I agree in principle. But in practice, I think the sociopolitical environment's become too polarized to even be able to set the stage. For instance, a good majority of people support the mass deportation of illegal alien criminals. And yet, when I.C.E./B.P. shows up to "do the needful," we see celebs like Selena Gomez crying about "her people," others about tyrants and freedom, how Trump's a threat to Our
There's a problem on the right of those like asmon who say 'if we don't get 100% total death, don't vote'. Stupid. Fuentes idiots are like this too. That needs to be addressed. Null's like this on his 'issue of the year except jews' on pajeets. Fuck the GOP, unless it's my way. The left is vote blue no matter who.
This is what I've been told as well, by mainland Chinese people. If you accept a deal that is too good to be true and it turns out to be fake then you're the greedy idiot who got what he deserved.
On one hand, it's quite a rash sentiment to have. On the other hand, Charlie Kirk's assassination put into focus the need of the Trump administration to solidify wins and to do so in a decisive manner, to make room for more. Thus, in an ideal world, this sentiment would be satiated rather quickly.
Trump can't do that, it's antithetical to his nature to admit weakness or problems. It's his strength and weakness, he's a stubborn ass. Really no politician at that level can admit mistakes or corrections very much. Kamala and the 'would you do anything different?' 'I can't think of anything'. It'll be interesting down the road to see if JD can think and act for himself any. Only the most shrewd can navigate to how your superiors were good but then how you'll be able to explain that to go forward.
Hence why he's taking the latter approach. It really boils down the fact that they're (i.e. Dissident Right) not being pragmatic, at all. As with all things in life, critiques regarding the administration must be balanced with acknowledgement of the good it's done (closed the borders, much more pragmatic foreign policy, emphasized effort on immigration law enforcement, reduction of refugees/legal immigrants admitted into the country/naturalized, etc.). Can't be a Negative Nancy all the time and expect to curry favor with the President (just ask MTG).
I can explain it. You see, she thinks she just gave false testimony against her own community, aka the only real people who actually matter. To her, stealing from the kafir is not bad at all, but the highest good. And everyone who is Somali, aka the only real people, agrees. Essentially, saying "fraud is bad" is blasphemy, and speaking blasphemy, even in service of jihad, shocked her.
"Media literacy."
But he vaguely looks like Patrick Bateman so he mogs thobeit. Holy fuck as if there weren't enough reasons Cali's in the hole.
Sounds like the "lesson" is "don't ever make a deal with chinks" if this is as well know as it *clearly* is, then why has nobody else seemingly learned this lesson?
someone said something about poor nutrition fucking up the jaw bone.
Wrong. The best way to lose weight is to do meth and hit yourself in the face with a hammer.
I agree, I've watched 4 family members die to drinking, either directly or indirectly, and a few to other substance abuses+booze.
Happy New Year indeed.
This might come across as sideways, but I've had smokers/tobacco users tell me to never start, and I never had the heart to say "You don't have to tell me twice." I don't want to powerlevel about tobacco/alcohol use in my family, so all I will say is, is that it'd be another chain around my neck.
Depends on the outcome of the Supreme Court case regarding the VRA. If Section 2 is gutted or removed, GOP will hang on based entirely off the new maps. If not, Democrats will gain the house but not with 2018 numbers. In terms of the Senate, they'll gain one or two seats (most likely Maine and maybe North Carolina).So how are the Ds gonna do in the midterms?
