US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png ​

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Click to expand...
Twix Eatr said:
OMG, I love it. Any evidence this won't be completely toothless?
Click to expand...
Current ICE/CBP/DHS operations?

Quence said:
I’ll just drop this right here:

Click to expand...
Legally speaking he can't and frankly I don't think he should. The two-term presidency was a tradition followed by every president except one of the worst, and comes from George Washington, who only had two terms because he got tired of tard wrangling the early republic. God rest his soul. The tism was strong in those days. I see no reason to break with tradition. Or waste time and resources tackling the legal question.
 
Quence said:
I’ll just drop this right here:

Click to expand...
afe all day erry day
smallground said:
So... is this a roundabout acceptance of banana republics and other corpo country investments? With Stephen Miller's logic the US has rightful claim to half of central America and Liberia (not that we should claim Liberia).
Also add another item to the justification counter: Oil. El classico.
Click to expand...
There's an MST3k short about US interests in Venezuelan oil
I'll dig it up when I'm off the phone
 
Hollywood Hulk Hogan said:
It's as true now as when I first said it. You MAGAloids are in a cult based on the Chris Chan of presidents and glorify and praise him constantly on a website devoted to laughing at lolcows like Chris Chan.
Click to expand...
Didn't your side pick a literal retard who gives taxpayer money to terrorists because they're his brown pets as the VP choice who also is friends with school shooters? And a President choice who was an alcoholic empty minded DEI hire?
 
smallground said:
Shame that Fuentes co-opted that phrase, but ironically the longer I read the more I believes its a dogwhistle. He's very forward about being anti-immigrant, against DEI/equality propaganda, and calling his opponent Israel-first. Big things for people online, bad for IRL.
Click to expand...
Yeah him and fishback are making weird mistakes.

You don't have dismiss the groyper wing, but going all in on it is a bad idea.
 
My HOA post keeps getting reactions, so I'm going to throw this in here. The reason I moved away from libertarianism, particularly on questions of immigration and trade, is the "right," if you want to call it that, to live in a stable, peaceful society is prior to property rights. Your ability to have property is conditioned on everyone around you agreeing to not chase you off the land because you've become such an obnoxious shit. The Indians were obnoxious shits; that's why we chased them off the land.

BigGuyOS 6 : Jovial Janny said:
But the obvious flaw is "what if it doesn't work"? It reminds me of China's new touchscreen tank.
Click to expand...

Do we still train our artillerymen how to fall back to mechanical tools if the electro-gadgets fail? We used to.
 
The Ugly One said:
We should pull out of UN and create a new org, The Council of Nuclear Countries. That's all who matters. Got nukes? You're in. Don't? Nobody cares what you think. I wonder whether Israel will join.
Click to expand...
Yeah but keep in mind that having one or two nukes like North Korea doesn't mean that you have nukes.
"Having nukes" should mean "We have enough nuclear weapons to destroy the entire planet" and you should at least have enough to be able to do it three times over.
 
Dorothy said:
Yeah him and fishback are making weird mistakes.

You don't have dismiss the groyper wing, but going all in on it is a bad idea.
Click to expand...
for what it's worth I hear "america first" out of conservatives so boomer they couldn't tell a groyper from a gopher and think "vine" and "twitter" involves birds and plants
it's really common regardless of gay mexican feds

also
actually not a bad little rundown of how US oil interests got involved
 
Lip Glossary said:
Yeah but keep in mind that having one or two nukes like North Korea doesn't mean that you have nukes.
"Having nukes" should mean "We have enough nuclear weapons to destroy the entire planet" and you should at least have enough to be able to do it three times over.
Click to expand...
Women's standards are out of control. When I was a kid you only needed one nuke to be a pretty big deal.
 
Lip Glossary said:
Yeah but keep in mind that having one or two nukes like North Korea doesn't mean that you have nukes.
"Having nukes" should mean "We have enough nuclear weapons to destroy the entire planet" and you should at least have enough to be able to do it three times over.
Click to expand...
Nukes + ICBM

If you can't launch your nuke farther than over the wall, who cares? If you can hit DC, we should at least be talking.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom