AI Derangement Syndrome / Anti-AI artists / Pro-AI technocultists / AI "debate" communities - The Natural Retardation in the Artificial Intelligence communities

[mr. testicular torsion]

Spoiler: literal tentacle rape porn being used as an argument against ai

 

[FeedMeAmericanCheese]

i remember Qwarz Atarz having pedophiles on his discord from Sharty’s /raid/ board

 

[synthetic_glazer]

Spoiler: literal tentacle rape porn being used as an argument against ai

View attachment 8361605

Fuckin' pro-ai chuds, you don't get to feed me slop. Only the wholesome anti-ai SOULFUL twitter troons get to feed me slop

 

[The Thinking Abacus]

Fuckin' pro-ai chuds, you don't get to feed me slop. Only the wholesome anti-ai SOULFUL twitter troons get to feed me slop

Why is the EU raging? Don't leftists and troons love the EU?

 

[306h4Ge5eJUJ]

Why is the EU raging? Don't leftists and troons love the EU?

I assume it's this.
(L, A)

 

[The Thinking Abacus]

I assume it's this.
View attachment 8362573 (L, A)

The left's love of purity spirals will be its undoing.

 

[ToroidalBoat]

literal tentacle rape porn being used as an argument against ai

Can SJWs go even one moment without making up some REEing BS about dissenters or stuff that is "triggering" to them -- such as AI art?

SOULFUL

Do SJWs even believe in the soul? I thought that SJWs only worship "the community", "marginalized groups", and non-straight sexuality.

 

[synthetic_glazer]

Do SJWs even believe in the soul?

Tbh I don't think I've ever seen them bring it up outside of ai art, and even then, not as often as you might expect. Trying to be as charitable as possible, I'll assume they're using it as a shorthand for 'the human touch' or something else unrelated to religion, but I still do find it really funny that they're willing to at the very least pay lip service to the idea of something spiritual existing just to try to argue their point.

And also, I've seen so many YCH's or Telegram sticker sets made from the same base. On an artistic level, are near-identical, by-the-numbers pieces like those all that different from an ai generating some generic-looking furry art based on the gorillion pics it was trained on? I don't even care for ai art, but trying to defend the sanctity of human art in spite of the countless examples of fill-in-the-blank commission bullshit on twitter and bsky is ridiculous imo

 

[Runch]

Trying to be as charitable as possible, I'll assume they're using it as a shorthand for 'the human touch' or something else unrelated to religion, but I still do find it really funny that they're willing to at the very least pay lip service to the idea of something spiritual existing just to try to argue their point.

Yeah, I've seen multiple m'lady new atheist type personalities on Youtube talk about how AI lacks "soul" or equivalent insubstantial ethereal dreamstuff. It would be baffling if it wasn't completely expected in leftist spaces/discourse to fall in line with cognitively dissonant beliefs.

 

[long waters]

Do SJWs even believe in the soul? I thought that SJWs only worship "the community", "marginalized groups", and non-straight sexuality.

Isn't that the whole point with being a tranny? Having a "woman's soul" in a man's body or something? Or is it purely a mind-body thing and no soul comes into it?

And also, I've seen so many YCH's or Telegram sticker sets made from the same base. On an artistic level, are near-identical, by-the-numbers pieces like those all that different from an ai generating some generic-looking furry art based on the gorillion pics it was trained on? I don't even care for ai art, but trying to defend the sanctity of human art in spite of the countless examples of fill-in-the-blank commission bullshit on twitter and bsky is ridiculous imo

Last year I found out what YCH means. I still can't comprehend why someone would pay for those.

Yeah, I've seen multiple m'lady new atheist type personalities on Youtube talk about how AI lacks "soul" or equivalent insubstantial ethereal dreamstuff. It would be baffling if it wasn't completely expected in leftist spaces/discourse to fall in line with cognitively dissonant beliefs.

"Thank God I'm an atheist" ahh blud

 

[ToroidalBoat]

An anti-AI REE-er would likely claim a pic that looks human-made has "soul" to it, but then change his tune rather quickly if it were revealed it's really "AI slop" instead.

 

[The Thinking Abacus]

An anti-AI REE-er would likely claim a pic that looks human-made has "soul" to it, but then change his tune rather quickly if it were revealed it's really "AI slop" instead.

 

[Colon capital V]

Last year I found out what YCH means. I still can't comprehend why someone would pay for those.

Because it's YOUR Character HERE, don't you want to see your heckin' OC placed in a specific position doing god knows what from whatever fetish artist is desperate for rent money for you to jack off gawk at and going "WOWEE, MY SPESHUL CHARACTER IS IN THE ART WORLD DOING THINGS!!! THIS IS SO FREAKING SWEET!!!!"

