberal thinking here. They view a foreigner being sent to their home country as a punishment.
Click to expand...
If every immigrant has to go through the court system, then the answer is quite simple. Round up the Soros judges and send them and their court to Somalia and Haiti along with the immigrants to process. Then just put them on ignore and don't take their calls anymore.
 
AnOminous said:
And if I do go there, I can OBEY THE LAW and I probably won't get caned or executed.
Click to expand...
Where I live your gonna get arrested for doing violent crimes. They don't care what your race is. Its hilarious how many people say its racist when the fucker assaulted people who called him a nigger and his answer to words is violence. Its like saying fireball at them.
 
The Cheese Aisle said:
This made me realize that all of my Libertarian fantasies would always only include White people
Click to expand...
Many Libertarians (the lolberts, in particular) tend to forget (purposefully ignore, really) that one the principal tenets of Libertarianism is that you have the liberty to ONLY associate with the people you want. You have NO OBLIGATION to tolerate or associate with anybody you don't want.

That, of course, means no niggers, of any kind. Not even black libertarians can't stand their own niggers.
 
Nice Stick said:
If every immigrant has to go through the court system, then the answer is quite simple. Round up the Soros judges and send them and their court to Somalia and Haiti along with the immigrants to process. Then just put them on ignore and don't take their calls anymore.
Click to expand...
Which is the thing. They don't have to see a Judge. Due process is being asked by ICE to hand over their Visa paperwork, and then upon failure to provide it to be sent back to their home country.

It goes without saying, but sending a citizen of a country back to the country of their citizenship is not a criminal punishment. ICE is actually doing you a favor, sending you back to your home on the US Taxpayers dime. Which means there is no need to go through the constitutional due process of a criminal trial. Because its not a criminal proceeding. Its charity technically speaking.
 
mindlessobserver said:
These people also assume that due process for every illegal immigrant in the country means they have to go through the court system and not simply be asked to present a valid visa allowing them to be here. We hear it all the time. "No due process." They did get process. They were asked to present their Visa, and when they couldn't they got sent back to their home country.

Which is another obnoxious thing about liberal thinking here. They view a foreigner being sent to their home country as a punishment.
Click to expand...
Non-citizens have 5A and 14A rights, legally here or not. And that requires notice and opportunity to challenge deportation, even for "alien enemies," which is a step beyond illegal alien. (Note that non-citizens do not have a 6A Constitutional right to government-appointed counsel.)

Notice has probably been given - many of these people had deportation orders (notice should be specific). So how deep does the "opportunity to challenge"/ judicial review go? Not that deep, and what it includes depends on where a swept person is being interned. A recent Supreme Court case was light on specifics, as is typical, so there's wiggle-room there - and plus, if you got here illegally, there's not much you can offer up to show you aren't subject to deportation. Sure, DP via court is critical*, but in reality it's primarily a time and money extension game. People getting detained who are not legally here aren't going to change that outcome unless the administration keeps its track record of backing off after detention.

*Counterpoint: 1996 IIRIRA (expedited removal) program, though it is limited to relatively recent arrivals. Also counterpoint - point of entry (w/in 100 miles) programs.

Gobermental Supervisor said:
What they did: Enforced the law.

What they should have done: Not enforced the law.

Simple worldview of the leftist TikTok brigade.
Click to expand...
I don't agree with them, but it's interesting to see you criticizing people who disagree with the law/ principles behind the law, when in certain other cases, that's exactly what you argue for, citing your opinion.
 
So which side pussd out in the end?

also, It's a great start to the year when a fat dyke and a hook-nose get sent to hell in January.

To 2026 and ICE! :drink:
 
Friend of Dorothy Parker said:
Non-citizens have 5A and 14A rights, legally here or not. And that requires notice and opportunity to challenge deportation, even for "alien enemies," which is a step beyond illegal alien. (Note that non-citizens do not have a 6A Constitutional right to government-appointed counsel.)

