- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It will be like the Yamato from the anime, it will have lasers, and nuclear cruise missiles. And a railgun. And hypersonic missile batteries. Perhaps with enough research they will build legs on it like Supreme Commander 2Ah I see, so Trump-sama is channeling Shinzo Abe spirit to make the Trump-Class into gold gilded American Yamato-Class ships. Based.
Being real for a sec, they are pretty powerful. 35,000 tons, nuclear armed, fucking railguns and frikin laser beams, not to mention all the conventional armaments.
View attachment 8323571
View attachment 8323572
1. It's called the Trump Class.That sounds fucking awesome. What is the issue exactly?
Like, I don't get why people say Battleships are outdated. They are if you rely only on them, but if you have Carriers a few Battleships makes sense as good support. And if the issue is nukes then well, a nuke can take out a carrier too. If you are at the point of just lobbying nukes then you might as well just ignore ships and invest on ICBMs and SLBMs only.
It's certainly not a WWII era Battleship, or even like the Soviet take on it. Looking at the design, it looks like a massive missile boat with defensive armament that's actually suited for taking out drone ships. Plus a railgun would actually be great alternative to conventional weaponry for giving fire support in the current era, which will ALWAYS be needed (especially against a peer with contended airspace IE China).2. They are calling it a battleship which is causing a tism spasm among the autists that know nothing of modern warfare and think you can never, ever, reinvent a old concept
The big issue is that you're putting too many eggs in one basket.Like, I don't get why people say Battleships are outdated. They are if you rely only on them, but if you have Carriers a few Battleships makes sense as good support. And if the issue is nukes then well, a nuke can take out a carrier too. If you are at the point of just lobbying nukes then you might as well just ignore ships and invest on ICBMs and SLBMs only.
It's about keeping up with the current tech. Smaller ships can't handle the loads the navy wants. Something battleship sized canIt's certainly not a WWII era Battleship, or even like the Soviet take on it. Looking at the design, it looks like a massive missile boat with defensive armament that's actually suited for taking out drone ships. Plus a railgun would actually be great alternative to conventional weaponry for giving fire support in the current era, which will ALWAYS be needed (especially against a peer with contended airspace IE China).
If these people actually listened to Perun's powerpoint lectures they'd see why these design decisions actually make sense, especially for a potential usurper to the aging ABs who's biggest problem has been a limit on tonnage.
tl;dr bigger boats are coming back, because we have to fit so much shit on them to increase viability for the future.
If I remember correctly, don't the current ABs have limits on the radars they can have because they've actually ran out of space? This extends to basically every system we have getting cut down to fit in old hulls. We're basically left cucking ourselves because nobody actually wants to take the chance to build things that are a bit more expensive, with maybe the only exception being the Fords which are easier to wrap heads and egos around because carriers = big, big carrier = good, ect ect.It's about keeping up with the current tech. Smaller ships can't handle the loads the navy wants. Something battleship sized can
Not just space, but power generation and heat dissipation. The burkes are at the limits of their hulls. A bigger hull gives a lot more room for these new power hungry systems and their generatorsIf I remember correctly, don't the current ABs have limits on the radars they can have because they've actually ran out of space? This extends to basically every system we have getting cut down to fit in old hulls. We're basically left cucking ourselves because nobody actually wants to take the chance to build things that are a bit more expensive, with maybe the only exception being the Fords which are easier to wrap heads and egos around because carriers = big, big carrier = good, ect ect.
Funny you should mention him. He too is SEETHING.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=RV6oRJocyTMAll of left wing milspergtube is shitting their fucking pants over this ship because its the TRUMP CLASS.
About that
View attachment 8323464
If one more person brings up drones, I'm going to literally blow that person's head off with a 45. This whole idea of drones, drones, drones. You're just going to pilot a drone somehow 2000 miles from your coast without having problems with massive interference on top of mass amounts of jamming technology. The reason it works in Ukraine is because Ukraine and Russia are both broke bitches who can't afford actually. Good jamming technology like the United States.In current warfare with drones, cheap missiles, etc, it is imperative that one takes economics into the designs of, everything. For example look at the houthi "blockade" of the bab-al mandab strait. Let's say ali muhmamad launches a drone towards the USS Trumen, it will not get hit, however you are limited on how many missiles your destoryers can carry, your carrier can carry, and how many aircraft you can have on CAP. Not to mention everything you use to shoot it down (Except CIWS which has its own problems) will cost even more then the drone. While that doesn't matter in the case of the houthi's it can be easily scaled up by even a weak economic power such as Iran and don't even mention China.
Battleships will make a comeback.It's about keeping up with the current tech. Smaller ships can't handle the loads the navy wants. Something battleship sized can
It doesn't need to work 2000 miles off shore it needs to be able to cross the panama canal, or Singapore, or tawian strait, or suez, or gibraltar, or on and on. You can't jam every wave (especially if your transiting a canal) nor can you jam a cable.If one more person brings up drones, I'm going to literally blow that person's head off with a 45. This whole idea of drones, drones, drones. You're just going to pilot a drone somehow 2000 miles from your coast without having problems with massive interference on top of mass amounts of jamming technology. The reason it works in Ukraine is because Ukraine and Russia are both broke bitches who can't afford actually. Good jamming technology like the United States.
If we could make this work, which I somewhat doubt, it would be nice to have a warship that isn't a holdover from the Cold War. Rust builds character, but sinking just makes a reef.Being real for a sec, they are pretty powerful. 35,000 tons, nuclear armed, fucking railguns and frikin laser beams, not to mention all the conventional armaments.
View attachment 8323571
View attachment 8323572
This stupid nigger-faggot tried to dump the failure of the LCS and Constellation Classes onto Trump. Fucking retard, he fired the dipshits responsible and stated in the speech that they were working with the South Koreans to get another class going, along with the Philly shipyards. So that would be three shipyards producing a new, low cost frigate. If the can just keep to good enough that addresses the lower tonnage mass issue.https://youtube.com/watch?v=pqPDghQp__c Piggu is not happy at ALL with the new battleship. He is doing a full trump impression and saying the Reformers won. KEKKKK
The irony of this is that old school armored ships (in theory) have better survivability since they're designed around the idea that they will take a hit and need to survive it. The ship's size serves a role in its defense and survivability at that point by being able to disperse important components and increase redundancy.The big issue is that you're putting too many eggs in one basket.
I see zero reason for a faggoty lawyer or redditor guntuber (zach) to even give the slightest fuck about a project like this. The lawyer's whinging especially pisses me off due to the fact that any military project ever is a giant moneyhole and suddenly pulling moralist polemics over it shows his agenda of "drumpf bad" and "I am a giant whinging faggot". All of their stupid excuses like "UHM WHERE DOES XYZ GO" "MUH MOTHERFUCKING CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL" "YOU CANT JUST SCALE RAILGUNS UP I AM A WHINGY CRYBABY FAGGOT WAAHHH" shows these people do not enjoy military history and want history to end here and gapesex to win forever because penis sucking in the military is the most important o algo. They need spic niggers and tranny kikes to do everything for them when none of these "people" (cattle) could handle a high stress situation at all.https://youtube.com/watch?v=pqPDghQp__c Piggu is not happy at ALL with the new battleship. He is doing a full trump impression and saying the Reformers won. KEKKKK