That's basically the gist behind them.

 

[Runch]

YCH is dumb but at least it's better than adoptables. At least YCH is ordering custom work with more idea than usual what to expect the result to be.

With adoptables you are literally buying nothing. You're buying a gentlemen's agreement that a specific artist won't draw a specific character design ever again, and sometimes not even that. There's no transfer of copyright because it's unlikely that a random adoptable rises to the level of copyrightability. Other people could start drawing your adoptable and develop it into their own character and there's likely nothing you can do about it.

You're paying for the privilege of dwelling on an image, imagining all the cool hijinks "your" character could get into if only you could draw.

 

[long waters]

YCH is dumb but at least it's better than adoptables. At least YCH is ordering custom work with more idea than usual what to expect the result to be.

With adoptables you are literally buying nothing. You're buying a gentlemen's agreement that a specific artist won't draw a specific character design ever again, and sometimes not even that. There's no transfer of copyright because it's unlikely that a random adoptable rises to the level of copyrightability. Other people could start drawing your adoptable and develop it into their own character and there's likely nothing you can do about it.

You're paying for the privilege of dwelling on an image, imagining all the cool hijinks "your" character could get into if only you could draw.

Sounds like you're describing furry NFTs

 

[Autistic Nonetheless]

I can appreciate a painter or a novelist insisting on the integrity of their craft. But nigga, if you make mspaint stick-figure art or write furry deworming erotica then maybe some AI will do you good.
Grok may even call you degenerate faggot for good measure.

 

[synthetic_glazer]

Had some free time so I spent a few minutes torturing myself by browsing bsky to find some retardation to share.


Glorious trifecta, right here. Coof/"long covid" paranoia in '25, AI doomerism, and post-fact 'muh misinformation' hand-wringing. Now if we could just find a way to bring Palestine into it...


Training AI on publicly-posted art is exactly the same as breaking into a museum and stealing a physical painting so no one else can see it. Everyone knows when you scrape an image, it's being permanently deleted everywhere except the AI's vault of evil plagiarism. And obviously, fat furry tickle.png is just as valuable an art piece as a Renoit painting. Now watch me and my unfunny friends sit in a sharing circle and attempt to be funny.



Not sure how it'd be pedantic to point that out, but the main attraction here (at least for me) is the admission that this loser (and presumably most of his ilk) are just using the environmental impact whinging as a smokescreen, and they don't really care about the facts of it as long as they can use it to bash ai lol



This is probably the least retarded among these takes, but it's still incredibly ignorant to what art is in this situation. I agree that the iterative, feedback-gathering parts of art are something it has over ai art. I know you can fine tune prompts and use in-painting to regenerate parts of it, but I think it'll be a long while before ai can interpret feedback and prompts with the same nuance as an actual human artist (and an ai won't ask, 'wait, do you mean x?' if it's given ambiguous or unclear directions like a person would.) But at the end of the day, the "story" behind a particular piece of art doesn't really matter when it's a product. Whether a great piece of art was made in an hour or slowly made over months of slow work, it's only really as valuable as the finished product. I don't agree, but I can understand the desire to try to cut down on drafting/sketching phases since it has a negligible impact on the final product and its perceived value compared to the finalized art. (Also lmao at this cuck just posting a screenshot of what he wrote in his own article)



Not ai-related but still deranged

 

[CervixHammer]

rDrama (and probably the Sharty too) has been shooting fish in a barrel all year:


Internet Tough Guy discovered:

Spoiler: Bet you can't guess what happens next

Bargain Bin Denims has some thots thoughts (and the second or third rDrama thread has the "KILL YOURSELF" screencaps which I found too boring to save):

Then LFJ's gimp squad DDoSed the Farms or something and I lost my train of thought.
Wait, no. Got it back: LOL

 

[Anti pedo]

(warning power level)
OH BOY! im gonna use the similar statement from previous AI threads, i notice 3D artist handling AI Far better than These "pick up the pencil" Dumb fucks, these "artist" does not advocate for art but rather want to look down on people, and feel superior for the fact they have carpal tunnel from hours of using a tablet, at least 3d artist aren't performative and see AI like a normal person AI is a FUCKING TOOL like any digital tools.

also obligatory AI victim comic:

Does this even happened in actual workplace?

 

[Outer Space Traveller]

View attachment 8361646View attachment 8361651View attachment 8361652
Fuckin' pro-ai chuds, you don't get to feed me slop. Only the wholesome anti-ai SOULFUL twitter troons get to feed me slop

I don't get it? Is this some retard tranny farming ragebait?