- Joined
- Jan 27, 2020
geez... Jamie overdoes the exclamation points more than @Debbie Macomber!
🐮 Lolcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / Russell Greee / Russle / Brothel Prince / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner
- Thread starter Cryin RN
- Start date
-
🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2019
They have no idea how lucky they are. Anyone else remember the Winnemucca saga where even after being told to contact someone else, and given their email, he continued to plightsperg to poor Betty about the evil and unfair Gilman's.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2022
I think this is what Russell means when he says Hardin should be a neutral third party and objective.
Lawyers are meant to be detached from the case and give the most sober, level headed, logical advice to their clients to best serve their interests. Russell thinks this case is a slam dunk victory already decided by the 10th circuit, so from his perspective, if Hardin were detached and giving Null the most sober, level headed, logical advice, he'd obviously be advising he settle for his own good. He isn't, so the only explanation is that this case has gotten personal for Hardin and he's just irrationally lashing out at Russell for purely unprofessional, emotional reasons.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2014
Well when he tried to get the coffee shop he asked for a bridge loan, which is a high interest loan that usually has some collateral tied to it. So he must have some assets tucked away to cover it.
I have a strong feeling he's going to ask(expect) his parents to put their home up for collateral for his bridge loan once he finds a piece of property he can turn into the whorehouse of his dreams. He's that goddamn selfish and delusional.
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2019
*him his princely penis
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2019
His car, perhaps.So he must have some assets tucked away to cover it.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2023
Can a business apply for one, rather than a person? If so, he might have communicated as ID LLC, or can you ask about an application by a specific NV business license, #NV20222557279? I have a feeling Rusty is trying to limit our ability to seek public records by using a pseudonym, as he has been known to have done before, such as using his birth name, Brett Ross, but still under the same business and business license. He has just enough brain power to come up with an idea like that, if it is possible.
If you feel this post gives Crusty any good ideas, please delete it.
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
It's also possible that he spamed the clerk with phone calls demanding an answer and was told what to do and what the filing fees would be. And it cost more than Olive Garden.
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2020
In Greeeeeeee vs Nevada Secretary Of State.
We now have a second amended complaint.
Why the fuck is it amended? I haven't looked yet. But here it is.
ECF 8 as images and attached as PDF.
No docket entries reflecting payment of fees or IFP filing. Also no docket entries from the court. I'm pretty sure the court is doing nothing until they get their money.
We now have a second amended complaint.
Why the fuck is it amended? I haven't looked yet. But here it is.
ECF 8 as images and attached as PDF.
No docket entries reflecting payment of fees or IFP filing. Also no docket entries from the court. I'm pretty sure the court is doing nothing until they get their money.
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2020
Link to the doc comparison I'm using: https://api.draftable.com/compare/SaFbqmKZaGwS
This is a more substantial edit, but I'm going to go out on a limb and say that it's the result of Russ giving his FAC to ChatGreePT and asking it for edits, if only because it inserts a bunch of em dashes which is really painful for me to say because I like using em dashes.
It also cuts the citation to Angle v. Miller in paragraph 54...
And absolutely goes to town on Count IV with both edits and new arguments.
This is a more substantial edit, but I'm going to go out on a limb and say that it's the result of Russ giving his FAC to ChatGreePT and asking it for edits, if only because it inserts a bunch of em dashes which is really painful for me to say because I like using em dashes.
It also cuts the citation to Angle v. Miller in paragraph 54...
And absolutely goes to town on Count IV with both edits and new arguments.
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2022
Why can I not see the Gree legal thread anymore?
Did Nully move or hide it for reasons I missed? I mean damn, take a week off for Xmas and shit goes AWOL on me.
Did Nully move or hide it for reasons I missed? I mean damn, take a week off for Xmas and shit goes AWOL on me.
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2020
Reactions: x 54 x 18 x 8 x 15
x 54 x 18 x 8 x 15
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2020
Did you accidentally(or deliberately) ignore the OP of the thread?
Reactions: x 54 x 18 x 8 x 15
x 54 x 18 x 8 x 15
Let me spoil it for you. Nothing happened.
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2022
Did you accidentally(or deliberately) ignore the OP of the thread?
Reactions:
Let me spoil it for you. Nothing happened.
ahhh I did somehow ignore Ommy. I never check my ignore list as I never used it.
Much thanks.
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2021
His second?
FRCP:
Rule 15. Amended and Supplemental Pleadings
(a) Amendments Before Trial.(1) Amending as a Matter of Course. A party may amend its pleading once as a matter of course no later than:
(A) 21 days after serving it, or
(B) if the pleading is one to which a responsive pleading is required, 21 days after service of a responsive pleading or 21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f), whichever is earlier.
(2) Other Amendments. In all other cases, a party may amend its pleading only with the opposing party's written consent or the court's leave. The court should freely give leave when justice so requires.
Christ, he's just trying to polish up his prose and add support, not amending his claims (ok, I just skimmed your compare docs [why doesn't it just do a redline?], but all I saw in a glance is just fleshed-out argument and tweaked language, not substantive changes to his plights).
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2020
District of Nevada Local Rules require even the first amended complaint to be a motion.
Oh, look, the document he was sent when he opened the case even told him this.
Admittedly the other good bit from that document is this one:
This is about the IFP screening process.
So, he files IFP and it takes many months, or he pays the money and then tries to explain to Utah why he couldn't cough up $80 over there.
I like that he mentions in the complaint he wants this expedited, but has not yet paid the fee or filed for IFP.
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2023
Plights? Inserted!
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
Someone should explain to Russ that his shit is so fucking retarded that even the most beautiful big-breasted woman wouldn’t be able to keep people’s attention if they were spewing his shit.
Your complex procedures are fucking insane, that’s why you can’t communicate them at all. Even the farms, who spend hours and have top men on the problem can’t work out what the fuck you’re doing.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Third technically, if we are counting the duplicate
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2019
Can never get enough Mona Lisa Vito.