UK Shabana Mahmood proposes AI 'Panopticon' system of state surveillance - Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood revealed that she wanted a system where “the eyes of the state can be on you at all times” while invoking an enduringly controversial proposal by the 18th-century philosopher Jeremy Bentham.

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
1.png
Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood appearing on the BBC1 current affairs programme Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg (Image: Jeff Overs/BBC/PA Wire)

THE Home Secretary has said she wants to create a “Panopticon” system of state surveillance.

Shabana Mahmood revealed that she wanted a system where “the eyes of the state can be on you at all times” while invoking an enduringly controversial proposal by the 18th-century philosopher Jeremy Bentham.

In comments reported on Monday by The Telegraph, Mahmood said she wanted to use artificial intelligence for surveillance, as she proposed “Minority Report-style” policing.

“AI and technology can be transformative to the whole of the law and order space,” said the Home Secretary in an interview with former prime minister Tony Blair last month.

“When I was in justice, my ultimate vision for that part of the criminal justice system was to achieve, by means of AI and technology, what Jeremy Bentham tried to do with his Panopticon. That is that the eyes of the state can be on you at all times.

2.png
File photograph of CCTV cameras (Image: Pixabay)

“Similarly, in the world of policing, in particular, we’ve already been rolling out live facial recognition technology, but I think there’s big space here for being able to harness the power of AI and tech to get ahead of the criminals, frankly, which is what we’re trying to do.”

Bentham’s most famous idea was for prisons to be based on the “Panopticon”, which meant that guards would be able to monitor all inmates constantly. This would be achieved by creating circular prisons with a central watchtower from which prisoners would be observed without the guard being visible.

A UK Government source told The Telegraph: “This doesn’t mean watching people who are non-criminals – but she feels like, if you commit a crime, you sacrifice the right to the kind of liberty the rest of us enjoy.”

Scottish Greens MSP Maggie Chapman told The National: "This is absolutely shocking. What Shabana Mahmood is calling for is essentially a deeply authoritarian, 'Big Brother' state. It is totally unacceptable, and we must resist this dystopian future.

“Everyone is entitled to a level of privacy in their lives regardless of their history or wrongdoings. We know too that surveillance by the state in this way would not be restricted to potential or actual criminals.

“Once it is in place, it would obviously be used on a much wider scale. We’ve already seen this with other forms of surveillance. The notion that 'if you’ve not done anything wrong you have nothing to worry about' is never justification for such widespread curtailment of civil liberties."

It is not clear whether this system of surveillance would apply only to prisoners or to all people under the watch of the criminal justice system in England and Wales.

Police chiefs south of the Border are also considering plans to use AI in a bid to predict whether people will commit crimes, The Telegraph reports.

3.png
File photograph of the inside of a prison (Image: PA)

In plans that echo the 2002 Steven Spielberg film Minority Report, police forces are looking at monitoring 1000 men they believe pose the highest risk to women to predict whether they will commit crimes.

Minority Report depicts a world where police can foresee crimes before they happen and arrest the would-be perpetrators. It is considered dystopian science fiction.

Andy Marsh, the head of the College of Policing, told The Telegraph: “We know the data and case histories tell us that, unfortunately, it’s far from uncommon for these individuals to move from one female victim to another, and we understand all of the difficulties of bringing successful cases to bear in court.

“So what we want to do is use these predictive tools to take the battle to those individuals, so that they are the ones who are frightened because the police are coming after them and we’re going to lock them up.”

Pete Wishart, the SNP's Home Office spokesperson said that Labour wanted "the state to use AI as a means to watch people's every move".

He added: "Obviously new technology can and should be used to ensure more criminals are caught but the Home Secretary appears to be openly advocating for the idea of a surveillance state - where people's rights and privacy are of no concern and have no protection.

"It feels no coincidence that the Home Secretary made these remarks while casually chatting to Tony Blair – the man whose institute first came up with the 'Brit Card' idea.

"As the Labour Party gets increasingly desperate because of the disaster they have made in government, it seems they are reaching for ever more extreme policies."

Article Link

Archive
 
Typical politician.

“AI and technology can be transformative to the whole of the law and order space,”

Yep.

You'll end up knowing the persons name, address, sock colour, exact location and browsing habits.

However, going on past experience of AI at this time, you will have absolutely no idea what they've actually done and spend £4bn getting to that point before quietly walking away from the project.
 
The UK will continue to be a shithole until the Home Secretary's office is occupied by at least a British person with a British name.
 
Finally they can automate the tiring job of ignoring Pakistani gangs of pedophile rapists.
 
I hope she gets caught doing illegal shit herself with this software
I always think about this when they announce software like this, do they blacklist themselves from being detected or will it end up flagging the very people who vote for it and the people who run the software. I saw in Germany (iirc) that censorship software is attacking both sides of the political spectrum, that's incredibly bad because if both sides end up working against you that could end in anarchy, and who knows what will happen after that. I still will remain optimistic though.
 
I always think about this when they announce software like this, do they blacklist themselves from being detected or will it end up flagging the very people who vote for it and the people who run the software. I saw in Germany (iirc) that censorship software is attacking both sides of the political spectrum, that's incredibly bad because if both sides end up working against you that could end in anarchy, and who knows what will happen after that. I still will remain optimistic though.

I think they do. Most cops and government workers are systematically removed from sites such as truepeoplesearch.com. someone tried to even look up our plant manager and dude has no online footprint.
 
People created dystopian books and movies to warn others away from authoritarianism. Labour politicians plunder them for ideas instead. At this point I'm not even surprised. You want the state watching you at all times, don't you citizens? You'll be safe then. Nothing to fear, nothing to hide.

I'd make some darkly humorous predictions but there might be some Labour twat reading this thread and I don't want to see them proposed as policy next year.
 
All governments want panopticons.
All governments have them, but they're built of people. Their judgment can be questioned, they have names and addresses, etc. The West is soon to eliminate jury trials (as England has signaled). What replaces them? "Objectivity." Beep boop.

"AI" is infallible, unquestionable from outside—is the official story, believed by many, soon by most, eventually by almost all. It will be corporate management. It will be law enforcement. It will "make" (transmit) all decisions.

They know it's wrong all the time. They want it that way.
 
The telescreen, straight out of Orwell and Airstrip One.

They aren't even trying to sugarcoat anything anymore in that hole.

Law-abiding human beings have the right NOT to have the eyes of the state on them at all times in every situation. That shit wouldn't fly here. Fourth Amendment, Bill of Rights, written Constitution.

UKtards, seems like every day you have a new reason to get over here.
 
My neighbor across the hall is on the board of the HOA. this whore has a doorbell camera aimed directly at my door, so I Dont even have privacy because of her. And she sits in the window, smoking and observing. Meanwhile her coalburning whore daughter gets beat and ends homeless at least once a year, and her junkie son is randomly texting me from different numbers asking if I wanna hang out or if he can crash on my couch.

People who think they have power are the most worthless of all humankind.
 
Hilariously, if you're Muzzie, you have nothing to fear. You can rape someone in front of the camera and they'll do nothing.

Surprised this hasn't been made into a Hentai plot.

View attachment 8468096
Big Brother is monitoring this thread for dissent against the country.
Had to do it.

Bongistan Obey copy.jpg
She has a face as haunting as Andre's. Except unlike Andre, this bitch is that unhinged.
 
When I was in justice, my ultimate vision for that part of the criminal justice system was to achieve, by means of AI and technology, what Jeremy Bentham tried to do with his Panopticon. That is that the eyes of the state can be on you at all times.
Why would you say this out loud? In what world would you saying this out loud be ok?
 
Back
Top Bottom