Notice has probably been given - many of these people had deportation orders (notice should be specific). So how deep does the "opportunity to challenge"/ judicial review go? Not that deep, and what it includes depends on where a swept person is being interned. A recent Supreme Court case was light on specifics, as is typical, so there's wiggle-room there - and plus, if you got here illegally, there's not much you can offer up to show you aren't subject to deportation. Sure, DP via court is critical*, but in reality it's primarily a time and money extension game. People getting detained who are not legally here aren't going to change that outcome unless the administration keeps its track record of backing off after detention.

*Counterpoint: 1996 IIRIRA (expedited removal) program, though it is limited to relatively recent arrivals. Also counterpoint - point of entry (w/in 100 miles) programs.
Click to expand...
First of all, the 14th amendment may be out completely depending on the outcome of the current case being argued before the supreme court. And much of the exceptions are retarded loop holes based on things like refugee treaties and wat not, which activisist organizations very cynically convinced every wetback jumping the border to claim. Meaning as part of immigration reform actual war refugees may not be able to get asylum anymore.

And again, the 5th amendment doesn't give you a right to a trial if you are not being charged criminally. Your due process is the administrative process of presenting your valid visa or the lack of one. You can certainly request to have a hearing before a magistrate, but that is not a set in stone requirement and is entirely dependent on the administrative procedure being in operation.

Again, being deported is NOT a punishment. There is no harm or deprivation of rights being sent back to where you came from. A trial is not required to implement it. The exceptions to this are very esoteric and extreme and the Supreme Court didn't want to make a sweeping generalization on the issue.
 
Taser Confetti said:
Lmao, I actually worked at one of these facilities in another life. You have no fucking idea what you’re talking about.
Click to expand...
If you say so. The ones i am familar with in my neck of the woods it holds true.

Ice totally doesnt give preference fo spanish speakers despite saying they do on the job apps. Federal jobs totally arent dumping ground for ex military. Yes sir.

Federal job sites totally hire local people and dont go off procurement contracts. Everyone knows that.

I totally havent personally worked with ice agents before and notice they were plurality hispanic.
 
AnOminous said:
Places with no other jobs do. Prison guards get paid a lot for doing something that requires no skill at all other than being able to beat down some meth freak from time to time.
Click to expand...
Maybe on paper the benefits look good but reading this now I can't help but think of Cats and how much that job seems to have gravely harmed him both physically and emotionally. I don't think that's an unusual outcome either. I see it that the job either breaks a normal person or attracts antisocial people who are immune to the psychological pressures of tard wrangling horrible people locked in a cage all day. Money might be good but does it mean you end up with a community of broken and antisocial people?
 
The funny thing about all this is how absolutely fucked the anti-ICE agitators and protesters are. Antifa retards can get away with their anti-police bullshit in cities like Portland because they're often the children of a middle class that has substantial local political power. Prosecutors and cops who crack down on them can quickly find themselves out of a job. Cops and local officials can always pretend to not notice the terrorists or at least pretend that they're too difficult to deal with.
However, when it comes to the federal government, this shit won't be allowed to go on. The feds don't tolerate people and organizations undermining their authority and targeting individuals in federal LEO. Even people in the FBI who "vote blue no matter who" won't tolerate a bunch of tranny redditer terrorists attacking ICE since they know the same retards could go after them as well.
So here's what's going to happen to all the whistle-blowing ICE-watch fuckers in Minnesota: the next few weeks and months will go as normal as they brag about their exploits on the Internet and share tactics for the next "cause" to attack the feds over. Then there will be a knock on their door as some FBI agent or member of some other federal law enforcement organization comes to pay them a visit. This agent will have all the evidence of the terrorist's actions against ICE. They'll also have all the incriminating posts the person made online. Then the tranny retard will be given a choice: go to federal prison for a long time or squeal on all their friends and get a lighter sentence. Obviously redditers who think that morality is passe will quickly turn on all their terrorist buddies and a whole bunch will quietly get arrested by the end of the year.

Trump was pretty smart for taking such a heavy-handed approach in Minnesota. He got all the retards to publicly commit federal crimes so they can be rounded up at a later date.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom