Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[DragoonSierra]

Lol how fucking very dare you! I'm Scottish and Irish so you may call me a Jock ginger cunt or even a Paddy bogtrotter gobshite but never NEVER call me fucking British!

Im apologize for offending your very high class Scottish sensibilities.

 

[mindlessobserver]

At this point I am convinced the Judges strategy with this case is to just ignore it completely in the hope everyone gets bored and goes away. I wonder if they honestly believe Null will just get so exasperated with Greer he'll just settle for a pittance.

Which obviously won't be happening, but we are coming up on an entire year since Hardin made the new motions to dismiss. I think if we cross that threshold and there has still been nothing from the Judges we are straying into Mandamus territory.

 

[Kosher Dill]

I think if we cross that threshold and there has still been nothing from the Judges we are straying into Mandamus territory.

If the judges ever come back, Greer is going to be the one most recently pissing them off. Why change that?
I hope we get ten more emergency motions to imprison Hardin.

 

[Iron Hamster]

Em dashes are back, baby. Ai'd to the gills

View attachment 8477770

By god he's done it again - asserted another persons actions as statement of fact. So surely, we must bring in Mr Jerry Leach to confirm these assertations?
what a fucking MONG

Did he also open the door to be able to subpoena his tax filings?

ETA: Christensen involved Bennet as the magistrate judge recommending restricted filing status (i.e. vexlit).

And that's exactly why he used it.

 

[Debbie Macomber]

Ive had to tell at least one of my clients the proper way to take money out of their business accounts without running afoul of regulations for this very reason. Also, people having multiple entities need to be careful because transferring money back and forth can trigger an audit or examination. During my accounting internship, my then boss told me a story of a client who got examined because of how much and how often money was transferred between two separate business entities. From what I was told, the client was suspected of money laundering and the examination was rather thorough because of that. In the end, though, it was discovered there was no laundering and simply sloppy money management involving the client and both entities.

RG has had multiple entities, including at least one PAC, documented in his main thread. With as tight as his personal finances can be, I can easily see him moving money back and forth to pay various expenses - business and personal both. If his financial skills are as good as as his law skills, it would be unsurprising if his books were an absolute mess.

I once heard a guy at the gym on his bluetooth, probably with the bank, casually say "Yeah, I was trying to transfer some money from my business account to my personal account, why isn't it letting me do that?"

As for Russell's PACs and LLC, he frequently advertises that "A Safer Nevada is partnering with a company called Intimate Dealings" as if these are real things with multiple people and deals being made when really he's just playing with himself. I don't know the legality of being the sole member of a PAC and LLC and making deals with himself, especially if donor funds from the PAC are going to the LLC he also owns, and the LLC seemingly being a personal bank account he "can't keep dipping into"

 

[FamicomGorby]

At this point I am convinced the Judges strategy with this case is to just ignore it completely in the hope everyone gets bored and goes away. I wonder if they honestly believe Null will just get so exasperated with Greer he'll just settle for a pittance.

Which obviously won't be happening, but we are coming up on an entire year since Hardin made the new motions to dismiss. I think if we cross that threshold and there has still been nothing from the Judges we are straying into Mandamus territory.

I'm thinking at this point they might legitimately be waiting for a decision in Sony v Cox to come out. If the Supreme Court basically nullifies Greer's contributory copyright infringement claim then they can dismiss the case with minimal effort, just render all open motions as moot and finally be rid of Greer v Moon.

Of course the only downside to waiting for them is that the longer they way the longer the docket gets in the event that the Supreme Court doesn't say contributory copyright infringement is dumb and gay, which they would then have to deal with. But that's clearly a gamble worth taking.

As for Russell's PACs and LLC, he frequently advertises that "A Safer Nevada is partnering with a company called Intimate Dealings" as if these are real things with multiple people and deals being made when really he's just playing with himself. I don't know the legality of being the sole member of a PAC and LLC and making deals with himself, especially if donor funds from the PAC are going to the LLC he also owns, and the LLC seemingly being a personal bank account he "can't keep dipping into"

Can an LLC or PAC get randomly audited for that? You'd think the government would maybe look into Greer now that he's suing the secretary of state.

 

[Disgruntled Pupper]

I'm thinking at this point they might legitimately be waiting for a decision in Sony v Cox to come out. If the Supreme Court basically nullifies Greer's contributory copyright infringement claim then they can dismiss the case with minimal effort, just render all open motions as moot and finally be rid of Greer v Moon.

Okay, so why have the not announced to either party that that is their intention? Why, when Hardin submitted a motion proposing exactly that, while asking for a pause on the case to keep Greer from further shitting up the docket, did they not fish their gravel out of their asses, say "yeah, that's a good idea", and give it a good bang?

 

[3-2-1836]

casually say "Yeah, I was trying to transfer some money from my business account to my personal account, why isn't it letting me do that?"

Weird, my credit union allows me to but then again I'm a sole proprietorship so it all goes on my personal taxes anyway.

 

[kcbbq]

Weird, my credit union allows me to but then again I'm a sole proprietorship so it all goes on my personal taxes anyway.

"Here's this different situation under completely different rules and the outcomes different".

 

[CEO of Gay]

"Here's this different situation under completely different rules and the outcomes different".

Greee's citations in a nutshell.

 

[the khat quaffer]

Nobody cares about polls (i mean really) but the wording right now is a bit nebulous. There are no dates in the title or options. Last year I voted "Next year" meaning 2026, this year is now 2026. My option is now kicked down to 2027. Put some dates maybe?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Nobody cares about polls (i mean really) but the wording right now is a bit nebulous. There are no dates in the title or options. Last year I voted "Next year" meaning 2026, this year is now 2026. My option is now kicked down to 2027. Put some dates maybe?

It's all the same question anyway, despite the date. If your opinion changes, click the "change vote" button

 

[Retarded INTP]

Last year I voted "Next year" meaning 2026, this year is now 2026. My option is now kicked down to 2027. Put some dates maybe?

It's all the same question anyway, despite the date. If your opinion changes, click the "change vote" button

TL;DR of the entire lawsuit

 

[kcbbq]

It's all the same question anyway, despite the date. If your opinion changes, click the "change vote" button

I think all perpetual "next year" is a better reflection of reality so I think it's still a fine answer.

I'll be happy when it's finally a wrong answer.

 

[Ralph’s Shack]

TD;LR of the entire lawsuit

NOW COMES THE PLAINTIFF WITH A MOTION TO SUPPRESS THIS STATEMENT
Ya Honah I’m just a dumb but also extremely smart disabled leegul assistant This meanie head HardIN and Nawl have rooined mah lyfe

 

[Bill Evans 45]

Russel's only skill in life is in "Filing a Complaint".

Come on now, he's also pretty good at getting banned from whorehouses and being fired.

If his financial skills are as good as as his law skills, it would be unsurprising if his books were an absolute mess.

God love you, the only book in the life of RGG is the one he wrote himself and is the supposed reason for this entire farago.

 

[Your Girlfriend's Dad]

Well, there goes another week with nothing from the judges.

 

[The Un-Clit]

Well, there goes another week with nothing from the judges.

Neither of them could be arsed to even squash a non-emergency emergency motion. Fuck that case, let it rot right?

 

[Your Girlfriend's Dad]

Neither of them could be arsed to even squash a non-emergency emergency motion. Fuck that case, let it rot right?

We seriously need (non-politically biased) codes of conducts with requisite reprecussions in this country. I mean, I understand that I'm opening a bag of worms with that, but Jesus anything has to be better than this completly non-redressable ignoring of a case.

 

[TheOtherSideofMakeBelieve]

@Potentially Criminal is greestreaming tonight